Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Quiznos logo

Quiznos Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Quick-Service RestaurantsCOFranchising since 1991
FWeakest tierWeakest tier16/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$214K – $649K
Disclosed sales
partial, no system average
SBA charge-off
28.1%
on 2,220 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-02084FDD 2025Data QualityExcellent81%
Manager-run OKNo: No territory protection

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Quiznos is a quick-service franchise known for its toasted submarine sandwiches. Franchisees run shops managing made-to-order subs, counter service, and staffing.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Quiznos franchise requires a total initial investment of $214K – $649K, including a $5K franchise fee and an ongoing 5.0% royalty[2]. The 2025 FDD on file does not yield a unit-revenue figure we can publish. SBA 7(a) loans show a 28.1% charge-off rate across 2,220 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: F (Weakest tier), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: low - issued within the last 12 months

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored6 of 6 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$214K – $649K
27th pct Service Resta…
Avg gross sales
N/A
Royalty
5.0%
12th pct Service Resta…
Units
152
80th pct Service Resta…
SBA charge-off
28.1%
% of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category

Quick verdict · Quick-Service Restaurants · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$214K – $649K
Median $486K
below median ↓, better than category
Franchise Fee
$5K – $5K
Median $35K
below median ↓, better than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$35K – $40K
Median $33K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
Partial, no system average
No system average in Item 19
Royalty Rate
5.0%
Median 5.5%
near median
Ongoing Fees
9.0% of rev
Median 7.5%
above median ↑, worse than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
28.1%
2,220 loans · Median 14.3%
above median ↑, worse than category
System Size
152 units
Median 18 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
24.5%
Median 0.0%
Territory
None
The franchisor can open or license outlets nearby
Owner-Operator
Optional
Can hire a manager
Litigation
1 case
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Quick-Service Restaurants median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $214K – $649K including a $5K franchise fee, 5.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSItem 19 reports outlet revenue, but not in a form that yields a per-outlet average we can compare across brands.
  • RISKVerdict F (Weakest tier), verdict score 16/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 28.1% across 2220 loans (well above the 16% franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
  • GROWTHNegative: net -3 franchised outlets in the latest year (7 opened, 7 closed); 3 signed but not yet open (Item 20).
  • FLAGAuditor disclosed a going-concern note, which flagged doubt about the franchisor's ability to continue operations. Verify against the latest FDD.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Quiz Holdings, LLC
Parent company
Quiz Franchisor, LLC (immediate parent); REGO Intermediate Holding Company, LLC; REGO Restaurant Holdings, LLC; REGO Restaurant Holdings IV, LLC; Super REGO, LLC; High Bluff Capital Partners, LLC
FDD Item 1, page 9 of the 2025 FDD
Ultimate parent
REGO Restaurant Holdings, LLC / High Bluff Capital Partners, LLC
FDD Item 1, page 9 of the 2025 FDD
Predecessor
QFA Royalties LLC (offered QUIZNOS franchises March 2008-June 2018); original predecessors began franchising QUIZNOS in 1991
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
Chief Executive Officer
Neel Mahendra Patel
Incorporated in
Delaware
HQ
4700 S. Syracuse St., Suite 225, Denver, Colorado 80237
Auditor
Ernst & Young LLP
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$32.3M
vs $39.2M prior year
⚠ Going-concern note
Disclosed in FDD 2025
Auditor flagged doubt about continued operations. Verify against the latest FDD before deciding.

Overview

About

CEO
Neel Mahendra Patel
Headquarters
CO
FDD year
2025
States available
34

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 11% below the typical quick-service restaurants franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$214K – $649KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 19 of the 2025 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$5,000Verified — printed on page 13 of the 2025 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty5.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 14 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund4.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 15 of the 2025 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$35K – $40K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

FDD Item 7 · 2025 filing

Initial investment breakdown

Quiznos: Item 7 initial investment breakdown
Cost componentLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$5K$5K
Working capital (3–6 mo)$35K$40K
Equipment, build-out, other$174K$604K
Total initial investment$214K$649K

Source: Quiznos 2025 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$214K – $649K
Top 40% of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$35K – $40K
Bottom third — review vs category
Franchise fee
$5K – $5K
Top 40% of category vs category
Royalty
5.0%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
4.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
9.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Quiznos: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty5.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund4.0% of gross sales
Technology fee$400
Transfer fee$5K
Renewal fee$5K
Inventory (initial)$3K – $15K
Total fee load9.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Avg gross salesNot extracted
Median gross salesNot extracted
Item 19 typegross sales
Sample size118

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

No Item 19 revenue figure for Quiznos is on file. The return models need a revenue figure to start from, and the operating costs that turn gross sales into a profit are in no FDD. Enter your own and the calculator runs on your assumptions — nothing here is modelled until you do.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Quiznos unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearnot set
Item 19 not disclosed. Enter your own revenue assumption
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $214K–$649K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $35K–$40K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for annual revenue, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$469K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Item 19 type
gross sales
Sample size
118
vs category median 19 · large
Range (low → high)
$12K→$790KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 47 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Reporting year
2024
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2025
Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2024
Transparency
4 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · typical
Gross sales rank
No comparison data
Investment cost rank27th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank12th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank80th
vs Quick-Service Restaurants peers
Risk score rank100th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 781 Quick-Service Restaurants brands

Showing the headline figures — all 151 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Item 19 · by group

What the filing does disclose

Item 19 of this FDD reports performance in more than one group. We publish no single average for this brand; the groups the filing does disclose are listed below, quoted from its own Item 19 table.

