Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Preferred Care At Home logo

Preferred Care At Home Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Senior CareTNFranchising since 2013
BAbove averageAbove average55/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$84K – $112K
Disclosed sales
partial, no system average
SBA charge-off
Under 10 loans (6)

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-02019FDD 2026Data QualityExcellent81%Pre-opening
Owner-operator requiredYes: Exclusive territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Preferred Care at Home is an in-home care franchise providing non-medical personal care and companionship to seniors and other adults. Franchisees run an agency recruiting caregivers, scheduling visits, and managing client care in a territory.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Preferred Care At Home franchise requires a total initial investment of $84K – $112K, including a $65K franchise fee and an ongoing 5.0% royalty[2]. The 2026 FDD on file does not yield a unit-revenue figure we can publish. FranchiseVerdict grade: B (Above average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: 2026 filing · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: low - the current year's filing

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✗ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored5 of 5 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$84K – $112K
27th pct Senior Care
Avg gross sales
N/A
Partial period
Royalty
5.0%
5th pct Senior Care
Units
130
69th pct Senior Care
SBA charge-off
N/A

Quick verdict · Senior Care · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$84K – $112K
Median $137K
below median ↓, better than category
Franchise Fee
$65K – $65K
Median $50K
above median ↑, worse than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$7K – $8K
Median $38K
below median ↓, better than category
Avg Revenue
Partial, no system average
No system average in Item 19
Royalty Rate
5.0%
Median 5.0%
near median
Ongoing Fees
8.0% of rev
Median 7.0%
above median ↑, worse than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Under 10 loans (6)
Insufficient SBA coverage: 6 loans, rate hidden below 10
System Size
130 units
Median 25 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
4.6%
Median 2.1%
above median ↑, worse than category
Territory
Exclusive
No other outlet of the brand may open inside it
Owner-Operator
Required
You must run it yourself
Litigation
4 cases
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Senior Care median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $84K – $112K including a $65K franchise fee, 5.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAll Item 19 figures are MONTHLY gross revenue amounts (not annual). Systemwide Average Monthly Gross Revenue = $108,598.52 (annualized ~$1,303,182); Average excl. top/bottom 20% = $73,204.00/mo; Top 20% Average = $302,538.21/mo (Jan-Dec 2024, n=85 reporting units). Percentile breakdown (monthly): Top 20% avg $307,561.92/median $238,677.27 (n=25); Middle 60% avg $98,949.47/median $92,153.32 (n=45); Bottom 20% avg $17,183.98/median $13,784.98 (n=15). By years in operation (monthly avg/median): 0-<2 yrs $125,945.88/$125,945.88 (n=6); 2-<5 yrs $116,923.38/$108,451.64 (n=22); 5+ yrs $137,590.18/$85,384.49 (n=57). Figures are gross revenue only, unaudited, pulled from WellSky software; exclude expenses/costs.
  • RISKVerdict B (Above average), verdict score 55/100 (higher is better).
  • GROWTHFlat: no net change in franchised outlets in the latest year (8 opened, 6 closed) (Item 20).
  • FLAGItem 4 discloses a bankruptcy of an officer or of a company an officer ran, not of the franchisor. Review Item 4 for details.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Help At Home Franchise Service, L.L.C.
Predecessor
Help at Home Health Care Services, Inc.
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
President / Managing Member
Frank V. Guerrieri
Incorporated in
Florida
HQ
414 Clinch Ave, Knoxville, TN 37902
Auditor
BAS Partners
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$2.9M
vs $3.0M prior year

Affiliated brands

  • PCAH Brands
  • described below operates and has operated a Preferred Care At Home business s

Other brands the franchisor or its parent operates (Item 1).

