Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
the COUNTER CUSTOM BURGERS logo

The Counter Custom Burgers Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Quick-Service RestaurantsAZFranchising since 2006
DBelow averageBelow average34/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$712K – $2.0M
Disclosed sales
$2.7M
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
Under 10 loans (8)

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-02616FDD 2025Data QualityExcellent95%
Manager-run OKYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

The Counter is a fast-casual franchise serving build-your-own custom burgers with premium toppings. Franchisees run the restaurants, managing food prep, staffing, and counter service.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A the COUNTER CUSTOM BURGERS franchise requires a total initial investment of $712K – $2.0M, including a $35K franchise fee and an ongoing 6.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2025 FDD, average unit revenue was $2.7M[2]. FranchiseVerdict grade: D (Below average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - issued 12 to 24 months ago; a newer filing is likely on file

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✗ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored6 of 7 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing; the rest are marked “Not cited” beside the figure.

Overview

Investment
$712K – $2.0M
86th pct Service Resta…
Avg gross sales
$2.7M
35th pct Service Resta…
Royalty
6.0%
48th pct Service Resta…
Units
11
39th pct Service Resta…
SBA charge-off
N/A

Quick verdict · Quick-Service Restaurants · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$712K – $2.0M
Median $486K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$35K – $35K
Median $35K
near median
Liquid Capital Req'd
$50K – $200K
Median $33K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
$2.7M
Median $975K
above median ↑, better than category
Royalty Rate
6.0%
Median 5.5%
near median
Ongoing Fees
7.0% of rev
Median 7.5%
near median
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Under 10 loans (8)
Insufficient SBA coverage: 8 loans, rate hidden below 10
System Size
11 units
Median 18 units
below median ↓, worse than category
Turnover Rate
50.0%
Median 0.0%
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Optional
Can hire a manager
Litigation
20 cases
Review carefully

Green = favorable by >10% vs Quick-Service Restaurants median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $712K – $2.0M including a $35K franchise fee, 6.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $2.7M/year (median $2.4M).
  • RISKVerdict D (Below average), verdict score 34/100 (higher is better).
  • GROWTHNegative: net -5 franchised outlets in the latest year (0 opened, 3 closed); 1 signed but not yet open (Item 20).
  • FLAGItem 4 discloses a bankruptcy of an officer or of a company an officer ran, not of the franchisor. Review Item 4 for details.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
MTY Franchising USA, Inc.
Parent company
MTY Franchising Inc. (MTY Canada)
FDD Item 1, page 8 of the 2025 FDD
Ultimate parent
MTY Food Group, Inc. (Toronto Stock Exchange public company)
FDD Item 1, page 9 of the 2025 FDD
Predecessor
CB Franchise Systems, LLC (The Counter); Built Franchise Systems, LLC (Built Custom Burgers)
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
Chief Executive Officer of MTY (parent)
Eric Lefebvre
CEO experience
15 yrs
Years in role or industry
Incorporated in
Tennessee
HQ
9311 E Via De Ventura, Scottsdale, Arizona 85258
Auditor
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$580.3M
vs $597.5M prior year
Management churn noted
Frequent turnover
Item 2 disclosed frequent executive changes

Same owner · FDD Item 1, page 9

26 other brands on this site name MTY Food Group, Inc. (Toronto Stock Exchange public company) as parent or ultimate parent in their own FDD.

Portfolio: MTY Food Group

Grouped by the owner's name as each filing prints it (this page: the 2025 FDD). Spelling variants of the same group may be listed apart; a brand is never grouped with an owner its filing does not name.

Overview

About

CEO
Eric Lefebvre
Headquarters
AZ
Founded
2006
FDD year
2025
States available
3

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 178% above the typical quick-service restaurants franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$712K – $2.0MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 50 of the 2025 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$35,000Verified — printed on page 37 of the 2025 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty6.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 40 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund1.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 40 of the 2025 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$50K – $200K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

FDD Item 7 · 2025 filing

Initial investment breakdown

the COUNTER CUSTOM BURGERS: Item 7 initial investment breakdown
Cost componentLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$35K$35K
Working capital (3–6 mo)$50K$200K
Equipment, build-out, other$627K$1.7M
Total initial investment$712K$2.0M

Source: the COUNTER CUSTOM BURGERS 2025 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$712K – $2.0M
Bottom third — review vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$50K – $200K
Bottom third — review vs category
Franchise fee
$35K – $35K
Middle of category vs category
Royalty
6.0%
Set by a formula · typical 6–8%
Ad fund
1.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
7.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

the COUNTER CUSTOM BURGERS: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty6.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund1.0% of gross sales
Technology fee$100
Training fee$2K
Transfer fee$13K
Renewal fee$18K
Inventory (initial)$20K – $50K
Total fee load7.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 180% above the quick-service restaurants norm.

