Waters Edge Winery & Bistro Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026
- Investment
- $577K – $1.3M
- Disclosed sales
- $882K
- gross sales, not profit
- SBA charge-off
- Under 10 loans (8)
Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records
Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology
Waters Edge Winery & Bistro is a franchise operating urban wineries that make wine on-site and serve it with a bistro menu. Franchisees run the venues, managing winemaking, food service, and hospitality.
FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026
A WATERS EDGE WINERY & BISTRO franchise requires a total initial investment of $577K – $1.3M, including a $55K franchise fee and an ongoing 5.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2025 FDD, average unit revenue was $882K[2]. FranchiseVerdict grade: C (Average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →
Sources, dates and evidence
FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - issued 12 to 24 months ago; a newer filing is likely on file
Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✗ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored8 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.
Overview
- Investment
- $577K – $1.3M
- 26th pct Service Resta…
- Avg gross sales
- $882K
- 4th pct Service Resta…
- Royalty
- 5.0%
- 8th pct Service Resta…
- Units
- 10
- 13th pct Service Resta…
- SBA charge-off
- N/A
Quick verdict · Full-Service Restaurants · color = vs category peers
Green = favorable by >10% vs Full-Service Restaurants median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)
Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology
Bottom line
- COSTTotal investment $577K – $1.3M including a $55K franchise fee, 5.0% ongoing royalty.
- RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $882K/year (median $585K).
- RISKVerdict C (Average), verdict score 43/100 (higher is better).
- GROWTHNegative: net -2 franchised outlets in the latest year (0 opened, 2 closed); 4 signed but not yet open (Item 20).
- TERMSNo protected territory and the franchisor reserves the right to compete in your area. Clarify territorial boundaries before signing.
Item 1 · who you're contracting with
The Franchisor
Corporate structure & franchisor financials
- Legal entity
- Waters Edge Wineries, Inc.
- CEO title
- Chief Executive Officer
- Ken Lineberger
- Incorporated in
- Delaware
- HQ
- 8560 Vineyard Avenue, Suite 408, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
- Auditor
- CASHUK, WISEMAN, GOLDBERG, BIRNBAUM AND SALEM, LLP
- Audited financials
- Franchisor revenue
- $825K
- vs $688K prior year
Overview
About
- CEO
- Ken Lineberger
- Headquarters
- CA
- Founded
- 2012
- FDD year
- 2025
- States available
- 6
Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?
Entry cost runs 41% above the typical full-service restaurants franchise.
Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7
FDD Item 7 · 2025 filing
Initial investment breakdown
| Cost component | Low | High |
|---|---|---|
| Initial franchise fee | $55K | $55K |
| Working capital (3–6 mo) | $10K | $50K |
| Equipment, build-out, other | $512K | $1.2M |
| Total initial investment | $577K | $1.3M |
Source: WATERS EDGE WINERY & BISTRO 2025 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.
Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate
The Vitals
- Total investment
- $577K – $1.3M
- Top 40% of category vs category
- Liquid capital req'd
- $10K – $50K
- Top 40% of category vs category
- Franchise fee
- $55K – $55K
- Top 40% of category vs category
- Royalty
- 5.0%
- Tiered by sales volume · typical 6–8%
- Ad fund
- 2.0%
- typical 3–5%
- Total fee load
- 7.0%
- vs 9–13% typical
Ongoing fees · Item 6
| Fee | Amount |
|---|---|
| Royalty | 5.0% of gross sales |
| Marketing / ad fund | 2.0% of gross sales |
| Technology fee | $550 |
| Training fee | $4K |
| Transfer fee | $28K |
| Renewal fee | $5K |
| Inventory (initial) | $35K – $55K |
| Total fee load | 7.0% of rev |
What do units actually make?
Average unit sales run 45% below the full-service restaurants norm.
Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19
Single-unit · not modelled
Returns at a glance
An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for WATERS EDGE WINERY & BISTRO until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.
—
Not modelled yet
An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.
Total invested capital · disclosed
$987K
Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.
ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
What one unit earns on your invested capital
Model A · Single-Unit Return
Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.
Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.
Returns model · single-unit ROIC
What would one WATERS EDGE WINERY & BISTRO unit return on the cash you put in?
Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.
Unlevered ROIC · per unit
Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.
—
An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.
What 25 units return when you use SBA financing
Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition
Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).
This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.
What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.
Not modelled yet
An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.
A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.
