Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Signarama logo

Signarama Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Business ServicesFLFranchising since 1987
CAverageAverage40/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$245K – $345K
Disclosed sales
$916K
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
29.5%
on 276 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-02317FDD 2026Data QualityExcellent86%
Owner-operator requiredNo: No territory protection

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Signarama is a B2B franchise producing custom signs, banners, vinyl lettering, and promotional graphics for local businesses. Franchisees run a sign shop handling design, production, and customer accounts in a protected territory.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Signarama franchise requires a total initial investment of $245K – $345K, including a $25K – $50K franchise fee and an ongoing 6.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2026 FDD, average unit revenue was $916K[2]. SBA 7(a) loans show a 29.5% charge-off rate across 276 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: C (Average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: low - issued within the last 12 months

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored7 of 7 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$245K – $345K
58th pct Business Serv…
Avg gross sales
$916K
11th pct Business Serv…
Royalty
6.0%
9th pct Business Serv…
Units
684
63rd pct Business Serv…
SBA charge-off
29.5%
% of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category

Quick verdict · Business Services · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$245K – $345K
Median $133K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$25K – $50K
Median $48K
below median ↓, better than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$39K – $61K
Median $23K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
$916K
Median $686K
above median ↑, better than category
Royalty Rate
6.0%
Median 7.0%
below median ↓, better than category
Ongoing Fees
6.0% of rev
Median 9.0%
below median ↓, better than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
29.5%
276 loans · Median 11.8%
above median ↑, worse than category
System Size
684 units
Median 39 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
3.9%
Median 3.7%
near median
Territory
None
The franchisor can open or license outlets nearby
Owner-Operator
Required
You must run it yourself
Litigation
5 cases
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Business Services median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $245K – $345K including a $50K franchise fee, 6.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $916K/year (median $593K).
  • RISKVerdict C (Average), verdict score 40/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 29.5% across 276 loans (well above the 16% franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
  • GROWTHPositive: net +3 franchised outlets in the latest year (23 opened, 20 closed) (Item 20).
  • TERMSNo protected territory and the franchisor reserves the right to compete in your area. Clarify territorial boundaries before signing.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Sign*A*Rama Inc.
Parent company
United Franchise Group (Starpoint Brands division)
FDD Item 1, page 8 of the 2026 FDD
Ultimate parent
United Franchise Group
FDD Item 1, page 8 of the 2026 FDD
Predecessor
Speedy Sign*A*Rama, USA
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
Chief Executive Officer
Ray Titus
Founder active
Yes
Original founder still leading the business
Incorporated in
Florida
HQ
2121 Vista Parkway, West Palm Beach, FL 33411
Auditor
Milbery & Kesselman, CPAs, LLC
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$20.9M
vs $20.1M prior year
Management churn noted
Frequent turnover
Item 2 disclosed frequent executive changes

Same owner · FDD Item 1, page 8

8 other brands on this site name United Franchise Group as parent or ultimate parent in their own FDD.

Grouped by the owner's name as each filing prints it (this page: the 2026 FDD). Spelling variants of the same group may be listed apart; a brand is never grouped with an owner its filing does not name.

Overview

About

CEO
Ray Titus
Headquarters
FL
Founded
1986
FDD year
2026
States available
44

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 122% above the typical business services franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$245K – $345KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 21 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$49,500Verified — printed on page 15 of the 2026 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty6.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 16 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fundNot extracted
Working capital$39K – $61K

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 5–7

Full Item 7 breakdown10 line items

Initial investment breakdown

Item 7 initial investment line items
Line itemLowHigh
Initial Franchise Fee$50K$50K
Travel and Living expenses while at training school$245$566
Real Estate (Rental payments)$4K$8K
Real Estate Service Charge$0$2K
Leasehold Improvements$2K$44K
Architectural Services$0$10K
Standard Equipment Package$150K$166K
Insurance$1K$2K
Security Deposit/Utility Deposits/Licenses$0$3K
Additional Funds (0-6 mos.)$39K$61K
Total initial investment$245K$345K

Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$245K – $345K
Middle of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$39K – $61K
Middle of category vs category
Franchise fee
$25K – $50K
Top 40% of category vs category
Royalty
6.0%
Set by a formula · typical 6–8%
Ad fund
1.0
Total fee load
6.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Signarama: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty6.0% of gross sales
Technology fee$467
Training fee$500
Transfer fee$40K
Renewal fee$15K
Total fee load6.0% of rev
Fee structure insight

A 6.0% total fee load is unusually lean. More of each revenue dollar stays with the franchisee.

