FDD Items 3 & 4 · 2025 filing
Freshly Go litigation history
What Freshly Go disclosed about lawsuits, arbitrations and bankruptcy in the 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document. Item 3 lists the material legal actions a franchisor must report; Item 4 covers bankruptcy. This is the franchisor's own disclosure, not a court record, and not legal advice.
Items 3 & 4 at a glance
What the filing discloses
- Cases disclosed
- 4
- Item 3, as counted in the filing
- Largest disclosed settlement
- $5K
- As stated in Item 3
- Bankruptcy (Item 4)
- None
- Franchisor, parent, predecessor or officer
- Filing year
- 2025
- Disclosures cover the prior ten years
Extracted from the 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document
Item 3: litigation
4 concluded cases: (1) Pau Sian Mung - wrongful termination claim dismissed 2024; (2) Pau Sushi Catering - breach/fraud claim settled 2020 with mutual releases; (3) Cherry Lee - employment/harassment claim settled 2019 for $5,000; (4) Pilrang Owa - franchisor filed arbitration against franchisee claiming independent contractor status, arbitrator awarded in franchisor's favor with $373K fees, settled Oct 2018; plus Zaw Min Oo improperly reduced commissions claim, award in franchisor's favor with nominal $1,280 to claimant. No pending cases.
Disclosure signals that moved the score
How this shows up in the verdict
- Going concern status is FALSE — franchisor may be financially unstable or operationally distressed
- Five litigation cases in short history indicate employment disputes, termination conflicts, and royalty/commission disagreements — pattern of franchisor-franchisee friction
The verdict grade is FranchiseVerdict's editorial assessment across SBA loan performance, unit growth, revenue and disclosure signals. It is not investment advice.
Before you weigh a lawsuit
How to read Item 3
A franchisor must disclose pending actions and any material civil action involving the franchise relationship, plus convictions or civil judgments for fraud, unfair or deceptive practices, or franchise-law violations, going back ten years. A case the franchisor brought against a franchisee counts too. Item 3 does not include every dispute: settled claims below the materiality line and matters resolved in private arbitration can be absent.
Questions worth asking current and former franchisees, using the contact list in Item 20:
- Were you, or anyone you know in the system, party to a dispute with the franchisor?
- Was it resolved by settlement, arbitration or a court, and on what terms?
- Has the number of disputes gone up or down since you signed?