These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.
Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD
Financial Performance
- Avg gross sales
- $882K
- Per unit, per year
- Median gross sales
- $585K
Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.
- Item 19 type
- gross sales
- Sample size
- 9 outlets
- vs category median 18
- Range (low → high)
- $221K→$2.6MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 41 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
- Cohort dispersion (min → max)
- Reporting year
- 2024
- Fiscal year the figures cover
- Source filing
- FDD 2025
- Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2024
- Transparency
- 6 / 10
- vs category median 3 / 10 · above
Compared against 801 Full-Service Restaurants brands
Revenue is only 0.9x the investment. This means each unit may take 5+ years to recoup the initial outlay at typical margins.
Operator outlook
What the numbers say
Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.
Unit economics
Average unit generates $882K/year in gross sales. Median is $585K — top performers pull the average up, so a typical unit earns less. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 0.9x.
Fee burden
Total ongoing fee load of 7.0% (near the Full-Service Restaurants median).
Disclosure
Transparency score 6/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.
Operator retention
System shrank 28.6% over 3 years — 2 closures. Ask existing franchisees about local market conditions.
Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.
vs Full-Service Restaurants medians
How Waters Edge Winery & Bistro Compares
Category median of published Full-Service Restaurants brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.
Is the system healthy?
Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20
Unit growth
Item 20 · unit dynamics
The Growth Chart
- Total units
- 10
- Opened
- 0
- Last reporting year
- Closed
- 2
- Terminated
- 0
- Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
- Non-renewed
- 0
- Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
- Turnover rate
- N/A
- Company-owned
- 0
- Corporate units in the system
- % franchised
- 100%
- vs corporate-owned
- Net growth (3-yr)
- -28.6%
- Net unit change over 3 years
- 3-yr CAGR
- -28.6%
- Compounded over last 3 years
Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers
- Terminated
- 0
- Not renewed
- 0
- Transferred
- 0
- Reacquired
- 0
- Franchisor bought back
- Signed, not yet open
- 4
- 0.40 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
- Projected new
- 4
- Franchisor's next-year forecast
- Continuity rate
- 81.7%
- Units that stayed open
Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.
Item 20 · 3 states with active franchisees
The Territory Map
Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).
States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.
Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list
6 current owners across 3 states.
- CA 2
- OK 2
- TX 2
Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.
SBA loan performance
Government records
SBA Loan Data
Aggregated from SBA loan disclosures. This brand has only 8 7(a) loans on file; statistical reliability is limited below 10 loans.
- Total loans
- 8
- Loan volume
- $7.0M
- Median loan
- $873K
- average
- Charge-off rate
- Under 10 loans (8)
- Insufficient SBA coverage: 8 loans, rate hidden below 10
Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated
- Repayment rate (PIF)
- Under 10 loans (8)
- 5-yr charge-off
- Under 10 loans (8)
- Loans approved 2021+
- Active lenders
- 8
- Defaults
- N/A
Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.
What could kill this investment?
Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21
Risk analysis
FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21
Risk & Legal
Waters Edge Winery has three concluded litigation matters (including a franchisor suit against a former franchisee settled Sept 2023 for $300,000) on a small 10-unit system, with revenue of $825,440 and a -28.6% net unit decline. Item 19 disclosed (avg gross sales $881,555) but three suits relative to just 10 units plus contraction stack up. No bankruptcy or going-concern.
Litigation (Item 3)
Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).
Waters Edge Wineries, Inc. filed federal complaint against franchisee Wine Vibes, LLC and principals (Sherifat Lawal, Tamesha Hampton, Phelicia Colvin) on October 26, 2022 for breach of contract, trademark infringement, false designation of origin, misappropriation of trade secrets (DTSA/CUTSA), and unfair competition. Defendants countersued. Settled September 26, 2023 with $300,000 payment (reducible to $200,000 in installments if compliant). Also concluded: California Commissioner of Financial Protection and Innovation v. Waters Edge Wineries (Consent Order, November 10, 2021) for violation of undertaking regarding promissory note payment during registration period.
