Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
RENUE® logo

Renue® Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

LodgingILFranchising since 2001
AStrongest tierStrongest tier71/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$182K – $226K
Disclosed sales
$658K
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
Limited · 12 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-02140FDD 2026Data QualityExcellent95%
Owner-operator requiredYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Renue Systems is a hospitality services franchise providing deep cleaning and disinfecting for hotels and commercial facilities. Franchisees run the operations, managing crews, scheduling, and recurring hospitality accounts.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A RENUE® franchise requires a total initial investment of $182K – $226K, including a $75K franchise fee and an ongoing 10.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2026 FDD, average unit revenue was $658K[2]. FranchiseVerdict grade: A (Strongest tier), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: low - issued within the last 12 months

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored8 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$182K – $226K
6th pct Lodging
Avg gross sales
$658K
Outlet subset0th pct Lodging
Royalty
10.0%
70th pct Lodging
Units
26
31st pct Lodging
SBA charge-off
N/A

Quick verdict · Lodging · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$182K – $226K
Median $8.9M
below median ↓, better than category
Franchise Fee
$75K – $75K
Median $50K
above median ↑, worse than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$15K – $25K
Median $312K
below median ↓, better than category
Avg Revenue
$658K
Median $1.4M
below median ↓, worse than category
Outlet subset
Royalty Rate
10.0%
Median 5.0%
above median ↑, worse than category
Ongoing Fees
11.0% of rev
Median 8.5%
above median ↑, worse than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Limited · 12 loans
Limited SBA coverage: 12 loans, rate hidden until 10 have resolved and loans reach 2% of franchised units
System Size
26 units
Median 60 units
below median ↓, worse than category
Turnover Rate
N/A
Median 0.7%
below median ↓, better than category
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Required
You must run it yourself
Litigation
1 case
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Lodging median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $182K – $226K including a $75K franchise fee, 10.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $658K/year (median $400K) (reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system).
  • RISKVerdict A (Strongest tier), verdict score 71/100 (higher is better).
  • GROWTHPositive: net +1 franchised outlets in the latest year (1 opened, 0 closed) (Item 20).

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Renue Systems Development Corp., Inc.
Predecessor
National Appeal Development Corp., Inc.
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
President, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
David J. Grossman
CEO experience
14 yrs
Years in role or industry
Incorporated in
Illinois
HQ
1147 North Main Street, Lombard, Illinois 60148
Auditor
Kezos & Dunlavy
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$2.2M
vs $2.0M prior year
Management churn noted
Frequent turnover
Item 2 disclosed frequent executive changes

Affiliated brands

  • related to us by common ownership
  • of ours and related to us by common ownership

Other brands the franchisor or its parent operates (Item 1).

Overview

About

CEO
David J. Grossman
Headquarters
IL
Founded
2000
FDD year
2026
States available
16

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 98% below the typical lodging franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$182K – $226KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 11 of the 2026 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$74,500Verified — printed on page 8 of the 2026 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty10.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 9 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund1.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 9 of the 2026 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$15K – $25K

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 5–7

Full Item 7 breakdown11 line items

Initial investment breakdown

Item 7 initial investment line items
Line itemLowHigh
Initial Franchise Feenot refundable$75K$75K
Initial Equipment, Chemicals, Supplies and Training Package Feenot refundable$55K$55K
Shipping Costs for Initial Equipment, Chemicals and Supplies$0$4K
Storage Space - 3 Months$2K$5K
Wages, Travel and Living Expenses During Training$2K$5K
Vehicle$30K$50K
Computer Equipment, Software and Accessories$500$2K
Insurance - 3 Months$3K$5K
Accounting and Legal Professional Fees$1K$3K
Business Licenses$100$200
Additional Funds for First 3 Months$15K$25K
Total initial investment$182K$226K

Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$182K – $226K
Top 40% of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$15K – $25K
Top 40% of category vs category
Franchise fee
$75K – $75K
Middle of category vs category
Royalty
10.0%
Set by a formula · typical 6–8%
Ad fund
1.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
11.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

RENUE®: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty10.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund1.0%
Technology fee$2K
Training fee$500
Transfer fee$37K
Renewal fee$7K
Total fee load11.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 53% below the lodging norm.

Avg gross sales$658K

Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system

Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 31 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$400KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 31 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typeHistorical financial infor…
Sample size20 outlets

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for RENUE® until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$224K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one RENUE® unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $657,806 per unit — Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system. Adjust to a franchisee figure before relying on this.
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $182K–$226K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $15K–$25K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$224K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2026 FDD

Financial Performance

Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system

Avg gross sales
$658K
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$400K

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
Historical financial information
Sample size
20 outlets
vs category median 98 · small
Range (low → high)
$145K→$1.9MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 31 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Reporting year
2025
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2026
Disclosed in the 2026 filing, covering 2025
Transparency
7 / 10
vs category median 0 / 10 · above
Gross sales rank0th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank6th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank70th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank31th
vs Lodging peers
Risk score rank28th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 175 Lodging brands

Showing the headline figures — all 127 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $658K/year in gross sales. Median is $400K — top performers pull the average up, so a typical unit earns less. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 3.2x. Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 11.0% — above the Lodging median of 8.5%.

Disclosure

Transparency score 7/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Lodging medians

How Renue® Compares

Metric
Renue®
Category median
vs median
Investment
$204K
$8.9Mmiddle half $1.2M–$18.3M · n=96
Below median, better than category
Revenue
$658K
$1.4Mmiddle half $1.0M–$1.8M · n=2
Below median, worse than category
Unit Count
26
60middle half 6–245 · n=126
Below median, worse than category

Category median of published Lodging brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units26Verified — printed on page 33 of the 2026 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it two ways.

