B55/100FDD 2026

Speedy Freight — Litigation & Risk

Business Services - Shipping & Postal · FDD Items 3, 4 & 5

Back to overview

Lower Risk

No litigation cases disclosed in FDD Items 3 and 4.

Source: FDD Items 3–5

FDD Items 3 & 4

Litigation Metrics

Cases disclosed

Total from FDD Items 3 and 4

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

—

Franchisor or officer bankruptcy

Overall risk score

55 / 100

FranchiseVerdict composite

Rating

MODERATE

STRONG / MODERATE / CAUTION / AVOID

FDD Items 5, 6 & 17 — what you give up

Contract Risk Indicators

Mandatory arbitration

Required

Disputes resolved outside court — limits your legal options

Jury trial waiver

Waived

You give up the right to a jury trial

Non-compete

1 yrs

Post-termination restriction on similar businesses

Franchisor can compete

Yes

Franchisor can open competing locations in or near your territory

Right of first refusal

Yes

Franchisor can match any purchase offer when you try to sell

Governing law

Texas

State whose law governs disputes — relevant if you're not based there

What drove the 55/100 rating

Risk Score Breakdown

01MINORExtremely high royalty rate of 30% on gross margin (vs. typical 5-7% on revenue) creates severe profitability pressure
02MEDNet income not disclosed in Item 19 — impossible to validate actual franchisee earnings or ROI
03MEDOnly 10 units system-wide indicates very limited scale, brand recognition, and support infrastructure
04MINORUnknown unit growth trajectory suggests stagnation or shrinkage — critical red flag in franchise disclosure
05MINORHigh initial investment ($74.75K-$193.75K) coupled with non-transparent profitability is extremely risky
06MED5-year term is short; renewal risk unclear with only 10 units and undisclosed financials

Severity inferred from FDD text — not a regulatory or legal classification

Litigation data from FDD Items 3, 4, and 5. SBA data from public 7(a) FOIA records (FY2020–present). Not legal advice — consult a franchise attorney before signing any franchise agreement.