Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Assisted Living Locators logo

Assisted Living Locators Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Senior CareAZFranchising since 2006
CAverageAverage38/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$74K – $94K
Disclosed sales
$156K
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
35.7%
on 36 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-00191Data QualityExcellent91%FDD 2022 · 4yr old
Owner-operator requiredYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

This data is from a 2022 FDD. Current terms may differ. Always verify with the franchisor's latest disclosure document.

Assisted Living Locators is a senior-care franchise that helps families find assisted living, memory care, and in-home care options. Franchisees run an advisory business assessing needs and matching clients to providers, earning placement fees, typically home-based.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Assisted Living Locators franchise requires a total initial investment of $74K – $94K, including a $50K franchise fee and an ongoing 8.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2022 FDD, average revenue per franchisee was $156K. This franchisor reports Item 19 per franchisee rather than per outlet, so the figure is not comparable with per-outlet averages[2]. SBA 7(a) loans show a 35.7% charge-off rate across 36 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: C (Average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: high - issued more than two years ago

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored8 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$74K – $94K
19th pct Senior Care
Avg gross sales
$156K
Per franchisee, not per outlet
Royalty
8.0%
85th pct Senior Care
Units
133
71st pct Senior Care
SBA charge-off
35.7%
% of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category

Quick verdict · Senior Care · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$74K – $94K
Median $137K
below median ↓, better than category
Franchise Fee
$50K – $50K
Median $50K
near median
Liquid Capital Req'd
$7K – $10K
Median $38K
below median ↓, better than category
Avg Revenue
$156K
Median $1.1M
Per franchisee, not per outlet
Royalty Rate
8.0%
Median 5.0%
above median ↑, worse than category
Ongoing Fees
10.0% of rev
Median 7.0%
above median ↑, worse than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
35.7%
36 loans · Median 3.9%
above median ↑, worse than category
System Size
133 units
Median 25 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
12.0%
Median 2.1%
above median ↑, worse than category
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Required
You must run it yourself
Litigation
2 cases
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Senior Care median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $74K – $94K including a $50K franchise fee, 8.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage revenue per franchisee of $156K/year (median $105K). Averaged per franchisee, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures.
  • RISKVerdict C (Average), verdict score 38/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 35.7% across 36 loans (well above the 16% franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
  • GROWTHPositive: net +1 franchised outlets in the latest year (17 opened, 16 closed) (Item 20).

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
ALL Franchising, LLC
Parent company
EHC Holding Company, LLC
Ultimate parent
The Riverside Company
Predecessor
CALLRN Franchise LLC
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
Chief Executive Officer
Tim Hadley
Founder active
Yes
Original founder still leading the business
Incorporated in
DE
HQ
7330 E. Earll Drive, Suite E, Scottsdale, Arizona 85251
Auditor
RC Consulting LLC
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$2.4M
vs $2.2M prior year
Management churn noted
Frequent turnover
Item 2 disclosed frequent executive changes

Same owner · FDD Item 1

4 other brands on this site name The Riverside Company as parent or ultimate parent in their own FDD.

Portfolio: The Riverside Company (private-equity sponsor)

Grouped by the owner's name as each filing prints it (this page: the 2022 FDD). Spelling variants of the same group may be listed apart; a brand is never grouped with an owner its filing does not name.

Overview

About

CEO
Tim Hadley
Headquarters
AZ
Founded
2003
FDD year
2022
States available
34

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 38% below the typical senior care franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$74K – $94KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 20 of the 2022 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$49,500Verified — printed on page 13 of the 2022 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty8.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 15 of the 2022 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund2.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 15 of the 2022 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$7K – $10K

Source: FDD 2022 · Items 5–7

Full Item 7 breakdown17 line items

Initial investment breakdown

Item 7 initial investment line items
Line itemLowHigh
Initial Franchise Feenot refundable$50K$50K
Business Set-Up Feenot refundable$10K$10K
Food, Lodging & Travel (1 person while training)$1K$2K
Real Estate, Buildout and Improvements——
Furniture & Furnishings (for home office)$0$500
Technology Systems$0$3K
Technology Fees (pre-opening)not refundable$495$844
Marketing Fees (pre-opening)not refundable$3K$3K
Utility Deposits$0$300
Certified Senior Advisor (CSA) Certification Fee$990$1K
Dementia Care Certification Fee$0$125
Business Licenses$50$1K
Professional Fees$300$3K
Vehicle (title, registration, deposit & 3 lease payments)$0$5K
Vehicle Wraps (Optional)$0$3K
Insurance (12 months' premium)$2K$3K
Additional Funds (3 months)$7K$10K
Total initial investment$74K$94K

Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$74K – $94K
Top 40% of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$7K – $10K
Top 40% of category vs category
Franchise fee
$50K – $50K
Top 40% of category vs category
Royalty
8.0%
Set by a formula · typical 6–8%
Ad fund
2.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
10.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Assisted Living Locators: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty8.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund2.0%
Technology fee$199
Transfer fee$10K
Renewal fee$8K
Total fee load10.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 85% below the senior care norm.