Overview

About

CEO
Frank V. Guerrieri
Headquarters
TN
Founded
2013
FDD year
2026
States available
16

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 29% below the typical senior care franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$84K – $112KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 17 of the 2026 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$64,500Verified — printed on page 13 of the 2026 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty5.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 66 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fundNot extracted
Working capital$7K – $8K

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 5–7

FDD Item 7 · 2026 filing

Initial investment breakdown

Preferred Care At Home: Item 7 initial investment breakdown
Cost componentLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$65K$65K
Working capital (3–6 mo)$7K$8K
Equipment, build-out, other$12K$39K
Total initial investment$84K$112K

Source: Preferred Care At Home 2026 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$84K – $112K
Top 40% of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$7K – $8K
Top 40% of category vs category
Franchise fee
$65K – $65K
Bottom third — review vs category
Royalty
5.0%
Tiered by sales volume · typical 6–8%
Ad fund
$180 monthly ad fund.
Total fee load
8.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Preferred Care At Home: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty5.0% of gross sales
Transfer fee$16K
Renewal fee$6K
Inventory (initial)$2K – $3K
Total fee load8.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Avg gross salesNot extracted
Median gross salesNot extracted
Item 19 typeSystemwide Average Gross R…
Sample size85

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 19

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

No Item 19 revenue figure for Preferred Care At Home is on file. The return models need a revenue figure to start from, and the operating costs that turn gross sales into a profit are in no FDD. Enter your own and the calculator runs on your assumptions — nothing here is modelled until you do.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Preferred Care At Home unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearnot set
Item 19 not disclosed. Enter your own revenue assumption
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $84K–$112K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $7K–$8K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for annual revenue, ad fund rate, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$105K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2026 FDD

Financial Performance

All Item 19 figures are MONTHLY gross revenue amounts (not annual). Systemwide Average Monthly Gross Revenue = $108,598.52 (annualized ~$1,303,182); Average excl. top/bottom 20% = $73,204.00/mo; Top 20% Average = $302,538.21/mo (Jan-Dec 2024, n=85 reporting units). Percentile breakdown (monthly): Top 20% avg $307,561.92/median $238,677.27 (n=25); Middle 60% avg $98,949.47/median $92,153.32 (n=45); Bottom 20% avg $17,183.98/median $13,784.98 (n=15). By years in operation (monthly avg/median): 0-<2 yrs $125,945.88/$125,945.88 (n=6); 2-<5 yrs $116,923.38/$108,451.64 (n=22); 5+ yrs $137,590.18/$85,384.49 (n=57). Figures are gross revenue only, unaudited, pulled from WellSky software; exclude expenses/costs.

Covers a partial period, not a full year

Item 19 type
Systemwide Average Gross Revenue, percentile breakdown, and years-in-operation breakdown for 2024
Sample size
85
vs category median 22 · large
Range (low → high)
$17K→$308KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 40 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Reporting year
2025
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2026
Disclosed in the 2026 filing, covering 2025
Transparency
3 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · below
Gross sales rank
No comparison data
Investment cost rank27th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank5th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank69th
vs Senior Care peers
Risk score rank56th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 79 Senior Care brands

Showing the headline figures — all 129 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 8.0% (near the Senior Care median).

Disclosure

Item 19 reports revenue for a partial period rather than annual gross sales, so unit revenue is not directly comparable.

Operator retention

System expanding at 8.3% CAGR over 3 years across 130 units — operators are staying and new ones are joining.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Senior Care medians

How Preferred Care At Home Compares

Metric
Preferred Care At Home
Category median
vs median
Investment
$98K
$137Kmiddle half $110K–$185K · n=78
Below median, better than category
Revenue
N/A
$1.1Mmiddle half $796K–$1.4M · n=31
N/A
Unit Count
130
25middle half 6–172 · n=78
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Senior Care brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units130Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 41 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
3-yr growth+1.5% (favorable vs category)
Turnover rate4.6% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
130
Opened
8
Last reporting year
Closed
6
Turnover rate
4.6%
Company-owned
0
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
100%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
+1.5%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+8.3%
Compounded over last 3 years
2023
120
Franchised units
2024
130+10
Franchised units
2025
130±0
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 5 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 5 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

8 current owners across 5 states.

  • FL 3
  • PA 2
  • CA 1
  • MD 1
  • MI 1

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA loan disclosures. This brand has only 6 7(a) loans on file; statistical reliability is limited below 10 loans.

