Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Buffalo’s Cafe logo

Buffalo’s Cafe Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Full-Service RestaurantsCAFranchising since 1989
BAbove averageAbove average50/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$857K – $2.9M
Disclosed sales
$2.4M
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
Not SBA-matched

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-00415FDD 2025Data QualityExcellent95%
Manager-run OKYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Buffalo's Cafe is a casual-dining franchise known for buffalo wings and American comfort food. Franchisees run the restaurants, managing the kitchen, table service, and staffing.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Buffalo’s Cafe franchise requires a total initial investment of $857K – $2.9M, including a $50K franchise fee and an ongoing 6.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2025 FDD, average unit revenue was $2.4M[2]. FranchiseVerdict grade: B (Above average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: 2025 filing · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - a newer filing may exist

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✗ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored8 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$857K – $2.9M
31st pct Service Resta…
Avg gross sales
$2.4M
Net sales11th pct Service Resta…
Royalty
6.0%
25th pct Service Resta…
Units
12
15th pct Service Resta…
SBA charge-off
N/A

Quick verdict · Full-Service Restaurants · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$857K – $2.9M
Median $678K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$50K – $50K
Median $40K
above median ↑, worse than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$30K – $60K
Median $43K
near median
Avg Revenue
$2.4M
Median $1.6M
above median ↑, better than category
Net sales
Royalty Rate
6.0%
Median 5.0%
above median ↑, worse than category
Ongoing Fees
8.0% of rev
Median 7.0%
above median ↑, worse than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Not SBA-matched
Not matched to SBA 7(a) loans
System Size
12 units
Median 20 units
below median ↓, worse than category
Turnover Rate
8.3%
Median 0.0%
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Optional
Can hire a manager
Litigation
9 cases
Review carefully

Green = favorable by >10% vs Full-Service Restaurants median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $857K – $2.9M including a $50K franchise fee, 6.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $2.4M/year (median $2.4M).
  • RISKVerdict B (Above average), verdict score 50/100 (higher is better).
  • GROWTHNegative: net -1 franchised outlets in the latest year (0 opened, 1 closed); 1 signed but not yet open (Item 20).

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Buffalo's Franchise Concepts, Inc.
Parent company
FAT Brands, Inc.
FDD Item 1, page 10 of the 2025 FDD
CEO title
President and Chief Executive Officer
Taylor Wiederhorn
Incorporated in
Delaware
HQ
9720 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 500, Beverly Hills, California 90212
Auditor
Macias Gini & O'Connell LLP
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$2.3M
vs $2.3M prior year
Management churn noted
Frequent turnover
Item 2 disclosed frequent executive changes

Same owner · FDD Item 1, page 10

12 other brands on this site name FAT Brands, Inc. as parent or ultimate parent in their own FDD.

Portfolio: FAT Brands

Grouped by the owner's name as each filing prints it (this page: the 2025 FDD). Spelling variants of the same group may be listed apart; a brand is never grouped with an owner its filing does not name.

Overview

About

CEO
Taylor Wiederhorn
Headquarters
CA
Founded
1989
FDD year
2025
States available
1

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 179% above the typical full-service restaurants franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$857K – $2.9MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 31 of the 2025 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$50,000Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 29 of the 2025 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Royalty6.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 23 of the 2025 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund2.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 23 of the 2025 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$30K – $60K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

FDD Item 7 · 2025 filing

Initial investment breakdown

Buffalo’s Cafe: Item 7 initial investment breakdown
Cost componentLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$50K$50K
Working capital (3–6 mo)$30K$60K
Equipment, build-out, other$777K$2.8M
Total initial investment$857K$2.9M

Source: Buffalo’s Cafe 2025 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$857K – $2.9M
Top 40% of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$30K – $60K
Top 40% of category vs category
Franchise fee
$50K – $50K
Top 40% of category vs category
Royalty
6.0%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
2.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
8.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Buffalo’s Cafe: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty6.0% of net sales
Marketing / ad fund2.0% of net sales
Technology fee$1K
Training fee$48K
Transfer fee$15K
Renewal fee$20K
Inventory (initial)$10K – $26K
Total fee load8.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 47% above the full-service restaurants norm.