Avg gross sales$2.7MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 107 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$2.4MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 107 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typegross sales
Sample size8 outlets

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for the COUNTER CUSTOM BURGERS until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$1.5M

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one the COUNTER CUSTOM BURGERS unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $2,730,597 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $712K–$2.0M (midpoint used)
FDD reports $50K–$200K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$1.5M
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$2.7M
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$2.4M

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
gross sales
Sample size
8 outlets
vs category median 19 · small
Reporting year
2024
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2025
Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2024
Transparency
4 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · typical
Gross sales rank35th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank86th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank48th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank39th
vs Quick-Service Restaurants peers
Risk score rank93th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 781 Quick-Service Restaurants brands

Showing the headline figures — all 170 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $2.7M/year in gross sales. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 2.0x.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 7.0% (near the Quick-Service Restaurants median).

Disclosure

Transparency score 4/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System contracting at -55.6% CAGR over 3 years. Investigate whether closures are franchisor-driven consolidation or franchisee exits.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Quick-Service Restaurants medians

How The Counter Custom Burgers Compares

Metric
The Counter Custom Burgers
Category median
vs median
Investment
$1.3M
$486Kmiddle half $342K–$748K · n=780
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
$2.7M
$975Kmiddle half $664K–$1.4M · n=284
Above median, better than category
Unit Count
11
18middle half 5–79 · n=755
Below median, worse than category

Category median of published Quick-Service Restaurants brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units11Not cited — published from our reading of the franchisor's disclosure document; the page it is printed on has not been located.
3-yr growth-55.6% (worth scrutinizing)
Turnover rate50.0% (caution)

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
11
Opened
0
Last reporting year
Closed
3
Terminated
0
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
1
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
50.0%
Company-owned
3
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
73%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
-55.6%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
-55.6%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
0
Not renewed
1
Transferred
2
Reacquired
1
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
1
0.09 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
1
Franchisor's next-year forecast
Transfer rate
18.2%
Owners selling to other franchisees
Termination rate
18.2%
Franchisor-initiated terminations
Ceased ops
36.4%
Units that stopped operating
2022
18
Franchised units
2023
13-5
Franchised units
2024
8-5
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 12 · 3 states reported

The Territory Map

FDD Item 12 reports the state count, but the specific list isn't in our current data. The map will appear once we re-extract from the FDD or enough franchisee contacts are available.

3

states with franchisees (per FDD Item 12)

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

0 current owners across 0 states; 1 former (terminated, transferred or not renewed) listed separately.

    Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

    SBA loan performance

    Government records

    SBA Loan Data

    Aggregated from SBA loan disclosures. This brand has only 8 7(a) loans on file; statistical reliability is limited below 10 loans.

    Total loans
    8
    Loan volume
    $7.8M
    Median loan
    $980K
    average
    Charge-off rate
    Under 10 loans (8)
    Insufficient SBA coverage: 8 loans, rate hidden below 10

    Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

    Repayment rate (PIF)
    Under 10 loans (8)
    5-yr charge-off
    Under 10 loans (8)
    Loans approved 2021+
    Active lenders
    6
    Defaults
    N/A

    Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

    What could kill this investment?

    SBA charge-offUnder 10 loans (8)
    Verdict score34/100 (higher is better)
    Litigation20 cases
    Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

    Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

    Risk analysis

    FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

    Risk & Legal

    DBelow average34Verdict score 34/100
    High confidence±6 pts
    2840

    Litigation (Item 3)

    Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).

    Two concluded cases: (1) Purav Enterprises, L.L.C., et al. v. The Extreme Pita Franchising USA, Inc., et al. (WA Superior Court, Case No. 15-2-15120-7) - settled March 11, 2016 for $20,000 regarding FIPA violations and misrepresentation; (2) KOHO, Inc. v. Kahala Franchising, L.L.C. (CA Superior Court, Case No. BC572565) - breach of contract and unjust enrichment claim with cross-complaint filed

    Bankruptcy (Item 4)

    Subject: an officer. An officer’s own bankruptcy or a company an officer ran, not the franchisor’s

    Our co-COO Adam Lehr in connection with his ownership of Lehr Restaurant Group and Lehr Real Estate filed a bankruptcy proceeding as debtor under Chapter 13 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Minnesota on January 30, 2018, under Case No. 18-40253-KHS.

