FDD Items 3 & 4 · 2025 filing
Shipley Do-Nuts litigation history
What Shipley Do-Nuts disclosed about lawsuits, arbitrations and bankruptcy in the 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document. Item 3 lists the material legal actions a franchisor must report; Item 4 covers bankruptcy. This is the franchisor's own disclosure, not a court record, and not legal advice.
Items 3 & 4 at a glance
What the filing discloses
- Cases disclosed
- 9
- Item 3, as counted in the filing
- Largest disclosed settlement
- None stated
- Bankruptcy (Item 4)
- Disclosed
- Franchisor, parent, predecessor or officer
- Filing year
- 2025
- Disclosures cover the prior ten years
Extracted from the 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document
Item 3: litigation
Shipley Franchise Company LLC and Shipley Do-Nut Flour and Supply Co LLC are involved in 4 pending litigation cases against former franchisees. Cases involve claims of trademark infringement, unfair competition, deceptive trade practices violations, and breach of contract. All defendants have filed counterclaims alleging wrongful termination and violations of the Arkansas Franchise Practices Act. Defendant counterclaims in 3 cases (Sonny Ros, Botny Heang, Llina Lab) have been dismissed by the Court. One case (Jeffrey Ek) is stayed due to defendant's Chapter 7 bankruptcy filing. Discovery is ongoing in active cases. Attorney fees of $7,607.80 were awarded in one case.
Disclosed in the 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document
Item 4: bankruptcy
Jeffrey Ek (Grandpa's Donuts franchisee defendant) filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, resulting in automatic stay of litigation in Case No. 60CV-22-2903.
Disclosure signals that moved the score
How this shows up in the verdict
- 7 litigation matters (franchisor mostly plaintiff)
The verdict grade is FranchiseVerdict's editorial assessment across SBA loan performance, unit growth, revenue and disclosure signals. It is not investment advice.
Before you weigh a lawsuit
How to read Item 3
A franchisor must disclose pending actions and any material civil action involving the franchise relationship, plus convictions or civil judgments for fraud, unfair or deceptive practices, or franchise-law violations, going back ten years. A case the franchisor brought against a franchisee counts too. Item 3 does not include every dispute: settled claims below the materiality line and matters resolved in private arbitration can be absent.
Questions worth asking current and former franchisees, using the contact list in Item 20:
- Were you, or anyone you know in the system, party to a dispute with the franchisor?
- Was it resolved by settlement, arbitration or a court, and on what terms?
- Has the number of disputes gone up or down since you signed?