FranchiseVerdict
BFT logo
FV-00293·MODERATEExcellent95

BFT

Formerly known as Body Fit Training

Health & FitnessFranchising since 2020Website
Investment
$510K – $1.2M
87th pct Health & Fitn…
Avg revenue
$361K
16th pct Health & Fitn…
Royalty
7.0%
27th pct Health & Fitn…
Units
49
70th pct Health & Fitn…
SBA default
0.0%
vs <3% typical

Bottom line

  • Total investment $510K – $1.2M including a $60K franchise fee, 7.0% ongoing royalty.
  • Average unit revenue of $361K/year (median $329K).
  • Rated MODERATE with a risk score of 66/100. SBA loan default rate of 0.0% across 23 loans (below the industry average).
  • 14 litigation matters disclosed in Item 3 — higher than typical. Review the summary for patterns (franchisor-initiated vs. franchisee-initiated).

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Legal entity
BFT Franchise SPV, LLC
Parent company
XPOF Assetco, LLC
Incorporated in
Delaware
HQ
17877 Von Karman Ave., Suite 100, Irvine, California 92614
Auditor
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$521K
vs $204.6M prior year

Yale framework · single-unit ROIC

Returns Analysis

Pulls Item 7 (investment) and Item 19 (revenue) from this brand's FDD into the Yale unlevered-ROIC formula. Override any input to stress-test it against your own assumptions.

The model · Yale framework

What would one BFT unit return on the cash you put in?

Revenue · per unit, per year
$
FDD Item 19 reports $360,918
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fund
Royaltytyp 68%
%
Ad fundtyp 35%
%
Operating costs · category default: fitness
COGS
%
Labor
%
Rent / occupancy
%
Other operating
%
Total invested capital · what you actually put in
Initial investment
$
FDD Item 7: $510K–$1.2M
Working capital
$
FDD reports $30K–$78K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

11%

Below typical band (30–60%)

0%30–60% Yale band80%

Store EBITDA · annual
$105K
EBITDA margin
29.0%
Total invested
$911K
Payback
104 mo
Unit-level only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even Yale describes.

Levered LBO scenario · Yale Crease Capital framing

What would 25 BFT units return on equity?

Edit assumptions

Equity IRR · 5-yr

49.9%

7.57× MOIC

Year-1 DSCR

1.88×

EBITDA ÷ debt service

Equity required

$1.6M

on $7.9M purchase

Total debt

$6.4M

SBA $4.0M + senior + seller note

Overview

About

BFT franchisees operate boutique fitness studio locations (likely specialized fitness classes based on Xponential Fitness portfolio). Day-to-day operations include managing class schedules, instructor staffing, member retention programs, facility maintenance, and generating revenue through class packages, memberships, and ancillary services. Franchisees are responsible for local marketing, community partnerships, and maintaining brand standards while remitting 7% of gross sales to the franchisor.

CEO
Michael Nuzzo
Founded
2023
FDD year
2025
States available
20

Item 7 · what it costs

The Vitals

Total investment
$510K – $1.2M
All-in to open one unit
Liquid capital
$30K – $78K
Cash you must have on hand
Franchise fee
$60K
Royalty
7.0%
Percentage of Gross Sales · typical 6–8%
Ad fund
2.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
9.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Item 19

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$361K
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$329K
Item 19 type
Gross Revenue
Sample size
29 units
vs category median 12 · large
Range (low → high)
$167K$746K
Cohort dispersion
Transparency
4 / 5
vs category median 4 / 5 · typical
Revenue rank16th
vs Health & Fitness peers
Investment cost rank87th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank27th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank70th
vs Health & Fitness peers
Risk score rank76th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
49
Opened
21
Last reporting year
Closed
2
Turnover rate
4.1%
Company-owned
0
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
100%
vs corporate-owned
Multi-unit owners
5.0%
Net growth (yr3)
+53.1%
Net unit change last year
3-yr CAGR
Outlier (see FDD)
Likely small-sample artifact
2023
49+17
Franchised units
2024
32
Franchised units
2025
2
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 22 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator — not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Registered · 22 states
Not registered

States derived from franchisee phone area codes (Item 20). Approximate — ported numbers may show the original state, not the franchisee's current location.

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

Total loans
23
Loan volume
Avg loan
Default rate
0.0%
vs <3% typical · system-wide
5-yr default

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 5, 6, 12, 17

Risk & Legal

66
Risk · 0-100
MODERATE66 / 100

HIGH RISK: Litigation-laden franchisor with going concern issues at parent level, no earnings disclosure, regulatory consent orders, and unverified unit economics despite rapid growth claims.

Score breakdown · what drove the 66 / 100 rating

  1. 01HIGHGoing concern status is FALSE — indicates potential financial instability or restructuring at parent company level
  2. 02HIGHActive litigation across multiple jurisdictions with specific allegations of fraudulent inducement and disclosure violations — suggests systemic franchisor credibility issues
  3. 03MINORTwo regulatory consent orders (CA and WA) demonstrate state-level enforcement actions for violations
  4. 04MINORPending securities class actions and shareholder derivative suits against parent company (Xponential Fitness) create uncertainty about franchisor's financial viability and management integrity
  5. 05MINORNo Item 19 (Average Unit Volume) disclosure despite $509K-$1.2M investment range — inability or unwillingness to substantiate average franchisee earnings
  6. 06MINOR53.1% YoY unit growth appears strong but occurs within shrinking or restructuring parent company — growth may be artificial or unsustainable
  7. 07MEDHigh royalty burden (7%) combined with undisclosed net income and only $360K average revenue creates profitability uncertainty
  8. 08MINOR10-year term locks franchisees into commitment during period of parent company legal and financial distress

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

FDD Items 5, 6, 12, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Territory
Area-based
Protected territory
Yes
Initial term
10 years
Renewal term
10 years
Online sales rights
Restricted
Franchisor can compete
Yes
Hire a manager?
Allowed
Litigation count
14
Right of first refusal
Yes
Franchisor can buy back on resale
Mandatory arbitration
Yes
Jury trial waiver
Yes
Non-compete
2 yrs
Post-termination restriction
Owner-operator
Optional
Governing law
California

Item 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
50 hrs
On-the-job training
24 hrs
POS system
ClubReady
Operating tech stack

Item 20

Franchisee Contacts

Phone numbers extracted directly from this brand's FDD Item 20. After purchase, you'll also receive a list of validation questions tailored to this brand.

Franchisee contacts

60 numbers

Locked
(415) 972-••••
One Sansome Street, Ste.
CA
(949) 346-••••
The franchisor is BFT Franchise SPV, LLC,
CA
(408) 333-••••
CA

One-time purchase · CSV download · Validation questions included

FDD download

BFT · FDD (2025) PDF

Single-page checkout · instant download · CSV export of contacts available separately above