Radiant Waxing Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026
- Investment
- $433K – $708K
- Disclosed sales
- $555K
- gross sales, not profit
- SBA charge-off
- Under 10 loans (9)
Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records
Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology
Radiant Waxing is a personal care franchise specializing in speed waxing and full-body hair removal. Franchisees run the salons, managing licensed waxers, memberships, retail, and scheduling.
FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026
A RADIANT WAXING franchise requires a total initial investment of $433K – $708K, including a $50K franchise fee and an ongoing 6.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2026 FDD, average unit revenue was $555K[2]. FranchiseVerdict grade: B (Above average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →
Sources, dates and evidence
FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: low - issued within the last 12 months
Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✗ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored8 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.
Overview
- Investment
- $433K – $708K
- 44th pct Personal Care…
- Avg gross sales
- $555K
- 18th pct Personal Care…
- Royalty
- 6.0%
- 12th pct Personal Care…
- Units
- 58
- 36th pct Personal Care…
- SBA charge-off
- N/A
Quick verdict · Personal Care & Beauty · color = vs category peers
Green = favorable by >10% vs Personal Care & Beauty median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)
Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology
Bottom line
- COSTTotal investment $433K – $708K including a $50K franchise fee, 6.0% ongoing royalty.
- RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $555K/year (median $538K).
- RISKVerdict B (Above average), verdict score 46/100 (higher is better).
- GROWTHNegative: net -1 franchised outlets in the latest year (2 opened, 3 closed); 3 signed but not yet open (Item 20).
- FLAG3 units terminated last reporting year (5.2% of the system). Ask existing franchisees why.
Item 1 · who you're contracting with
The Franchisor
Corporate structure & franchisor financials
- Legal entity
- Radiant Waxing Franchise, LLC
- Parent company
- Radiant Waxing Holdings, LLC (owned by Steele Pomp Investment, LLC)
- FDD Item 1, page 8 of the 2026 FDD
- Ultimate parent
- Transom Bloom Topco, LP (and related Transom entities)
- FDD Item 1, page 8 of the 2026 FDD
- Predecessor
- LunchboxWax (Lunchbox Franchise, LLC / Lunchboxwax Holdings LLC)
- Prior franchisor entity
- CEO title
- Chief Executive Officer and Manager
- Amanda Clark
- Incorporated in
- Delaware
- HQ
- 1890 Wynkoop Street, Unit 1, Denver, Colorado 80202
- Auditor
- Grant Thornton LLP
- Audited financials
- Franchisor revenue
- $31.0M
- vs $29.3M prior year
Same owner · FDD Item 1, page 8
2 other brands on this site name Transom Bloom Topco, LP (and related Transom entities) as parent or ultimate parent in their own FDD.
Grouped by the owner's name as each filing prints it (this page: the 2026 FDD). Spelling variants of the same group may be listed apart; a brand is never grouped with an owner its filing does not name.
Overview
About
- CEO
- Amanda Clark
- Headquarters
- CO
- Founded
- 2021
- FDD year
- 2026
- States available
- 13
Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?
Entry cost runs 42% above the typical personal care & beauty franchise.
Source: FDD 2026 · Items 5–7
FDD Item 7 · 2026 filing
Initial investment breakdown
| Cost component | Low | High |
|---|---|---|
| Initial franchise fee | $50K | $50K |
| Working capital (3–6 mo) | $35K | $55K |
| Equipment, build-out, other | $348K | $603K |
| Total initial investment | $433K | $708K |
Source: RADIANT WAXING 2026 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.
Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate
The Vitals
- Total investment
- $433K – $708K
- Middle of category vs category
- Liquid capital req'd
- $35K – $55K
- Middle of category vs category
- Franchise fee
- $50K – $50K
- Middle of category vs category
- Royalty
- 6.0%
- typical 6–8%
- Ad fund
- 2.0%
- typical 3–5%
- Total fee load
- 8.0%
- vs 9–13% typical
Ongoing fees · Item 6
| Fee | Amount |
|---|---|
| Royalty | 6.0% of gross sales |
| Marketing / ad fund | 2.0% of gross sales |
| Technology fee | $719 |
| Transfer fee | $25K |
| Renewal fee | $13K |
| Inventory (initial) | $30K – $36K |
| Total fee load | 8.0% of rev |
What do units actually make?
Average unit sales land near the personal care & beauty norm.
