Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
1-800 WATER DAMAGE logo

1-800 Water Damage Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Home ServicesMIFranchising since 2015
DBelow averageBelow average36/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$143K – $312K
Disclosed sales
$512K
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
20.0%
on 24 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-00003FDD 2026Data QualityExcellent91%
Owner-operator requiredNo: No territory protection

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

1-800 Water Damage is a restoration franchise handling emergency water damage, drying, and mold remediation for homes and businesses. Franchisees run field crews on emergency mitigation and restoration jobs, often through insurance referrals.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A 1-800 WATER DAMAGE franchise requires a total initial investment of $143K – $312K, including a $59K – $65K franchise fee and an ongoing 10.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2026 FDD, average revenue per franchisee was $512K. This franchisor reports Item 19 per franchisee rather than per outlet, so the figure is not comparable with per-outlet averages[2]. SBA 7(a) loans show a 20.0% charge-off rate across 24 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: D (Below average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: low - issued within the last 12 months

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored7 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing; the rest are marked “Not cited” beside the figure.

Overview

Investment
$143K – $312K
55th pct Home Services
Avg gross sales
$512K
Per franchisee, not per outletOutlet subset
Royalty
10.0%
75th pct Home Services
Units
160
71st pct Home Services
SBA charge-off
20.0%
% of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category

Quick verdict · Home Services · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$143K – $312K
Median $168K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$59K – $65K
Median $50K
above median ↑, worse than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$10K – $30K
Median $29K
below median ↓, better than category
Avg Revenue
$512K
Median $587K
Per franchisee, not per outletOutlet subset
Royalty Rate
10.0%
Median 6.0%
above median ↑, worse than category
Ongoing Fees
12.0% of rev
Median 8.0%
above median ↑, worse than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
20.0%
24 loans · Median 15.4%
above median ↑, worse than category
System Size
160 units
Median 47 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
15.6%
Median 4.3%
above median ↑, worse than category
Territory
None
The franchisor can open or license outlets nearby
Owner-Operator
Required
You must run it yourself
Litigation
3 cases
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Home Services median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $143K – $312K including a $59K franchise fee, 10.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage revenue per franchisee of $512K/year (median $354K) (reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system). Averaged per franchisee, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures.
  • RISKVerdict D (Below average), verdict score 36/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 20.0% across 24 loans (above the 16% franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
  • GROWTHNegative: net -15 franchised outlets in the latest year (10 opened, 25 closed); 4 signed but not yet open (Item 20).
  • FLAG25 units terminated last reporting year (15.6% of the system). Ask existing franchisees why.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
1-800 WATER DAMAGE International, LLC
Parent company
BELFOR Franchise Group, LLC (f/k/a DUCTZ Holdings, LLC)
FDD Item 1, page 9 of the 2026 FDD
Ultimate parent
ASP BF Intermediate Sub, LLC / BELFOR Holdings, Inc.
FDD Item 1, page 9 of the 2026 FDD
Predecessor
LLB Group, Inc. (f/k/a The Cure Service Group, Inc.)
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
Chief Executive Officer
Sheldon Yellen
Incorporated in
Delaware
HQ
5405 Data Court, Ann Arbor, MI 48108
Auditor
BDO USA, P.C.
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$30.1M
vs $29.5M prior year

Same owner · FDD Item 1, page 9

10 other brands on this site name ASP BF Intermediate Sub, LLC / BELFOR Holdings, Inc. as parent or ultimate parent in their own FDD.

Portfolio: BELFOR Franchise Group

Grouped by the owner's name as each filing prints it (this page: the 2026 FDD). Spelling variants of the same group may be listed apart; a brand is never grouped with an owner its filing does not name.

Overview

About

CEO
Sheldon Yellen
Headquarters
MI
Founded
2015
FDD year
2026
States available
33

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 35% above the typical home services franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$143K – $312KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 27 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$59,000Verified — printed on page 15 of the 2026 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty10.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 19 of the 2026 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund2.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 20 of the 2026 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$10K – $30K

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 5–7

FDD Item 7 · 2026 filing

Initial investment breakdown

1-800 WATER DAMAGE: Item 7 initial investment breakdown
Cost componentLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$59K$59K
Working capital (3–6 mo)$10K$30K
Equipment, build-out, other$74K$223K
Total initial investment$143K$312K

Source: 1-800 WATER DAMAGE 2026 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$143K – $312K
Middle of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$10K – $30K
Top 40% of category vs category
Franchise fee
$59K – $65K
Middle of category vs category
Royalty
10.0%
Tiered by sales volume · typical 6–8%
Ad fund
2.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
12.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

1-800 WATER DAMAGE: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty10.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund2.0% of gross sales
Technology fee$750
Transfer fee$10K
Renewal fee$6K
Total fee load12.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 13% below the home services norm.