Avg gross sales$2.4M

Reported as net sales, not gross sales

Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 72 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$2.4MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 72 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typeNet Sales
Sample size10 outlets

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Buffalo’s Cafe until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$1.9M

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Buffalo’s Cafe unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $2,350,384 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $857K–$2.9M (midpoint used)
FDD reports $30K–$60K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$1.9M
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Reported as net sales, not gross sales

Avg gross sales
$2.4M
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$2.4M

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
Net Sales
Sample size
10 outlets
vs category median 18
Range (low → high)
$1.1M→$3.3MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 72 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Reporting year
2024
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2025
Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2024
Transparency
7 / 10
vs category median 3 / 10 · above
Gross sales rank11th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank31th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank25th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank15th
vs Full-Service Restaurants peers
Risk score rank32th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 801 Full-Service Restaurants brands

Showing the headline figures — all 159 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $2.4M/year in gross sales. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 1.2x.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 8.0% (near the Full-Service Restaurants median).

Disclosure

Transparency score 7/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System contracting at -7.7% CAGR over 3 years. Investigate whether closures are franchisor-driven consolidation or franchisee exits.

Multi-unit rate

Only 1% of franchisees own multiple units. Could indicate challenging economics or a young system where operators haven't had time to expand.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Full-Service Restaurants medians

How Buffalo’s Cafe Compares

Metric
Buffalo’s Cafe
Category median
vs median
Investment
$1.9M
$678Kmiddle half $427K–$1.3M · n=326
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
$2.4M
$1.6Mmiddle half $885K–$2.4M · n=122
Above median, better than category
Unit Count
12
20middle half 6–73 · n=308
Below median, worse than category

Category median of published Full-Service Restaurants brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units12Verified — printed on page 76 of the 2025 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it two ways.
3-yr growth-7.7% (worth scrutinizing)
Turnover rate8.3% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
12
Opened
0
Last reporting year
Closed
1
Terminated
0
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
8.3%
Company-owned
0
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
100%
vs corporate-owned
Multi-unit owners
1.0%
Net growth (3-yr)
-7.7%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
-7.7%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
0
Not renewed
0
Transferred
1
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
1
0.08 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
2
Franchisor's next-year forecast
Transfer rate
8.3%
Owners selling to other franchisees
Continuity rate
92.3%
Units that stayed open
Ceased ops
8.3%
Units that stopped operating
2022
13
Franchised units
2023
13±0
Franchised units
2024
12-1
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 12 · 1 state reported

The Territory Map

FDD Item 12 reports the state count, but the specific list isn't in our current data. The map will appear once we re-extract from the FDD or enough franchisee contacts are available.

1

states with franchisees (per FDD Item 12)

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

11 current owners across 1 state.

  • GA 11

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20; 71 entries carry no state. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

No SBA loan data available for this brand.

What could kill this investment?

SBA charge-offNot SBA-matched
Verdict score50/100 (higher is better)
Litigation9 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

BAbove average50Verdict score 50/100

Buffalo's Cafe operates within a contracting franchise system under a parent company facing securities litigation and disclosure violations, with no disclosed net income data and concerning governance issues that create substantial operational and financial risk.

Moderate confidence±13 pts
3763

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).

