Lower Risk
No litigation cases disclosed in FDD Items 3 and 4.
Source: FDD Items 3–5
FDD Items 3 & 4
Litigation Metrics
Cases disclosed
0
Total from FDD Items 3 and 4
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
—
Franchisor or officer bankruptcy
Overall risk score
65 / 100
FranchiseVerdict composite
Rating
MODERATE
STRONG / MODERATE / CAUTION / AVOID
FDD Items 5, 6 & 17 — what you give up
Contract Risk Indicators
Mandatory arbitration
Required
Disputes resolved outside court — limits your legal options
Jury trial waiver
Waived
You give up the right to a jury trial
Non-compete
2 yrs
Post-termination restriction on similar businesses
Franchisor can compete
Yes
Franchisor can open competing locations in or near your territory
Right of first refusal
Yes
Franchisor can match any purchase offer when you try to sell
Governing law
Texas
State whose law governs disputes — relevant if you're not based there
What drove the 65/100 rating
Risk Score Breakdown
- 01MINOROnly 4 units in system with unknown growth trajectory indicates minimal scale and unproven model
- 02MINORNo average revenue or net income disclosure (Item 19) prevents realistic ROI assessment on $32-50K investment
- 03MINORUnprotected territory creates direct competition risk from other franchisees in same market
- 04MINORMinimum royalty floor of $500/month ($6,000 annually) represents 18-37% of lowest investment tier if sales are weak
- 05MED5-year term is shorter than industry standard, creating renewal uncertainty and limited payback window
- 06MINORTravel industry highly vulnerable to economic downturns, pandemics, and digital disruption (OTAs)
Severity inferred from FDD text — not a regulatory or legal classification
Litigation data from FDD Items 3, 4, and 5. SBA data from public 7(a) FOIA records (FY2020–present). Not legal advice — consult a franchise attorney before signing any franchise agreement.