Circle K Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026
- Investment
- $1.5M – $2.7M
- Disclosed sales
- $1.4M
- gross sales, not profit
- SBA charge-off
- 6.7%
- on 80 loans
Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records
Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology
Circle K is a convenience-store franchise selling fuel, drinks, snacks, and prepared food, typically around the clock. Franchisees run extended-hour stores managing fuel margins, inventory, staffing, and shrinkage.
FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026
A Circle K franchise requires a total initial investment of $1.5M – $2.7M, including a $25K franchise fee and an ongoing 3.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2024 FDD, average unit revenue was $1.4M[2]. SBA 7(a) loans show a 6.7% charge-off rate across 80 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: B (Above average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →
Sources, dates and evidence
FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: high - issued more than two years ago
Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored8 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.
Overview
- Investment
- $1.5M – $2.7M
- 46th pct Retail
- Avg gross sales
- $1.4M
- 17th pct Retail
- Royalty
- 3.0%
- 1st pct Retail
- Units
- 6,063
- 45th pct Retail
- SBA charge-off
- 6.7%
- % of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category
Quick verdict · Retail · color = vs category peers
Green = favorable by >10% vs Retail median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)
Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology
Bottom line
- COSTTotal investment $1.5M – $2.7M including a $25K franchise fee, 3.0% ongoing royalty.
- RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $1.4M/year (median $1.3M).
- RISKVerdict B (Above average), verdict score 60/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 6.7% across 80 loans (near or below the 16% franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
- GROWTHNegative: net -53 franchised outlets in the latest year (22 opened, 75 closed) (Item 20).
- DECLINESystem contracting at -7.9% CAGR over 3 years. Investigate whether closures are franchisor-driven (consolidation) or franchisee-driven (economics).
Item 1 · who you're contracting with
The Franchisor
Corporate structure & franchisor financials
- Legal entity
- TMC Franchise Corporation
- Parent company
- Circle K Stores Inc.
- FDD Item 1, page 10 of the 2024 FDD
- Ultimate parent
- Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.
- FDD Item 1, page 10 of the 2024 FDD
- Predecessor
- of TMC in as much as TMC has remained the franchisor of the Circle K
- Prior franchisor entity
- CEO title
- President of TMC and Vice President of Worldwide Franchise
- Pat Fitzpatrick
- Incorporated in
- AZ
- HQ
- 1130 West Warner Road, Tempe, Arizona 85284
- Auditor
- PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
- Audited financials
- Franchisor revenue
- $70.3M
- vs $71.4M prior year
Independent franchisee associations
- Franchise Advisory Council (FAC)
Franchisee-led councils or alliances disclosed in Item 20. Indicates operator voice.
Overview
About
- CEO
- Pat Fitzpatrick
- Headquarters
- AZ
- Founded
- 1995
- FDD year
- 2024
- States available
- 30
Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?
Entry cost runs 527% above the typical retail franchise.
Source: FDD 2024 · Items 5–7
Full Item 7 breakdown18 line items
Initial investment breakdown
| Line item | Low | High | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial Franchise Fee (new or rebuilt convenience store) | $25K | $25K | |
| Regional In-Store Training Fee (new or rebuilt) | $1K | $1K | |
| Travel and Living Expenses While Training (new or rebuilt) | $4K | $16K | |
| Real Estate (new or rebuilt) | — | — | |
| Construction, Remodeling, and Leasehold Improvements (new or rebuilt) | $850K | $1.5M | |
| Other Site Development Costs (new or rebuilt) | $40K | $100K | |
| Furniture, Fixtures & Equipment (new or rebuilt) | $400K | $800K | |
| EPOS and Computer Systems (new or rebuilt) | $40K | $50K | |
| Network Fee (3 months) (new or rebuilt) | $0 | $150 | |
| Signs (new or rebuilt) | $20K | $75K | |
| Security Deposits and Licenses and Permits (new or rebuilt) | $2K | $10K | |
| Utility Deposits (new or rebuilt) | $2K | $5K | |
| Vendor Deposits (new or rebuilt) | $0 | $16K | |
| Merchandise Inventory (new or rebuilt) | $60K | $100K | |
| Professional Fees (new or rebuilt) | $1K | $5K | |
| Insurance (new or rebuilt) | $5K | $12K | |
| Grand Opening Costs (new or rebuilt) | $5K | $10K | |
| Additional Funds (3 months) (new or rebuilt) | $10K | $20K | |
| Total initial investment | $1.5M | $2.7M |
Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.
Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate
The Vitals
- Total investment
- $1.5M – $2.7M
- Middle of category vs category
- Liquid capital req'd
- $10K – $20K
- Top 40% of category vs category
- Franchise fee
- $25K – $25K
- Top 40% of category vs category
- Royalty
- 3.0%
- Tiered by sales volume · typical 6–8%
- Ad fund
- 0.3%
- typical 3–5%
- Total fee load
- 4.5%
- vs 9–13% typical
Ongoing fees · Item 6
| Fee | Amount |
|---|---|
| Royalty | 3.0% of gross sales |
| Marketing / ad fund | 0.3% of gross sales |
| Technology fee | $0 |
| Training fee | $1K |
| Transfer fee | $25K |
| Renewal fee | $0 |
| Inventory (initial) | $60K – $100K |
| Total fee load | 4.5% of rev |
A 4.5% total fee load is unusually lean. More of each revenue dollar stays with the franchisee.
What do units actually make?
Average unit sales run 73% above the retail norm.
Source: FDD 2024 · Item 19
Single-unit · not modelled
Returns at a glance
An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Circle K until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.
—
Not modelled yet
An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.
Total invested capital · disclosed
$2.1M
Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.
ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
What one unit earns on your invested capital
Model A · Single-Unit Return
Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.
Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.
Returns model · single-unit ROIC
What would one Circle K unit return on the cash you put in?
Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.
Unlevered ROIC · per unit
Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.
—
An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.
What 25 units return when you use SBA financing
Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition
Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).
This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.
What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.
Not modelled yet
An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.
A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.
These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.
Item 19 · Source: 2024 FDD
Financial Performance
- Avg gross sales
- $1.4M
- Per unit, per year
- Median gross sales
- $1.3M
Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.
- Item 19 type
- Gross Sales by quartile - company-operated and franchised stores separately; also by store size and multi-year cohort data
- Sample size
- 529 outlets
- vs category median 46 · large
- Range (low → high)
- $148K→$4.1MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 87 of the 2024 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
- Cohort dispersion (min → max)
- Quartile band
- $712K→$2.2M
- Bottom 25% → top 25%
- Reporting year
- 2024
- Fiscal year the figures cover
- Source filing
- FDD 2024
- The FDD edition these figures were read from
- Transparency
- 4 / 10
- vs category median 3 / 10 · above
Compared against 278 Retail brands
Revenue is only 0.7x the investment. This means each unit may take 5+ years to recoup the initial outlay at typical margins.
Operator outlook
What the numbers say
Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.
Unit economics
Average unit generates $1.4M/year in gross sales. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 0.7x.
Fee burden
Total ongoing fee load of 4.5% — below the Retail median of 8.0%.
Disclosure
Transparency score 4/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.
Operator retention
System contracting at -7.9% CAGR over 3 years. Investigate whether closures are franchisor-driven consolidation or franchisee exits.
Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.
vs Retail medians
How Circle K Compares
Category median of published Retail brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.
Is the system healthy?
Source: FDD 2024 · Item 20
Unit growth
Item 20 · unit dynamics
The Growth Chart
- Total units
- 6,063
- Opened
- 22
- Last reporting year
- Closed
- 75
- Terminated
- 32
- Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
- Non-renewed
- 23
- Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
- Turnover rate
- 1.2%
- Company-owned
- 5,477
- Corporate units in the system
- % franchised
- 10%
- vs corporate-owned
- Net growth (3-yr)
- -7.9%
- Net unit change over 3 years
- 3-yr CAGR
- -7.9%
- Compounded over last 3 years
Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers
- Terminated
- 32
- Not renewed
- 23
- Transferred
- 26
- Reacquired
- 0
- Franchisor bought back
- Ceased ops
- 7.7%
- Units that stopped operating
Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.
Item 20 · 29 states with active franchisees
The Territory Map
Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).
States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.
Available to sell in · Item 12
- Washington
States where the franchisor is registered to sell new franchises (FDD registration filings).
Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list
418 current owners across 27 states; 40 former (terminated, transferred or not renewed) listed separately.