Avg gross sales$156K

Averaged per franchisee, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures

Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 53 of the 2022 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$105KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 53 of the 2022 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typeGross Invoiced Revenues an…
Sample size75 franchisees

Source: FDD 2022 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Assisted Living Locators until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$93K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Assisted Living Locators unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per franchisee, per year (NOT per outlet)FDD
FDD Item 19 reports $156,265 per franchisee — not per outlet. Every other input below is for ONE unit; replace this with a single-unit figure before relying on the ROIC.
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $74K–$94K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $7K–$10K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$93K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2022 FDD

Financial Performance

Averaged per franchisee, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures

Avg gross sales
$156K
Per franchisee, per year — not per outlet
Median gross sales
$105K
Per franchisee, not per outlet

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
Gross Invoiced Revenues and Gross Collected Revenues by quartile
Sample size
75 franchisees
vs category median 22 · large
Range (low → high)
$2K→$901KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 53 of the 2022 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Reporting year
2021
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2022
Disclosed in the 2022 filing, covering 2021
Transparency
7 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · above
Gross sales rank
No comparison data
Investment cost rank19th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank85th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank71th
vs Senior Care peers
Risk score rank95th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 79 Senior Care brands

Showing the headline figures — all 147 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

The average franchisee generates $156K/year in gross sales. Median is $105K — top performers pull the average up, so a typical unit earns less.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 10.0% — above the Senior Care median of 7.0%.

Disclosure

Transparency score 7/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System roughly stable (+4.0% 3-year CAGR) with 133 units.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Senior Care medians

How Assisted Living Locators Compares

Metric
Assisted Living Locators
Category median
vs median
Investment
$84K
$137Kmiddle half $110K–$185K · n=78
Below median, better than category
Revenue
$156K
$1.1Mmiddle half $796K–$1.4M · n=31
Not compared

Per franchisee, not per outlet - the category median is per-outlet only, so no comparison is shown

Unit Count
133
25middle half 6–172 · n=78
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Senior Care brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units133Verified — printed on page 55 of the 2022 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it three ways.
3-yr growth+4.0% (favorable vs category)
Turnover rate12.0% (caution)

Source: FDD 2022 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
133
Opened
17
Last reporting year
Closed
16
Terminated
5
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
12.0%
Company-owned
3
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
98%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
+4.0%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+4.0%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
5
Not renewed
0
Transferred
2
Reacquired
2
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
0
0.00 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
22
Franchisor's next-year forecast
Transfer rate
1.5%
Owners selling to other franchisees
Continuity rate
89.0%
Units that stayed open
Termination rate
3.8%
Franchisor-initiated terminations
Ceased ops
6.8%
Units that stopped operating
2019
125
Franchised units
2020
129+4
Franchised units
2021
130+1
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 21 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 21 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

57 current owners across 21 states.

  • FL 9
  • CA 8
  • AZ 7
  • MD 5
  • MI 4
  • CO 3
  • AL 2
  • GA 2
  • IL 2
  • IN 2
  • KS 2
  • MA 2
  • +9 more states

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

F
SBA Lending Health
Weak SBA lending record · 35.7% charge-off
Total loans
36
Loan volume
$8.9M
Median loan
$150K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
35.7%
on 36 loans · rates vary by category · see methodology

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
64.3%
5-yr charge-off
50.0%
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
9
Defaults
5
Typical loan rate
8.0%
avg rate to borrowers
Franchised industry avg
14.0%
brand above franchise avg ↑
Jobs supported
103
1.1 per loan
Lender concentration
50%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 92% went to startups / new businesses, 8% to established operators

Franchise vs independent — in services for the elderly and persons with disabi, franchised businesses charge off at 14.0% vs 12.2% for independents — franchising is associated with 15% higher SBA default risk in this category.