Avg gross sales$512K

Averaged per franchisee, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures

Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system

Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 62 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$354KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 62 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typegross sales
Sample size46 franchisees

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for 1-800 WATER DAMAGE until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$248K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one 1-800 WATER DAMAGE unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per franchisee, per year (NOT per outlet)FDD
FDD Item 19 reports $512,051 per franchisee — not per outlet. Every other input below is for ONE unit; replace this with a single-unit figure before relying on the ROIC. — Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system. Adjust to a franchisee figure before relying on this.
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $143K–$312K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $10K–$30K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$248K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2026 FDD

Financial Performance

Averaged per franchisee, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures

Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system

Avg gross sales
$512K
Per franchisee, per year — not per outlet
Median gross sales
$354K
Per franchisee, not per outlet

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
gross sales
Sample size
46 franchisees
vs category median 32
Range (low → high)
$0→$2.2MNot cited — published from our reading of the franchisor's disclosure document; the page it is printed on has not been located.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Reporting year
2025
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2026
Disclosed in the 2026 filing, covering 2025
Transparency
4 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · typical
Gross sales rank
No comparison data
Investment cost rank55th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank75th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank71th
vs Home Services peers
Risk score rank89th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 319 Home Services brands

Showing the headline figures — all 150 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

The average franchisee generates $512K/year in gross sales. Median is $354K — top performers pull the average up, so a typical unit earns less. Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 12.0% — above the Home Services median of 8.0%.

Disclosure

Transparency score 4/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System contracting at -10.1% CAGR over 3 years. Investigate whether closures are franchisor-driven consolidation or franchisee exits.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Home Services medians

How 1-800 Water Damage Compares

Metric
1-800 Water Damage
Category median
vs median
Investment
$228K
$168Kmiddle half $122K–$232K · n=283
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
$512K
$587Kmiddle half $376K–$1.3M · n=79
Not compared

Per franchisee, not per outlet - the category median is per-outlet only, so no comparison is shown

Unit Count
160
47middle half 14–137 · n=283
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Home Services brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units160Verified — printed on page 64 of the 2026 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it three ways.
3-yr growth-10.1% (worth scrutinizing)
Turnover rate15.6% (caution)

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
160
Opened
10
Last reporting year
Closed
25
Terminated
25
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
15.6%
Company-owned
0
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
100%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
-10.1%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
-10.1%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
25
Not renewed
0
Transferred
7
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
4
0.03 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
20
Franchisor's next-year forecast
2023
178
Franchised units
2024
175-3
Franchised units
2025
160-15
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 4 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 4 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

6 current owners across 4 states.

  • MI 2
  • MT 2
  • GA 1
  • NY 1

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

Growth insight

A system losing more than 10% of its units year-over-year is a red flag. Check whether closures are concentrated in specific regions.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

D
SBA Lending Health
Below-average SBA lending record · 20.0% charge-off
Total loans
24
Loan volume
$6.1M
Median loan
$150K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
20.0%
on 24 loans · rates vary by category · see methodology

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
80.0%
5-yr charge-off
50.0%
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
11
Defaults
2
Typical loan rate
7.0%
avg rate to borrowers
Franchised industry avg
12.9%
brand above franchise avg ↑
Jobs supported
135
2.2 per loan
Lender concentration
42%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 67% went to startups / new businesses, 33% to established operators

Franchise vs independent — in remediation services, franchised businesses charge off at 12.9% vs 10.4% for independents — franchising is associated with 24% higher SBA default risk in this category.

Top lenders financing 1-800 Water Damage franchisees

United Midwest Savings Bank National Association10 loans33.3%
Waukesha State Bank2 loans0.0%
Stearns Bank National Association2 loans0.0%

Showing 3 of 11 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for 1-800 Water Damage from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Principal loss rate
3.5%
Avg SBA guarantee
81%
Avg interest rate
7.03%
Avg chargeoff amount
$106K
Lender concentration
41.7%
Job velocity
2.2 per $100K
NAICS benchmark
10.2%
NAICS 562910
Jobs supported
135

Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 42% of loans

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
1United Midwest Savings Bank National Association10$1.5M33.3%
2Waukesha State Bank2$225K0.0%
3Stearns Bank National Association2$262K0.0%
4Centier Bank2$215K0.0%
5Live Oak Banking Company2$2.9MN/A
6Quad City Bank and Trust Company1$53K0.0%
7The Bancorp Bank National Association1$131KN/A
8Synovus Bank1$318KN/A
9Celtic Bank Corporation1$150KN/A
10Readycap Lending, LLC1$280KN/A

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
TXTexas3266.7%
FLFlorida200.0%
GAGeorgia20--
INIndiana200.0%
NCNorth Carolina200.0%
WAWashington20--
WIWisconsin200.0%
AZArizona10--
CTConnecticut10--
IAIowa100.0%

SBA 7(a) lending trend

2018
4
2019
3
2020
6
2021
6
2022
3
2024
1
2025
1

Borrower profile

Startup15 (63%)
Existing (2+ yr)5 (21%)
Ownership change2 (8%)
Unanswered1 (4%)
New (< 2 yr)1 (4%)

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

Lending insight

A 20.0% charge-off rate means roughly 1 in 5 franchisees failed to repay their SBA loan. Investigate what changed.

