Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Ziebart logo

Ziebart Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

AutomotiveMIFranchising since 1962
AStrongest tierStrongest tier71/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$450K – $924K
Disclosed sales
$1.4M
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
12.5%
on 25 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-03043FDD 2025Data QualityExcellent91%
Manager-run OKYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Ziebart is an automotive franchise providing vehicle protection services, rustproofing, undercoating, detailing, films, and accessories. Franchisees run a service center managing applications, technicians, and dealer and retail accounts.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Ziebart franchise requires a total initial investment of $450K – $924K, including a $45K franchise fee and an ongoing 8.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2025 FDD, average unit revenue was $1.4M[2]. SBA 7(a) loans show a 12.5% charge-off rate across 25 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: A (Strongest tier), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - issued 12 to 24 months ago; a newer filing is likely on file

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored8 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$450K – $924K
45th pct Automotive
Avg gross sales
$1.4M
15th pct Automotive
Royalty
8.0%
40th pct Automotive
Units
96
30th pct Automotive
SBA charge-off
12.5%
% of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category

Quick verdict · Automotive · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$450K – $924K
Median $368K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$45K – $45K
Median $35K
above median ↑, worse than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$100K – $150K
Median $40K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
$1.4M
Median $1.0M
above median ↑, better than category
Royalty Rate
8.0%
Median 6.0%
above median ↑, worse than category
Ongoing Fees
10.0% of rev
Median 8.0%
above median ↑, worse than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
12.5%
25 loans · Median 12.9%
near median
System Size
96 units
Median 92 units
near median
Turnover Rate
2.4%
Median 2.4%
near median
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Optional
Can hire a manager
Litigation
None disclosed
Clean record

Green = favorable by >10% vs Automotive median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $450K – $924K including a $45K franchise fee, 8.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $1.4M/year (median $1.1M).
  • RISKVerdict A (Strongest tier), verdict score 71/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 12.5% across 25 loans (above the 16% franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
  • GROWTHFlat: no net change in franchised outlets in the latest year (2 opened, 2 closed); 5 signed but not yet open (Item 20).

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Ziebart Corporation
Parent company
Ziebart International Corporation
FDD Item 1, page 8 of the 2025 FDD
Predecessor
Artech Franchising, Inc. (for ARTECH-branded franchises only)
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
President and CEO of ZInt
Thomas A. Wolfe
Incorporated in
Michigan
HQ
1290 E. Maple, Troy, Michigan 48083
Auditor
BDO USA, P.C.
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$19.7M
vs $19.7M prior year

Overview

About

CEO
Thomas A. Wolfe
Headquarters
MI
Founded
1962
FDD year
2025
States available
22

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 87% above the typical automotive franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$450K – $924KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 22 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$45,000Verified — printed on page 14 of the 2025 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty8.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 16 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund2.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 16 of the 2025 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$100K – $150K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

FDD Item 7 · 2025 filing

Initial investment breakdown

Ziebart: Item 7 initial investment breakdown
Cost componentLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$45K$45K
Working capital (3–6 mo)$100K$150K
Equipment, build-out, other$305K$729K
Total initial investment$450K$924K

Source: Ziebart 2025 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$450K – $924K
Middle of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$100K – $150K
Middle of category vs category
Franchise fee
$45K – $45K
Top 40% of category vs category
Royalty
8.0%
Set by a formula · typical 6–8%
Ad fund
2.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
10.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Ziebart: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty8.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund2.0% of gross sales
Renewal fee$15
Total fee load10.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 38% above the automotive norm.

Avg gross sales$1.4MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 67 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$1.1MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 67 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typegross sales
Sample size71 outlets

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Ziebart until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$812K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Ziebart unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $1,418,929 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $450K–$924K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $100K–$150K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$812K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$1.4M
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$1.1M

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
gross sales
Sample size
71 outlets
vs category median 70
Range (low → high)
$253K→$5.0MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 66 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Reporting year
2024
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2025
Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2024
Transparency
4 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · typical
Gross sales rank15th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank45th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank40th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank30th
vs Automotive peers
Risk score rank17th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 167 Automotive brands

Showing the headline figures — all 150 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $1.4M/year in gross sales. Median is $1.1M — top performers pull the average up, so a typical unit earns less. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 2.1x.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 10.0% — above the Automotive median of 8.0%.

Disclosure

Transparency score 4/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Automotive medians

How Ziebart Compares

Metric
Ziebart
Category median
vs median
Investment
$687K
$368Kmiddle half $178K–$858K · n=95
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
$1.4M
$1.0Mmiddle half $695K–$1.8M · n=38
Above median, better than category
Unit Count
96
92middle half 23–293 · n=94
Near median

Category median of published Automotive brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units96Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 70 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Turnover rate2.4% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
96
Opened
2
Last reporting year
Closed
2
Turnover rate
2.4%
Company-owned
11
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
1%
vs corporate-owned

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Signed, not yet open
5
0.05 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
5
Franchisor's next-year forecast
2022
86
Franchised units
2023
85-1
Franchised units
2024
85±0
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 12 · 22 states reported

The Territory Map

FDD Item 12 reports the state count, but the specific list isn't in our current data. The map will appear once we re-extract from the FDD or enough franchisee contacts are available.