Pending: 1 securities class action (Kates v. FAT Brands). Concluded: Tatum (franchise/civil rights, settled $40K); Matthews/Chipman securities class action (settled $2.5M + $500K stock); Virginia SCC v. FBNA (2 matters, registration violations); Shahi v. FBNA (international franchise rescission, dismissed); P&K Food Market v. BFCI (franchise sale fraud, dismissed 2019); Rojany/Vignola securities class actions (settled $50K and $75K)

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Macias Gini & O'Connell LLP

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $2.3MYr 2: $2.3M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Item 6 states franchisor's total revenue for fiscal year ending December 31, 2024 was $2,252,975, none of which was derived from required purchases or leases from franchisees. Audited consolidated financial statement tables (balance sheet / statement of operations) were not present in the provided text extract (it ends at the Independent Auditor's Report for Buffalo's Franchise Concepts Inc.), so net worth/assets/liabilities/net income could not be read.

ⓘ These are the parent company's consolidated financials (the parent guarantees the franchisor), not this brand's standalone results — the figure reflects the whole corporate group, not this brand alone.

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 50 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MEDUnit count declined 7.7% YoY (12 units total) indicating system contraction and weak franchisee retention
  2. 02MINORParent company (FAT Brands) facing multiple securities class actions for alleged false statements and misrepresentation—direct credibility and disclosure risk
  3. 03MEDNet income not disclosed in FDD Item 19—prevents ROI validation and suggests either poor performance or deliberate opacity
  4. 04HIGHHigh litigation exposure: securities fraud, registration violations in Virginia, breach of contract, and misrepresentation claims regarding international development
  5. 05MINORInvestment range of $857K–$2.9M is substantial with 6% royalty; declining unit count raises franchise viability questions
  6. 06MINORMultiple settlement violations and international development disputes indicate governance and contract enforcement problems

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 159 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 8.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term15 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training100 hrs

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term15 years
Renewal term10 years
Allowed renewalsℹ2
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory radius1 mi
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorOptional
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ5 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice10 days
Curable defaultsℹ2
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationLos Angeles, California (county of franchisor headquarters)
Jury trial waiverNo
Governing lawCA
Litigation count9
View Item 3 litigation summary

Pending: 1 securities class action (Kates v. FAT Brands). Concluded: Tatum (franchise/civil rights, settled $40K); Matthews/Chipman securities class action (settled $2.5M + $500K stock); Virginia SCC v. FBNA (2 matters, registration violations); Shahi v. FBNA (international franchise rescission, dismissed); P&K Food Market v. BFCI (franchise sale fraud, dismissed 2019); Rojany/Vignola securities class actions (settled $50K and $75K)

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
24 hrs
On-the-job training
76 hrs
Training location
BFCI home office or designated training restaurant (Issaquah WA; Los Angeles CA; Fresno CA; Beverly Hills CA)
Ongoing training
Required
Field support
56 hrs/yr
On-site visits per year
Time to open
8 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
Franchisee with franchisor approval; must use designated/approved real estate broker
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
Aloha
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✓Lease negotiation help

Technology: Aloha

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

82 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 82 contacts · $49
Free preview
678-236-••••GA
Unlock all 82 contacts
(804) 371-••••
(701) 328-••••
(702) 889-••••
(907) 687-••••

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Buffalo’s Cafe franchise?

The total investment to open a Buffalo’s Cafe franchise ranges from $857K – $2.9M, with an initial franchise fee of $50K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Buffalo’s Cafe franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Buffalo’s Cafe FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $2.4M. The median is $2.4M. Important context: Reported as net sales, not gross sales. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Buffalo’s Cafe?

Buffalo’s Cafe is franchised by Buffalo's Franchise Concepts, Inc.. Its parent company is FAT Brands, Inc.. Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Buffalo’s Cafe FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Buffalo’s Cafe FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Buffalo’s Cafe's franchise failure rate?

SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for Buffalo’s Cafe (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.

How many Buffalo’s Cafe franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Buffalo’s Cafe has 12 total units in the United States, including 12 franchised units and 0 company-owned units.

Is Buffalo’s Cafe a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Buffalo’s Cafe as a B-grade franchise with a verdict score of 50 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Buffalo’s Cafe, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Full-Service Restaurants franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Full-Service Restaurants category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.