FranchiseVerdict
FV-02835·CAUTIONStandard67

Ug

Formerly known as Uni-Green

Food & Beverage - Full ServiceFranchising since 2025
Investment
$284K – $679K
33rd pct Full Service
Avg revenue
57th pct Full Service
Royalty
6.0%
54th pct Full Service
Units
0
0th pct Full Service
SBA default

Bottom line

  • Total investment $284K – $679K including a $15K franchise fee, 6.0% ongoing royalty.
  • No Item 19 financial performance data disclosed — the franchisor chose not to publish revenue figures.
  • Rated CAUTION with a risk score of 75/100.
  • No Item 19 financial performance representation. Without franchisor-disclosed revenue data, you'll need to gather unit economics directly from existing franchisees.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Legal entity
UNI GREEN INC
Parent company
Lian Fa International Dining Business Corporation
Incorporated in
Delaware
HQ
131 Continental Drive, Suite 301, Newark, Delaware 19713
Auditor
KAIZEN CPA PLLC
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$0
Most recent fiscal year

Yale framework · single-unit ROIC

Returns Analysis

Pulls Item 7 (investment) and Item 19 (revenue) from this brand's FDD into the Yale unlevered-ROIC formula. Override any input to stress-test it against your own assumptions.

The model · Yale framework

What would one UG unit return on the cash you put in?

Revenue · per unit, per year
$
Item 19 not disclosed — typing your own estimate
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fund
Royaltytyp 68%
%
Ad fundtyp 35%
%
Operating costs · category default: generic
COGS
%
Labor
%
Rent / occupancy
%
Other operating
%
Total invested capital · what you actually put in
Initial investment
$
FDD Item 7: $284K–$679K
Working capital
$
FDD reports $20K–$80K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

20%

Below typical band (30–60%)

0%30–60% Yale band80%

Store EBITDA · annual
$105K
EBITDA margin
14.0%
Total invested
$531K
Payback
61 mo
Unit-level only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even Yale describes.

Overview

About

UG franchisees operate [UNABLE TO DETERMINE—brand name/industry not provided]. Without clarity on the business model, franchisees' day-to-day operations cannot be accurately described. This lack of transparency is itself a critical red flag.

CEO
Kai Lung Cheng
Founded
2024
FDD year
2025
States available
0

Item 7 · what it costs

The Vitals

Total investment
$284K – $679K
All-in to open one unit
Liquid capital
$20K – $80K
Cash you must have on hand
Franchise fee
$15K
Royalty
6.0%
6% of Gross Monthly Revenues · typical 6–8%
Ad fund
3.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
9.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Item 19

Financial Performance

This franchisor did not disclose financial performance representations in Item 19, or our extractor could not parse them.

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
0
Opened
0
Last reporting year
Closed
0
Company-owned
0
Corporate units in the system
2023
0±0
Franchised units
2024
0
Franchised units
2025
0
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 9 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator — not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Registered · 9 states
Not registered

States derived from franchisee phone area codes (Item 20). Approximate — ported numbers may show the original state, not the franchisee's current location.

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

No SBA loan data available for this brand.

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 5, 6, 12, 17

Risk & Legal

75
Risk · 0-100
CAUTION75 / 100

High-risk franchise with going concern warnings, zero disclosed units, no earnings data, and high capital requirements—likely pre-launch, failing, or unreliable.

Score breakdown · what drove the 75 / 100 rating

  1. 01HIGHGoing Concern status indicates material uncertainty about franchisor's ability to continue operations
  2. 02HIGHZero disclosed franchise units with unknown growth trajectory suggests brand may be pre-revenue, collapsing, or fraudulent
  3. 03MINORNo average revenue or net income disclosure (Item 19) prevents ROI validation and suggests poor franchisee performance
  4. 04MEDHigh investment range ($283.5K–$679.2K) combined with undisclosed earnings creates severe financial risk exposure
  5. 05HIGH5-year term is relatively short; combined with going concern status raises renewal and long-term viability concerns
  6. 06MINORUnknown unit count indicates lack of transparency; franchisor may be hiding franchisee failures or system collapse

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

FDD Items 5, 6, 12, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Territory
Radius/Zip Code
Protected territory
Yes
Initial term
5 years
Renewal term
5 years
Online sales rights
Restricted
Franchisor can compete
Yes
Hire a manager?
Allowed
Litigation count
0
Right of first refusal
Yes
Franchisor can buy back on resale
Mandatory arbitration
Yes
Non-compete
2 yrs
Post-termination restriction
Owner-operator
Required
Governing law
California

Item 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
8 hrs
On-the-job training
85 hrs

Item 20

Franchisee Contacts

Phone numbers extracted directly from this brand's FDD Item 20. After purchase, you'll also receive a list of validation questions tailored to this brand.

Franchisee contacts

10 numbers

Locked
(951) 903-••••
CA
(701) 328-••••
ND
(360) 902-••••
WA

One-time purchase · CSV download · Validation questions included

FDD download

UG · FDD (2025) PDF

Single-page checkout · instant download · CSV export of contacts available separately above