Source: FDD 2026 · Item 19
Single-unit · not modelled
Returns at a glance
An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for RADIANT WAXING until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.
—
Not modelled yet
An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.
Total invested capital · disclosed
$615K
Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.
ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
What one unit earns on your invested capital
Model A · Single-Unit Return
Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.
Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.
Returns model · single-unit ROIC
What would one RADIANT WAXING unit return on the cash you put in?
Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.
Unlevered ROIC · per unit
Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.
—
An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.
What 25 units return when you use SBA financing
Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition
Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).
This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.
What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.
Not modelled yet
An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.
A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.
These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.
Item 19 · Source: 2026 FDD
Financial Performance
- Avg gross sales
- $555K
- Per unit, per year
- Median gross sales
- $538K
Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.
- Item 19 type
- Actual
- Sample size
- 56 outlets
- vs category median 38
- Range (low → high)
- $127K→$994KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 64 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
- Cohort dispersion (min → max)
- Reporting year
- 2025
- Fiscal year the figures cover
- Source filing
- FDD 2026
- Disclosed in the 2026 filing, covering 2025
- Transparency
- 4 / 10
- vs category median 4 / 10 · typical
Compared against 177 Personal Care & Beauty brands
Revenue is only 1.0x the investment. This means each unit may take 5+ years to recoup the initial outlay at typical margins.
Operator outlook
What the numbers say
Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.
Unit economics
Average unit generates $555K/year in gross sales. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 1.0x.
Fee burden
Total ongoing fee load of 8.0% (near the Personal Care & Beauty median).
Disclosure
Transparency score 4/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.
Operator retention
System contracting at -10.8% CAGR over 3 years. Investigate whether closures are franchisor-driven consolidation or franchisee exits.
Multi-unit rate
Only 1% of franchisees own multiple units. Could indicate challenging economics or a young system where operators haven't had time to expand.
Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.
vs Personal Care & Beauty medians
How Radiant Waxing Compares
Category median of published Personal Care & Beauty brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.
Is the system healthy?
Source: FDD 2026 · Item 20
Unit growth
Item 20 · unit dynamics
The Growth Chart
- Total units
- 58
- Opened
- 2
- Last reporting year
- Closed
- 3
- Terminated
- 3
- Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
- Turnover rate
- 5.2%
- Company-owned
- 0
- Corporate units in the system
- % franchised
- 100%
- vs corporate-owned
- Multi-unit owners
- 1.0%
- Net growth (3-yr)
- -10.8%
- Net unit change over 3 years
- 3-yr CAGR
- -10.8%
- Compounded over last 3 years
Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers
- Terminated
- 3
- Signed, not yet open
- 3
- 0.05 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
- Projected new
- 0
- Franchisor's next-year forecast
Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.
Item 20 · 15 states with active franchisees
The Territory Map
Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).
States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.
Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list
58 current owners across 13 states; 2 former (terminated, transferred or not renewed) listed separately.
- CA 12
- ID 8
- TX 8
- UT 8
- NC 4
- AZ 3
- MA 3
- NJ 3
- CO 2
- FL 2
- OR 2
- WA 2
- +1 more states
Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.
A system losing more than 10% of its units year-over-year is a red flag. Check whether closures are concentrated in specific regions.
SBA loan performance
Government records
SBA Loan Data
Aggregated from SBA loan disclosures. This brand has only 9 7(a) loans on file; statistical reliability is limited below 10 loans.
- Total loans
- 9
- Loan volume
- $4.5M
- Median loan
- $436K
- 50th percentile
- Charge-off rate
- Under 10 loans (9)
- Insufficient SBA coverage: 9 loans, rate hidden below 10
Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated
- Repayment rate (PIF)
- Under 10 loans (9)
- 5-yr charge-off
- Under 10 loans (9)
- Loans approved 2021+
- Active lenders
- 5
- Defaults
- N/A
Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.
What could kill this investment?
Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21
Risk analysis
FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21
Risk & Legal
Multiple concerns: pending consolidated franchisee class action (Martin et al.) over the LunchboxWax rebrand where the court found the franchisor breached the covenant of good faith (nominal $100/franchisee damages, on appeal), plus operating losses (net income -$813,181) and a shrinking system (-10.8% net growth). Net worth is healthy at $22,303,403.
Litigation (Item 3)
Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).
Pending: consolidated franchisee class action (Martin et al.) alleging breach of franchise agreements re: LunchboxWax rebrand and Brand/System Development Fund handling; court found franchisor breached covenant of good faith re: rebrand timing but awarded only nominal $100/franchisee damages; on appeal. Completed: predecessor trademark infringement/TTAB dispute (Aesthetica v. Lunchbox LLC) settled 2020.