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 33% above the business services norm.

Avg gross sales$916KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 53 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$593KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 53 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typehistorical financial perfo…
Sample size313 outlets

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Signarama until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for ad fund rate, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$345K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Signarama unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $916,066 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $245K–$345K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $39K–$61K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for ad fund rate, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$345K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for ad fund rate, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2026 FDD

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$916K
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$593K

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
historical financial performance (average/median/high/low gross sales by segment)
Sample size
313 outlets
vs category median 37 · large
Range (low → high)
$32K→$10.7MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 53 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Reporting year
2025
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2026
Disclosed in the 2026 filing, covering 2025
Transparency
4 / 10
vs category median 3 / 10 · above
Gross sales rank11th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank58th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank9th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank63th
vs Business Services peers
Risk score rank73th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 296 Business Services brands

Showing the headline figures — all 153 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $916K/year in gross sales. Median is $593K — top performers pull the average up, so a typical unit earns less. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 3.1x.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 6.0% — below the Business Services median of 9.0%.

Disclosure

Transparency score 4/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Business Services medians

How Signarama Compares

Metric
Signarama
Category median
vs median
Investment
$295K
$133Kmiddle half $79K–$260K · n=193
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
$916K
$686Kmiddle half $373K–$1.4M · n=61
Above median, better than category
Unit Count
684
39middle half 8–116 · n=193
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Business Services brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units684Verified — printed on page 55 of the 2026 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it two ways.
Turnover rate3.9% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
684
Opened
23
Last reporting year
Closed
20
Terminated
15
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
3.9%
Company-owned
0
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
100%
vs corporate-owned

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
15
Transfer rate
7.0%
Owners selling to other franchisees
Continuity rate
97.2%
Units that stayed open
Termination rate
2.2%
Franchisor-initiated terminations
Ceased ops
0.7%
Units that stopped operating
2023
675
Franchised units
2024
681+6
Franchised units
2025
684+3
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 40 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 40 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

321 current owners across 41 states.

  • FL 54
  • IL 27
  • NY 19
  • PA 18
  • TX 17
  • GA 16
  • OH 14
  • VA 13
  • WI 13
  • MA 12
  • MD 11
  • KY 10
  • +29 more states

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

F
SBA Lending Health
Weak SBA lending record · 29.5% charge-off
Total loans
276
Loan volume
$64.7M
Median loan
$150K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
29.5%
on 276 loans · rates vary by category · see methodology

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
70.5%
5-yr charge-off
25.0%
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
111
Defaults
56
Typical loan rate
7.3%
avg rate to borrowers
Franchised industry avg
20.4%
brand above franchise avg ↑
Jobs supported
910
2.0 per loan
Lender concentration
14%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 47% went to startups / new businesses, 53% to established operators

Franchise vs independent — in sign manufacturing, franchised businesses charge off at 20.4% vs 17.9% for independents — franchising is associated with 14% higher SBA default risk in this category.

Vintage analysis

Signarama charge-off rate by loan vintage

BrandNational avg
Signarama charge-off rate by loan vintage. Showing 9 vintages from 2013 to 2021. Rates range from 0.0% to 100.0%.0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%100%'13'15'17'19'21

Top lenders financing Signarama franchisees

United Midwest Savings Bank National Association19 loans33.3%
Celtic Bank Corporation19 loans62.5%
Stearns Bank National Association6 loans33.3%

Showing 3 of 111 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Total loans
8
Loan volume
$3.4M
Charge-off rate
N/A
Jobs created
28

Historical SBA 504 lending data via CDCs, not predictive of future performance.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for Signarama from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Principal loss rate
15.2%
Avg SBA guarantee
75%
Avg interest rate
7.32%
Avg chargeoff amount
$247K
Lender concentration
13.9%
Job velocity
2.0 per $100K
Startup risk premium
+8.4pp
NAICS benchmark
16.4%
NAICS 339950
Jobs supported
910

Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 14% of loans

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
1United Midwest Savings Bank National Association19$2.9M33.3%
2Celtic Bank Corporation19$2.8M62.5%
3Stearns Bank National Association6$1.8M33.3%
4Webster Bank National Association6$2.4MN/A
5Citizens Bank, National Association5$487K0.0%
6Newtek Small Business Finance, Inc.5$3.2M0.0%
7United Community Bank4$3.7M100.0%
8BayFirst National Bank3$650K0.0%
9CDC Small Business Finance Corp.3$570K66.7%
10Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company3$304K100.0%

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
TXTexas13666.7%
ILIllinois1200.0%
CACalifornia11233.3%
FLFlorida9233.3%
MAMassachusetts900.0%
GAGeorgia7375.0%
SCSouth Carolina7350.0%
NCNorth Carolina6150.0%
PAPennsylvania6360.0%
COColorado500.0%

SBA 7(a) lending trend

2006
1
2012
1
2013
3
2014
6
2015
15
2016
12
2017
18
2018
25
2019
8
2020
7
2021
10
2022
4
2023
11
2024
7
2025
7
2026
2

Borrower profile

Ownership change24 (30%)
Startup24 (30%)
Existing (2+ yr)17 (21%)
New (< 2 yr)13 (16%)
Unanswered1 (1%)
Established (5+ yr)1 (1%)
New (< 1 yr)1 (1%)

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

Lending insight

A 29.5% charge-off rate means roughly 1 in 3 franchisees failed to repay their SBA loan. Investigate what changed.

What could kill this investment?

SBA loans charge off at 29.5% — 84% above the 16.0% national norm, i.e. higher lender-observed risk.

SBA charge-off29.5% · 276 loans
Verdict score40/100 (higher is better)
Litigation5 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

CAverage40Verdict score 40/100

Established system since 1987 with strong financials (net worth $17.5M, net income $750,109, 684 units) and Item 19 disclosed. Only one recent franchisee royalty suit plus old historical regulatory orders (1993 FTC, 1996 MD); franchised units dropped notably (390 of 684).

High confidence±4 pts
3644

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Milbery & Kesselman, CPAs, LLC

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $20.9MYr 2: $20.1MNon-royalty: $0.3M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: No
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 40 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINOR1 recent franchisee royalty suit; old 1993 FTC/1996 MD orders
  2. 02MINORFranchised units 390 vs 684 total
  3. 03MEDStrong financials, long history, Item 19 disclosed

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 153 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

Litigation case detail5 matters · Item 3

Litigation cases

The franchisor

Concluded (2)

  • Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. Minuteman Press International, Inc., Speedy Sign-A-Rama, USA, Inc., Roy W. Titus and Jeffrey Haber, Defendants

    concluded

    Government or regulatory action · filed 1993-06-04 · United States District Court, Eastern District of New York · CV 93-2496

    “Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. Minuteman Press International, Inc., Speedy Sign-A-Rama, USA, Inc., Roy W. Titus and Jeffrey Haber, Defendants (CV 93-2496) Filed on June 4, 1993, in the United States District Court, Eastern District of New York. The Federal Trade Commission complaint alleged that the Defendants violated Section 5(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act”Page 13 of the 2026 FDD, Item 3

    Outcome:“On December 18, 1998, an injunction was filed prohibiting the Defendants excluding Haber from doing the following:”

  • In the Matter of Speedy Sign-A-Rama, USA, Inc.

    concluded

    Government or regulatory action · Securities Commissioner of Maryland · Case No. S-95-112

    “Signarama entered into a consent order with the Securities Commissioner of Maryland in January of 1996. The matter is captioned In the Matter of Speedy Sign-A-Rama, USA, Inc. and is Case No. S-95- 112. It is alleged in the consent order that Speedy sold four (4) franchises in the State of Maryland after its registration under the Maryland Franchise Law had lapsed, and before it was renewed.”Page 13 of the 2026 FDD, Item 3

    Outcome:“In settlement of the matter, and while neither admitting nor denying the findings in the order, Speedy agreed to offer rescission to the four (4) franchisees, adopt a compliance program intended to avoid unregistered sales and disclose the existence of the order in its franchise Disclosure Document under the Maryland Franchises Law.”

Status not stated in the filing (1)

  • Sign*A*Rama, Inc. v. David Kinney and Kinney Custom Signs, Inc.