What could kill this investment?

SBA loans charge off at 20.0% — 25% above the 16.0% national norm, i.e. higher lender-observed risk.

SBA charge-off20.0% · 24 loans
Verdict score36/100 (higher is better)
Litigation3 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

DBelow average36Verdict score 36/100

Declining franchise system with regulatory baggage, no profit transparency, and recent litigation despite solid gross revenue—presents elevated risk for new franchisees entering a contracting network.

High confidence±4 pts
3240

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: the franchisor is a named party (plaintiff).

Two concluded predecessor (LLB Group/Cure Service Group) regulatory matters: a 2006 settlement with the California Corporations Commissioner over unregistered franchise sales, and a 2006 New York Assurance of Discontinuance ($4,750 paid). One franchisor action: 1-800 Water Damage International, LLC v. Restoration Rx, LLC et al. (E.D. Mich. 2:2024-cv-10110), filed Jan 2024 for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and trademark infringement against a former franchisee; settled confidentially December 2025.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · BDO USA, P.C.

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $30.1MYr 2: $29.5M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

ⓘ These are the parent company's consolidated financials (the parent guarantees the franchisor), not this brand's standalone results — the figure reflects the whole corporate group, not this brand alone.

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes

Score breakdown · what drove the 36 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINORDeclining unit count (-8.6% YoY) suggests system contraction and franchisee attrition
  2. 02MINORRegulatory history: LLB Group settled with CA and NY regulators for unregistered sales and failure to disclose prior lawsuits, indicating compliance and disclosure failures
  3. 03HIGHRecent litigation against franchisee Restoration Rx LLC (settled Dec 2025) signals franchisor-franchisee disputes
  4. 04MEDHigh initial investment ($59k franchise fee + $71-312k total) relative to undisclosed net income creates ROI uncertainty
  5. 05MINOR10% royalty on first tier is aggressive for a service business with thin margins; reconstruction at 3% suggests potential royalty disputes or tiered performance issues

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 150 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 12.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term5 yrs
Renewal term5 yrs
TerritoryNone (caution)
Initial training112 hrs

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term5 years
Renewal term5 years
Allowed renewalsℹ2
Territory typeNo territory protection
Protected territoryNo
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory population350,000
Online sales rightsRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorRequired
Non-compete (years)ℹ1 year
Non-compete (miles)ℹ50 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
RoFR response window30 days
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice15 days
Curable defaultsℹ16
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationAnn Arbor, Michigan
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawMI
Litigation count3
View Item 3 litigation summary

Two concluded predecessor (LLB Group/Cure Service Group) regulatory matters: a 2006 settlement with the California Corporations Commissioner over unregistered franchise sales, and a 2006 New York Assurance of Discontinuance ($4,750 paid). One franchisor action: 1-800 Water Damage International, LLC v. Restoration Rx, LLC et al. (E.D. Mich. 2:2024-cv-10110), filed Jan 2024 for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and trademark infringement against a former franchisee; settled confidentially December 2025.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
112 hrs
On-the-job training
39 hrs
Training location
Ann Arbor, MI or virtual
Ongoing training
Required
Time to open
4 mo
From signing to launch
Franchisor financing
Offered
Item 10
POS system
WATER DAMAGE Software
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✗Site selection assistance
✗Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Technology: WATER DAMAGE Software

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

6 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 6 contacts · $49
Free preview
(404) 797-••••GA
Unlock all 6 contacts
(810) 623-••••MI
(406) 407-••••MT
(734) 864-••••MI
(631) 413-••••NY

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a 1-800 WATER DAMAGE franchise?

The total investment to open a 1-800 WATER DAMAGE franchise ranges from $143K – $312K, with an initial franchise fee of $59K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do 1-800 WATER DAMAGE franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the 1-800 WATER DAMAGE FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $512K. The median is $354K. Important context: Averaged per franchisee, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures; Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns 1-800 WATER DAMAGE?

1-800 WATER DAMAGE is franchised by 1-800 WATER DAMAGE International, LLC. Its parent company is BELFOR Franchise Group, LLC (f/k/a DUCTZ Holdings, LLC). The ultimate parent named in the FDD is ASP BF Intermediate Sub, LLC / BELFOR Holdings, Inc.. Source: FDD Item 1, 2026 filing.

What is Item 19 in the 1-800 WATER DAMAGE FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the 1-800 WATER DAMAGE FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is 1-800 WATER DAMAGE's franchise failure rate?

Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, 1-800 WATER DAMAGE has a charge-off rate of 20.0% across 24 loans, meaning 20.0% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.

How many 1-800 WATER DAMAGE franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, 1-800 WATER DAMAGE has 160 total units in the United States, including 160 franchised units and 0 company-owned units. 10 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is 1-800 WATER DAMAGE a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates 1-800 WATER DAMAGE as a D-grade franchise with a verdict score of 36 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent 1-800 WATER DAMAGE, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Home Services franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Home Services category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.