- CA 204
- FL 87
- NJ 19
- GA 18
- MA 14
- VA 13
- MD 7
- PA 6
- IL 5
- AL 4
- HI 4
- NY 4
- +15 more states
Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.
SBA loan performance
Government records
SBA Loan Data
Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.
- Total loans
- 80
- Loan volume
- $110.2M
- Median loan
- $1.1M
- 50th percentile
- Charge-off rate
- 6.7%
- on 80 loans · rates vary by category · see methodology
Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated
- Repayment rate (PIF)
- 91.7%
- 5-yr charge-off
- N/A
- Loans approved 2021+
- Active lenders
- 27
- Defaults
- 3
- Typical loan rate
- 5.6%
- avg rate to borrowers
- Franchised industry avg
- 5.0%
- brand above franchise avg ↑
- Jobs supported
- 358
- 0.6 per loan
- Lender concentration
- 9%
- top lender's share
Franchise vs independent — in gasoline stations with convenience stores, franchised businesses charge off at 5.0% vs 16.0% for independents — franchising is associated with 69% lower SBA default risk in this category.
Vintage analysis
Circle K charge-off rate by loan vintage
Top lenders financing Circle K franchisees
Showing 3 of 27 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.
Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.
Lender network · 7(a) + 504
SBA Lending Report
Full lending analysis for Circle K from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.
- Principal loss rate
- 1.3%
- Avg SBA guarantee
- 77%
- Avg interest rate
- 5.60%
- Avg chargeoff amount
- $235K
- Lender concentration
- 8.9%
- Job velocity
- 0.6 per $100K
- NAICS benchmark
- 6.7%
- NAICS 447110
- Jobs supported
- 358
Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 9% of loans
| # | Lender | Loans | Volume | Default % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Commonwealth Business Bank | 4 | $6.3M | 0.0% |
| 2 | PCB Bank | 4 | $4.3M | 0.0% |
| 3 | US Metro Bank | 3 | $4.0M | 50.0% |
| 4 | Wells Fargo Bank National Association | 3 | $2.7M | 50.0% |
| 5 | Open Bank | 3 | $4.4M | 0.0% |
| 6 | Columbia Bank | 2 | $1.8M | 50.0% |
| 7 | Celtic Bank Corporation | 2 | $3.5M | 0.0% |
| 8 | Bank of Hope | 2 | $890K | 0.0% |
| 9 | West Coast Community Bank | 2 | $900K | 0.0% |
| 10 | UniBank | 2 | $1.1M | 0.0% |
Geographic failure vector
| State | Loans | Defaults | Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| CACalifornia | 33 | 3 | 11.1% |
| GAGeorgia | 4 | 0 | 0.0% |
| WAWashington | 4 | 0 | 0.0% |
| FLFlorida | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| OROregon | 1 | 0 | -- |
SBA 7(a) lending trend
Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict
What could kill this investment?
SBA loans charge off at 6.7% — 58% below the 16.0% national norm, i.e. lower lender-observed risk.
Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21
Risk analysis
FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21
Risk & Legal
Circle K presents elevated risk due to contracting unit count, undisclosed net income, unprotected territories, active litigation, and substantial capital requirements in a declining system.
Why this reads harsher than the B grade: the grade weighs financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency across the whole filing, while this summary lists individual flags without that weighting. The flags are worth checking with current owners; neither is investment advice.
Litigation (Item 3)
Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).
TMC as plaintiff: 2 cases (v. Broadway Restaurants re post-termination obligations, settled $30,722 paid to TMC; v. Golen et al. re liquidated damages, settled with payment to TMC). TMC as defendant/cross-defendant: Universal Property Services v. Lehigh Gas et al. added TMC as defendant re misrepresentations in sale of 17 stores, settled 7/2024 with TMC paying $180,000. FTC order involving affiliate ACT and CrossAmerica re divestiture timing, $3.5M civil penalty paid.
Largest disclosed settlement: $3,500,000
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
None disclosed
Audited financials (Item 21)
Yes · PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Franchisor revenue (Item 21)
Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)
Consolidated total revenues for TMC Franchise Corporation (a wholly owned subsidiary of Circle K Stores Inc.) for FY ended April 28, 2024: Initial franchise sales $1,030,058; Royalty and promotional fees $60,722,633; Fuel sales, net $2,723,519; Interest and other income $5,867,604.
