Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Bridge to Better Living logo

Bridge to Better Living Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Senior CareNEFranchising since 2019
DBelow averageBelow average30/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$83K – $112K
Disclosed sales
partial, no system average
SBA charge-off
Under 10 loans (1)

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-00388Data QualityStandard71%FDD 2021 · 5yr old
Manager-run OKYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

This data is from a 2021 FDD. Current terms may differ. Always verify with the franchisor's latest disclosure document.

Bridge to Better Living is a senior services franchise providing assisted-living transition consulting and senior-care placement. Franchisees run local operations, matching seniors with care communities for referral fees.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Bridge to Better Living franchise requires a total initial investment of $83K – $112K, including a $48K franchise fee and an ongoing 8.0% royalty[2]. The 2021 FDD on file does not yield a unit-revenue figure we can publish. FranchiseVerdict grade: D (Below average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: high - issued more than two years ago

Evidence: partial✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✗ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored5 of 5 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$83K – $112K
26th pct Senior Care
Avg gross sales
N/A
Company-owned only1 outlet
Royalty
8.0%
85th pct Senior Care
Units
2
3rd pct Senior Care
SBA charge-off
N/A

Quick verdict · Senior Care · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$83K – $112K
Median $137K
below median ↓, better than category
Franchise Fee
$48K – $48K
Median $50K
near median
Liquid Capital Req'd
$21K – $35K
Median $38K
below median ↓, better than category
Avg Revenue
Partial, no system average
No system average in Item 19
Royalty Rate
8.0%
Median 5.0%
above median ↑, worse than category
Ongoing Fees
10.0% of rev
Median 7.0%
above median ↑, worse than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Under 10 loans (1)
Insufficient SBA coverage: 1 loan, rate hidden below 10
System Size
2 units
Median 25 units
below median ↓, worse than category
Turnover Rate
N/A
Median 2.1%
below median ↓, better than category
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Optional
Can hire a manager
Litigation
None disclosed
Clean record

Green = favorable by >10% vs Senior Care median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $83K – $112K including a $48K franchise fee, 8.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSItem 19 reports gross sales and ebitda rather than annual gross sales, so unit revenue is not directly comparable.
  • RISKVerdict D (Below average), verdict score 30/100 (higher is better).
  • GROWTHFlat: no net change in franchised outlets in the latest year (0 opened, 0 closed); 1 signed but not yet open (Item 20).
  • DATAItem 19 reports gross sales and ebitda rather than annual gross sales, so unit revenue is not directly comparable. Ask franchisees directly for full unit-level revenue.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Bridge to Better Living Franchising, LLC
CEO title
Manager, President and Chief Executive Officer
Mary Ann Stallings
CEO experience
14 yrs
Years in role or industry
Founder active
Yes
Original founder still leading the business
Incorporated in
NE
HQ
4230 Pioneer Woods Drive, Suite B, Lincoln, Nebraska 68506
Auditor
Lutz & Company, PC
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$12K
Most recent fiscal year

Overview

About

CEO
Mary Ann Stallings
Headquarters
NE
Founded
2018
FDD year
2021
States available
0

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 29% below the typical senior care franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$83K – $112KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 18 of the 2021 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$48,000Verified — printed on page 11 of the 2021 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty8.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 12 of the 2021 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund2.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 12 of the 2021 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$21K – $35K

Source: FDD 2021 · Items 5–7

Full Item 7 breakdown16 line items

Initial investment breakdown

Item 7 initial investment line items
Line itemLowHigh
Initial Franchise Feenot refundable$48K$48K
Construction/Leasehold Improvements/Furniture and Fixtures$1K$4K
Equipment$300$900
Signage (interior and exterior)$500$3K
Computer and Software$1K$3K
Opening Inventory——
Rent Deposit$500$750
Utility Deposits$0$300
Insurance Deposits and Premiums$450$1K
Pre-Opening Travel Expense$2K$3K
Grand Opening Advertising$3K$5K
Professional Fees$3K$5K
Business Permits and Licenses$100$350
Printing, Stationery and Office Supplies$200$500
Initial Marketing Set-Up Fee$3K$3K
Additional Funds - 3 Months$21K$35K
Total initial investment$83K$112K

Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$83K – $112K
Top 40% of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$21K – $35K
Middle of category vs category
Franchise fee
$48K – $48K
Top 40% of category vs category
Royalty
8.0%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
2.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
10.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Bridge to Better Living: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty8.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund2.0% of gross sales
Technology fee$99
Training fee$500
Transfer fee$24K
Renewal fee$12K
Inventory (initial)$0 – $0
Total fee load10.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Avg gross salesNot extracted
Median gross salesNot extracted
Item 19 typegross sales and ebitda
Sample size1 outlet

Source: FDD 2021 · Item 19

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

No Item 19 revenue figure for Bridge to Better Living is on file. The return models need a revenue figure to start from, and the operating costs that turn gross sales into a profit are in no FDD. Enter your own and the calculator runs on your assumptions — nothing here is modelled until you do.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Bridge to Better Living unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearnot set
Item 19 not disclosed. Enter your own revenue assumption
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $83K–$112K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $21K–$35K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for annual revenue, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$125K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2021 FDD

Financial Performance

Company-owned outlets only - not franchisee performance

Based on a single outlet - not a system average

Item 19 type
gross sales and ebitda
Sample size
1 outlet
vs category median 22 · small
Reporting year
2020
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2021
Disclosed in the 2021 filing, covering 2020
Transparency
6 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · above
Gross sales rank
No comparison data
Investment cost rank26th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank85th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank3th
vs Senior Care peers
Risk score rank100th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 79 Senior Care brands

Showing the headline figures — all 147 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 10.0% — above the Senior Care median of 7.0%.

