B65/100FDD 2025
We Make Footballers — Litigation & Risk
Education - Children's Programs · FDD Items 3, 4 & 5
Lower Risk
No litigation cases disclosed in FDD Items 3 and 4.
Source: FDD Items 3–5
FDD Items 3 & 4
Litigation Metrics
Cases disclosed
0
Total from FDD Items 3 and 4
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
—
Franchisor or officer bankruptcy
Overall risk score
65 / 100
FranchiseVerdict composite
Rating
MODERATE
STRONG / MODERATE / CAUTION / AVOID
FDD Items 5, 6 & 17 — what you give up
Contract Risk Indicators
Mandatory arbitration
Not required
You retain the right to sue in court
Jury trial waiver
Waived
You give up the right to a jury trial
Non-compete
2 yrs
Post-termination restriction on similar businesses
Franchisor can compete
Yes
Franchisor can open competing locations in or near your territory
Right of first refusal
Yes
Franchisor can match any purchase offer when you try to sell
Governing law
Florida
State whose law governs disputes — relevant if you're not based there
What drove the 65/100 rating
Risk Score Breakdown
- 01MINOROnly 1 unit in system with unknown growth trajectory — cannot validate scalability or franchisee success
- 02MINORNo average revenue or net income disclosure (no Item 19) — impossible to assess earning potential or ROI on $31k-$49k investment
- 03MINORRoyalty structure ($300/month minimum) creates cash flow risk for early-stage operators, especially in months 1-3
- 04MEDHigh royalty rate (8.6%) combined with undisclosed profitability makes unit economics opaque
- 05MINORSingle unit operator suggests brand is either pre-revenue, unproven, or intentionally limiting franchising — raises confidence questions
- 06MINOR5-year term is short for recouping franchise fee and reaching profitability in youth sports education
Severity inferred from FDD text — not a regulatory or legal classification
Litigation data from FDD Items 3, 4, and 5. SBA data from public 7(a) FOIA records (FY2020–present). Not legal advice — consult a franchise attorney before signing any franchise agreement.