F85/100FDD 2025
Duan Chun Zhen — Litigation & Risk
Food & Beverage - Full Service · FDD Items 3, 4 & 5
Moderate — Review
5 cases disclosed in FDD Items 3 and 4.
Source: FDD Items 3–5
FDD Items 3 & 4
Litigation Metrics
Cases disclosed
5
Total from FDD Items 3 and 4
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
—
Franchisor or officer bankruptcy
Overall risk score
85 / 100
FranchiseVerdict composite
Rating
AVOID
STRONG / MODERATE / CAUTION / AVOID
FDD Items 5, 6 & 17 — what you give up
Contract Risk Indicators
Mandatory arbitration
Required
Disputes resolved outside court — limits your legal options
Non-compete
2 yrs
Post-termination restriction on similar businesses
Franchisor can compete
Yes
Franchisor can open competing locations in or near your territory
Right of first refusal
Yes
Franchisor can match any purchase offer when you try to sell
Governing law
California
State whose law governs disputes — relevant if you're not based there
What drove the 85/100 rating
Risk Score Breakdown
- 01HIGHGoing Concern status is FALSE — indicates the franchisor may not be financially viable as an ongoing business
- 02HIGHLitigation history includes misrepresentation of authority to sell franchises and multi-state registration violations (NY, CA, WA), suggesting regulatory non-compliance and potential fraud
- 03MINOROnly 3 existing units with unknown growth trajectory — minimal proof of concept and severe lack of franchisee success data
- 04MEDAverage Revenue and Net Income not disclosed — complete opacity on franchisee profitability makes ROI assessment impossible
- 05MINORNo protected territory — franchisees face direct competition from other franchisees in the same area
- 06MINOREscalating royalty structure (4% to 5%) combined with high investment range ($311k–$708k) creates cash flow pressure without proven unit economics
- 07MINORMaster Franchisor involved in breach of contract disputes — raises questions about franchisor reliability and contract enforcement
- 08MINORHigh franchise fee ($60k) relative to tiny system size (3 units) suggests fee-driven growth model rather than sustainable franchising
Severity inferred from FDD text — not a regulatory or legal classification
Litigation data from FDD Items 3, 4, and 5. SBA data from public 7(a) FOIA records (FY2020–present). Not legal advice — consult a franchise attorney before signing any franchise agreement.