ⓘ These are the parent company's consolidated financials (the parent guarantees the franchisor), not this brand's standalone results — the figure reflects the whole corporate group, not this brand alone.
Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16
- Franchisor sells you products: Yes
- Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
- Must buy proprietary products: Yes
- Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
- Can negotiate own supplier terms: No
Score breakdown · what drove the 60 / 100 verdict
- 01MINORSystem declining 8.3% YoY with 6,063 units down from ~6,615 last year, indicating contraction and potential market saturation or franchisee dissatisfaction
- 02MEDNo average net income disclosed in Item 19 prevents assessment of actual profitability; disclosed $1.39M revenue doesn't guarantee positive returns after $25K-$55K annual royalties plus operating costs
- 03MINORUnprotected territory creates direct cannibalization risk; franchisees compete with corporate-owned and other franchised Circle K locations in same market
- 04HIGHMultiple active litigation cases (TMC v. Broadway, Universal Property Services v. Lehigh Gas, TMC v. Golen) suggest operational disputes and potential franchisor relationship issues
- 05MINORHigh upfront investment ($1.46M–$2.74M) combined with 10-year commitment and declining unit count increases difficulty recovering capital
Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification
Litigation case detail4 matters · Item 3
Litigation cases
The franchisor
Concluded (3)
TMC Franchise Corporation v. Broadway Restaurants, Inc., Zuri Barnes
settledBrought against a franchisee · filed 2021-05-25 · Los Angeles County Sup. Ct. · 21STCV 19544
“TMC Franchise Corporation v. Broadway Restaurants, Inc., Zuri Barnes, Case No. 21STCV 19544 (Los Angeles County Sup. Ct.). On September 13, 2019, TMC terminated for cause the Circle K franchise agreement with Broadway Restaurants, Inc. (“BRI”), after BRI failed to cure its defaults under the franchise agreement, following several opportunities to cure provided by TMC.”Page 17 of the 2024 FDD, Item 3
Outcome:“The parties settled the dispute on December 29, 2022, pursuant to which settlement Defendant paid TMC $30,722, and the parties entered into mutual releases of liability and filed a stipulation of dismissal, with prejudice, of the lawsuit.”
Universal Property Services, Inc., et al. v. Lehigh Gas Wholesale Services, Inc., et al.
settledBrought by a franchisee · filed 2020-03-26 · U.S. District Court for New Jersey (D. N.J.) · 3:20-CV-03315-FLW-TJB
“Universal Property Services, Inc., et al. v. Lehigh Gas Wholesale Services, Inc., et al., Case No. 3:20-CV- 03315-FLW-TJB (D. N.J.). A former franchisee and its guarantor (“Plaintiffs”) filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for New Jersey on March 26, 2020, against Lehigh Gas Wholesale Services, Inc., Lehigh Gas Wholesale LLC, and LGP Realty Holdings LP (together, “Lehigh Defendants”).”Page 17 of the 2024 FDD, Item 3
Outcome:“The parties settled the dispute on July 2, 2024 pursuant to which settlement TMC and Circle K Stores, without admitting any fault or liability, collectively paid Plaintiffs $180,000, and the parties entered into mutual releases of liability and filed a stipulation of dismissal, with prejudice, of the lawsuit.” (page 18)
TMC Franchise Corporation et al. v. Golen, et al.
settledBrought against a franchisee · filed 2019-10-16 · U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida (M.D. Fla.) · 6:19-CV-1970
“TMC Franchise Corporation et al. v. Golen, et al., Case No. 6:19-CV-1970 (M.D. Fla.). TMC Franchise Corporation (“TMC”) and its parent company Circle K Stores, Inc. (“Circle K Stores”) filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida on October 16, 2019, against its former franchisee Ishan Interprices, Inc.”Page 18 of the 2024 FDD, Item 3
Outcome:“The parties resolved the lawsuit through a settlement agreement effective April 27, 2020, which included mutual releases of claims and payment of certain amounts to TMC and Circle K Stores.”
