B63/100FDD 2025
Michelin® Commercial Service Network™ — Litigation & Risk
Other · FDD Items 3, 4 & 5
Lower Risk
No litigation cases disclosed in FDD Items 3 and 4.
Source: FDD Items 3–5
FDD Items 3 & 4
Litigation Metrics
Cases disclosed
0
Total from FDD Items 3 and 4
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
—
Franchisor or officer bankruptcy
Overall risk score
63 / 100
FranchiseVerdict composite
Rating
MODERATE
STRONG / MODERATE / CAUTION / AVOID
FDD Items 5, 6 & 17 — what you give up
Contract Risk Indicators
Mandatory arbitration
Required
Disputes resolved outside court — limits your legal options
Jury trial waiver
Waived
You give up the right to a jury trial
Franchisor can compete
Yes
Franchisor can open competing locations in or near your territory
Right of first refusal
Yes
Franchisor can match any purchase offer when you try to sell
Governing law
South Carolina
State whose law governs disputes — relevant if you're not based there
What drove the 63/100 rating
Risk Score Breakdown
- 01MINORMassive investment range ($189K–$4.25M) suggests inconsistent unit economics and unclear cost structure
- 02MEDRoyalty rate not disclosed — hidden ongoing fees could erode profitability significantly
- 03MEDZero unit growth (0.6% YoY decline) across 340 units indicates market saturation or franchisee struggles
- 04MINORNo Item 19 financial disclosures (avg revenue/net income) prevents assessment of franchisee earnings potential
- 05MINORUnprotected territory creates direct competition risk from other franchisees in same market
- 06MINOR10-year term is longer than industry standard (5-7 years), locking franchisees into potentially unfavorable agreement
- 07MINORLow franchise fee ($2,500) relative to investment range suggests hidden costs elsewhere (working capital, inventory, equipment)
Severity inferred from FDD text — not a regulatory or legal classification
Litigation data from FDD Items 3, 4, and 5. SBA data from public 7(a) FOIA records (FY2020–present). Not legal advice — consult a franchise attorney before signing any franchise agreement.