Dippin’ Dots® Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026
- Investment
- $113K – $344K
- Disclosed sales
- not disclosed
- SBA charge-off
- 14.3%
- on 20 loans
Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records
Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology
Dippin' Dots is a novelty frozen-dessert franchise serving its signature flash-frozen ice-cream beads. Franchisees run kiosks, stores, or event and vending operations selling Dippin' Dots and related treats.
FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026
A Dippin’ Dots® franchise requires a total initial investment of $113K – $344K, including a $15K – $35K franchise fee. This franchisor makes no financial performance representation in Item 19 of its FDD. Item 19 is voluntary under the FTC Franchise Rule, and this filing states that it makes none, so no revenue or earnings figures are disclosed. Declining to publish one is lawful and is not evidence of how the outlets perform. It does mean that less about this brand can be verified from its filing, and the FranchiseVerdict grade - an editorial assessment, not investment advice - reflects that. SBA 7(a) loans show a 14.3% charge-off rate across 20 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: B (Above average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →
Sources, dates and evidence
FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: low - issued within the last 12 months
Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored3 of 3 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.
Overview
- Investment
- $113K – $344K
- 7th pct Service Resta…
- Avg gross sales
- N/A
- Royalty
- Set by a formula
- Units
- 259
- 85th pct Service Resta…
- SBA charge-off
- 14.3%
- % of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category
Quick verdict · Quick-Service Restaurants · color = vs category peers
Green = favorable by >10% vs Quick-Service Restaurants median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)
Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology
Bottom line
- COSTTotal investment $113K – $344K including a $15K franchise fee.
- RETURNSThis franchisor makes no financial performance representation in Item 19 of its FDD. Item 19 is voluntary under the FTC Franchise Rule, and this filing states that it makes none, so no revenue or earnings figures are disclosed. Declining to publish one is lawful and is not evidence of how the outlets perform. It does mean that less about this brand can be verified from its filing, and the FranchiseVerdict grade - an editorial assessment, not investment advice - reflects that.
- RISKVerdict B (Above average), verdict score 64/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 14.3% across 20 loans (above the 16% franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
- GROWTHNegative: net -2 franchised outlets in the latest year (14 opened, 16 closed) (Item 20).
- DATAThis franchisor makes no financial performance representation in Item 19 of its FDD. Item 19 is voluntary under the FTC Franchise Rule, and this filing states that it makes none, so no revenue or earnings figures are disclosed. Declining to publish one is lawful and is not evidence of how the outlets perform. It does mean that less about this brand can be verified from its filing, and the FranchiseVerdict grade - an editorial assessment, not investment advice - reflects that. Item 20 of the FDD lists current and former franchisees; asking them directly is the standard way to fill this gap.
Item 1 · who you're contracting with
The Franchisor
Corporate structure & franchisor financials
- Legal entity
- Dippin' Dots Franchising, L.L.C.
- Parent company
- Dippin' Dots Holdings, L.L.C. (DDH)
- FDD Item 1, page 6 of the 2026 FDD
- Ultimate parent
- J & J Snack Foods Corp.
- FDD Item 1, page 6 of the 2026 FDD
- Predecessor
- Dippin' Dots, Inc. (DDI)
- Prior franchisor entity
- CEO title
- President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman (of parent J&J Snack Foods Corp.)
- Daniel Fachner
- Incorporated in
- Oklahoma
- HQ
- 910 South 5th Street, Paducah, Kentucky 42003
- Auditor
- Blythe CPAs
- Audited financials
- Franchisor revenue
- $1.2M
- vs $3.1M prior year
Independent franchisee associations
- Franchise Advisory Council (FAC)
Franchisee-led councils or alliances disclosed in Item 20. Indicates operator voice.
Affiliated brands
- The ICEE Company
- Doc Popcorn
- DDL
Other brands the franchisor or its parent operates (Item 1).
Same owner · FDD Item 1, page 6
1 other brand on this site name J & J Snack Foods Corp. as parent or ultimate parent in their own FDD.
Grouped by the owner's name as each filing prints it (this page: the 2026 FDD). Spelling variants of the same group may be listed apart; a brand is never grouped with an owner its filing does not name.
Overview
About
- CEO
- Daniel Fachner
- Headquarters
- Kentucky
- Founded
- 1999
- FDD year
- 2026
- States available
- 44
Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?
Entry cost runs 53% below the typical quick-service restaurants franchise.