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
None disclosed
Audited financials (Item 21)
Yes · Grant Thornton LLP
Franchisor revenue (Item 21)
Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)
Item 8 states the franchisor's own total revenue as $5,836,405 (FY ending 2025-12-31); the statements above are the parent's.
ⓘ These are the parent company's consolidated financials (the parent guarantees the franchisor), not this brand's standalone results — the figure reflects the whole corporate group, not this brand alone.
Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16
- Franchisor sells you products: No
- Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
- Must buy proprietary products: Yes
- Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
- Can negotiate own supplier terms: No
Score breakdown · what drove the 46 / 100 verdict
- 01MINORPending franchisee class action; breach-of-good-faith finding
- 02HIGH2 litigation matters
- 03MINORSystem contracting -10.8% net growth
- 04MINORPositive net worth $22,303,403 offsets financial risk
Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification
What are you signing up for?
Ongoing fees run about 8.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.
Source: FDD 2026 · Items 11, 12, 17
FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal
Contract & Territory Detail
| Initial term | 10 years |
|---|---|
| Renewal term | 10 years |
| Allowed renewalsℹ | 1 |
| Territory type | Protected territory |
| Protected territory | Yes |
| Exclusive territoryℹ | No |
| Territory radius | 1.5 mi |
| Online sales rightsℹ | Restricted |
| Franchisor can compete | Yes |
| Hire a manager? | Allowed |
| Owner-operator | Optional |
| Non-compete (years)ℹ | 2 years |
| Non-compete (miles)ℹ | 3 mi |
| Right of first refusalℹ | Yes |
| Transfer requires consent | Yes |
| Termination notice | 30 days |
| Termination groundsℹ | 23 |
| Curable defaultsℹ | 6 |
| Mandatory arbitration | Yes |
| Arbitration location | Within 50 miles of franchisor's then-current principal place of business (currently Denver, Colorado) |
| Jury trial waiver | Yes |
| Governing law | Colorado |
| Litigation count | 2 |
View Item 3 litigation summary
Pending: consolidated franchisee class action (Martin et al.) alleging breach of franchise agreements re: LunchboxWax rebrand and Brand/System Development Fund handling; court found franchisor breached covenant of good faith re: rebrand timing but awarded only nominal $100/franchisee damages; on appeal. Completed: predecessor trademark infringement/TTAB dispute (Aesthetica v. Lunchbox LLC) settled 2020.
Items 10, 11
Training & Operations
- Classroom training
- 29 hrs
- On-the-job training
- 20 hrs
- Ongoing training
- Required
- Site selection
- franchisee proposes, franchisor approves
- Franchisor financing
- Not offered
- Item 10
Items 5 & 11
Franchisor Support
Item 20 · call current owners
Franchisee Contacts
60 owners to call
Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20
Frequently asked questions
Frequently Asked Questions
How much does it cost to open a RADIANT WAXING franchise?
The total investment to open a RADIANT WAXING franchise ranges from $433K – $708K, with an initial franchise fee of $50K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).
What do RADIANT WAXING franchise owners earn?
According to Item 19 of the RADIANT WAXING FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $555K. The median is $538K. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.
Who owns RADIANT WAXING?
RADIANT WAXING is franchised by Radiant Waxing Franchise, LLC. Its parent company is Radiant Waxing Holdings, LLC (owned by Steele Pomp Investment, LLC). The ultimate parent named in the FDD is Transom Bloom Topco, LP (and related Transom entities). Source: FDD Item 1, 2026 filing.
What is Item 19 in the RADIANT WAXING FDD?
The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the RADIANT WAXING FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.
What is RADIANT WAXING's franchise failure rate?
SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for RADIANT WAXING (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.
How many RADIANT WAXING franchise locations are there?
As of their most recent FDD filing, RADIANT WAXING has 58 total units in the United States, including 58 franchised units and 0 company-owned units. 2 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.
Is RADIANT WAXING a good franchise to buy?
FranchiseVerdict rates RADIANT WAXING as a B-grade franchise with a verdict score of 46 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.
Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.
For franchisors
Are you the franchisor?
If you represent RADIANT WAXING, you can request corrections or provide updated information.
Other Personal Care & Beauty franchises
Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Personal Care & Beauty category
Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.