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
None disclosed
Audited financials (Item 21)
Yes · CASHUK, WISEMAN, GOLDBERG, BIRNBAUM AND SALEM, LLP
Franchisor revenue (Item 21)
Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)
Item 21 audited financial statements (Exhibit G, "Financial Statements of Waters Edge Wineries, Inc. as of December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022") are present in the FDD but the exhibit pages are image-based and did not OCR into the text, so no balance-sheet figures (assets/liabilities/net worth/net income) or auditor name could be extracted. franchisor_revenue_yr1/total_revenue of $825,440 is NOT from the Item 21 audited statements; it is the franchisor's total revenue for FY ending Dec 31, 2024 as disclosed in Item 8 (used to compute the 1.6% required-purchase revenue figure).
Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16
- Franchisor sells you products: Yes
- Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
- Must buy proprietary products: Yes
- Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
- Can negotiate own supplier terms: No
Score breakdown · what drove the 43 / 100 verdict
- 01HIGH3 concluded litigation matters on a small 10-unit system
- 02MEDNet unit decline -28.6%
- 03HIGHFranchisor litigation settled $300,000
- 04MEDItem 19 disclosed, avg gross sales $881,555, no bankruptcy/going-concern
Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification
What are you signing up for?
Ongoing fees run about 7.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.
Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17
FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal
Contract & Territory Detail
| Initial term | 10 years |
|---|---|
| Renewal term | 10 years |
| Territory type | No territory protection |
| Protected territory | No |
| Exclusive territoryℹ | No |
| Territory population | 100,000 |
| Online sales rightsℹ | Granted |
| Franchisor can compete | Yes |
| Hire a manager? | Allowed |
| Owner-operator | Required |
| Non-compete (years)ℹ | 2 years |
| Non-compete (miles)ℹ | 20 mi |
| Right of first refusalℹ | Yes |
| Transfer requires consent | Yes |
| Termination notice | 30 days |
| Mandatory arbitration | No |
| Jury trial waiver | Yes |
| Governing law | California |
| Litigation count | 2 |
View Item 3 litigation summary
Waters Edge Wineries, Inc. filed federal complaint against franchisee Wine Vibes, LLC and principals (Sherifat Lawal, Tamesha Hampton, Phelicia Colvin) on October 26, 2022 for breach of contract, trademark infringement, false designation of origin, misappropriation of trade secrets (DTSA/CUTSA), and unfair competition. Defendants countersued. Settled September 26, 2023 with $300,000 payment (reducible to $200,000 in installments if compliant). Also concluded: California Commissioner of Financial Protection and Innovation v. Waters Edge Wineries (Consent Order, November 10, 2021) for violation of undertaking regarding promissory note payment during registration period.
Items 10, 11
Training & Operations
- Classroom training
- 10 hrs
- On-the-job training
- 30 hrs
- Training location
- On-site and corporate
- Ongoing training
- Required
- Site selection
- franchisor-approved real estate broker, subject to franchisor consent
- Franchisor financing
- Not offered
- Item 10
- POS system
- Orderport
- Operating tech stack
Items 5 & 11
Franchisor Support
Technology: Orderport
Item 20 · call current owners
Franchisee Contacts
6 owners to call
Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20
Frequently asked questions
Frequently Asked Questions
How much does it cost to open a WATERS EDGE WINERY & BISTRO franchise?
The total investment to open a WATERS EDGE WINERY & BISTRO franchise ranges from $577K – $1.3M, with an initial franchise fee of $55K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).
What do WATERS EDGE WINERY & BISTRO franchise owners earn?
According to Item 19 of the WATERS EDGE WINERY & BISTRO FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $882K. The median is $585K. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.
Who owns WATERS EDGE WINERY & BISTRO?
WATERS EDGE WINERY & BISTRO is franchised by Waters Edge Wineries, Inc.. Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.
What is Item 19 in the WATERS EDGE WINERY & BISTRO FDD?
The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the WATERS EDGE WINERY & BISTRO FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.
What is WATERS EDGE WINERY & BISTRO's franchise failure rate?
SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for WATERS EDGE WINERY & BISTRO (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.
How many WATERS EDGE WINERY & BISTRO franchise locations are there?
As of their most recent FDD filing, WATERS EDGE WINERY & BISTRO has 10 total units in the United States, including 10 franchised units and 0 company-owned units.
Is WATERS EDGE WINERY & BISTRO a good franchise to buy?
FranchiseVerdict rates WATERS EDGE WINERY & BISTRO as a C-grade franchise with a verdict score of 43 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.
Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.
For franchisors
Are you the franchisor?
If you represent WATERS EDGE WINERY & BISTRO, you can request corrections or provide updated information.
Other Full-Service Restaurants franchises
Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Full-Service Restaurants category
Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.