Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Sugaring LA logo

Sugaring LA Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Personal Care & BeautyMIFranchising since 2023
DBelow averageBelow average35/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$313K – $432K
Disclosed sales
partial, no system average
SBA charge-off
Not SBA-matched

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-02487FDD 2025Data QualityExcellent81%
Owner-operator requiredYes: Exclusive territory

Data from FDD filing

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Sugaring LA is a beauty franchise specializing in sugaring, a natural hair-removal alternative to waxing. Franchisees run the salons, managing sugaring technicians, appointments, and retail.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Sugaring LA franchise requires a total initial investment of $313K – $432K, including a $60K franchise fee and an ongoing 6.0% royalty[2]. The 2025 FDD on file does not yield a unit-revenue figure we can publish. FranchiseVerdict grade: D (Below average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - issued 12 to 24 months ago; a newer filing is likely on file

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✗ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored6 of 6 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$313K – $432K
35th pct Personal Care…
Avg gross sales
N/A
Company-owned only
Royalty
6.0%
12th pct Personal Care…
Units
8
14th pct Personal Care…
SBA charge-off
N/A

Quick verdict · Personal Care & Beauty · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$313K – $432K
Median $402K
near median
Franchise Fee
$60K – $60K
Median $45K
above median ↑, worse than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$40K – $60K
Median $34K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
Partial, no system average
No system average in Item 19
Royalty Rate
6.0%
Median 6.0%
near median
Ongoing Fees
8.0% of rev
Median 7.9%
near median
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Not SBA-matched
Not matched to SBA 7(a) loans
System Size
8 units
Median 40 units
below median ↓, worse than category
Turnover Rate
N/A
Median 0.8%
below median ↓, better than category
Territory
Exclusive
No other outlet of the brand may open inside it
Owner-Operator
Required
You must run it yourself
Litigation
None disclosed
Clean record

Green = favorable by >10% vs Personal Care & Beauty median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $313K – $432K including a $60K franchise fee, 6.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSItem 19 disclosed $617K average from 4 affiliate-owned outlets. This is franchisor-operated data, not franchisee results.
  • RISKVerdict D (Below average), verdict score 35/100 (higher is better).
  • GROWTHNegative, pipeline stalled: 14 agreements signed but not yet open against 8 open outlets (Item 20).
  • DATAItem 19 reports outlet revenue, but not in a form that yields a per-outlet average we can compare across brands. Ask franchisees directly for full unit-level revenue.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
SugaringLA Franchise, LLC
Parent company
Franworth, LLC
FDD Item 1, page 8 of the 2025 FDD
Predecessor
sugaringLA Franchise, Inc.
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
Founder / CEO
Danielle Correia
CEO experience
12 yrs
Years in role or industry
Founder active
Yes
Original founder still leading the business
Incorporated in
Delaware
HQ
106 E. Liberty, Ste. 310, Ann Arbor, MI 48104
Auditor
DoerenMayhew
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$231K
vs $4K prior year
Management churn noted
Frequent turnover
Item 2 disclosed frequent executive changes

Affiliated brands

  • sugaringLA
  • of one of our members

Other brands the franchisor or its parent operates (Item 1).

Same owner · FDD Item 1, page 8

2 other brands on this site name Franworth, LLC as parent or ultimate parent in their own FDD.

Grouped by the owner's name as each filing prints it (this page: the 2025 FDD). Spelling variants of the same group may be listed apart; a brand is never grouped with an owner its filing does not name.

Overview

About

CEO
Danielle Correia
Headquarters
MI
Founded
2022
FDD year
2025
States available
3

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost is about typical for a personal care & beauty franchise (near the category median).

Total investment (Item 7)$313K – $432KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 18 of the 2025 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$60,000Verified — printed on page 11 of the 2025 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty6.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 12 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund2.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 12 of the 2025 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$40K – $60K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

Full Item 7 breakdown18 line items

Initial investment breakdown

Item 7 initial investment line items
Line itemLowHigh
Initial Franchise Fee$60K$60K
Lease Payment (first 3 months)$8K$15K
Security Deposits$4K$8K
Leasehold Improvements$100K$160K
Furniture, Fixtures, Decor, and Equipment$9K$9K
Studio Layout, Architect, Engineer, Drawings, and Permits$14K$20K
Construction Management$20K$20K
Initial Supplies$13K$15K
Outdoor Signage$8K$15K
Point of Sale (POS) Register, Hardware, Software$10K$12K
Initial Inventory Package$5K$7K
Pre-opening training expenses$8K$12K
Telephone and Utility Deposits and Expenses$250$2K
Grand Opening Marketing (3 months prior to opening)$10K$10K
Business Licenses, Permits, etc. (first year)$200$1K
Insurance Deposits and Premiums (first three months)$2K$2K
Professional Fees (first year)$3K$5K
Additional Funds (first three months)$40K$60K
Total initial investment$313K$432K

Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$313K – $432K
Top 40% of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$40K – $60K
Middle of category vs category
Franchise fee
$60K – $60K
Middle of category vs category
Royalty
6.0%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
2.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
8.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Sugaring LA: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty6.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund2.0% of gross sales
Technology fee$375
Training fee$8K
Transfer fee$5K
Renewal fee$3K
Inventory (initial)$19K – $21K
Total fee load8.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Avg gross salesNot extracted
Median gross salesNot extracted
Item 19 typegross sales
Sample size4

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

No Item 19 revenue figure for Sugaring LA is on file. The return models need a revenue figure to start from, and the operating costs that turn gross sales into a profit are in no FDD. Enter your own and the calculator runs on your assumptions — nothing here is modelled until you do.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Sugaring LA unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearnot set
Item 19 not disclosed. Enter your own revenue assumption
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $313K–$432K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $40K–$60K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for annual revenue, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$422K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Item 19 disclosed $617K average from 4 affiliate-owned outlets. This is franchisor-operated data, not franchisee results.