Disclosure

Item 19 reports gross sales and ebitda rather than annual gross sales, so unit revenue is not directly comparable.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Senior Care medians

How Bridge to Better Living Compares

Metric
Bridge to Better Living
Category median
vs median
Investment
$97K
$137Kmiddle half $110K–$185K · n=78
Below median, better than category
Revenue
N/A
$1.1Mmiddle half $796K–$1.4M · n=31
N/A
Unit Count
2
25middle half 6–172 · n=78
Below median, worse than category

Category median of published Senior Care brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units2Verified — printed on page 50 of the 2021 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it two ways.

Source: FDD 2021 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
2
Opened
0
Last reporting year
Closed
0
Terminated
0
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
N/A
Company-owned
2
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
0%
vs corporate-owned

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
0
Not renewed
0
Transferred
0
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
1
0.50 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
3
Franchisor's next-year forecast
2018
0
Franchised units
2019
0±0
Franchised units
2020
0±0
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA loan disclosures. This brand has only 1 7(a) loan on file; statistical reliability is limited below 10 loans.

Total loans
1
Loan volume
$44K
Median loan
$44K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
Under 10 loans (1)
Insufficient SBA coverage: 1 loan, rate hidden below 10

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
Under 10 loans (1)
5-yr charge-off
Under 10 loans (1)
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
1
Defaults
N/A

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

What could kill this investment?

SBA charge-offUnder 10 loans (1)
Verdict score30/100 (higher is better)
Litigation0 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

DBelow average30Verdict score 30/100

This is a micro-franchise system (2 units) with unvalidated financials, undisclosed royalty minimums, and limited growth evidence—presenting meaningful execution risk despite no disclosed litigation.

Low confidence±19 pts
1149

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: officers or affiliates. The franchisor is not a named party in these cases.

No litigation required to be disclosed

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Lutz & Company, PC

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $0.0MNon-royalty: $0.0M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Item 21 references audited financial statements for FY2020 and FY2019 in Exhibit D, but the Exhibit D financial statement pages are blank/not present in the extracted text, so no figures or auditor could be captured.

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: No
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: No
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 30 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINOROnly 2 franchised units with unknown growth trajectory suggests nascent or stalled system expansion
  2. 02MINORRoyalty structure with minimum creates fixed cost burden; 8% of $490k ($39.3k) plus unknown minimum could significantly erode the $107k average net income
  3. 03MINORHigh franchise fee ($48k) relative to system size and unproven unit economics raises capital recovery concerns
  4. 04MEDLack of disclosed litigation doesn't confirm clean history; small systems often lack legal infrastructure to report disputes
  5. 05MINOR10-year term is longer than industry standard (5-7 years typical), locking franchisees into potentially unfavorable economics

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 147 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 10.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training40 hrs

Source: FDD 2021 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term10 years
Allowed renewalsℹ1
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory population300,000
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorOptional
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ30 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
RoFR response window30 days
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice15 days
Curable defaultsℹ14
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationLincoln, Nebraska
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawNE
Litigation count0
View Item 3 litigation summary

No litigation required to be disclosed

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
22 hrs
On-the-job training
18 hrs
Training location
Lincoln, Nebraska
Ongoing training
Optional
Time to open
4 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
franchisee
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
BridgIT
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Technology: BridgIT

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Bridge to Better Living franchise?

The total investment to open a Bridge to Better Living franchise ranges from $83K – $112K, with an initial franchise fee of $48K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Bridge to Better Living franchise owners earn?

Item 19 of the Bridge to Better Living FDD discloses figures for part of the system but no single average across all outlets. These are gross sales figures, not profit; the Revenue section shows what the filing reports and on what basis. Item 20 of the FDD lists current and former franchisees; asking them directly is the standard way to fill this gap.

Who owns Bridge to Better Living?

Bridge to Better Living is franchised by Bridge to Better Living Franchising, LLC. Source: FDD Item 1, 2021 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Bridge to Better Living FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Bridge to Better Living FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Bridge to Better Living's franchise failure rate?

SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for Bridge to Better Living (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.

How many Bridge to Better Living franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Bridge to Better Living has 2 total units in the United States.

Is Bridge to Better Living a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Bridge to Better Living as a D-grade franchise with a verdict score of 30 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Bridge to Better Living, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Senior Care franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Senior Care category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.