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
26
Opened
1
Last reporting year
Closed
0
Terminated
0
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
N/A
Company-owned
1
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
1%
vs corporate-owned

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
0
Not renewed
0
Transferred
0
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
2023
25
Franchised units
2024
24-1
Franchised units
2025
25+1
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 14 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 14 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

19 current owners across 14 states.

  • CA 3
  • TX 3
  • HI 2
  • AZ 1
  • FL 1
  • GA 1
  • IN 1
  • LA 1
  • MA 1
  • MD 1
  • MI 1
  • NC 1
  • +2 more states

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20; 2 entries carry no state. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

Total loans
12
Loan volume
$2.1M
Median loan
$150K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
Limited · 12 loans
Limited SBA coverage: 12 loans, rate hidden until 10 have resolved and loans reach 2% of franchised units

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
Limited · 12 loans
5-yr charge-off
Limited · 12 loans
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
5
Defaults
2
Typical loan rate
8.0%
avg rate to borrowers
Franchised industry avg
15.4%
n=1,491 loans
Jobs supported
42
3.3 per loan
Lender concentration
67%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 67% went to startups / new businesses, 33% to established operators

Franchise vs independent — in janitorial services, franchised businesses charge off at 15.4% vs 22.8% for independents — franchising is associated with 32% lower SBA default risk in this category.

Top lenders financing Renue® franchisees

United Midwest Savings Bank National Association6 loans33.3%
KeyBank National Association2 loans0.0%
TD Bank, National Association1 loans100.0%

Showing 3 of 5 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for Renue® from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Principal loss rate
13.8%
Avg SBA guarantee
71%
Avg interest rate
8.00%
Avg chargeoff amount
$88K
Lender concentration
66.7%
Job velocity
3.3 per $100K
NAICS benchmark
16.8%
NAICS 561720
Jobs supported
42

Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 67% of loans

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
1United Midwest Savings Bank National Association6$1.1M33.3%
2KeyBank National Association2$72K0.0%
3TD Bank, National Association1$100K100.0%

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
HIHawaii200.0%
INIndiana200.0%
AZArizona11100.0%
NCNorth Carolina10--
OHOhio100.0%
PAPennsylvania11100.0%
UTUtah10--

SBA 7(a) lending trend

2018
3
2020
2
2021
1
2022
1
2024
1
2025
1

Borrower profile

Startup6 (67%)
Unanswered2 (22%)
Existing (2+ yr)1 (11%)

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

What could kill this investment?

SBA charge-offLimited · 12 loans
Verdict score71/100 (higher is better)
Litigation1 cases · none name the franchisor
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

AStrongest tier71Verdict score 71/100

Small 26-unit service franchise with one prior regulatory matter, a 2011 Washington DFI consent order (no fines, only cost reimbursement) and no pending litigation. Financials are healthy: net worth $1.54M, revenue $2.16M, positive net income $346K, audited with Item 19.

High confidence±4 pts
6775

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: officers or affiliates. The franchisor is not a named party in these cases.

Washington Consent Order S-11-0789-11-CO01 issued by State of Washington Department of Financial Institutions, Securities Division on September 30, 2011. Required compliance with registration and delivery of Franchise Disclosure Document sections. Reimbursement of investigative costs required; no fines or assessments. Related to franchise offer and sale by prior owner and subsequent offer before Washington franchise registration obtained.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Kezos & Dunlavy

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $2.2MYr 2: $2.0MNon-royalty: $0.0M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Franchisor operating revenue for FY2025: Royalties $1,898,644; Initial franchise fees $182,874; Equipment package fees $67,705; Other operating revenue $12,550; Total $2,161,773. FY2024 total operating revenue $2,048,063.

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: No
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 71 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINOROne prior regulatory action: 2011 WA DFI consent order, no fines
  2. 02MINORSmall system of 26 units
  3. 03MINOROtherwise clean: positive equity, positive net income $346,351, audited

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 127 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 11.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term5 yrs
Renewal term5 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training71 hrs

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term5 years
Renewal term5 years
Allowed renewalsℹ3
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory sizeℹGeographic Area
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorRequired
Non-compete (years)ℹ3 years
Right of first refusalℹYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationLombard, Illinois
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawIllinois
Litigation count1
View Item 3 litigation summary

Washington Consent Order S-11-0789-11-CO01 issued by State of Washington Department of Financial Institutions, Securities Division on September 30, 2011. Required compliance with registration and delivery of Franchise Disclosure Document sections. Reimbursement of investigative costs required; no fines or assessments. Related to franchise offer and sale by prior owner and subsequent offer before Washington franchise registration obtained.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
65 hrs
On-the-job training
6 hrs
Training location
On-site and off-site
Ongoing training
Required
Franchisor financing
Offered
Item 10
POS system
QuickBooks Online
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✗Site selection assistance
✗Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Technology: QuickBooks Online

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

21 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 21 contacts · $49
Free preview
916-791-••••CA
Unlock all 21 contacts
858-265-••••CA
954-545-••••FL
505-515-••••AZ
904-476-••••

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a RENUE® franchise?

The total investment to open a RENUE® franchise ranges from $182K – $226K, with an initial franchise fee of $75K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do RENUE® franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the RENUE® FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $658K. The median is $400K. Important context: Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns RENUE®?

RENUE® is franchised by Renue Systems Development Corp., Inc.. Source: FDD Item 1, 2026 filing.

What is Item 19 in the RENUE® FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the RENUE® FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is RENUE®'s franchise failure rate?

SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for RENUE® (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.

How many RENUE® franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, RENUE® has 26 total units in the United States, including 25 franchised units and 1 company-owned units. 1 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is RENUE® a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates RENUE® as a A-grade franchise with a verdict score of 71 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent RENUE®, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Lodging franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Lodging category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.