Parent, affiliates and predecessor
Concluded (1)
In the Matter of Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc., a corporation, and CrossAmerica Partners LP, a limited partnership (FTC Decision and Order and Order to Maintain Assets)
judgmentGovernment or regulatory action · Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. and CrossAmerica Partners LP · filed 2017-11-29 · United States Federal Trade Commission · Docket No. C - 4635, FTC file number 171-0184
“Decision and Order and Order to Maintain Assets of the United States Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) in the Matter of Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc., a corporation, and CrossAmerica Partners LP, a limited partnership; Docket No. C - 4635, FTC file number 171-0184. In connection with the acquisition by ACT of equity interests in HDS and certain of its affiliates”Page 18 of the 2024 FDD, Item 3
Outcome:“Also on July 6, 2020, the parties entered into a Stipulation on Final Judgment against Respondents in settlement of disputed claims and without any admission of liability by Respondents, pursuant to which Respondents agreed to pay a civil penalty of $3,500,000 within 30 days of the final judgment.” (page 19)
Item 3 lists the litigation the franchisor must disclose; a matter against a parent, an affiliate or a named officer is not a matter against the franchisor, and pending claims are allegations, not findings.
What are you signing up for?
Ongoing fees run about 4.5% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.
Source: FDD 2024 · Items 11, 12, 17
FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal
Contract & Territory Detail
| Initial term | 10 years |
|---|---|
| Renewal term | 10 years |
| Allowed renewalsℹ | 1 |
| Territory type | No territory protection |
| Protected territory | No |
| Exclusive territoryℹ | No |
| Online sales rightsℹ | Restricted |
| Franchisor can compete | Yes |
| Hire a manager? | Allowed |
| Owner-operator | Optional |
| Non-compete (years)ℹ | 10 years |
| Non-compete (miles)ℹ | 2 mi |
| Right of first refusalℹ | Yes |
| Transfer requires consent | Yes |
| Termination notice | 5 days |
| Termination groundsℹ | 1 |
| Curable defaultsℹ | 2 |
| Mandatory arbitration | Yes |
| Arbitration location | County where corporate headquarters are located (Maricopa County, AZ) |
| Jury trial waiver | Yes |
| Governing law | AZ |
| Litigation count | 4 |
View Item 3 litigation summary
TMC as plaintiff: 2 cases (v. Broadway Restaurants re post-termination obligations, settled $30,722 paid to TMC; v. Golen et al. re liquidated damages, settled with payment to TMC). TMC as defendant/cross-defendant: Universal Property Services v. Lehigh Gas et al. added TMC as defendant re misrepresentations in sale of 17 stores, settled 7/2024 with TMC paying $180,000. FTC order involving affiliate ACT and CrossAmerica re divestiture timing, $3.5M civil penalty paid.
Items 10, 11
Training & Operations
- Classroom training
- 32 hrs
- On-the-job training
- 24 hrs
- Training location
- Remote (video/audio computer applications), online; additional in-store at regional franchise locations
- Ongoing training
- Required
- Site selection
- Franchisee (with franchisor review/approval)
- Franchisor financing
- Offered
- Item 10
- POS system
- EPOS (Electronic Point of Sale) / SSCS back-office system
- Operating tech stack
Items 5 & 11
Franchisor Support
Technology: EPOS (Electronic Point of Sale) / SSCS back-office system
Item 20 · call current owners
Franchisee Contacts
458 owners to call
Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20
Frequently asked questions
Frequently Asked Questions
How much does it cost to open a Circle K franchise?
The total investment to open a Circle K franchise ranges from $1.5M – $2.7M, with an initial franchise fee of $25K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).
What do Circle K franchise owners earn?
According to Item 19 of the Circle K FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $1.4M. The median is $1.3M. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.
Who owns Circle K?
Circle K is franchised by TMC Franchise Corporation. Its parent company is Circle K Stores Inc.. The ultimate parent named in the FDD is Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.. Source: FDD Item 1, 2024 filing.
What is Item 19 in the Circle K FDD?
The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Circle K FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.
What is Circle K's franchise failure rate?
Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, Circle K has a charge-off rate of 6.7% across 80 loans, meaning 6.7% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.
How many Circle K franchise locations are there?
As of their most recent FDD filing, Circle K has 6,063 total units in the United States, including 586 franchised units and 5,477 company-owned units. 22 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.
Is Circle K a good franchise to buy?
FranchiseVerdict rates Circle K as a B-grade franchise with a verdict score of 60 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.
Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.
For franchisors
Are you the franchisor?
If you represent Circle K, you can request corrections or provide updated information.
Other Retail franchises
Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Retail category
Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.