    Brought against a franchisee · filed 2025-12-09 · Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, FL · Case No. 502025 CA012813XXXAMB

    “Sign*A*Rama, Inc. v. David Kinney and Kinney Custom Signs, Inc. (Case No. 502025 CA012813XXXAMB, Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, FL), Filed December 9, 2025 Suit initiated by Company for failure to pay royalties, marketing fees, technology fees, failure to use the proper EPOS system, operating a competing website, and failure to comply with the Operation Manual.”Page 13 of the 2026 FDD, Item 3

Parent, affiliates and predecessor

Concluded (2)

  • In the Matter of: The Commissioner of Financial Protection and Innovation v. Great Greek Franchising, LLC

    concluded

    Government or regulatory action · Great Greek Franchising, LLC ("TGG") · Department of Financial Protection and Innovation of the State of California

    “TGG entered into a consent order with the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation of the State of California on August 9, 2021. The matter is captioned In the Matter of: The Commissioner of Financial Protection and Innovation v. Great Greek Franchising, LLC. The Commissioner found that TGG removed a condition of registration that was previously imposed on the franchisor, which required”Page 14 of the 2026 FDD, Item 3

    Outcome:“In settlement of the matter, TGG agreed to desist and refrain from the violations of Corporations Code section(s) 31200, 31203, and Rule 310.122.1, pay an administrative penalty, offer rescission to each of the franchisees who were offered and sold a franchise from October 18, 2018 to August 20, 2020, and attend continuing education.”

  • In the Matter of: The Commissioner of Financial Protection and Innovation v. Great Greek Franchising, LLC and UFG Group, Inc. dba United Franchise Group

    concluded

    Government or regulatory action · Great Greek Franchising, LLC (TGG), Graze Craze Franchising, LLC (GCZ) and UFG Group, Inc. dba United Franchise Group (UFG) · Department of Financial Protection and Innovation

    “On March 4, 2022, TGG, GCZ, and UFG entered into consent orders with the State of California, and its Department of Financial Protection and Innovation, as it relates to alleged violations which occurred at a trade show in California. The matters are captioned In the Matter of: The Commissioner of Financial Protection and Innovation v. Great Greek Franchising, LLC”Page 14 of the 2026 FDD, Item 3

    Outcome:“As required by the consent orders, TGG, GCZ, and UFG agreed to desist and refrain from the violations of Corporations Code section(s) 31110, 31201, and 31204, pay an administrative penalty of $5,000 each, send a Notice of Consent Order to TGG franchisees, and contract with an independent monitor for up to three years to assist with developing, implementing, and reviewing policies and procedures of its franchise ...”

Item 3 lists the litigation the franchisor must disclose; a matter against a parent, an affiliate or a named officer is not a matter against the franchisor, and pending claims are allegations, not findings.

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 6.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term35 yrs
Renewal term35 yrs
TerritoryNone (caution)
Initial training160 hrs

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term35 years
Renewal term35 years
Territory typeNo territory protection
Protected territoryNo
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory sizeℹnon_exclusive
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorRequired
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ25 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationPalm Beach County, Florida
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawFlorida
Litigation count5

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
80 hrs
On-the-job training
80 hrs
Training location
West Palm Beach, Florida
Ongoing training
Required
Field support
80 hrs/yr
On-site visits per year
Site selection
Franchisor (Regional Vice President) with franchisee final approval; optional affiliate Franchise Real Estate assists with site selection/lease negotiation
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
Corebridge
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✓Lease negotiation help

Technology: Corebridge

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

321 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 321 contacts · $49
Free preview
(949) 803-••••CA
Unlock all 321 contacts
(405) 631-••••OK
(812) 537-••••IN
(602) 920-••••AZ
(813) 324-••••FL

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Signarama franchise?

The total investment to open a Signarama franchise ranges from $245K – $345K, with an initial franchise fee of $50K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Signarama franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Signarama FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $916K. The median is $593K. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Signarama?

Signarama is franchised by Sign*A*Rama Inc.. Its parent company is United Franchise Group (Starpoint Brands division). The ultimate parent named in the FDD is United Franchise Group. Source: FDD Item 1, 2026 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Signarama FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Signarama FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Signarama's franchise failure rate?

Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, Signarama has a charge-off rate of 29.5% across 276 loans, meaning 29.5% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.

How many Signarama franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Signarama has 684 total units in the United States, including 684 franchised units and 0 company-owned units. 23 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Signarama a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Signarama as a C-grade franchise with a verdict score of 40 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Signarama, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Business Services franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Business Services category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.