Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Fazoli's logo

Fazoli's Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Quick-Service RestaurantsKYFranchising since 2006
CAverageAverage45/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$1.6M – $2.6M
Disclosed sales
$1.3M
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
12.0%
on 40 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-00923FDD 2025Data QualityExcellent91%
Manager-run OKNo: No territory protection

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Fazoli's is a fast-casual franchise serving Italian-American pasta, sandwiches, and its signature breadsticks. Franchisees run restaurants with counter service and drive-thru, managing food prep, staffing, and costs.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Fazoli's franchise requires a total initial investment of $1.6M – $2.6M, including a $50K franchise fee and an ongoing 5.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2025 FDD, average unit revenue was $1.3M[2]. SBA 7(a) loans show a 12.0% charge-off rate across 40 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: C (Average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - issued 12 to 24 months ago; a newer filing is likely on file

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored8 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$1.6M – $2.6M
98th pct Service Resta…
Avg gross sales
$1.3M
Net sales25th pct Service Resta…
Royalty
5.0%
12th pct Service Resta…
Units
195
83rd pct Service Resta…
SBA charge-off
12.0%
% of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category

Quick verdict · Quick-Service Restaurants · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$1.6M – $2.6M
Median $486K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$50K – $50K
Median $35K
above median ↑, worse than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$60K – $120K
Median $33K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
$1.3M
Median $975K
above median ↑, better than category
Net sales
Royalty Rate
5.0%
Median 5.5%
near median
Ongoing Fees
9.0% of rev
Median 7.5%
above median ↑, worse than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
12.0%
40 loans · Median 14.3%
below median ↓, better than category
System Size
195 units
Median 18 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
7.2%
Median 0.0%
Territory
None
The franchisor can open or license outlets nearby
Owner-Operator
Optional
Can hire a manager
Litigation
3 cases
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Quick-Service Restaurants median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $1.6M – $2.6M including a $50K franchise fee, 5.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $1.3M/year (median $1.2M).
  • RISKVerdict C (Average), verdict score 45/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 12.0% across 40 loans (above the 16% franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
  • GROWTHNegative: net -11 franchised outlets in the latest year (3 opened, 14 closed); 3 signed but not yet open (Item 20).
  • FLAGItem 4 discloses a bankruptcy of an officer or of a company an officer ran, not of the franchisor. Review Item 4 for details.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Fazoli's Franchising Systems, LLC
Parent company
Fazoli's Group, Inc.
Ultimate parent
FAT Brands, Inc.
Predecessor
Fazoli's Systems, Inc.
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
Chief Executive Officer
Taylor Wiederhorn
Incorporated in
DE
HQ
2470 Palumbo Drive, Lexington, Kentucky 40509-1117
Auditor
Macias Gini & O'Connell LLP
Audited financials

Affiliated brands

  • to the following brands

Other brands the franchisor or its parent operates (Item 1).

Same owner · FDD Item 1

12 other brands on this site name FAT Brands, Inc. as parent or ultimate parent in their own FDD.

Portfolio: FAT Brands

Grouped by the owner's name as each filing prints it (this page: the 2025 FDD). Spelling variants of the same group may be listed apart; a brand is never grouped with an owner its filing does not name.

Overview

About

CEO
Taylor Wiederhorn
Headquarters
KY
Founded
1991
FDD year
2025
States available
26

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 341% above the typical quick-service restaurants franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$1.6M – $2.6MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 30 of the 2025 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$50,000Verified — printed on page 22 of the 2025 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty5.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 23 of the 2025 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund4.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 23 of the 2025 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$60K – $120K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

Full Item 7 breakdown12 line items

Initial investment breakdown

Item 7 initial investment line items
Line itemLowHigh
Franchise Fee (See Note 1)$50K$50K
Site Preparation (See Note 2a)$270K$485K
Architectural Services (See Note 3)$25K$75K
Cost of the Building (See Note 4a)$865K$1.3M
Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment (See Note 5a)$270K$470K
Information System and related technology (See Note 6)$47K$59K
Training Expenses (See Note 7)$10K$35K
Inventory & Uniforms (See Note 8)$15K$30K
Security Deposits, Utilities and Insurance (See Note 9)$5K$27K
Trade Area Analysis, Sales Projection and Sales Impact Report (see Item 8)$15K$15K
Pre-opening and Opening Advertising (See Note 10)$15K$15K
Additional Funds- 3 Months (See Note 11)$60K$120K
Total initial investment$1.6M$2.6M

Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$1.6M – $2.6M
Bottom third — review vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$60K – $120K
Bottom third — review vs category
Franchise fee
$50K – $50K
Bottom third — review vs category
Royalty
5.0%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
4.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
9.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Fazoli's: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty5.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund4.0% of gross sales
Technology fee$16K
Training fee$10K
Transfer fee$25K
Renewal fee$25K
Inventory (initial)$15K – $30K
Total fee load9.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 35% above the quick-service restaurants norm.