Source: FDD 2026 · Items 5–7
Full Item 7 breakdown12 line items
Initial investment breakdown
| Line item | Low | High | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial Franchise Fee1 | $15K | $15K | |
| Grand Opening Advertising Materials Expenditure2 | $500 | $3K | |
| Office and Retail Supplies3 | $100 | $500 | |
| Opening Inventory4 | $3K | $5K | |
| Insurance5 | $2K | $3K | |
| Printing and Signage6 | $499 | $5K | |
| Equipment (Freezers, etc.), Furniture, Fixtures, & Décor7 | $66K | $85K | |
| Travel, Lodging, Meals, Etc. for Initial Training10 | $2K | $3K | |
| Real Estate and Improvements11 | $2K | $120K | |
| Security Deposit and Prepaid Rent12 | $500 | $10K | |
| Miscellaneous Start-up Costs13 | $13K | $33K | |
| Additional Funds (6 months)14 | $10K | $64K | |
| Total initial investment | $113K | $344K |
Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.
Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate
The Vitals
- Total investment
- $113K – $344K
- Top 40% of category vs category
- Liquid capital req'd
- $10K – $64K
- Top 40% of category vs category
- Franchise fee
- $15K – $35K
- Top 40% of category vs category
- Royalty
- $2.16 per bag (bulk ice cream) / $0.09 per pre-pack unit,…
- Ad fund
- $0.24 per bag (bulk) / $0.01 per pre-pack unit, plus up t…
- Total fee load
- 8.0%
- vs 9–13% typical
Ongoing fees · Item 6
| Fee | Amount |
|---|---|
| Training fee | $500 |
| Transfer fee | $15K |
| Renewal fee | $7K |
| Inventory (initial) | $3K – $5K |
| Total fee load | 8.0% of rev |
ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Dippin’ Dots® makes no financial performance representation in Item 19 of its FDD - a voluntary item under the FTC Franchise Rule - so no unit revenue figures are disclosed. The return models need a revenue figure to start from, and the operating costs that turn gross sales into a profit are in no FDD. Enter your own and the calculator runs on your assumptions — nothing here is modelled until you do.
Returns model · single-unit ROIC
What would one Dippin’ Dots® unit return on the cash you put in?
Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.
Unlevered ROIC · per unit
Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.
—
An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for annual revenue, royalty rate, ad fund rate, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.
These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.
Item 19 · Source: 2026 FDD
Financial Performance
No financial performance representation
This franchisor makes no financial performance representation in Item 19 of its FDD. Item 19 is voluntary under the FTC Franchise Rule, and this filing states that it makes none, so no revenue or earnings figures are disclosed. Declining to publish one is lawful and is not evidence of how the outlets perform. It does mean that less about this brand can be verified from its filing, and the FranchiseVerdict grade - an editorial assessment, not investment advice - reflects that.
Item 20 of the FDD lists current and former franchisees; asking them directly is the standard way to fill this gap.
Operator outlook
What the numbers say
Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.
Fee burden
Total ongoing fee load of 8.0% (near the Quick-Service Restaurants median).
Disclosure
This franchisor makes no financial performance representation in Item 19 of its FDD. Item 19 is voluntary under the FTC Franchise Rule, and this filing states that it makes none, so no revenue or earnings figures are disclosed. Declining to publish one is lawful and is not evidence of how the outlets perform. It does mean that less about this brand can be verified from its filing, and the FranchiseVerdict grade - an editorial assessment, not investment advice - reflects that. Item 20 of the FDD lists current and former franchisees; asking them directly is the standard way to fill this gap.
Operator retention
System roughly stable (+4.4% 3-year CAGR) with 259 units.
Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.
vs Quick-Service Restaurants medians
How Dippin’ Dots® Compares
Category median of published Quick-Service Restaurants brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.
Is the system healthy?
Source: FDD 2026 · Item 20
Unit growth
Item 20 · unit dynamics
The Growth Chart
- Total units
- 259
- Opened
- 14
- Last reporting year
- Closed
- 16
- Terminated
- 3
- Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
- Non-renewed
- 2
- Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
- Turnover rate
- 6.2%
- Company-owned
- 0
- Corporate units in the system
- % franchised
- 100%
- vs corporate-owned
- Net growth (3-yr)
- +4.4%
- Net unit change over 3 years
- 3-yr CAGR
- +4.4%
- Compounded over last 3 years
Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers
- Terminated
- 3
- Not renewed
- 2
- Transferred
- 11
- Reacquired
- 0
- Franchisor bought back
- Signed, not yet open
- 0
- 0.00 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
- Projected new
- 0
- Franchisor's next-year forecast
- Transfer rate
- 5.9%
- Owners selling to other franchisees
- Termination rate
- 1.3%
- Franchisor-initiated terminations
Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.
