Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Savvy Sliders logo

Savvy Sliders Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Quick-Service RestaurantsMIFranchising since 2019
CAverageAverage40/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$588K – $1.1M
Disclosed sales
$1.1M
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
Under 10 loans (2)

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-02241FDD 2025Data QualityExcellent95%
Owner-operator requiredYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Savvy Sliders is a fast-casual franchise serving fresh sliders, chicken tenders, fries, and shakes. Franchisees run the restaurants, managing food prep, staffing, and fast counter and drive-thru service.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Savvy Sliders franchise requires a total initial investment of $588K – $1.1M, including a $35K franchise fee and an ongoing 5.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2025 FDD, average unit revenue was $1.1M[2]. FranchiseVerdict grade: C (Average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - issued 12 to 24 months ago; a newer filing is likely on file

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✗ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored8 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$588K – $1.1M
81st pct Service Resta…
Avg gross sales
$1.1M
22nd pct Service Resta…
Royalty
5.0%
12th pct Service Resta…
Units
37
60th pct Service Resta…
SBA charge-off
N/A

Quick verdict · Quick-Service Restaurants · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$588K – $1.1M
Median $486K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$35K – $35K
Median $35K
near median
Liquid Capital Req'd
$10K – $35K
Median $33K
below median ↓, better than category
Avg Revenue
$1.1M
Median $975K
above median ↑, better than category
Royalty Rate
5.0%
Median 5.5%
near median
Ongoing Fees
9.0% of rev
Median 7.5%
above median ↑, worse than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Under 10 loans (2)
Insufficient SBA coverage: 2 loans, rate hidden below 10
System Size
37 units
Median 18 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
N/A
Median 0.0%
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Required
You must run it yourself
Litigation
2 cases
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Quick-Service Restaurants median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $588K – $1.1M including a $35K franchise fee, 5.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $1.1M/year (median $1.0M).
  • RISKVerdict C (Average), verdict score 40/100 (higher is better).
  • GROWTHPositive: net +8 franchised outlets in the latest year (8 opened, 0 closed) (Item 20).
  • FLAGBankruptcy history disclosed in the FDD. Review Item 4 for details before proceeding.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Savvy Sliders Franchise, LLC
Parent company
AKJ Brands LLC
FDD Item 1, page 6 of the 2025 FDD
CEO title
Chief Executive Officer and Manager
Happy Asker
Incorporated in
MI
HQ
30955 Northwestern Highway, Suite 300, Farmington Hills, Michigan 48334
Auditor
UHY LLP
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$2.7M
vs $2.0M prior year

Affiliated brands

  • and is the franchisor for
  • and owns our Proprietary
  • and provides construction
  • and administers and
  • that sells products to our
  • and administers and places
  • that may sell products to our

Other brands the franchisor or its parent operates (Item 1).

Overview

About

CEO
Happy Asker
Headquarters
MI
Founded
2019
FDD year
2025
States available
6

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 71% above the typical quick-service restaurants franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$588K – $1.1MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 20 of the 2025 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$35,000Verified — printed on page 11 of the 2025 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty5.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 12 of the 2025 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund4.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 12 of the 2025 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$10K – $35K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

Full Item 7 breakdown15 line items

Initial investment breakdown

Item 7 initial investment line items
Line itemLowHigh
Franchise Feenot refundable$35K$35K
Rentnot refundable$17K$63K
Security Deposits$7K$25K
Leasehold Improvementsnot refundable$240K$350K
Equipment, Furniture and Fixturesnot refundable$221K$430K
Insurancenot refundable$3K$10K
Permits and Licensesnot refundable$1K$8K
Initial Inventorynot refundable$25K$25K
Signagenot refundable$10K$30K
Grand Opening Advertisingnot refundable$15K$15K
Architecture & MEP Drawingsnot refundable$3K$10K
Travel Expenses for Trainingnot refundable$0$15K
Professional Feesnot refundable$3K$7K
Opening Assistancenot refundable$0$15K
Additional Funds (3 months)not refundable$10K$35K
Total initial investment$588K$1.1M

Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$588K – $1.1M
Bottom third — review vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$10K – $35K
Top 40% of category vs category
Franchise fee
$35K – $35K
Middle of category vs category
Royalty
5.0%
Tiered by sales volume · typical 6–8%
Ad fund
4.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
9.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Savvy Sliders: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty5.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund4.0% of gross sales
Technology fee$430
Training fee$2K
Transfer fee$9K
Renewal fee$9K
Inventory (initial)$25K – $25K
Total fee load9.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 15% above the quick-service restaurants norm.

Avg gross sales$1.1MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 57 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$1.0MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 57 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typegross sales
Sample size29 outlets

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Savvy Sliders until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$852K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Savvy Sliders unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $1,123,089 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $588K–$1.1M (midpoint used)
FDD reports $10K–$35K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$852K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$1.1M
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$1.0M

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
gross sales
Sample size
29 outlets
vs category median 19
Range (low → high)
$364K→$2.1MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 57 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Quartile band
$724K→$1.7M
Bottom 25% → top 25%
Reporting year
2024
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2025
Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2024
Transparency
4 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · typical
Gross sales rank22th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank81th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank12th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank60th
vs Quick-Service Restaurants peers
Risk score rank74th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 781 Quick-Service Restaurants brands

Showing the headline figures — all 145 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $1.1M/year in gross sales. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 1.4x.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 9.0% — above the Quick-Service Restaurants median of 7.5%.

