Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Go Mini's logo
AStrongest tier66/100FDD 2024

Go Mini's: Litigation & Risk

Business Services · FDD Items 3, 4 & 5

Back to overview

Moderate: Review

4 cases disclosed in FDD Items 3 and 4.

Source: FDD Items 3–5

FDD Items 3 & 4

Litigation Metrics

Cases disclosed
4
Total from FDD Items 3 and 4
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
None
Franchisor or officer bankruptcy
Verdict score
66 / 100
FranchiseVerdict composite · higher is better
Rating
A
A / B / C / D / F verdict grade

7(a) FOIA data · FY2020–present

SBA Loan Performance

Aggregated from public SBA 7(a) loan disclosures. Charge-off rate is the share of loans that were charged off or settled for less than the full balance.

Total 7(a) loans
5
Government-backed loans issued
Charge-off rate
N/A
vs 16% franchise average
5-yr charge-off rate
N/A
Defaults
N/A
Loans charged off or defaulted
Total loan volume
$2.6M
Avg loan size
$512K
Participating lenders
4

FDD Items 5, 6 & 17: What You Give Up

Contract Risk Indicators

Mandatory arbitration
Not required
You retain the right to sue in court
Jury trial waiver
Not waived
Non-compete
1 yrs
Post-termination restriction on similar businesses
Franchisor can compete
Yes
Franchisor can open competing locations in or near your territory
Right of first refusal
Yes
Franchisor can match any purchase offer when you try to sell
Governing law
Florida
State whose law governs disputes. Relevant if you're not based there

Extracted from FDD Item 3

Litigation Detail

Franchisor sued a terminated franchisee for breach/nonpayment of royalties, obtaining a $90,527 judgment after a $150,000 settlement was partly unpaid. Three older (2012-2013) state regulatory actions (NY, VA, MD) concerned pre-formation Dealer Agreements entered into by the franchisor's predecessor/parent before proper franchise registration; resolved via consent orders with modest fines ($3,500-$4,000) and no admission of wrongdoing.

What drove the 66/100 verdict

Risk Score Breakdown

  1. 01MEDNo Item 19 financial disclosure (average revenue and net income not disclosed) prevents ROI validation and comparability analysis
  2. 02MINORHistorical regulatory settlements (2002-2009) in NY, VA, MD for unregistered dealer agreements signal compliance/governance issues, even if predecessor-related
  3. 03HIGHActive litigation between franchisor and franchisee for breach of contract indicates operational or support friction and potential enforcement disputes
  4. 04MEDModest unit growth (9.4% YoY on 105 units = ~10 new units) combined with undisclosed financials raises questions about franchisee profitability and system sustainability
  5. 05MINORHigh initial investment range ($291K-$634K) without transparent earnings data creates significant downside risk with no benchmarking

Severity inferred from FDD text. Not a regulatory or legal classification

Litigation data from FDD Items 3, 4, and 5. SBA data from public 7(a) FOIA records (FY2020–present). Not legal advice. Consult a franchise attorney before signing any franchise agreement.