Green Home Solutions Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026
- Investment
- $116K – $199K
- Disclosed sales
- $140K
- gross sales, not profit
- SBA charge-off
- 0.0%
- on 11 loans
Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records
Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology
Green Home Solutions is a home-services franchise providing mold remediation, air-duct cleaning, and indoor-air-quality treatments for homes and businesses. Franchisees run a service operation handling inspections, treatments, and customer acquisition in a territory.
FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026
A Green Home Solutions franchise requires a total initial investment of $116K – $199K, including a $30K – $55K franchise fee and an ongoing 10.0% royalty[2]. Item 5 conditions this fee. The figure shown is the lowest amount the filing discloses, and the filing ties that amount to a qualifying condition — so it is not necessarily what a first-time single-unit franchisee pays. Per the 2025 FDD, average unit revenue was $140K[2]. SBA 7(a) loans show a 0.0% charge-off rate across 11 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: A (Strongest tier), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →
Sources, dates and evidence
FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - issued 12 to 24 months ago; a newer filing is likely on file
Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored6 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing; the rest are marked “Not cited” beside the figure.
Overview
- Investment
- $116K – $199K
- 42nd pct Home Services
- Avg gross sales
- $140K
- 0th pct Home Services
- Royalty
- 10.0%
- 75th pct Home Services
- Units
- 198
- 74th pct Home Services
- SBA charge-off
- 0.0%
- % of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category
Quick verdict · Home Services · color = vs category peers
Green = favorable by >10% vs Home Services median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)
Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology
Bottom line
- COSTTotal investment $116K – $199K including a $30K franchise fee, 10.0% ongoing royalty. Item 5 conditions this fee. The figure shown is the lowest amount the filing discloses, and the filing ties that amount to a qualifying condition — so it is not necessarily what a first-time single-unit franchisee pays.
- RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $140K/year (median $108K).
- RISKVerdict A (Strongest tier), verdict score 78/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 0.0% across 11 loans (well below the franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
- GROWTHPositive: net +1 franchised outlets in the latest year (12 opened, 11 closed) (Item 20).
- DECLINESystem contracting at -8.8% CAGR over 3 years. Investigate whether closures are franchisor-driven (consolidation) or franchisee-driven (economics).
Item 1 · who you're contracting with
The Franchisor
Corporate structure & franchisor financials
- Legal entity
- OnAxis Franchising Group, LLC
- Parent company
- NSF GHS, LLC
- FDD Item 1, page 8 of the 2025 FDD
- Predecessor
- JC Franchising Group, LLC
- Prior franchisor entity
- CEO title
- President and CEO
- Jeff Panella CFE
- Incorporated in
- DE
- HQ
- 136 School Street, #286, Spring Mills, PA 16875
- Auditor
- Urish Popeck & Co., LLC
- Audited financials
- Franchisor revenue
- $4.1M
- vs $4.2M prior year
- Management churn noted
- Frequent turnover
- Item 2 disclosed frequent executive changes
Overview
About
- CEO
- Jeff Panella CFE
- Headquarters
- PA
- FDD year
- 2025
- States available
- 29
Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?
Entry cost is about typical for a home services franchise (near the category median).
Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7
Item 5 conditions this fee. The figure shown is the lowest amount the filing discloses, and the filing ties that amount to a qualifying condition — so it is not necessarily what a first-time single-unit franchisee pays.
