FranchiseVerdict
Tio Juan’s Margaritas Mexican Restaurant logo
FV-02746·CAUTIONExcellent91

Tio Juan’s Margaritas Mexican Restaurant

Formerly known as Maryland Fried Chicken

Food & Beverage - Full ServiceFranchising since 2009Website
Investment
$489K – $2.9M
64th pct Full Service
Avg revenue
$2.4M
47th pct Full Service
Royalty
5.0%
15th pct Full Service
Units
25
58th pct Full Service
SBA default
0.0%
vs <3% typical

Bottom line

  • Total investment $489K – $2.9M including a $40K franchise fee, 5.0% ongoing royalty.
  • Average unit revenue of $2.4M/year (median $1.9M). Estimated payback in 3.3 years.
  • Rated CAUTION with a risk score of 72/100. SBA loan default rate of 0.0% across 5 loans (below the industry average).
  • System contracting at -14.3% CAGR over 3 years. Investigate whether closures are franchisor-driven (consolidation) or franchisee-driven (economics).

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Legal entity
Margaritas Franchising Corp.
Incorporated in
Delaware
HQ
273 Locust Street, Suite 200, Dover, NH 03820
Auditor
CohnReznick LLP
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$950K
vs $1.0M prior year

Yale framework · single-unit ROIC

Returns Analysis

Pulls Item 7 (investment) and Item 19 (revenue) from this brand's FDD into the Yale unlevered-ROIC formula. Override any input to stress-test it against your own assumptions.

The model · Yale framework

What would one Tio Juan’s Margaritas Mexican Restaurant unit return on the cash you put in?

Revenue · per unit, per year
$
FDD Item 19 reports $2,364,881
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fund
Royaltytyp 68%
%
Ad fundtyp 35%
%
Operating costs · category default: generic
COGS
%
Labor
%
Rent / occupancy
%
Other operating
%
Total invested capital · what you actually put in
Initial investment
$
FDD Item 7: $489K–$2.9M
Working capital
$
FDD reports $150K–$150K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

18%

Below typical band (30–60%)

0%30–60% Yale band80%

Store EBITDA · annual
$331K
EBITDA margin
14.0%
Total invested
$1.9M
Payback
67 mo
Unit-level only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even Yale describes.

Levered LBO scenario · Yale Crease Capital framing

What would 25 Tio Juan’s Margaritas Mexican Restaurant units return on equity?

Edit assumptions

Equity IRR · 5-yr

32.3%

4.05× MOIC

Year-1 DSCR

2.50×

EBITDA ÷ debt service

Equity required

$6.6M

on $16.6M purchase

Total debt

$10.0M

SBA $5.0M + senior + seller note

SBA 7(a) request ($8.3M) exceeds the $5M program cap. Excess capped automatically; backfill via conventional or equity.

Overview

About

Franchisees operate full-service Mexican restaurants featuring margaritas, table service dining, and kitchen management. Day-to-day responsibilities include staff management (typically 15-25 employees), food cost control, inventory management, customer service oversight, and local marketing compliance with corporate brand standards across a capital-intensive 2,000-4,000 sq ft location.

CEO
Randall (Bob) Ray
Founded
1984
FDD year
2024
States available
3

Item 7 · what it costs

The Vitals

Total investment
$489K – $2.9M
All-in to open one unit
Liquid capital
$150K – $150K
Cash you must have on hand
Franchise fee
$40K
Royalty
5.0%
weekly Gross Sales · typical 6–8%
Ad fund
4.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
9.0%
vs 9–13% typical
Payback period
3.3 yrs
From v3 / Item 19

Item 19

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$2.4M
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$1.9M
Item 19 type
Historical Financial Performance
Sample size
18 units
vs category median 15
Range (low → high)
$1.8M$2.8M
Cohort dispersion
Transparency
10 / 5
vs category median 4 / 5 · above
Revenue rank47th
vs Food & Beverage - Full Service peers
Investment cost rank64th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank15th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank58th
vs Food & Beverage - Full Service peers
Risk score rank84th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
25
Opened
0
Last reporting year
Closed
1
Turnover rate
4.0%
Company-owned
19
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
24%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (yr3)
-14.3%
Net unit change last year
3-yr CAGR
-14.3%
Compounded over last 3 years
2022
6-1
Franchised units
2023
7
Franchised units
2024
7
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 4 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator — not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Registered · 4 states
Not registered

States derived from franchisee phone area codes (Item 20). Approximate — ported numbers may show the original state, not the franchisee's current location.

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

Total loans
5
Loan volume
Avg loan
Default rate
0.0%
vs <3% typical · system-wide
5-yr default

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 5, 6, 12, 17

Risk & Legal

72
Risk · 0-100
CAUTION72 / 100

This contracting Mexican restaurant franchise shows critical warning signs including shrinking unit base, absence of territory protection, undisclosed going concern status, and unverified profitability claims—warranting extreme caution.

Score breakdown · what drove the 72 / 100 rating

  1. 01MEDUnit count declined 14.3% YoY (25 units) indicating system contraction and franchisee struggles
  2. 02MINORNo protected territory creates direct competition risk and cannibalization between locations
  3. 03MINORHigh initial investment range ($488K-$2.9M) with 5% royalty burden on thin restaurant margins (~22% net margin)
  4. 04HIGHGoing Concern status is FALSE — suggests corporate financial instability or disclosure issues
  5. 05MINORNo Item 19 financial performance representation limits ability to validate the $515K average net income claim
  6. 06MINORWide investment spread ($2.4M variance) indicates inconsistent unit economics and unclear capital requirements
  7. 07MINORRelatively low franchise fee ($40K) may indicate undervalued system or inability to attract quality franchisees

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

FDD Items 5, 6, 12, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Protected territory
No
Initial term
10 years
Renewal term
5 years
Online sales rights
Granted
Franchisor can compete
Yes
Hire a manager?
Allowed
Litigation count
0
Right of first refusal
Yes
Franchisor can buy back on resale
Mandatory arbitration
No
Jury trial waiver
Yes
Non-compete
2 yrs
Post-termination restriction
Owner-operator
Optional
Governing law
New Hampshire

Item 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
110 hrs
On-the-job training
340 hrs
POS system
Toast
Operating tech stack

Item 20

Franchisee Contacts

Phone numbers extracted directly from this brand's FDD Item 20. After purchase, you'll also receive a list of validation questions tailored to this brand.

Franchisee contacts

8 numbers

Locked
(212) 416-••••
CA
(267) 358-••••
NJ
(360) 902-••••
CA

One-time purchase · CSV download · Validation questions included

FDD download

Tio Juan’s Margaritas Mexican Restaurant · FDD (2024) PDF

Single-page checkout · instant download · CSV export of contacts available separately above