Disclosure

Transparency score 4/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System expanding at 76.2% CAGR over 3 years across 37 units — operators are staying and new ones are joining.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Quick-Service Restaurants medians

How Savvy Sliders Compares

Metric
Savvy Sliders
Category median
vs median
Investment
$830K
$486Kmiddle half $342K–$748K · n=780
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
$1.1M
$975Kmiddle half $664K–$1.4M · n=284
Above median, better than category
Unit Count
37
18middle half 5–79 · n=755
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Quick-Service Restaurants brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units37Verified — printed on page 58 of the 2025 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it three ways.
3-yr growth+76.2% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
37
Opened
8
Last reporting year
Closed
0
Terminated
0
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
N/A
Company-owned
0
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
100%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
+76.2%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+76.2%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
0
Not renewed
0
Transferred
7
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Transfer rate
24.1%
Owners selling to other franchisees
2022
21
Franchised units
2023
29+8
Franchised units
2024
37+8
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 6 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 6 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

44 current owners across 6 states.

  • MI 34
  • FL 4
  • OH 3
  • IN 1
  • LA 1
  • TX 1

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

Growth insight

Fast growth in a small system. Newer franchisors expanding quickly may not yet have the support infrastructure of larger systems.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA loan disclosures. This brand has only 2 7(a) loans on file; statistical reliability is limited below 10 loans.

Total loans
2
Loan volume
$696K
Median loan
$348K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
Under 10 loans (2)
Insufficient SBA coverage: 2 loans, rate hidden below 10

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
Under 10 loans (2)
5-yr charge-off
Under 10 loans (2)
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
2
Defaults
N/A

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

What could kill this investment?

SBA charge-offUnder 10 loans (2)
Verdict score40/100 (higher is better)
Litigation2 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

CAverage40Verdict score 40/100
Moderate confidence±10 pts
3050

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).

Two matters disclosed: (1) United States v. Happy Asker, Maher Bashi et al. (E.D. Mich., 2013) - criminal tax fraud indictment against officers (not the franchisor); both found guilty, sentenced, restitution ordered. (2) Edmond Mourad et al. v. Happy's Pizza Franchise, LLC et al. (Oakland County, MI, 2015) - investors sought refund of $335,000 franchise fee alleging misrepresentation about liquor license; settled with $335,000 refund, dismissed with prejudice 2019.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

Subject: the company or an affiliate. Disclosed (Item 4 covers the last 10 years)

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · UHY LLP

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $2.7MYr 2: $2.0MNon-royalty: $0.7M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes

Score breakdown · what drove the 40 / 100 verdict

  1. 01HIGHCriminal tax fraud indictment involving both principals (Happy Asker and Maher Bashi) creates severe legal and reputational risk
  2. 02HIGHActive civil litigation from Happy's Pizza investors alleging false representations about liquor licenses suggests pattern of misleading franchisees
  3. 03MEDNet Income not disclosed despite $1.12M average unit revenue — suggests profitability problems or financial opacity
  4. 04MINORHigh investment range ($352K-$1.07M) combined with 5-6% royalties creates breakeven challenges if margins compressed
  5. 05HIGHLitigation pattern suggests potential misrepresentation of unit economics and regulatory compliance to franchisees

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 145 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 9.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term5 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training34 hrs

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term5 years
Allowed renewalsℹ2
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorRequired
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ5 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Curable defaultsℹ2
Mandatory arbitrationNo
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawMI
Litigation count2
View Item 3 litigation summary

Two matters disclosed: (1) United States v. Happy Asker, Maher Bashi et al. (E.D. Mich., 2013) - criminal tax fraud indictment against officers (not the franchisor); both found guilty, sentenced, restitution ordered. (2) Edmond Mourad et al. v. Happy's Pizza Franchise, LLC et al. (Oakland County, MI, 2015) - investors sought refund of $335,000 franchise fee alleging misrepresentation about liquor license; settled with $335,000 refund, dismissed with prejudice 2019.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
34 hrs
On-the-job training
416 hrs
Training location
Corporate Office and Certified Training Store in southeast Michigan
Ongoing training
Required
Time to open
12 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
joint

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✓Lease negotiation help

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

44 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 44 contacts · $49
Free preview
(248) 256-••••MI
Unlock all 44 contacts
(517) 308-••••MI
(734) 704-••••MI
(937) 275-••••TX
(248) 497-••••IN

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Savvy Sliders franchise?

The total investment to open a Savvy Sliders franchise ranges from $588K – $1.1M, with an initial franchise fee of $35K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Savvy Sliders franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Savvy Sliders FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $1.1M. The median is $1.0M. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Savvy Sliders?

Savvy Sliders is franchised by Savvy Sliders Franchise, LLC. Its parent company is AKJ Brands LLC. Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Savvy Sliders FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Savvy Sliders FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Savvy Sliders's franchise failure rate?

SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for Savvy Sliders (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.

How many Savvy Sliders franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Savvy Sliders has 37 total units in the United States, including 37 franchised units and 0 company-owned units. 8 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Savvy Sliders a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Savvy Sliders as a C-grade franchise with a verdict score of 40 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Savvy Sliders, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Quick-Service Restaurants franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Quick-Service Restaurants category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.