Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Fatburger logo

Fatburger Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Quick-Service RestaurantsCAFranchising since 1990
DBelow averageBelow average28/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$517K – $2.7M
Disclosed sales
$1.1M
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
13.6%
on 39 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-00921FDD 2026Data QualityExcellent95%Pre-opening
Manager-run OKYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Fatburger is a fast-casual franchise serving large, made-to-order burgers, hand-scooped shakes, and fries. Franchisees run restaurants managing food prep, counter service, and staffing.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Fatburger franchise requires a total initial investment of $517K – $2.7M, including a $50K franchise fee and an ongoing 6.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2026 FDD, average unit revenue was $1.1M[2]. SBA 7(a) loans show a 13.6% charge-off rate across 39 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: D (Below average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: 2026 filing · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: low - the current year's filing

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored8 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$517K – $2.7M
78th pct Service Resta…
Avg gross sales
$1.1M
Net sales22nd pct Service Resta…
Royalty
6.0%
48th pct Service Resta…
Units
177
82nd pct Service Resta…
SBA charge-off
13.6%
% of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category

Quick verdict · Quick-Service Restaurants · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$517K – $2.7M
Median $486K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$50K – $50K
Median $35K
above median ↑, worse than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$25K – $40K
Median $33K
near median
Avg Revenue
$1.1M
Median $975K
above median ↑, better than category
Net sales
Royalty Rate
6.0%
Median 5.5%
near median
Ongoing Fees
9.0% of rev
Median 7.5%
above median ↑, worse than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
13.6%
39 loans · Median 14.3%
near median
System Size
177 units
Median 18 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
40.7%
Median 0.0%
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Optional
Can hire a manager
Litigation
6 cases
Review carefully

Green = favorable by >10% vs Quick-Service Restaurants median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $517K – $2.7M including a $50K franchise fee, 6.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $1.1M/year (median $1.1M).
  • RISKVerdict D (Below average), verdict score 28/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 13.6% across 39 loans (above the 16% franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
  • GROWTHNegative: net -9 franchised outlets in the latest year (19 opened, 28 closed); 16 signed but not yet open (Item 20).
  • FLAGBankruptcy history disclosed in the FDD. Review Item 4 for details before proceeding.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Fatburger North America, Inc.
Parent company
FAT Brands, Inc.
FDD Item 1, page 10 of the 2026 FDD
Predecessor
and Affiliates
Prior franchisor entity
Incorporated in
DE
HQ
9720 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 500, Beverly Hills, California 90212
Auditor
Macias Gini & O'Connell LLP
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$11.0M
vs $10.6M prior year

Same owner · FDD Item 1, page 10

12 other brands on this site name FAT Brands, Inc. as parent or ultimate parent in their own FDD.

Portfolio: FAT Brands

Grouped by the owner's name as each filing prints it (this page: the 2026 FDD). Spelling variants of the same group may be listed apart; a brand is never grouped with an owner its filing does not name.

Overview

About

CEO
Taylor Wiederhorn
Headquarters
CA
Founded
1952
FDD year
2026
States available
13

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 227% above the typical quick-service restaurants franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$517K – $2.7MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 36 of the 2026 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$50,000Verified — printed on page 24 of the 2026 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty6.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 26 of the 2026 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund3.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 27 of the 2026 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$25K – $40K

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 5–7

FDD Item 7 · 2026 filing

Initial investment breakdown

Fatburger: Item 7 initial investment breakdown
Cost componentLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$50K$50K
Working capital (3–6 mo)$25K$40K
Equipment, build-out, other$442K$2.6M
Total initial investment$517K$2.7M

Source: Fatburger 2026 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$517K – $2.7M
Bottom third — review vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$25K – $40K
Middle of category vs category
Franchise fee
$50K – $50K
Bottom third — review vs category
Royalty
6.0%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
3.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
9.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Fatburger: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty6.0% of net sales
Marketing / ad fund3.0% of net sales
Technology fee$2K
Training fee$33K
Transfer fee$15K
Renewal fee$40
Inventory (initial)$7K – $10K
Total fee load9.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 17% above the quick-service restaurants norm.

Avg gross sales$1.1M

Reported as net sales, not gross sales

Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 81 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$1.1MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 81 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typeNet Sales (unaudited)
Sample size66 outlets

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Fatburger until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$1.6M

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Fatburger unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $1,144,270 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $517K–$2.7M (midpoint used)
FDD reports $25K–$40K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$1.6M
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2026 FDD

Financial Performance

Reported as net sales, not gross sales

Avg gross sales
$1.1M
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$1.1M

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
Net Sales (unaudited)
Sample size
66 outlets
vs category median 19 · large
Range (low → high)
$305K→$3.2MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 81 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Reporting year
2024
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2026
Disclosed in the 2026 filing, covering 2024
Transparency
7 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · above
Gross sales rank22th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank78th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank48th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank82th
vs Quick-Service Restaurants peers
Risk score rank98th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 781 Quick-Service Restaurants brands

Showing the headline figures — all 160 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →
Revenue insight

Revenue is only 0.7x the investment. This means each unit may take 5+ years to recoup the initial outlay at typical margins.