Avg gross sales$1.3M

Reported as net sales, not gross sales

Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 73 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$1.2MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 73 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typenet sales
Sample size136 outlets

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Fazoli's until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$2.2M

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Fazoli's unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $1,312,096 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $1.6M–$2.6M (midpoint used)
FDD reports $60K–$120K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$2.2M
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Reported as net sales, not gross sales

Avg gross sales
$1.3M
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$1.2M

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
net sales
Sample size
136 outlets
vs category median 19 · large
Range (low → high)
$484K→$2.6MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 73 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Reporting year
2024
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2025
Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2024
Transparency
9 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · above
Gross sales rank25th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank98th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank12th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank83th
vs Quick-Service Restaurants peers
Risk score rank59th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 781 Quick-Service Restaurants brands

Showing the headline figures — all 155 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →
Revenue insight

Revenue is only 0.6x the investment. This means each unit may take 5+ years to recoup the initial outlay at typical margins.

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $1.3M/year in gross sales. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 0.6x.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 9.0% — above the Quick-Service Restaurants median of 7.5%.

Disclosure

Transparency score 9/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System contracting at -7.9% CAGR over 3 years. Investigate whether closures are franchisor-driven consolidation or franchisee exits.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Quick-Service Restaurants medians

How Fazoli's Compares

Metric
Fazoli's
Category median
vs median
Investment
$2.1M
$486Kmiddle half $342K–$748K · n=780
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
$1.3M
$975Kmiddle half $664K–$1.4M · n=284
Above median, better than category
Unit Count
195
18middle half 5–79 · n=755
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Quick-Service Restaurants brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units195Verified — printed on page 74 of the 2025 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it two ways.
3-yr growth-7.9% (worth scrutinizing)
Turnover rate7.2% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
195
Opened
3
Last reporting year
Closed
14
Terminated
0
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
1
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
7.2%
Company-owned
56
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
71%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
-7.9%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
-7.9%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
0
Not renewed
1
Transferred
0
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
3
0.02 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
4
Franchisor's next-year forecast
Termination rate
1.4%
Franchisor-initiated terminations
Ceased ops
7.9%
Units that stopped operating
2022
151
Franchised units
2023
150-1
Franchised units
2024
139-11
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 9 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 9 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Available to sell in · Item 12

  • Hawaii
  • Illinois
  • Indiana
  • Michigan
  • Minnesota
  • New York
  • North Dakota
  • Rhode Island
  • South Dakota
  • Virginia
  • Wisconsin

States where the franchisor is registered to sell new franchises (FDD registration filings).

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

13 current owners across 3 states; 9 former (terminated, transferred or not renewed) listed separately.

  • WI 9
  • VA 2
  • WV 2

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

C
SBA Lending Health
Average SBA lending record · 12.0% charge-off
Total loans
40
Loan volume
$27.6M
Median loan
$820K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
12.0%
on 40 loans · rates vary by category · see methodology

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
88.0%
5-yr charge-off
0.0%
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
13
Defaults
3
Typical loan rate
6.2%
avg rate to borrowers
Franchised industry avg
10.8%
brand above franchise avg ↑
Jobs supported
765
4.9 per loan
Lender concentration
18%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 62% went to startups / new businesses, 38% to established operators

Franchise vs independent — in limited-service restaurants, franchised businesses charge off at 10.8% vs 10.0% for independents — franchising is associated with 8% higher SBA default risk in this category.

Top lenders financing Fazoli's franchisees

Gulf Coast Bank and Trust Company3 loans—
The Huntington National Bank2 loans—
Columbia Bank2 loans50.0%

Showing 3 of 13 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Total loans
3
Loan volume
$3.1M
Charge-off rate
N/A
Jobs created
65

Historical SBA 504 lending data via CDCs, not predictive of future performance.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for Fazoli's from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Principal loss rate
1.2%
Avg SBA guarantee
76%
Avg interest rate
6.18%
Avg chargeoff amount
$95K
Lender concentration
17.6%
Job velocity
4.9 per $100K
NAICS benchmark
8.7%
NAICS 722513
Jobs supported
765

Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 18% of loans

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
1Gulf Coast Bank and Trust Company3$1.2MN/A
2The Huntington National Bank2$625KN/A
3Columbia Bank2$769K50.0%
4Horizon Bank1$250K100.0%
5Bank of Franklin County1$618K0.0%
6PNC Bank, National Association1$1.3M0.0%
7First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company1$1.4MN/A
8TD Bank, National Association1$820K0.0%
9First Federal Bank1$2.5MN/A
10Community Trust Bank, Inc.1$1.1MN/A

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
FLFlorida400.0%
TXTexas400.0%
GAGeorgia200.0%
OROregon2150.0%
ILIllinois10--
INIndiana11100.0%
KYKentucky10--
MIMichigan10--
MOMissouri100.0%

SBA 7(a) lending trend

2014
1
2016
3
2018
5
2020
1
2021
6
2023
1

Borrower profile

Startup5 (38%)
New (< 1 yr)2 (15%)
Existing (2+ yr)2 (15%)
Unanswered1 (8%)
Ownership change1 (8%)
Established (5+ yr)1 (8%)
New (< 2 yr)1 (8%)

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

What could kill this investment?