Top lenders financing Assisted Living Locators franchisees

United Midwest Savings Bank National Association18 loans50.0%
Celtic Bank Corporation10 loans28.6%
First Bank of the Lake2 loans—

Showing 3 of 9 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for Assisted Living Locators from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Principal loss rate
5.2%
Avg SBA guarantee
83%
Avg interest rate
8.02%
Avg chargeoff amount
$94K
Lender concentration
50.0%
Job velocity
1.1 per $100K
NAICS benchmark
27.4%
NAICS 624120
Jobs supported
103

Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 50% of loans

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
1United Midwest Savings Bank National Association18$2.5M50.0%
2Celtic Bank Corporation10$1.5M28.6%
3First Bank of the Lake2$255KN/A
4Wilson & Muir Bank & Trust Company1$3.5MN/A
5Citizens Bank1$338KN/A
6U.S. Bank, National Association1$646KN/A
7Meredith Village Savings Bank1$50KN/A
8Bell Bank1$91KN/A
9First Business Bank1$50K0.0%

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
AZArizona30--
CACalifornia3150.0%
FLFlorida31100.0%
OHOhio30--
TXTexas300.0%
COColorado200.0%
INIndiana20--
KYKentucky200.0%
LALouisiana21100.0%
MAMassachusetts200.0%

SBA 7(a) lending trend

2015
3
2016
5
2017
2
2018
5
2019
4
2020
4
2021
1
2023
3
2024
4
2025
3
2026
2

Borrower profile

Startup22 (85%)
New (< 2 yr)2 (8%)
Existing (2+ yr)2 (8%)

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

Lending insight

A 35.7% charge-off rate means roughly 1 in 3 franchisees failed to repay their SBA loan. Investigate what changed.

What could kill this investment?

SBA loans charge off at 35.7% — 123% above the 16.0% national norm, i.e. higher lender-observed risk.

SBA charge-off35.7% · 36 loans
Verdict score38/100 (higher is better)
Litigation2 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

CAverage38Verdict score 38/100
High confidence±8 pts
3046

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: the franchisor is a named party (plaintiff).

1 pending arbitration (CALLRN v. Vasia Corp, et al.) for breach of franchise agreements; 1 concluded lawsuit (CALLRN v. JL2 Holdings, et al.) for trademark infringement and violation of post-termination noncompetition covenants, settled with franchisor repurchasing 3 territories

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · RC Consulting LLC

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $2.4MYr 2: $2.2MNon-royalty: $0.3M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 38 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MEDSystem contracting sharply: only 0.8% YoY unit growth with 133 units suggests stagnation or decline; mature systems typically grow 3-5%
  2. 02HIGHLitigation pattern: two separate legal actions (one pending arbitration, one settled) indicate franchisor-franchisee disputes over compliance and post-termination conduct, signaling enforcement issues

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 147 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 10.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term5 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training30 hrs

Source: FDD 2022 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term5 years
Allowed renewalsℹ4
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory population300,000
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorRequired
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Right of first refusalℹYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice10 days
Curable defaultsℹ2
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationMaricopa County, Arizona
Jury trial waiverNo
Governing lawAZ
Litigation count2
View Item 3 litigation summary

1 pending arbitration (CALLRN v. Vasia Corp, et al.) for breach of franchise agreements; 1 concluded lawsuit (CALLRN v. JL2 Holdings, et al.) for trademark infringement and violation of post-termination noncompetition covenants, settled with franchisor repurchasing 3 territories

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
24 hrs
On-the-job training
5 hrs
Training location
Corporate Office, Scottsdale, Arizona
Ongoing training
Required
Field support
2 hrs/yr
On-site visits per year
Time to open
2 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
Franchisee (home-based; no commercial space required)
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
ALL-IN
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Technology: ALL-IN

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

57 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 57 contacts · $49
Free preview
(561) 692-••••FL
Unlock all 57 contacts
(772) 783-••••FL
(305) 506-••••FL
(402) 671-••••NE
(760) 904-••••CA

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Assisted Living Locators franchise?

The total investment to open a Assisted Living Locators franchise ranges from $74K – $94K, with an initial franchise fee of $50K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Assisted Living Locators franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Assisted Living Locators FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $156K. The median is $105K. Important context: Averaged per franchisee, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Assisted Living Locators?

Assisted Living Locators is franchised by ALL Franchising, LLC. Its parent company is EHC Holding Company, LLC. The ultimate parent named in the FDD is The Riverside Company. Source: FDD Item 1, 2022 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Assisted Living Locators FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Assisted Living Locators FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Assisted Living Locators's franchise failure rate?

Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, Assisted Living Locators has a charge-off rate of 35.7% across 36 loans, meaning 35.7% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.

How many Assisted Living Locators franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Assisted Living Locators has 133 total units in the United States, including 130 franchised units and 3 company-owned units. 17 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Assisted Living Locators a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Assisted Living Locators as a C-grade franchise with a verdict score of 38 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Assisted Living Locators, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Senior Care franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Senior Care category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.