Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

FDD Items 3 & 4 · 2025 filing

Cookies By Design litigation history

What Cookies By Design disclosed about lawsuits, arbitrations and bankruptcy in the 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document. Item 3 lists the material legal actions a franchisor must report; Item 4 covers bankruptcy. This is the franchisor's own disclosure, not a court record, and not legal advice.

Items 3 (litigation) & 4 (bankruptcy) at a glance

What the filing discloses

Cases disclosed
2
Item 3, as counted in the filing
Largest settlement, franchisor's own cases
None stated
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
Disclosed · an officer
Franchisor, parent, predecessor or officer
Filing year
2025
Disclosures cover the prior ten years

Extracted from the 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document

Item 3: litigation

Two matters disclosed: (1) Cakes By Design Inc. v. Cookies By Design Inc. et al. (Federal Court, Toronto, Canada, 2024) - IP infringement claim against predecessor and former franchisee, seeking >$50,000; franchisor is not a party. (2) Cookie Bouquet of Houston et al. v. Designed Cookies Inc. et al. (Harris County, TX, 2023) - former franchisees claiming FTC rule violations, fraud, breach of contract, and other claims against predecessor, seeking >$1,000,000.

Item 3 (litigation) · 2 matters disclosed · 2 pending listed

Litigation cases

The franchisor and its predecessor

Pending (2)

  • Cakes By Design Inc. (Plaintiff) v. Cookies By Design, Inc., Snickerdoodle Inc., Dharminder Bhullar and Kathleen R. Bhullar (Defendants)

    pending

    Cookies By Design, Inc. · filed 2024-04-03 · Federal Court, Toronto, Ontario, Canada · T-718-24

    “… as amended Court File No. T-718-24, Federal Court, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, dated April 3, 2024.”Page 10 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3
  • The Cookie Bouquet of Houston, Inc., Champions Cookie Bouquet, Inc., and Cookie Bouquet Development Corporation v. Designed Cookies, Inc., Cookies by Design, Inc., et al.

    pending

    Brought by a franchisee · Designed Cookies, Inc. · filed 2023-07-02 · District Court of Harris County, Texas · 2023-40765

    “The Cookie Bouquet of Houston, Inc., Champions Cookie Bouquet, Inc., and Cookie Bouquet Development Corporation v. Designed Cookies, Inc., Cookies by Design, Inc., Defendant Cookie Bouquet Franchising Corporation f/k/a Cookie Bouquet Inc., MGW Group, Inc.,”Page 10 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3

Item 3 lists the litigation the franchisor must disclose; a matter against a parent, an affiliate or a named officer is not a matter against the franchisor, and pending claims are allegations, not findings.

Disclosed in the 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document

Item 4: bankruptcy

Officers Andrew Berger and David Polonitza were officers/directors of Cosi, Inc. which filed Chapter 11 in September 2016 (emerged May 2017) and again in February 2020 (reinstated July 2022, plan confirmed July 2022, effective August 2022).

Disclosure signals that moved the score

How this shows up in the verdict

  • Dual litigation against predecessor franchisor: IP infringement claim in Canada plus Texas class action alleging breach of contract, fraud, and FTC violations creates legal/reputational risk and potential successor liability

The verdict grade is FranchiseVerdict's editorial assessment across SBA loan performance, unit growth, revenue and disclosure signals. It is not investment advice.

Before you weigh a lawsuit

How to read Item 3

A franchisor must disclose pending actions and any material civil action involving the franchise relationship, plus convictions or civil judgments for fraud, unfair or deceptive practices, or franchise-law violations, going back ten years. A case the franchisor brought against a franchisee counts too. Item 3 does not include every dispute: settled claims below the materiality line and matters resolved in private arbitration can be absent.

Questions worth asking current and former franchisees, using the contact list in Item 20:

  • Were you, or anyone you know in the system, party to a dispute with the franchisor?
  • Was it resolved by settlement, arbitration or a court, and on what terms?
  • Has the number of disputes gone up or down since you signed?