Each row below is quoted from the FDD's own Item 19 table. Gross sales are not profit.

Item 19 detail

traditional franchised

SegmentSampleAvg
Traditional Franchised Restaurants95$394K

non traditional franchised

SegmentSampleAvg
Non-Traditional Franchised Restaurants23$235K

company owned

SegmentSampleAvg
Non-Traditional Company-Owned Restaurant1$4.5M

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 9.0% — above the Quick-Service Restaurants median of 7.5%.

Disclosure

Item 19 reports outlet revenue, but not in a form that yields a per-outlet average we can compare across brands.

Operator retention

System contracting at -9.0% CAGR over 3 years. Investigate whether closures are franchisor-driven consolidation or franchisee exits.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Quick-Service Restaurants medians

How Quiznos Compares

Metric
Quiznos
Category median
vs median
Investment
$431K
$486Kmiddle half $342K–$748K · n=780
Below median, better than category
Revenue
N/A
$975Kmiddle half $664K–$1.4M · n=284
N/A
Unit Count
152
18middle half 5–79 · n=755
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Quick-Service Restaurants brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units152Verified — printed on page 48 of the 2025 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it two ways.
3-yr growth-9.0% (worth scrutinizing)
Turnover rate24.5% (caution)

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
152
Opened
7
Last reporting year
Closed
7
Terminated
0
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
4
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
24.5%
Company-owned
1
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
99%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
-9.0%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
-9.0%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
0
Not renewed
4
Transferred
2
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
3
0.02 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
9
Franchisor's next-year forecast
2022
166
Franchised units
2023
154-12
Franchised units
2024
151-3
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 32 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 32 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

112 current owners across 31 states; 9 former (terminated, transferred or not renewed) listed separately.

  • CA 12
  • TX 11
  • FL 10
  • WA 10
  • OK 6
  • IL 5
  • LA 5
  • CO 4
  • IA 4
  • NV 4
  • TN 4
  • AR 3
  • +19 more states

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

F
SBA Lending Health
Weak SBA lending record · 28.1% charge-off
Total loans
2,220
Loan volume
$331.9M
Median loan
$150K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
28.1%
on 2,220 loans · rates vary by category · see methodology

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
71.9%
5-yr charge-off
0.0%
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
323
Defaults
620
Typical loan rate
6.8%
avg rate to borrowers
Franchised industry avg
21.5%
brand above franchise avg ↑
Jobs supported
17,678
5.3 per loan
Lender concentration
7%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 50% went to startups / new businesses, 50% to established operators

Franchise vs independent — in limited-service restaurants, franchised businesses charge off at 21.5% vs 25.0% for independents — franchising is associated with 14% lower SBA default risk in this category.

Vintage analysis

Quiznos charge-off rate by loan vintage

BrandNational avg
Quiznos charge-off rate by loan vintage. Showing 20 vintages from 1993 to 2012. Rates range from 0.0% to 52.0%.0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%'93'96'99'02'05'08'11'12

Shaded area: recent vintages with few resolved loans; rates may change as loans mature.

Top lenders financing Quiznos franchisees

Zions Bank, A Division of151 loans33.1%
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association148 loans13.5%
PNC Bank, National Association120 loans31.1%

Showing 3 of 323 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Total loans
14
Loan volume
$7.2M
Charge-off rate
40.0%
Jobs created
171

Historical SBA 504 lending data via CDCs, not predictive of future performance.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for Quiznos from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Principal loss rate
18.2%
Avg SBA guarantee
77%
Avg interest rate
6.75%
Avg chargeoff amount
$98K
Lender concentration
6.8%
Job velocity
5.3 per $100K
NAICS benchmark
15.7%
NAICS 722211
Jobs supported
17,678

Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 7% of loans

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
1Zions Bank, A Division of151$20.8M33.1%
2JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association148$20.9M13.5%
3PNC Bank, National Association120$17.7M31.1%
4Readycap Lending, LLC116$17.7M42.2%
5Independence Bank112$16.4M52.7%
6Wells Fargo Bank National Association101$13.8M26.7%
7Stearns Bank National Association66$9.4M16.7%
8TD Bank, National Association63$9.5M23.8%
9KeyBank National Association62$9.9M27.4%
10BMO Bank National Association54$8.4M27.8%

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
TXTexas3047324.3%
CACalifornia2646725.6%
FLFlorida1355440.0%
NYNew York1023534.7%
ILIllinois922628.3%
OHOhio882326.1%
WAWashington861720.2%
PAPennsylvania823036.6%
NJNew Jersey771924.7%
MOMissouri621930.6%

SBA 7(a) lending trend

1993
4
1994
6
1995
8
1996
19
1997
50
1998
58
1999
58
2000
68
2001
95
2002
209
2003
367
2004
443
2005
414
2006
196
2007
94
2008
69
2009
23
2010
16
2011
8
2012
3
2013
2
2014
2
2017
2
2018
2
2019
1
2021
1
2023
2

Borrower profile

Ownership change2 (33%)
New (< 2 yr)2 (33%)
Existing (2+ yr)1 (17%)
Startup1 (17%)

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

Lending insight

A 28.1% charge-off rate means roughly 1 in 4 franchisees failed to repay their SBA loan. Investigate what changed.