Full Item 7 breakdown18 line items
Initial investment breakdown
| Line item | Low | High | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial Franchise Feenot refundable | $30K | $55K | |
| Initial Equipment and Inventory Packagenot refundable | $27K | $29K | |
| Additional Equipment Required for Optional Sanitizing and Disinfecting Servicesnot refundable | $0 | $16K | |
| Travel and living expenses while attending the certification programnot refundable | $250 | $4K | |
| Lease and Leasehold Improvementsnot refundable | $0 | $5K | |
| Security, Lease, and Utility Depositsnot refundable | $0 | $1K | |
| Office equipment, furniture, and fixturesnot refundable | $0 | $3K | |
| Vehiclenot refundable | $1K | $3K | |
| Vehicle Wrapnot refundable | $2K | $4K | |
| Opening Advertisingnot refundable | $22K | $22K | |
| Insurancenot refundable | $2K | $5K | |
| Software License Feesnot refundable | $445 | $2K | |
| Licenses and Permitsnot refundable | $0 | $4K | |
| Business Licenses and Permitsnot refundable | $100 | $1K | |
| Professional Feesnot refundable | $1K | $3K | |
| Prepaid Certifications and Feesnot refundable | $400 | $4K | |
| Employee Background Checksnot refundable | $0 | $570 | |
| Additional Funds (3 Months)not refundable | $30K | $40K | |
| Total initial investment | $116K | $199K |
Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.
Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate
The Vitals
- Total investment
- $116K – $199K
- Middle of category vs category
- Liquid capital req'd
- $30K – $40K
- Middle of category vs category
- Franchise fee
- $30K – $55K
- Conditional fee
- Royalty
- 10.0%
- Set by a formula · typical 6–8%
- Ad fund
- 1.3%
- typical 3–5%
- Total fee load
- 9.5%
- vs 9–13% typical
Ongoing fees · Item 6
| Fee | Amount |
|---|---|
| Royalty | 10.0% of gross sales |
| Marketing / ad fund | 1.3% of gross sales |
| Technology fee | $250 |
| Transfer fee | $10K |
| Renewal fee | $3K |
| Inventory (initial) | $27K – $29K |
| Total fee load | 9.5% of rev |
What do units actually make?
Average unit sales run 76% below the home services norm.
Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19
Single-unit · not modelled
Returns at a glance
An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Green Home Solutions until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.
—
Not modelled yet
An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.
Total invested capital · disclosed
$193K
Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.
ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
What one unit earns on your invested capital
Model A · Single-Unit Return
Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.
Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.
Returns model · single-unit ROIC
What would one Green Home Solutions unit return on the cash you put in?
Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.
Unlevered ROIC · per unit
Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.
—
An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.
What 25 units return when you use SBA financing
Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition
Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).
This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.
What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.
Not modelled yet
An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.
A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.
These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.
Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD
Financial Performance
- Avg gross sales
- $140K
- Per unit, per year
- Median gross sales
- $108K
Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.
- Item 19 type
- gross revenue
- Sample size
- 190 outlets
- vs category median 32 · large
- Range (low → high)
- $521→$574KNot cited — published from our reading of the franchisor's disclosure document; the page it is printed on has not been located.
- Cohort dispersion (min → max)
- Reporting year
- 2024
- Fiscal year the figures cover
- Source filing
- FDD 2025
- Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2024
- Transparency
- 7 / 10
- vs category median 4 / 10 · above
Compared against 319 Home Services brands
Revenue is only 0.9x the investment. This means each unit may take 5+ years to recoup the initial outlay at typical margins.
Operator outlook
What the numbers say
Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.
Unit economics
Average unit generates $140K/year in gross sales. Median is $108K — top performers pull the average up, so a typical unit earns less. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 0.9x.
Fee burden
Total ongoing fee load of 9.5% — above the Home Services median of 8.0%.
Disclosure
Transparency score 7/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.
Operator retention
System contracting at -8.8% CAGR over 3 years. Investigate whether closures are franchisor-driven consolidation or franchisee exits.
Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.
vs Home Services medians
How Green Home Solutions Compares
Category median of published Home Services brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.
Is the system healthy?
Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20
Unit growth
Item 20 · unit dynamics
The Growth Chart
- Total units
- 198
- Opened
- 12
- Last reporting year
- Closed
- 11
- Terminated
- 7
- Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
- Non-renewed
- 1
- Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
- Turnover rate
- 5.6%
- Company-owned
- 0
- Corporate units in the system
- % franchised
- 100%
- vs corporate-owned
- Net growth (3-yr)
- +0.5%
- Net unit change over 3 years
- 3-yr CAGR
- -8.8%
- Compounded over last 3 years
Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers
- Terminated
- 7
- Not renewed
- 1
- Signed, not yet open
- 0
- 0.00 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
- Projected new
- 27
- Franchisor's next-year forecast
- Transfer rate
- 0.5%
- Owners selling to other franchisees
- Termination rate
- 4.0%
- Franchisor-initiated terminations
- Ceased ops
- 5.6%
- Units that stopped operating
Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.
