Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Robeks logo
AStrongest tier98/100FDD 2025

Robeks: Litigation & Risk

Quick-Service Restaurants · FDD Items 3, 4 & 5

Back to overview

Moderate: Review

1 case disclosed in FDD Items 3 and 4.

Source: FDD Items 3–5

FDD Items 3 & 4

Litigation Metrics

Cases disclosed
1
Total from FDD Items 3 and 4
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
None
Franchisor or officer bankruptcy
Verdict score
98 / 100
FranchiseVerdict composite · higher is better
Rating
A
A / B / C / D / F verdict grade

7(a) FOIA data · FY2020–present

SBA Loan Performance

Aggregated from public SBA 7(a) loan disclosures. Charge-off rate is the share of loans that were charged off or settled for less than the full balance.

Total 7(a) loans
24
Government-backed loans issued
Charge-off rate
0.0%
vs 16% franchise average
5-yr charge-off rate
0.0%
Defaults
0 loans
Loans charged off or defaulted
Total loan volume
$6.7M
Avg loan size
$279K
Participating lenders
13

FDD Items 5, 6 & 17: What You Give Up

Contract Risk Indicators

Mandatory arbitration
Required
Disputes resolved outside court, limits your legal options
Jury trial waiver
Waived
You give up the right to a jury trial
Non-compete
2 yrs
Post-termination restriction on similar businesses
Franchisor can compete
Yes
Franchisor can open competing locations in or near your territory
Right of first refusal
Yes
Franchisor can match any purchase offer when you try to sell
Governing law
California
State whose law governs disputes. Relevant if you're not based there

Extracted from FDD Item 3

Litigation Detail

DRNK Coffee + Tea, LLC and Mostafa Narimanzadeh v. Mitchell Baker, Robeks Corporation, and Robeks Franchise Corp. (Case No. 21STCV21980, Los Angeles Superior Court). Plaintiffs asserted claims for intentional interference with prospective economic advantage, negligent interference with prospective economic advantage, intentional interference with contractual relations, unfair competition, defamation per se, trade libel, conversion, invasion of privacy, and violation of California Invasion of Privacy Act. Claims alleged interference with DRNK franchise lease location efforts and interference with DRNK franchisee relationship. Robeks Defendants' demurer granted on some claims, overruled on others. Matter resolved via settlement agreement executed April 10, 2024, with Robeks Defendants paying $50,000 and case dismissed with prejudice. Mutual releases of liability included.

What drove the 98/100 verdict

Risk Score Breakdown

  1. 01MINOROne concluded lawsuit (settled April 2024)
  2. 02MINORNet worth $5.87M, net income $410,837
  3. 03MED106 units, low turnover 4.85%, Item 19 disclosed

Severity inferred from FDD text. Not a regulatory or legal classification

Litigation data from FDD Items 3, 4, and 5. SBA data from public 7(a) FOIA records (FY2020–present). Not legal advice. Consult a franchise attorney before signing any franchise agreement.