FranchiseVerdict
Duan Chun Zhen logo
F85/100FDD 2025

Duan Chun Zhen — Litigation & Risk

Food & Beverage - Full Service · FDD Items 3, 4 & 5

Back to overview

Moderate — Review

5 cases disclosed in FDD Items 3 and 4.

Source: FDD Items 3–5

FDD Items 3 & 4

Litigation Metrics

Cases disclosed
5
Total from FDD Items 3 and 4
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
Franchisor or officer bankruptcy
Overall risk score
85 / 100
FranchiseVerdict composite
Rating
AVOID
STRONG / MODERATE / CAUTION / AVOID

FDD Items 5, 6 & 17 — what you give up

Contract Risk Indicators

Mandatory arbitration
Required
Disputes resolved outside court — limits your legal options
Non-compete
2 yrs
Post-termination restriction on similar businesses
Franchisor can compete
Yes
Franchisor can open competing locations in or near your territory
Right of first refusal
Yes
Franchisor can match any purchase offer when you try to sell
Governing law
California
State whose law governs disputes — relevant if you're not based there

What drove the 85/100 rating

Risk Score Breakdown

  1. 01HIGHGoing Concern status is FALSE — indicates the franchisor may not be financially viable as an ongoing business
  2. 02HIGHLitigation history includes misrepresentation of authority to sell franchises and multi-state registration violations (NY, CA, WA), suggesting regulatory non-compliance and potential fraud
  3. 03MINOROnly 3 existing units with unknown growth trajectory — minimal proof of concept and severe lack of franchisee success data
  4. 04MEDAverage Revenue and Net Income not disclosed — complete opacity on franchisee profitability makes ROI assessment impossible
  5. 05MINORNo protected territory — franchisees face direct competition from other franchisees in the same area
  6. 06MINOREscalating royalty structure (4% to 5%) combined with high investment range ($311k–$708k) creates cash flow pressure without proven unit economics
  7. 07MINORMaster Franchisor involved in breach of contract disputes — raises questions about franchisor reliability and contract enforcement
  8. 08MINORHigh franchise fee ($60k) relative to tiny system size (3 units) suggests fee-driven growth model rather than sustainable franchising

Severity inferred from FDD text — not a regulatory or legal classification

Litigation data from FDD Items 3, 4, and 5. SBA data from public 7(a) FOIA records (FY2020–present). Not legal advice — consult a franchise attorney before signing any franchise agreement.