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $1.1M/year in gross sales. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 0.7x.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 9.0% — above the Quick-Service Restaurants median of 7.5%.

Disclosure

Transparency score 7/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System contracting at -12.8% CAGR over 3 years. Investigate whether closures are franchisor-driven consolidation or franchisee exits.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Quick-Service Restaurants medians

How Fatburger Compares

Metric
Fatburger
Category median
vs median
Investment
$1.6M
$486Kmiddle half $342K–$748K · n=780
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
$1.1M
$975Kmiddle half $664K–$1.4M · n=284
Above median, better than category
Unit Count
177
18middle half 5–79 · n=755
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Quick-Service Restaurants brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units177Verified — printed on page 86 of the 2026 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it three ways.
3-yr growth-12.8% (worth scrutinizing)
Turnover rate40.7% (caution)

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
177
Opened
19
Last reporting year
Closed
28
Terminated
0
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
40.7%
Company-owned
0
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
100%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
-12.8%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
-12.8%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
0
Not renewed
0
Transferred
3
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
16
0.09 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
34
Franchisor's next-year forecast
2023
203
Franchised units
2024
186-17
Franchised units
2025
177-9
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 12 · 13 states reported

The Territory Map

FDD Item 12 reports the state count, but the specific list isn't in our current data. The map will appear once we re-extract from the FDD or enough franchisee contacts are available.

13

states with franchisees (per FDD Item 12)

Growth insight

A system losing more than 10% of its units year-over-year is a red flag. Check whether closures are concentrated in specific regions.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

C
SBA Lending Health
Average SBA lending record · 13.6% charge-off
Total loans
39
Loan volume
$18.9M
Median loan
$353K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
13.6%
on 39 loans · rates vary by category · see methodology

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
85.7%
5-yr charge-off
20.0%
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
24
Defaults
3
Typical loan rate
7.4%
avg rate to borrowers
Franchised industry avg
10.8%
brand above franchise avg ↑
Jobs supported
847
6.2 per loan
Lender concentration
12%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 56% went to startups / new businesses, 44% to established operators

Franchise vs independent — in limited-service restaurants, franchised businesses charge off at 10.8% vs 10.0% for independents — franchising is associated with 8% higher SBA default risk in this category.

Vintage analysis

Fatburger charge-off rate by loan vintage

BrandNational avg
Fatburger charge-off rate by loan vintage. Showing 3 vintages from 1997 to 2021. Rates range from 0.0% to 33.3%.0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%'97'01'21

Top lenders financing Fatburger franchisees

Wells Fargo Bank National Association4 loans0.0%
The Huntington National Bank4 loans—
OneUnited Bank3 loans0.0%

Showing 3 of 24 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Total loans
3
Loan volume
$4.1M
Charge-off rate
N/A
Jobs created
74

Historical SBA 504 lending data via CDCs, not predictive of future performance.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for Fatburger from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Principal loss rate
6.0%
Avg SBA guarantee
75%
Avg interest rate
7.42%
Avg chargeoff amount
$273K
Lender concentration
11.8%
Job velocity
6.2 per $100K
NAICS benchmark
8.7%
NAICS 722513
Jobs supported
847

Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 12% of loans

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
1Wells Fargo Bank National Association4$948K0.0%
2The Huntington National Bank4$2.6MN/A
3OneUnited Bank3$1.1M0.0%
4Northrim Bank2$80K0.0%
5Mission Valley Bank2$990K0.0%
6Northeast Bank2$300KN/A
7Zions Bank, A Division of1$200K0.0%
8Far East National Bank1$325K0.0%
9Popular Bank1$250K100.0%
10KeyPoint CU1$309K0.0%

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
CACalifornia24317.6%
TXTexas30--
AKAlaska200.0%
FLFlorida20--
WAWashington200.0%
VAVirginia10--

SBA 7(a) lending trend

1997
3
1999
1
2000
2
2001
3
2005
1
2010
1
2014
1
2016
3
2017
1
2018
1
2019
2
2021
4
2022
4
2023
2
2024
2
2025
3

Borrower profile

Startup9 (50%)
Existing (2+ yr)5 (28%)
Ownership change2 (11%)
Unanswered1 (6%)
New (< 2 yr)1 (6%)

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

What could kill this investment?