What could kill this investment?

The auditor flagged going-concern doubt (Item 21) — the single biggest risk here.

SBA charge-off28.1% · 2,220 loans
Verdict score16/100 (higher is better)
Litigation1 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtYes (worth scrutinizing)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

FWeakest tier16Verdict score 16/100

Serious concerns stacked: going-concern note flagged with negative franchisor net worth of -$3,836,577 and net loss of -$1,578,478. Franchisor equity is deeply negative and the system is shrinking (-9.0% net growth, 24.5% turnover). Predecessor QFA Chapter 11 (2014) is old and low-weight, but current financial distress is genuine.

High confidence±4 pts
1220

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).

No litigation disclosed against the current franchisor. One completed predecessor litigation: Horowitz, et al. v. QFA Royalties LLC, et al. (2014), a putative class-opt-out action alleging fraud, franchise act violations, and RICO-type claims by a former QFA franchisee; stayed during predecessor's bankruptcy, settled via bankruptcy court-approved agreement in 2015 (franchisee received $22,131.44 against a $330,000 unsecured claim), dismissed with prejudice November 30, 2015.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

Subject: the company or an affiliate. Disclosed (Item 4 covers the last 10 years)

Predecessor QFA and affiliates filed a prepackaged Chapter 11 plan (In re QCE Finance LLC, et al., Case No. 14-10543, D. Del.) on March 14, 2014; plan approved May 12, 2014, effective June 30, 2014, case closed December 15, 2015. No bankruptcy disclosed for the current franchisor.

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Ernst & Young LLP⚠ Going-concern note flagged

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $32.3MYr 2: $39.2M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: No
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 16 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINORNegative net worth -$3,836,577
  2. 02MINORSystem contracting -9.0%, turnover 24.5%
  3. 03HIGHOld predecessor bankruptcy (2014, closed 2015) - low weight

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 151 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 9.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryNone (caution)
Initial training148 hrs

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term10 years
Allowed renewalsℹ1
Protected territoryNo
Online sales rightsRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorOptional
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ5 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
RoFR response window30 days
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Curable defaultsℹ5
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationWithin 50 miles of Denver, Colorado (franchisor's principal place of business)
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawColorado
Litigation count1
View Item 3 litigation summary

No litigation disclosed against the current franchisor. One completed predecessor litigation: Horowitz, et al. v. QFA Royalties LLC, et al. (2014), a putative class-opt-out action alleging fraud, franchise act violations, and RICO-type claims by a former QFA franchisee; stayed during predecessor's bankruptcy, settled via bankruptcy court-approved agreement in 2015 (franchisee received $22,131.44 against a $330,000 unsecured claim), dismissed with prejudice November 30, 2015.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
60 hrs
On-the-job training
88 hrs
Ongoing training
Required
Site selection
franchisee, subject to franchisor authorization
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
authorized point-of-sale system
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✓Lease negotiation help

Technology: authorized point-of-sale system

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

121 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 121 contacts · $49
Free preview
(213) 995-••••CA
Unlock all 121 contacts
(510) 620-••••CA
(440) 282-••••OH
(615) 851-••••TN
(863) 858-••••FL

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Quiznos franchise?

The total investment to open a Quiznos franchise ranges from $214K – $649K, with an initial franchise fee of $5K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Quiznos franchise owners earn?

Item 19 of the Quiznos FDD discloses outlet figures from $12K to $790K but no single average across all outlets. These are gross sales figures, not profit; the Revenue section shows what the filing reports and on what basis. Item 20 of the FDD lists current and former franchisees; asking them directly is the standard way to fill this gap.

Who owns Quiznos?

Quiznos is franchised by Quiz Holdings, LLC. Its parent company is Quiz Franchisor, LLC (immediate parent); REGO Intermediate Holding Company, LLC; REGO Restaurant Holdings, LLC; REGO Restaurant Holdings IV, LLC; Super REGO, LLC; High Bluff Capital Partners, LLC. The ultimate parent named in the FDD is REGO Restaurant Holdings, LLC / High Bluff Capital Partners, LLC. Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Quiznos FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Quiznos FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Quiznos's franchise failure rate?

Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, Quiznos has a charge-off rate of 28.1% across 2,220 loans, meaning 28.1% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.

How many Quiznos franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Quiznos has 152 total units in the United States, including 151 franchised units and 1 company-owned units. 7 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Quiznos a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Quiznos as a F-grade franchise with a verdict score of 16 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Quiznos, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Quick-Service Restaurants franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Quick-Service Restaurants category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.