Total loans
6
Loan volume
$2.2M
Median loan
$274K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
Under 10 loans (6)
Insufficient SBA coverage: 6 loans, rate hidden below 10

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
Under 10 loans (6)
5-yr charge-off
Under 10 loans (6)
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
6
Defaults
N/A

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

What could kill this investment?

SBA charge-offUnder 10 loans (6)
Verdict score55/100 (higher is better)
Litigation4 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

BAbove average55Verdict score 55/100

Franchisor filed Chapter 11 on July 10, 2014 following a litigation cluster (4 matters), but the plan was confirmed September 9, 2015 and all matters resolved via global settlement over a decade ago. financial_distress is flagged but the bankruptcy is old and resolved. No pending litigation; audited with Item 19.

High confidence±6 pts
4961

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).

All 4 disclosed matters stem from a 2011-2014 dispute cluster (CAM Enterprises, PCC Universal, Family First Home Health Care, and a related trademark infringement suit) that led to the franchisor's 2014 Chapter 11 filing; resolved via global settlement confirmed September 9, 2015. No pending litigation as of FDD issuance.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

Subject: an officer. An officer’s own bankruptcy or a company an officer ran, not the franchisor’s

Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida, under Case No. 14-25709-PGH and No. 14-25706-PGH respectively. The bankruptcy case of Help at Home Franchise Service, LLC was substantively consolidated with the bankruptcy case of Help at Home Health Care Service, Inc., having a case number of

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · BAS Partners

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $2.9MYr 2: $3.0M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: No
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
  • Must buy proprietary products: No
  • Restricted to system-approved products: No
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: Yes

Score breakdown · what drove the 55 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINORFranchisor Chapter 11 in 2014, plan confirmed 2015 (old, resolved)
  2. 02HIGH4 litigation matters, all resolved via 2015 global settlement
  3. 03MEDNo pending litigation; audited, Item 19 disclosed

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 129 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 8.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryExclusive (favorable vs category)
Initial training64 hrs

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term10 years
Allowed renewalsℹ1
Territory typeExclusive territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹYes
Territory population30,000
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorRequired
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ75 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice15 days
Curable defaultsℹ1
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationKnoxville, Tennessee
Governing lawTennessee
Litigation count4
View Item 3 litigation summary

All 4 disclosed matters stem from a 2011-2014 dispute cluster (CAM Enterprises, PCC Universal, Family First Home Health Care, and a related trademark infringement suit) that led to the franchisor's 2014 Chapter 11 filing; resolved via global settlement confirmed September 9, 2015. No pending litigation as of FDD issuance.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
32 hrs
On-the-job training
32 hrs
Training location
On-site and at franchisor location
Ongoing training
Required
Site selection
franchisor
Franchisor financing
Offered
Item 10
POS system
WellSky
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Technology: WellSky

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

8 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 8 contacts · $49
Free preview
(570) 947-••••PA
Unlock all 8 contacts
(517) 614-••••MI
(561) 455-••••FL
(386) 320-••••FL
(858) 750-••••CA

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Preferred Care At Home franchise?

The total investment to open a Preferred Care At Home franchise ranges from $84K – $112K, with an initial franchise fee of $65K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Preferred Care At Home franchise owners earn?

Item 19 of the Preferred Care At Home FDD discloses outlet figures from $17K to $308K but no single average across all outlets. These are gross sales figures, not profit; the Revenue section shows what the filing reports and on what basis. Item 20 of the FDD lists current and former franchisees; asking them directly is the standard way to fill this gap.

Who owns Preferred Care At Home?

Preferred Care At Home is franchised by Help At Home Franchise Service, L.L.C.. Source: FDD Item 1, 2026 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Preferred Care At Home FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Preferred Care At Home FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Preferred Care At Home's franchise failure rate?

SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for Preferred Care At Home (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.

How many Preferred Care At Home franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Preferred Care At Home has 130 total units in the United States, including 130 franchised units and 0 company-owned units. 8 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Preferred Care At Home a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Preferred Care At Home as a B-grade franchise with a verdict score of 55 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Preferred Care At Home, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Senior Care franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Senior Care category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.