SBA loans charge off at 12.0% — 25% below the 16.0% national norm, i.e. lower lender-observed risk.

SBA charge-off12.0% · 40 loans
Verdict score45/100 (higher is better)
Litigation3 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

CAverage45Verdict score 45/100

Fazoli's presents a CAUTION-to-HIGH RISK profile: declining unit count, pending litigation against franchisor, razor-thin franchisee margins, and unprotected territories create substantial downside risk despite reasonable average unit volumes.

High confidence±4 pts
4149

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).

1 pending securities class action (Kates v. FAT Brands, 2024); 2 concluded: FAT Brands securities class action (settled $3M, dismissed 2023) and Virginia SCC franchise registration violation (affiliate FBNA, settled 2023)

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

Subject: an officer. An officer’s own bankruptcy or a company an officer ran, not the franchisor’s

FAT Brands and subsidiaries including Fazoli's Franchising Systems, LLC filed voluntary Chapter 11 petitions January 25, 2026 in U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, Case No. 26-90278 (ARP) for FFS LLC

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Macias Gini & O'Connell LLP

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 2: $11.0MNon-royalty: $0.1M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Item 21 audited statements (Exhibit B, FYE Dec 31 2024/2023/2022) are referenced but the audited statement text and CPA auditor name are not present in this extract. Figures shown are from the UNAUDITED interim statements included in the text: Balance Sheet as of July 27, 2025, and Consolidated Statement of Operations for the period 4/28/25-7/27/25 (a ~3-month quarter, not full year). franchisor_net_worth is a member's DEFICIT of $4,373,847 (negative). total_revenue $2,556,491 = royalties $1,812,642 + franchise fees $116,702 + advertising fees $627,147; net loss $546,162. Full-year audited revenue not available in text.

ⓘ These are the parent company's consolidated financials (the parent guarantees the franchisor), not this brand's standalone results — the figure reflects the whole corporate group, not this brand alone.

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: No
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 45 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINORSystem declining at -7.3% YoY with only 195 units; indicates shrinking franchise base and weakening brand momentum
  2. 02MINORPending putative investor class action against parent and officers creates uncertainty about franchisor financial stability and management credibility
  3. 03MINORUnprotected territory exposes franchisees to cannibalization; franchisor can place competing units in your service area
  4. 04MINORExtremely thin net margins: $64,718 avg net income on $1.36M revenue (4.8% net margin) leaves minimal profit after 5% royalty and operating expenses
  5. 05HIGHHigh initial investment ($472.5K-$2.64M) with minimal investment protection given system contraction and litigation exposure

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 155 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 9.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term15 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryNone (caution)
Initial training285 hrs

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term15 years
Renewal term10 years
Allowed renewalsℹ2
Territory typeNo territory protection
Protected territoryNo
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorOptional
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ5 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Curable defaultsℹ4
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationKentucky
Jury trial waiverNo
Governing lawKY
Litigation count3
View Item 3 litigation summary

1 pending securities class action (Kates v. FAT Brands, 2024); 2 concluded: FAT Brands securities class action (settled $3M, dismissed 2023) and Virginia SCC franchise registration violation (affiliate FBNA, settled 2023)

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
71 hrs
On-the-job training
214 hrs
Training location
Company Certified Training Restaurant
Ongoing training
Optional
Time to open
9 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
Franchisee selects, franchisor must approve
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
Brink POS
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Technology: Brink POS

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

22 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 22 contacts · $49
Free preview
920993••••WI
Unlock all 22 contacts
715344••••WI
414258••••WI
715355••••WI
920592••••WI

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Fazoli's franchise?

The total investment to open a Fazoli's franchise ranges from $1.6M – $2.6M, with an initial franchise fee of $50K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Fazoli's franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Fazoli's FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $1.3M. The median is $1.2M. Important context: Reported as net sales, not gross sales. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Fazoli's?

Fazoli's is franchised by Fazoli's Franchising Systems, LLC. Its parent company is Fazoli's Group, Inc.. The ultimate parent named in the FDD is FAT Brands, Inc.. Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Fazoli's FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Fazoli's FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Fazoli's's franchise failure rate?

Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, Fazoli's has a charge-off rate of 12.0% across 40 loans, meaning 12.0% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.

How many Fazoli's franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Fazoli's has 195 total units in the United States, including 139 franchised units and 56 company-owned units. 3 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Fazoli's a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Fazoli's as a C-grade franchise with a verdict score of 45 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Fazoli's, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Quick-Service Restaurants franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Quick-Service Restaurants category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.