FranchiseVerdict
iTAN logo
FV-01316·MODERATEExcellent91

Itan

Personal Services - Beauty & SalonFranchising since 2008Website
Investment
$280K – $835K
55th pct Beauty & Salon
Avg revenue
$513K
29th pct Beauty & Salon
Royalty
6.5%
57th pct Beauty & Salon
Units
28
40th pct Beauty & Salon
SBA default
0.0%
vs <3% typical

Bottom line

  • Total investment $280K – $835K including a $50K franchise fee, 6.5% ongoing royalty.
  • Average unit revenue of $513K/year (median $497K).
  • Rated MODERATE with a risk score of 62/100. SBA loan default rate of 0.0% across 1 loans (below the industry average).

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Legal entity
iTAN Franchising, Inc.
Incorporated in
California
HQ
1784 La Costa Meadows Dr., #101, San Marcos, California 92078
Auditor
Considine & Considine
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$769K
vs $908K prior year

Yale framework · single-unit ROIC

Returns Analysis

Pulls Item 7 (investment) and Item 19 (revenue) from this brand's FDD into the Yale unlevered-ROIC formula. Override any input to stress-test it against your own assumptions.

The model · Yale framework

What would one iTAN unit return on the cash you put in?

Revenue · per unit, per year
$
FDD Item 19 reports $512,926
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fund
Royaltytyp 68%
%
Ad fundtyp 35%
%
Operating costs · category default: personal services
COGS
%
Labor
%
Rent / occupancy
%
Other operating
%
Total invested capital · what you actually put in
Initial investment
$
FDD Item 7: $280K–$835K
Working capital
$
FDD reports $10K–$40K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

19%

Below typical band (30–60%)

0%30–60% Yale band80%

Store EBITDA · annual
$110K
EBITDA margin
21.5%
Total invested
$583K
Payback
63 mo
Unit-level only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even Yale describes.

Levered LBO scenario · Yale Crease Capital framing

What would 25 iTAN units return on equity?

Edit assumptions

Equity IRR · 5-yr

49.9%

7.57× MOIC

Year-1 DSCR

1.88×

EBITDA ÷ debt service

Equity required

$1.5M

on $7.4M purchase

Total debt

$5.9M

SBA $3.7M + senior + seller note

Overview

About

iTAN appears to be a tanning salon franchise where franchisees operate retail locations offering spray tans, UV tanning beds, and related beauty services. Day-to-day operations involve managing staff, maintaining equipment, serving walk-in and appointment clients, managing inventory of tanning solutions, and ensuring facility cleanliness and compliance with health regulations.

CEO
Faraje Kharsa
Founded
2008
FDD year
2025
States available
1

Item 7 · what it costs

The Vitals

Total investment
$280K – $835K
All-in to open one unit
Liquid capital
$10K – $40K
Cash you must have on hand
Franchise fee
$50K
Royalty
6.5%
Gross Sales · typical 6–8%
Ad fund
2.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
8.5%
vs 9–13% typical

Item 19

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$513K
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$497K
Item 19 type
Gross Sales, COGS, and Selected Operating Expenses
Sample size
28 units
vs category median 34
Range (low → high)
$207K$769K
Cohort dispersion
Transparency
7 / 5
vs category median 4 / 5 · above
Revenue rank29th
vs Personal Services - Beauty & Salon peers
Investment cost rank55th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank57th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank40th
vs Personal Services - Beauty & Salon peers
Risk score rank50th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
28
Opened
5
Last reporting year
Closed
1
Turnover rate
3.6%
Company-owned
0
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
100%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (yr3)
+16.7%
Net unit change last year
3-yr CAGR
+7.7%
Compounded over last 3 years
2023
28+4
Franchised units
2024
24
Franchised units
2025
26
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 7 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator — not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Registered · 7 states
Not registered

States derived from franchisee phone area codes (Item 20). Approximate — ported numbers may show the original state, not the franchisee's current location.

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

Total loans
1
Loan volume
Avg loan
Default rate
0.0%
vs <3% typical · system-wide
5-yr default

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 5, 6, 12, 17

Risk & Legal

62
Risk · 0-100
MODERATE62 / 100

iTAN presents caution-level risk due to opaque profitability metrics, going concern status, and inability to validate franchise viability against the substantial capital investment required.

Score breakdown · what drove the 62 / 100 rating

  1. 01MEDNo Item 19 (Average Unit Volume) disclosed — cannot verify if $512,926 avg revenue supports profitability against $280k-$835k investment range
  2. 02HIGHGoing Concern status is False — indicates potential financial instability or restructuring risk at franchisor level
  3. 03MEDNet income not disclosed — inability to assess actual franchisee profitability; gross revenue alone is insufficient for ROI validation
  4. 04MEDModest unit growth of 16.7% YoY with only 28 total units suggests limited scale and market traction
  5. 05MINORHigh investment ceiling ($835,064) creates significant capital requirement and extended breakeven risk if $512,926 revenue doesn't translate to net profit
  6. 06MINOR6.5% royalty on gross sales is standard but becomes problematic if net margins are compressed

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

FDD Items 5, 6, 12, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Territory
Population
Protected territory
Yes
Initial term
10 years
Renewal term
5 years
Online sales rights
Restricted
Franchisor can compete
Yes
Hire a manager?
Allowed
Litigation count
0
Right of first refusal
Yes
Franchisor can buy back on resale
Mandatory arbitration
No
Jury trial waiver
Yes
Non-compete
2 yrs
Post-termination restriction
Owner-operator
Required
Governing law
California

Item 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
80 hrs
On-the-job training
80 hrs
POS system
Helios
Operating tech stack

Item 20

Franchisee Contacts

Phone numbers extracted directly from this brand's FDD Item 20. After purchase, you'll also receive a list of validation questions tailored to this brand.

Franchisee contacts

34 numbers

Locked
(408) 239-••••
CA
(951) 600-••••
CA
(619) 222-••••
CA

One-time purchase · CSV download · Validation questions included

FDD download

iTAN · FDD (2025) PDF

Single-page checkout · instant download · CSV export of contacts available separately above