    Audited financials (Item 21)

    Yes · PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

    Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

    Yr 1: $580.3MYr 2: $597.5MNon-royalty: $5.7M

    Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

    MTY USA and subsidiaries FY2024 (ended Nov 30, 2024) total recognized revenue was $597,538,000 per Item 8, of which $51,714,322 (8.5%) derived from product/service sales and vendor allowances tied to franchisee purchases; audited FY2023 revenue (Exhibit V) was $580,280,000.

    ⓘ These are the parent company's consolidated financials (the parent guarantees the franchisor), not this brand's standalone results — the figure reflects the whole corporate group, not this brand alone.

    Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

    • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
    • Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
    • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
    • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
    • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

    Score breakdown · what drove the 34 / 100 verdict

    1. 01MINOROnly 11 units remaining
    2. 02HIGH19 litigation matters (mostly affiliate/parent, not brand)
    3. 03HIGHBankruptcy is old personal Ch.13 of an officer — low weight
    4. 04MINORStrong parent financials ($252.9M net worth)

    Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

    Showing the headline figures — all 170 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

    Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

    What are you signing up for?

    Ongoing fees run about 7.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

    Initial term10 yrs
    Renewal term5 yrs
    TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
    Initial training484 hrs

    Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

    FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

    Contract & Territory Detail

    Initial term10 years
    Renewal term5 years
    Allowed renewalsℹ1
    Territory typeProtected territory
    Protected territoryYes
    Exclusive territoryℹNo
    Territory radius2 mi
    Online sales rightsℹRestricted
    Franchisor can competeYes
    Hire a manager?Allowed
    Owner-operatorOptional
    Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
    Non-compete (miles)ℹ10 mi
    Right of first refusalℹYes
    Transfer requires consentYes
    Termination notice14 days
    Mandatory arbitrationYes
    Arbitration locationfranchisee_state
    Jury trial waiverYes
    Governing lawArizona
    Litigation count20
    View Item 3 litigation summary

    Two concluded cases: (1) Purav Enterprises, L.L.C., et al. v. The Extreme Pita Franchising USA, Inc., et al. (WA Superior Court, Case No. 15-2-15120-7) - settled March 11, 2016 for $20,000 regarding FIPA violations and misrepresentation; (2) KOHO, Inc. v. Kahala Franchising, L.L.C. (CA Superior Court, Case No. BC572565) - breach of contract and unjust enrichment claim with cross-complaint filed

    Items 10, 11

    Training & Operations

    Classroom training
    40 hrs
    On-the-job training
    444 hrs
    Training location
    On-site and franchisor location
    Ongoing training
    Required
    Time to open
    12 mo
    From signing to launch
    Site selection
    franchisor approval of franchisee-proposed sites (franchisee investigates/proposes; franchisor accepts/rejects per site selection criteria)
    Franchisor financing
    Offered
    Item 10
    POS system
    MICROS
    Operating tech stack

    Items 5 & 11

    Franchisor Support

    ✓Site selection assistance
    ✓Grand opening support
    ✓Lease negotiation help

    Technology: MICROS

    Item 20 · call current owners

    Franchisee Contacts

    1 owners to call

    Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

    Unlock 1 contacts · $49

    Frequently asked questions

    Frequently Asked Questions

    How much does it cost to open a the COUNTER CUSTOM BURGERS franchise?

    The total investment to open a the COUNTER CUSTOM BURGERS franchise ranges from $712K – $2.0M, with an initial franchise fee of $35K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

    What do the COUNTER CUSTOM BURGERS franchise owners earn?

    According to Item 19 of the the COUNTER CUSTOM BURGERS FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $2.7M. The median is $2.4M. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

    Who owns the COUNTER CUSTOM BURGERS?

    the COUNTER CUSTOM BURGERS is franchised by MTY Franchising USA, Inc.. Its parent company is MTY Franchising Inc. (MTY Canada). The ultimate parent named in the FDD is MTY Food Group, Inc. (Toronto Stock Exchange public company). Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.

    What is Item 19 in the the COUNTER CUSTOM BURGERS FDD?

    The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the the COUNTER CUSTOM BURGERS FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

    What is the COUNTER CUSTOM BURGERS's franchise failure rate?

    SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for the COUNTER CUSTOM BURGERS (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.

    How many the COUNTER CUSTOM BURGERS franchise locations are there?

    As of their most recent FDD filing, the COUNTER CUSTOM BURGERS has 11 total units in the United States, including 8 franchised units and 3 company-owned units.

    Is the COUNTER CUSTOM BURGERS a good franchise to buy?

    FranchiseVerdict rates the COUNTER CUSTOM BURGERS as a D-grade franchise with a verdict score of 34 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

    Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

    For franchisors

    Are you the franchisor?

    If you represent the COUNTER CUSTOM BURGERS, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

    Other Quick-Service Restaurants franchises

    Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Quick-Service Restaurants category

    Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.