Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Tio Juan’s Margaritas Mexican Restaurant logo

Tio Juan’s Margaritas Mexican Restaurant Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Full-Service RestaurantsNHFranchising since 2009
BAbove averageAbove average49/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$489K – $2.9M
Disclosed sales
$2.5M
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
Under 10 loans (5)

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-02746Data QualityExcellent86%FDD 2024 · 2yr old
Manager-run OKNo: No territory protection

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

This data is from a 2024 FDD. Current terms may differ. Always verify with the franchisor's latest disclosure document.

Margaritas Mexican Restaurant is a full-service franchise serving Mexican dishes and margaritas in a colorful, festive setting. Franchisees run the restaurants, managing the kitchen, bar, and dining service.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Tio Juan’s Margaritas Mexican Restaurant franchise requires a total initial investment of $489K – $2.9M, including a $40K franchise fee and an ongoing 5.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2024 FDD, average unit revenue was $2.5M[2]. FranchiseVerdict grade: B (Above average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: 2024 filing · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: high - figures are from a filing two or more years old

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✗ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored7 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing; the rest are marked “Not cited” beside the figure.

Overview

Investment
$489K – $2.9M
23rd pct Service Resta…
Avg gross sales
$2.5M
11th pct Service Resta…
Royalty
5.0%
8th pct Service Resta…
Units
25
22nd pct Service Resta…
SBA charge-off
N/A

Quick verdict · Full-Service Restaurants · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$489K – $2.9M
Median $678K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$40K – $40K
Median $40K
near median
Liquid Capital Req'd
$150K – $150K
Median $43K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
$2.5M
Median $1.6M
above median ↑, better than category
Royalty Rate
5.0%
Median 5.0%
near median
Ongoing Fees
9.0% of rev
Median 7.0%
above median ↑, worse than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Under 10 loans (5)
Insufficient SBA coverage: 5 loans, rate hidden below 10
System Size
25 units
Median 20 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
4.0%
Median 0.0%
Territory
None
The franchisor can open or license outlets nearby
Owner-Operator
Optional
Can hire a manager
Litigation
None disclosed
Clean record

Green = favorable by >10% vs Full-Service Restaurants median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $489K – $2.9M including a $40K franchise fee, 5.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $2.5M/year (median $2.7M).
  • RISKVerdict B (Above average), verdict score 49/100 (higher is better).
  • GROWTHNegative: net -1 franchised outlets in the latest year (0 opened, 1 closed) (Item 20).
  • DECLINESystem contracting at -14.3% CAGR over 3 years. Investigate whether closures are franchisor-driven (consolidation) or franchisee-driven (economics).

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Margaritas Franchising Corp.
Parent company
Margaritas Management Group, Inc.
FDD Item 1, page 9 of the 2024 FDD
CEO title
Chief Executive Officer
Randall (Bob) Ray
Incorporated in
Delaware
HQ
273 Locust Street, Suite 200, Dover, New Hampshire 03820
Auditor
CohnReznick LLP
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$950K
vs $1.0M prior year

Independent franchisee associations

  • Franchise Advisory Council (FAC)

Franchisee-led councils or alliances disclosed in Item 20. Indicates operator voice.

Overview

About

CEO
Randall (Bob) Ray
Headquarters
NH
Founded
2008
FDD year
2024
States available
3

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 152% above the typical full-service restaurants franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$489K – $2.9MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 19 of the 2024 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$40,000Verified — printed on page 13 of the 2024 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty5.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 14 of the 2024 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund4.0%Not cited — published from our reading of the franchisor's disclosure document; the page it is printed on has not been located.
Working capital$150K – $150K

Source: FDD 2024 · Items 5–7

FDD Item 7 · 2024 filing

Initial investment breakdown

Tio Juan’s Margaritas Mexican Restaurant: Item 7 initial investment breakdown
Cost componentLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$40K$40K
Working capital (3–6 mo)$150K$150K
Equipment, build-out, other$299K$2.7M
Total initial investment$489K$2.9M

Source: Tio Juan’s Margaritas Mexican Restaurant 2024 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$489K – $2.9M
Top 40% of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$150K – $150K
Top 40% of category vs category
Franchise fee
$40K – $40K
Top 40% of category vs category
Royalty
5.0%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
4.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
9.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Tio Juan’s Margaritas Mexican Restaurant: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty5.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund4.0% of gross sales
Transfer fee$10K
Inventory (initial)$21K – $43K
Total fee load9.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 54% above the full-service restaurants norm.

Avg gross sales$2.5MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 52 of the 2024 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$2.7MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 52 of the 2024 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typegross sales
Sample size6 outlets

Source: FDD 2024 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Tio Juan’s Margaritas Mexican Restaurant until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$1.9M

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Tio Juan’s Margaritas Mexican Restaurant unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $2,467,588 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $489K–$2.9M (midpoint used)
FDD reports $150K–$150K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$1.9M
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2024 FDD

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$2.5M
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$2.7M

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
gross sales
Sample size
6 outlets
vs category median 18 · small
Range (low → high)
$719K→$4.1MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 52 of the 2024 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Reporting year
2023
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2024
Disclosed in the 2024 filing, covering 2023
Transparency
9 / 10
vs category median 3 / 10 · above
Gross sales rank11th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank23th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank8th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank22th
vs Full-Service Restaurants peers
Risk score rank34th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 801 Full-Service Restaurants brands

Showing the headline figures — all 156 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $2.5M/year in gross sales. Median ($2.7M) exceeds the average — distribution is bottom-heavy but most units perform well. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 1.4x.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 9.0% — above the Full-Service Restaurants median of 7.0%.