SBA loans charge off at 13.6% — 15% below the 16.0% national norm, i.e. lower lender-observed risk.

SBA charge-off13.6% · 39 loans
Verdict score28/100 (higher is better)
Litigation6 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

DBelow average28Verdict score 28/100
High confidence±4 pts
2432

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).

1 pending securities class action (Kates v. FAT Brands 2024); concluded cases include Virginia SCC settlements, Tatum franchise dispute (settled $40K), Matthews securities class action (settled $2.5M+stock), Vignola securities class action (settled $75K), Rojany class action (settled $50K), Shahi international development dispute (dismissed)

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

Subject: the company or an affiliate. Disclosed (Item 4 covers the last 10 years)

On January 25, 2026, Parent (located at 9720 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 500, Beverly Hills, California 90212), Twin Hospitality Group Inc. (located at 5151 Belt Line Road, Suite 1200, Dallas, TX 75254) and their subsidiary entities, including us and our affiliates (collectively, the “FAT Group”), filed voluntary chapter 11 petitions in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, in Houston, Texas. The FAT Group requested joint administration under Case No. 26-90126 (ARP) to restructure their corporate debt.

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Macias Gini & O'Connell LLP

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $11.0MYr 2: $10.6M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

FY2024 (ended Dec 31, 2024) franchisor total revenue $10,999,932 per Item 1; audited consolidated balance-sheet line items not present in the extracted text. Net worth/assets/liabilities taken from the only balance sheet in Exhibit A (FBNA interim, unaudited, as of July 27, 2025): total assets $26,157,098, total liabilities $5,789,559, member's deficit $(20,367,539). Auditor Macias Gini & O'Connell LLP audited the FY2024/FY2023 consolidated statements (report dated Apr 15, 2025).

ⓘ These are the parent company's consolidated financials (the parent guarantees the franchisor), not this brand's standalone results — the figure reflects the whole corporate group, not this brand alone.

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 28 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINORUnit count declining 4.8% YoY indicates shrinking franchise system and potential market saturation or brand weakness
  2. 02MEDNet income not disclosed in FDD Item 19 — impossible to assess actual profitability despite $1.14M average revenue
  3. 03HIGHMultiple litigation cases including pending securities class action, franchise registration disputes, and breach of contract claims suggest systemic franchisor-franchisee relationship issues
  4. 04MEDHigh investment range ($517K–$2.66M) paired with undisclosed profitability creates significant downside risk with unclear return potential
  5. 05MINOR6% royalty on top of operating costs in declining QSR category may create unsustainable unit economics

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 160 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 9.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term15 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training300 hrs

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term15 years
Renewal term10 years
Allowed renewalsℹ2
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory radius1 mi
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorOptional
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ5 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationLos Angeles County, California
Jury trial waiverNo
Governing lawCA
Litigation count6
View Item 3 litigation summary

1 pending securities class action (Kates v. FAT Brands 2024); concluded cases include Virginia SCC settlements, Tatum franchise dispute (settled $40K), Matthews securities class action (settled $2.5M+stock), Vignola securities class action (settled $75K), Rojany class action (settled $50K), Shahi international development dispute (dismissed)

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
44 hrs
On-the-job training
256 hrs
Training location
Corporate offices in Beverly Hills, CA or certified training restaurants in Ladera Heights CA, Clovis CA, Arlington TX, New Braunfels TX
Ongoing training
Required
Time to open
12 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
Franchisee with franchisor approval; must use franchisor-designated real estate broker
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
Aloha
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✓Lease negotiation help

Technology: Aloha

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

106 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 106 contacts · $49
Free preview
(951) 407-••••
Unlock all 106 contacts
(760) 947-••••
(407) 566-••••
(702) 818-••••
(702) 208-••••

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Fatburger franchise?

The total investment to open a Fatburger franchise ranges from $517K – $2.7M, with an initial franchise fee of $50K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Fatburger franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Fatburger FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $1.1M. The median is $1.1M. Important context: Reported as net sales, not gross sales. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Fatburger?

Fatburger is franchised by Fatburger North America, Inc.. Its parent company is FAT Brands, Inc.. Source: FDD Item 1, 2026 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Fatburger FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Fatburger FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Fatburger's franchise failure rate?

Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, Fatburger has a charge-off rate of 13.6% across 39 loans, meaning 13.6% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.

How many Fatburger franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Fatburger has 177 total units in the United States, including 177 franchised units and 0 company-owned units. 19 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Fatburger a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Fatburger as a D-grade franchise with a verdict score of 28 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Fatburger, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Quick-Service Restaurants franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Quick-Service Restaurants category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.