Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

FDD Items 3 & 4 · 2025 filing

Roosters Men’s Grooming Center litigation history

What Roosters Men’s Grooming Center disclosed about lawsuits, arbitrations and bankruptcy in the 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document. Item 3 lists the material legal actions a franchisor must report; Item 4 covers bankruptcy. This is the franchisor's own disclosure, not a court record, and not legal advice.

Items 3 & 4 at a glance

What the filing discloses

Cases disclosed
16
Item 3, as counted in the filing
Largest disclosed settlement
Not extracted
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
None
Franchisor, parent, predecessor or officer
Filing year
2025
Disclosures cover the prior ten years

Extracted from the 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document

Item 3: litigation

Multiple AAA arbitrations (2015-2022) between Supercuts/Regis affiliates and franchisees involving collections claims and franchisee counterclaims under Virginia Franchising Act, Minnesota Franchise Act, and common law fraud, mostly settled; one arbitration (Sea Fever/Lovegrove) resulted in a $1,015,104.83 award against Supercuts for FTC Rule, VRFA, and VCPA violations; a federal lawsuit by ProPoint Solutions against Regis over misuse of POS source code/trade secrets, settled; a consumer class action (Delamarter) over credit card receipt disclosures, settled for $285,000; one current collections/counterclaim matter (Aboukoura) in settlement process for $95,000.

Disclosure signals that moved the score

How this shows up in the verdict

  • 10 litigations but routine collections/settled, at large parent scale

The verdict grade is FranchiseVerdict's editorial assessment across SBA loan performance, unit growth, revenue and disclosure signals. It is not investment advice.

Before you weigh a lawsuit

How to read Item 3

A franchisor must disclose pending actions and any material civil action involving the franchise relationship, plus convictions or civil judgments for fraud, unfair or deceptive practices, or franchise-law violations, going back ten years. A case the franchisor brought against a franchisee counts too. Item 3 does not include every dispute: settled claims below the materiality line and matters resolved in private arbitration can be absent.

Questions worth asking current and former franchisees, using the contact list in Item 20:

  • Were you, or anyone you know in the system, party to a dispute with the franchisor?
  • Was it resolved by settlement, arbitration or a court, and on what terms?
  • Has the number of disputes gone up or down since you signed?