Disclosure

Transparency score 9/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System contracting at -14.3% CAGR over 3 years. Investigate whether closures are franchisor-driven consolidation or franchisee exits.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Full-Service Restaurants medians

How Tio Juan’s Margaritas Mexican Restaurant Compares

Metric
Tio Juan’s Margaritas Mexican Restaurant
Category median
vs median
Investment
$1.7M
$678Kmiddle half $427K–$1.3M · n=326
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
$2.5M
$1.6Mmiddle half $885K–$2.4M · n=122
Above median, better than category
Unit Count
25
20middle half 6–73 · n=308
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Full-Service Restaurants brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units25Verified — printed on page 53 of the 2024 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it three ways.
3-yr growth-14.3% (worth scrutinizing)
Turnover rate4.0% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2024 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
25
Opened
0
Last reporting year
Closed
1
Terminated
0
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
4.0%
Company-owned
19
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
24%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
-14.3%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
-14.3%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
0
Not renewed
0
Transferred
2
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
0
0.00 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
1
Franchisor's next-year forecast
Continuity rate
85.7%
Units that stayed open
Ceased ops
14.3%
Units that stopped operating
2021
7
Franchised units
2022
7±0
Franchised units
2023
6-1
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 3 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 3 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Available to sell in · Item 12

  • Michigan

States where the franchisor is registered to sell new franchises (FDD registration filings).

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

5 current owners across 3 states.

  • ME 2
  • PA 2
  • NJ 1

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA loan disclosures. This brand has only 5 7(a) loans on file; statistical reliability is limited below 10 loans.

Total loans
5
Loan volume
$6.8M
Median loan
$1.4M
average
Charge-off rate
Under 10 loans (5)
Insufficient SBA coverage: 5 loans, rate hidden below 10

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
Under 10 loans (5)
5-yr charge-off
Under 10 loans (5)
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
4
Defaults
N/A

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

What could kill this investment?

SBA charge-offUnder 10 loans (5)
Verdict score49/100 (higher is better)
Litigation0 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

BAbove average49Verdict score 49/100

Clean FDD: no litigation, no bankruptcy, no going-concern, audited financials, and Item 19 disclosed with strong AUV of $2,467,588. The only minor note is negative net unit growth (-14.3%), largely a mature, company-heavy system (19 of 25 company-owned).

Moderate confidence±9 pts
4058

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: officers or affiliates. The franchisor is not a named party in these cases.

No litigation required to be disclosed in Item 3

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · CohnReznick LLP

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $0.9MYr 2: $1.0M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: No
  • Must buy proprietary products: No
  • Restricted to system-approved products: No
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: Yes

Score breakdown · what drove the 49 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINORNo litigation, no bankruptcy, no going-concern
  2. 02MEDAudited financials, Item 19 disclosed
  3. 03MINORStrong AUV $2,467,588
  4. 04MINORNet growth -14.3% (mild)

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 156 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 9.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term5 yrs
TerritoryNone (caution)
Initial training450 hrs

Source: FDD 2024 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term5 years
Allowed renewalsℹ2
Protected territoryNo
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Online sales rightsℹGranted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorOptional
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ10 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
RoFR response window30 days
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice15 days
Termination groundsℹ3
Curable defaultsℹ9
Mandatory arbitrationNo
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawNew Hampshire
Litigation count0
View Item 3 litigation summary

No litigation required to be disclosed in Item 3

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
110 hrs
On-the-job training
340 hrs
Training location
Corporate facility and on-site
Ongoing training
Required
Site selection
joint
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
Toast
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Technology: Toast

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

5 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 5 contacts · $49
Free preview
(207) 866-••••ME
Unlock all 5 contacts
(207) 813-••••ME
(267) 358-••••NJ
(610) 831-••••PA
(215) 362-••••PA

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Tio Juan’s Margaritas Mexican Restaurant franchise?

The total investment to open a Tio Juan’s Margaritas Mexican Restaurant franchise ranges from $489K – $2.9M, with an initial franchise fee of $40K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Tio Juan’s Margaritas Mexican Restaurant franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Tio Juan’s Margaritas Mexican Restaurant FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $2.5M. The median is $2.7M. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Tio Juan’s Margaritas Mexican Restaurant?

Tio Juan’s Margaritas Mexican Restaurant is franchised by Margaritas Franchising Corp.. Its parent company is Margaritas Management Group, Inc.. Source: FDD Item 1, 2024 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Tio Juan’s Margaritas Mexican Restaurant FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Tio Juan’s Margaritas Mexican Restaurant FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Tio Juan’s Margaritas Mexican Restaurant's franchise failure rate?

SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for Tio Juan’s Margaritas Mexican Restaurant (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.

How many Tio Juan’s Margaritas Mexican Restaurant franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Tio Juan’s Margaritas Mexican Restaurant has 25 total units in the United States, including 6 franchised units and 19 company-owned units.

Is Tio Juan’s Margaritas Mexican Restaurant a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Tio Juan’s Margaritas Mexican Restaurant as a B-grade franchise with a verdict score of 49 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Tio Juan’s Margaritas Mexican Restaurant, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Full-Service Restaurants franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Full-Service Restaurants category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.