Item 20 · 40 states with active franchisees
The Territory Map
Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).
States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.
Available to sell in · Item 12
- California
- Hawaii
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- New York
- North Dakota
- Rhode Island
- South Dakota
- Virginia
- Wisconsin
States where the franchisor is registered to sell new franchises (FDD registration filings).
Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list
180 current owners across 40 states.
- TX 32
- FL 18
- CA 14
- IL 10
- MD 6
- AL 5
- AR 5
- LA 5
- NC 5
- OH 5
- AZ 4
- MN 4
- +28 more states
Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.
SBA loan performance
Government records
SBA Loan Data
Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.
- Total loans
- 20
- Loan volume
- $4.5M
- Median loan
- $50K
- 50th percentile
- Charge-off rate
- 14.3%
- on 20 loans · rates vary by category · see methodology
Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated
- Repayment rate (PIF)
- 84.6%
- 5-yr charge-off
- N/A
- Loans approved 2021+
- Active lenders
- 17
- Defaults
- 2
- Typical loan rate
- N/A
- Franchised industry avg
- 21.6%
- brand beats franchise avg ↓
- Jobs supported
- 51
- 6.1 per loan
- Lender concentration
- 15%
- top lender's share
Franchise vs independent — in all other specialty food stores, franchised businesses charge off at 21.6% vs 22.8% for independents — franchising is associated with 5% lower SBA default risk in this category.
Top lenders financing Dippin’ Dots® franchisees
Showing 3 of 17 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.
Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.
Lender network · 7(a) + 504
SBA Lending Report
Full lending analysis for Dippin’ Dots® from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.
- Principal loss rate
- 20.6%
- Avg SBA guarantee
- 70%
- Avg chargeoff amount
- $86K
- Lender concentration
- 15.4%
- Job velocity
- 6.1 per $100K
- NAICS benchmark
- 14.4%
- NAICS 445299
- Jobs supported
- 51
Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 15% of loans
| # | Lender | Loans | Volume | Default % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Newtown Savings Bank | 2 | $75K | 0.0% |
| 2 | SouthWest Bank | 1 | $180K | 0.0% |
| 3 | Bangor Savings Bank | 1 | $25K | 0.0% |
| 4 | The Huntington National Bank | 1 | $25K | 0.0% |
| 5 | Extraco Banks National Association | 1 | $110K | 0.0% |
| 6 | American National Bank of Minnesota | 1 | $65K | 0.0% |
| 7 | Bank of America, National Association | 1 | $10K | 0.0% |
| 8 | Hancock Whitney Bank | 1 | $74K | 100.0% |
| 9 | JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association | 1 | $36K | 0.0% |
| 10 | Austin Bank Texas National Association | 1 | $50K | 0.0% |
Geographic failure vector
| State | Loans | Defaults | Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| TXTexas | 6 | 0 | 0.0% |
| CTConnecticut | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| CACalifornia | 1 | 1 | 100.0% |
| INIndiana | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| LALouisiana | 1 | 1 | 100.0% |
| MEMaine | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| MNMinnesota | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
SBA 7(a) lending trend
Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict
What could kill this investment?
SBA loans charge off at 14.3% — 11% below the 16.0% national norm, i.e. lower lender-observed risk.
Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21
Risk analysis
FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21
Risk & Legal
Dippin' Dots presents caution-level risk due to undisclosed financials, modest growth trajectory, territorial vulnerability, and opaque royalty mechanics that obscure true profitability potential.
Litigation (Item 3)
Subject: officers or affiliates. The franchisor is not a named party in these cases.
No litigation disclosed in Item 3.
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
None disclosed
Audited financials (Item 21)
Yes · Blythe CPAs
Franchisor revenue (Item 21)
Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)
Only figure extracted is net revenue of $1,164,528 for the unaudited partial period ended March 28, 2026 (royalties and advertising fees $1,018,651 plus franchise and transfer fees $145,878) — not a full fiscal year figure, so not mapped to franchisor_revenue_yr1/yr2 or total_revenue.
ⓘ These are the parent company's consolidated financials (the parent guarantees the franchisor), not this brand's standalone results — the figure reflects the whole corporate group, not this brand alone.
Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16
- Franchisor sells you products: No
- Kickbacks from required suppliers: No
- Must buy proprietary products: Yes
- Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
- Can negotiate own supplier terms: No
Score breakdown · what drove the 64 / 100 verdict
- 01MINORNo Item 19 financial disclosure (average revenue/net income not provided) prevents proper ROI analysis
- 02MEDSlow unit growth of 5.7% YoY with only 260 locations suggests limited market expansion and potential market saturation
- 03MINORUnprotected territory creates risk of internal brand cannibalization and direct franchisee competition
- 04MINORComplex royalty structure (per-bag bulk + per-unit pre-pack + 6% ancillary) lacks transparency on total cost of goods sold impact
Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification
What are you signing up for?
Ongoing fees run about 8.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.
Source: FDD 2026 · Items 11, 12, 17
FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal
Contract & Territory Detail
| Initial term | 5 years |
|---|---|
| Renewal term | 5 years |
| Allowed renewalsℹ | 2 |
| Territory type | Protected territory |
| Protected territory | Yes |
| Exclusive territoryℹ | No |
| Territory sizeℹ | Minimum territory equals the shopping mall or general shopping center containing the store location; actual territory size varies by mutual agreement based on location, population density, income, and franchisee resources |
| Online sales rightsℹ | Restricted |
| Franchisor can compete | Yes |
| Hire a manager? | Allowed |
| Owner-operator | Optional |
| Non-compete (years)ℹ | 2 years |
| Right of first refusalℹ | Yes |
| Transfer requires consent | Yes |
| Termination notice | 30 days |
| Termination groundsℹ | 20 |
| Curable defaultsℹ | 6 |
| Mandatory arbitration | Yes |
| Arbitration location | Oklahoma City, Oklahoma |
| Jury trial waiver | Yes |
| Governing law | Oklahoma |
| Litigation count | 0 |
View Item 3 litigation summary
No litigation disclosed in Item 3.
Items 10, 11
Training & Operations
- Classroom training
- 32 hrs
- On-the-job training
- 30 hrs
- Training location
- Paducah, Kentucky (DDF's offices) and at the Franchised Business location
- Ongoing training
- Required
- Time to open
- 6 mo
- From signing to launch
- Site selection
- franchisee
- Franchisor financing
- Not offered
- Item 10
- POS system
- P.O.S. System (unbranded)
- Operating tech stack
Items 5 & 11
Franchisor Support
Technology: P.O.S. System (unbranded)
Item 20 · call current owners
Franchisee Contacts
180 owners to call
Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20
Frequently asked questions
Frequently Asked Questions
How much does it cost to open a Dippin’ Dots® franchise?
The total investment to open a Dippin’ Dots® franchise ranges from $113K – $344K, with an initial franchise fee of $15K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).
What do Dippin’ Dots® franchise owners earn?
Dippin’ Dots® makes no financial performance representation in Item 19 of its FDD - a voluntary item under the FTC Franchise Rule - so no unit revenue figures are disclosed. Declining to publish one is lawful and is not evidence of how the outlets perform. It does mean that less about this brand can be verified from its filing, and the FranchiseVerdict grade - an editorial assessment, not investment advice - reflects that. Item 20 of the FDD lists current and former franchisees; asking them directly is the standard way to fill this gap.
Who owns Dippin’ Dots®?
Dippin’ Dots® is franchised by Dippin' Dots Franchising, L.L.C.. Its parent company is Dippin' Dots Holdings, L.L.C. (DDH). The ultimate parent named in the FDD is J & J Snack Foods Corp.. Source: FDD Item 1, 2026 filing.
What is Item 19 in the Dippin’ Dots® FDD?
The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Dippin’ Dots® FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.
What is Dippin’ Dots®'s franchise failure rate?
Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, Dippin’ Dots® has a charge-off rate of 14.3% across 20 loans, meaning 14.3% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.
How many Dippin’ Dots® franchise locations are there?
As of their most recent FDD filing, Dippin’ Dots® has 259 total units in the United States, including 259 franchised units and 0 company-owned units. 14 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.
Is Dippin’ Dots® a good franchise to buy?
FranchiseVerdict rates Dippin’ Dots® as a B-grade franchise with a verdict score of 64 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.
Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.
For franchisors
Are you the franchisor?
If you represent Dippin’ Dots®, you can request corrections or provide updated information.
Other Quick-Service Restaurants franchises
Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Quick-Service Restaurants category
Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.