22

states with franchisees (per FDD Item 12)

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

B
SBA Lending Health
Strong SBA lending record · 12.5% charge-off
Total loans
25
Loan volume
$5.7M
Median loan
$225K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
12.5%
on 25 loans · rates vary by category · see methodology

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
87.5%
5-yr charge-off
0.0%
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
10
Defaults
2
Typical loan rate
6.8%
avg rate to borrowers
Franchised industry avg
17.8%
brand beats franchise avg ↓
Jobs supported
218
3.8 per loan
Lender concentration
36%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 80% went to startups / new businesses, 20% to established operators

Franchise vs independent — in automotive parts and accessories stores, franchised businesses charge off at 17.8% vs 19.5% for independents — franchising is associated with 9% lower SBA default risk in this category.

Top lenders financing Ziebart franchisees

The Huntington National Bank9 loans40.0%
St. Mary's CU6 loans0.0%
1st Source Bank2 loans0.0%

Showing 3 of 10 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Total loans
2
Loan volume
$1.0M
Charge-off rate
N/A
Jobs created
15

Historical SBA 504 lending data via CDCs, not predictive of future performance.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for Ziebart from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Principal loss rate
2.6%
Avg SBA guarantee
66%
Avg interest rate
6.76%
Avg chargeoff amount
$75K
Lender concentration
36.0%
Job velocity
3.8 per $100K
NAICS benchmark
14.6%
NAICS 441310
Jobs supported
218

Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 36% of loans

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
1The Huntington National Bank9$2.6M40.0%
2St. Mary's CU6$570K0.0%
31st Source Bank2$293K0.0%
4Truist Bank2$325K0.0%
5Wells Fargo Bank National Association1$397K0.0%
6Glacier Bank1$170K0.0%
7Community Financial Services Bank1$365KN/A
8LAF CU1$417KN/A
9Independent Bank1$256KN/A
10Citizens Bank, National Association1$360KN/A

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
MAMassachusetts600.0%
MIMichigan6250.0%
WVWest Virginia400.0%
INIndiana200.0%
UTUtah20--
AZArizona100.0%
KYKentucky10--
PAPennsylvania10--
WAWashington100.0%
WIWisconsin100.0%

SBA 7(a) lending trend

2014
3
2016
6
2017
1
2018
2
2019
2
2020
2
2022
2
2024
1
2025
3
2026
3

Borrower profile

Startup10 (67%)
New (< 2 yr)2 (13%)
Existing (2+ yr)2 (13%)
Ownership change1 (7%)

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

What could kill this investment?

SBA loans charge off at 12.5% — 22% below the 16.0% national norm, i.e. lower lender-observed risk.

SBA charge-off12.5% · 25 loans
Verdict score71/100 (higher is better)
Litigation0 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

AStrongest tier71Verdict score 71/100

Clean, long-established system (franchising since 1962): no litigation, no bankruptcy, audited financials, Item 19 disclosed. Strong net worth $6.15M and net income $3.68M on $19.7M revenue. Healthy 96-unit system with +4.3% growth, strong AUV ($1.35M) and very low 2.35% turnover.

High confidence±4 pts
6775

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: officers or affiliates. The franchisor is not a named party in these cases.

No litigation is required to be disclosed in Item 3.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · BDO USA, P.C.

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $19.7MYr 2: $19.7MNon-royalty: $0.1M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: No
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 71 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINORNo litigation or bankruptcy
  2. 02MINORNet worth $6.15M, net income $3.68M
  3. 03MINORStable 96-unit system, AUV $1.35M, 2.35% turnover

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 150 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 10.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training312 hrs

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term10 years
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory radius10 mi
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorOptional
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ15 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
RoFR response window30 days
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawMichigan
Litigation count0
View Item 3 litigation summary

No litigation is required to be disclosed in Item 3.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
132 hrs
On-the-job training
180 hrs
Ongoing training
Required
Site selection
Franchisee proposes; franchisor approves; franchisor refers to commercial real estate companies
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
iBart
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Technology: iBart

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

101 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 101 contacts · $49
Free preview
412.751.••••
Unlock all 101 contacts
440.845.••••
469-794-••••
317.577.••••
614.863.••••

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Ziebart franchise?

The total investment to open a Ziebart franchise ranges from $450K – $924K, with an initial franchise fee of $45K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Ziebart franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Ziebart FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $1.4M. The median is $1.1M. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Ziebart?

Ziebart is franchised by Ziebart Corporation. Its parent company is Ziebart International Corporation. Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Ziebart FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Ziebart FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Ziebart's franchise failure rate?

Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, Ziebart has a charge-off rate of 12.5% across 25 loans, meaning 12.5% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.

How many Ziebart franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Ziebart has 96 total units in the United States, including 85 franchised units and 11 company-owned units. 2 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Ziebart a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Ziebart as a A-grade franchise with a verdict score of 71 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Ziebart, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Automotive franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Automotive category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.