FranchiseVerdict
Jan-Pro Franchise Development logo
FV-01332·MODERATEExcellent100

Jan-Pro Franchise Development

OtherFranchising since 1995Website
Investment
$130K – $422K
46th pct Other
Avg revenue
$6.1M
48th pct Other
Royalty
4.0%
3rd pct Other
Units
108
77th pct Other
SBA default

Bottom line

  • Total investment $130K – $422K including a $50K franchise fee, 4.0% ongoing royalty.
  • Average unit revenue of $6.1M/year (median $5.2M). Estimated payback in 0.4 years.
  • Rated MODERATE with a risk score of 60/100.
  • System growing at 90% CAGR over 3 years with 108 total units — strong expansion trajectory.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Legal entity
Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc.
Parent company
Empower Brands Franchising, LLC
Incorporated in
Massachusetts
HQ
2520 Northwinds Parkway, Suite 375, Alpharetta, Georgia 30009
Auditor
Smith+Howard PC
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$27.6M
vs $28.8M prior year

Yale framework · single-unit ROIC

Returns Analysis

Pulls Item 7 (investment) and Item 19 (revenue) from this brand's FDD into the Yale unlevered-ROIC formula. Override any input to stress-test it against your own assumptions.

The model · Yale framework

What would one Jan-Pro Franchise Development unit return on the cash you put in?

Revenue · per unit, per year
$
FDD Item 19 reports $6,089,822
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fund
Royaltytyp 68%
%
Ad fundtyp 35%
%
Operating costs · category default: generic
COGS
%
Labor
%
Rent / occupancy
%
Other operating
%
Total invested capital · what you actually put in
Initial investment
$
FDD Item 7: $130K–$422K
Working capital
$
FDD reports $50K–$100K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

278%

Above typical band (30–60%)

0%30–60% Yale band80%
ROIC above 100% usually means the revenue figure is a system-wide aggregate or top-cohort number rather than a single-unit average. Verify the "Revenue · per unit" field against the brand's FDD Item 19 detail tables before relying on this output.

Store EBITDA · annual
$974K
EBITDA margin
16.0%
Total invested
$351K
Payback
4 mo
Unit-level only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even Yale describes.

Levered LBO scenario · Yale Crease Capital framing

What would 25 Jan-Pro Franchise Development units return on equity?

Edit assumptions

Equity IRR · 5-yr

23.1%

2.82× MOIC

Year-1 DSCR

3.84×

EBITDA ÷ debt service

Equity required

$33.4M

on $54.8M purchase

Total debt

$21.4M

SBA $5.0M + senior + seller note

SBA 7(a) request ($27.4M) exceeds the $5M program cap. Excess capped automatically; backfill via conventional or equity.

Overview

About

Jan-Pro franchisees operate commercial cleaning businesses serving office buildings, retail spaces, and facilities on contract. Day-to-day work involves recruiting and managing cleaning crews, scheduling jobs, managing customer relationships, invoicing clients, and ensuring service quality. The model relies heavily on subcontractor labor and territory protection to generate recurring revenue.

CEO
Gary Bauer
Founded
1995
FDD year
2026
States available
39

Item 7 · what it costs

The Vitals

Total investment
$130K – $422K
All-in to open one unit
Liquid capital
$50K – $100K
Cash you must have on hand
Franchise fee
$50K
Royalty
4.0%
Gross Monthly Revenue · typical 6–8%
Ad fund
Lesser of 0.5% of Gross Monthly Revenue or $3,500 per mon…
Total fee load
4.5%
vs 9–13% typical
Payback period
0.4 yrs
From v3 / Item 19

Item 19

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$6.1M
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$5.2M
Item 19 type
Gross Contract Revenue
Sample size
115 units
vs category median 20 · large
Range (low → high)
$188K$20.3M
Cohort dispersion
Transparency
7 / 5
vs category median 3 / 5 · above
Revenue rank48th
vs Other peers
Investment cost rank46th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank3th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank77th
vs Other peers
Risk score rank41th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
108
Opened
2
Last reporting year
Closed
1
Turnover rate
0.9%
Company-owned
0
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
100%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (yr3)
+0.9%
Net unit change last year
3-yr CAGR
+0.9%
Compounded over last 3 years
2024
108+1
Franchised units
2025
107
Franchised units
2026
107
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 7 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator — not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Available · 7 states
Not registered

States derived from franchisee phone area codes (Item 20). Approximate — ported numbers may show the original state, not the franchisee's current location.

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

No SBA loan data available for this brand.

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 5, 6, 12, 17

Risk & Legal

60
Risk · 0-100
MODERATE60 / 100

Jan-Pro presents meaningful litigation and growth risks masked by selective financial data; the persistent unit decline, widespread misclassification suits, and absence of Item 19 disclosures warrant deep due diligence into actual franchisee profitability and legal exposure.

Score breakdown · what drove the 60 / 100 rating

  1. 01MEDChronic unit decline of 0.9% YoY indicates stagnating or contracting system despite $624K avg net income claims
  2. 02HIGHSystemic employee misclassification litigation across multiple states (CA, WA, DC, MA) suggests structural business model vulnerability, not isolated incidents
  3. 03MINORDual royalty structure (4% revenue + 10% unit fees) combined with $130K-$421K investment range lacks transparency on actual franchisee costs and profitability thresholds
  4. 04HIGHNo Item 19 financial performance representation (Going Concern: False) prevents validation of claimed $624K net income across 108 units
  5. 05HIGHRegional developer involvement in litigation indicates franchisor may lack direct control over unit operations and labor compliance

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

FDD Items 5, 6, 12, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Territory
SMSA, or county or city borders
Protected territory
Yes
Initial term
10 years
Renewal term
10 years
Online sales rights
Granted
Franchisor can compete
Yes
Hire a manager?
Allowed
Litigation count
5
Right of first refusal
Yes
Franchisor can buy back on resale
Mandatory arbitration
Yes
Jury trial waiver
Yes
Non-compete
2 yrs
Post-termination restriction
Owner-operator
Required
Governing law
Georgia

Item 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
50 hrs
On-the-job training
21 hrs
POS system
MasterView
Operating tech stack

Item 20

Franchisee Contacts

Phone numbers extracted directly from this brand's FDD Item 20. After purchase, you'll also receive a list of validation questions tailored to this brand.

Franchisee contacts

86 numbers

Locked
(423) 248-••••
OK
(254) 833-••••
OK
(805) 349-••••
CA

One-time purchase · CSV download · Validation questions included

FDD download

Jan-Pro Franchise Development · FDD (2026) PDF

Single-page checkout · instant download · CSV export of contacts available separately above