Item 20 · 27 states with active franchisees
The Territory Map
Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).
States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.
Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list
54 current owners across 27 states.
- MA 5
- NC 5
- CA 4
- NY 4
- CT 3
- SC 3
- CO 2
- IL 2
- IN 2
- MD 2
- MN 2
- NJ 2
- +15 more states
Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20; 2 entries carry no state. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.
SBA loan performance
Government records
SBA Loan Data
Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.
- Total loans
- 11
- Loan volume
- $1.4M
- Median loan
- $100K
- 50th percentile
- Charge-off rate
- 0.0%
- on 11 loans · rates vary by category · see methodology
Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated
- Repayment rate (PIF)
- 100.0%
- 5-yr charge-off
- 0.0%
- Loans approved 2021+
- Active lenders
- 6
- Defaults
- 0
- Typical loan rate
- 7.3%
- avg rate to borrowers
- Franchised industry avg
- 12.9%
- brand beats franchise avg ↓
- Jobs supported
- 39
- 2.7 per loan
- Lender concentration
- 27%
- top lender's share
Borrower mix: 73% went to startups / new businesses, 27% to established operators
Franchise vs independent — in remediation services, franchised businesses charge off at 12.9% vs 10.4% for independents — franchising is associated with 24% higher SBA default risk in this category.
Top lenders financing Green Home Solutions franchisees
Showing 3 of 6 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.
Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.
Lender network · 7(a) + 504
SBA Lending Report
Full lending analysis for Green Home Solutions from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.
- Principal loss rate
- 0.0%
- Avg SBA guarantee
- 71%
- Avg interest rate
- 7.32%
- Lender concentration
- 27.3%
- Job velocity
- 2.7 per $100K
- NAICS benchmark
- 10.2%
- NAICS 562910
- Jobs supported
- 39
Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 27% of loans
| # | Lender | Loans | Volume | Default % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United Midwest Savings Bank National Association | 3 | $687K | 0.0% |
| 2 | Northeast Bank | 2 | $200K | N/A |
| 3 | Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company | 2 | $150K | 0.0% |
| 4 | Bankers Trust Company | 2 | $120K | 0.0% |
| 5 | First Bank of the Lake | 1 | $241K | N/A |
| 6 | BankPlus | 1 | $25K | N/A |
Geographic failure vector
| State | Loans | Defaults | Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| AZArizona | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| NCNorth Carolina | 3 | 0 | -- |
| MDMaryland | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| MAMassachusetts | 1 | 0 | -- |
| MSMississippi | 1 | 0 | -- |
| UTUtah | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
SBA 7(a) lending trend
Borrower profile
Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict
With a 0.0% charge-off rate across 11 loans, banks have historically viewed this brand favorably for lending.
What could kill this investment?
SBA loans charge off at 0.0% — 100% below the 16.0% national norm, i.e. lower lender-observed risk.
Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21
Risk analysis
FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21
Risk & Legal
Slow-growth system with undisclosed profitability, aggressive litigation history, and high fixed royalty obligations creates material risk despite protected territories.
Litigation (Item 3)
Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).
Two concluded predecessor cases (Belcher territory infringement settled $23,715; JC Franchising v Terrapin breach settled). Two concluded current cases involving Harod Ventures non-compete dispute (OnAxis received $150,000 settlement).
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
None disclosed
Audited financials (Item 21)
Yes · Urish Popeck & Co., LLC
Franchisor revenue (Item 21)
Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)
ⓘ These are the parent company's consolidated financials (the parent guarantees the franchisor), not this brand's standalone results — the figure reflects the whole corporate group, not this brand alone.
Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16
- Franchisor sells you products: Yes
- Kickbacks from required suppliers: No
- Must buy proprietary products: Yes
- Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
- Can negotiate own supplier terms: No
Score breakdown · what drove the 78 / 100 verdict
- 01MINORStagnant unit growth (0.5% YoY) suggests market saturation or franchisee dissatisfaction in a 198-unit system
- 02MEDNo Item 19 (Average Net Income) disclosed — cannot validate the $140,390 average revenue translates to acceptable profit after 8.25-10% royalties plus operating costs
- 03HIGHFour active litigation cases including two post-term non-compete disputes indicate franchisor enforcement aggression and potential franchisee exit conflicts
- 04MINORHigh royalty floor ($740/month minimum = $8,880 annually) creates cash flow burden even in low-revenue months
- 05HIGHPredecessor company litigation (JC Franchising Group) suggests operational or compliance issues that may persist under current management
Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification
What are you signing up for?
Ongoing fees run about 9.5% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.
Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17
FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal
Contract & Territory Detail
| Initial term | 10 years |
|---|---|
| Renewal term | 10 years |
| Territory type | Protected territory |
| Protected territory | Yes |
| Exclusive territoryℹ | No |
| Territory population | 200,000 |
| Online sales rightsℹ | Restricted |
| Franchisor can compete | Yes |
| Hire a manager? | Allowed |
| Owner-operator | Optional |
| Non-compete (years)ℹ | 2 years |
| Non-compete (miles)ℹ | 10 mi |
| Right of first refusalℹ | Yes |
| Transfer requires consent | Yes |
| Termination notice | 30 days |
| Curable defaultsℹ | 7 |
| Mandatory arbitration | Yes |
| Arbitration location | State College, Pennsylvania (or county of principal office) |
| Jury trial waiver | Yes |
| Governing law | PA |
| Litigation count | 4 |
View Item 3 litigation summary
Two concluded predecessor cases (Belcher territory infringement settled $23,715; JC Franchising v Terrapin breach settled). Two concluded current cases involving Harod Ventures non-compete dispute (OnAxis received $150,000 settlement).
Items 10, 11
Training & Operations
- Classroom training
- 74 hrs
- On-the-job training
- 80 hrs
- Training location
- Corporate headquarters or near a major city; online/virtual option; field certification at franchisee facility
- Ongoing training
- Required
- Time to open
- 3 mo
- From signing to launch
- Site selection
- Franchisee
- Franchisor financing
- Not offered
- Item 10
- POS system
- Franchisor-designated and approved CRM and POS system
- Operating tech stack
Items 5 & 11
Franchisor Support
Technology: Franchisor-designated and approved CRM and POS system
Item 20 · call current owners
Franchisee Contacts
56 owners to call
Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20
Frequently asked questions
Frequently Asked Questions
How much does it cost to open a Green Home Solutions franchise?
The total investment to open a Green Home Solutions franchise ranges from $116K – $199K, with an initial franchise fee of $30K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD). Item 5 conditions this fee. The figure shown is the lowest amount the filing discloses, and the filing ties that amount to a qualifying condition — so it is not necessarily what a first-time single-unit franchisee pays.
What do Green Home Solutions franchise owners earn?
According to Item 19 of the Green Home Solutions FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $140K. The median is $108K. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.
Who owns Green Home Solutions?
Green Home Solutions is franchised by OnAxis Franchising Group, LLC. Its parent company is NSF GHS, LLC. Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.
What is Item 19 in the Green Home Solutions FDD?
The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Green Home Solutions FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.
What is Green Home Solutions's franchise failure rate?
Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, Green Home Solutions has a charge-off rate of 0.0% across 11 loans, meaning 0.0% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.
How many Green Home Solutions franchise locations are there?
As of their most recent FDD filing, Green Home Solutions has 198 total units in the United States, including 198 franchised units and 0 company-owned units. 12 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.
Is Green Home Solutions a good franchise to buy?
FranchiseVerdict rates Green Home Solutions as a A-grade franchise with a verdict score of 78 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.
Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.
For franchisors
Are you the franchisor?
If you represent Green Home Solutions, you can request corrections or provide updated information.
Other Home Services franchises
Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Home Services category
Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.