Company-owned outlets only - not franchisee performance

Item 19 type
gross sales
Sample size
4
vs category median 38 · small
Range (low → high)
$511K→$817KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 46 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Reporting year
2024
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2025
Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2024
Transparency
6 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · above
Gross sales rank
No comparison data
Investment cost rank35th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank12th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank14th
vs Personal Care & Beauty peers
Risk score rank90th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 177 Personal Care & Beauty brands

Showing the headline figures — all 139 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 8.0% (near the Personal Care & Beauty median).

Disclosure

Item 19 reports outlet revenue, but not in a form that yields a per-outlet average we can compare across brands.

Multi-unit rate

Only 1% of franchisees own multiple units. Could indicate challenging economics or a young system where operators haven't had time to expand.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Personal Care & Beauty medians

How Sugaring LA Compares

Metric
Sugaring LA
Category median
vs median
Investment
$372K
$402Kmiddle half $261K–$677K · n=112
Near median
Revenue
N/A
$527Kmiddle half $402K–$892K · n=59
N/A
Unit Count
8
40middle half 8–151 · n=111
Below median, worse than category

Category median of published Personal Care & Beauty brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units8Verified — printed on page 49 of the 2025 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it two ways.

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
8
Opened
4
Last reporting year
Closed
0
Terminated
0
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
N/A
Company-owned
4
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
50%
vs corporate-owned
Multi-unit owners
1.0%

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
0
Not renewed
0
Signed, not yet open
14
1.75 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
15
Franchisor's next-year forecast
Ceased ops
12.5%
Units that stopped operating
2022
0
Franchised units
2023
0±0
Franchised units
2024
4+4
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 12 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 12 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Available to sell in · Item 12

  • Minnesota
  • Virginia

States where the franchisor is registered to sell new franchises (FDD registration filings).

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

22 current owners across 13 states.

  • TX 4
  • FL 3
  • MI 3
  • IN 2
  • NY 2
  • AZ 1
  • CO 1
  • DC 1
  • GA 1
  • NC 1
  • NJ 1
  • PA 1
  • +1 more states

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

No SBA loan data available for this brand.

What could kill this investment?

SBA charge-offNot SBA-matched
Verdict score35/100 (higher is better)
Litigation0 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

DBelow average35Verdict score 35/100
Moderate confidence±13 pts
2248

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: officers or affiliates. The franchisor is not a named party in these cases.

No litigation or other dispute resolution required to be disclosed

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · DoerenMayhew

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $0.2MYr 2: $0.0MNon-royalty: $0.0M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 35 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINORNegative net worth -$1,314,021
  2. 02MINORSmall 8-unit system

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 139 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 8.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryExclusive (favorable vs category)
Initial training88 hrs

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term10 years
Allowed renewalsℹ2
Territory typeExclusive territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹYes
Territory radius3 mi
Territory population50,000
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorRequired
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ20 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
RoFR response window30 days
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Termination groundsℹ4
Curable defaultsℹ4
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationfranchisor principal place of business
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawMichigan
Litigation count0
View Item 3 litigation summary

No litigation or other dispute resolution required to be disclosed

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
50 hrs
On-the-job training
38 hrs
Training location
On-site and corporate
Ongoing training
Required
Field support
38 hrs/yr
On-site visits per year
Site selection
franchisor
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
QuickBooks Online
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✓Lease negotiation help

Technology: QuickBooks Online

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

22 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 22 contacts · $49
Free preview
(734) 619-••••MI
Unlock all 22 contacts
(917) 757-••••NY
(202) 425-••••DC
(954) 589-••••SW
(404) 713-••••GA

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Sugaring LA franchise?

The total investment to open a Sugaring LA franchise ranges from $313K – $432K, with an initial franchise fee of $60K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Sugaring LA franchise owners earn?

Item 19 of the Sugaring LA FDD discloses outlet figures from $511K to $817K but no single average across all outlets. These are gross sales figures, not profit; the Revenue section shows what the filing reports and on what basis. Item 20 of the FDD lists current and former franchisees; asking them directly is the standard way to fill this gap.

Who owns Sugaring LA?

Sugaring LA is franchised by SugaringLA Franchise, LLC. Its parent company is Franworth, LLC. Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Sugaring LA FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Sugaring LA FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Sugaring LA's franchise failure rate?

SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for Sugaring LA (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.

How many Sugaring LA franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Sugaring LA has 8 total units in the United States, including 4 franchised units and 4 company-owned units. 4 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Sugaring LA a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Sugaring LA as a D-grade franchise with a verdict score of 35 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Sugaring LA, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Personal Care & Beauty franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Personal Care & Beauty category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.