Bumble Bee Blinds Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026
- Investment
- $165K – $211K
- Disclosed sales
- $486K
- gross sales, not profit
- SBA charge-off
- 0.0%
- on 35 loans
Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records
Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology
Bumble Bee Blinds is a home-services franchise selling and installing custom blinds, shades, and shutters through in-home consultations. Franchisees run a sales-and-install operation handling measurements, orders, and installation in a territory.
FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026
A BUMBLE BEE BLINDS franchise requires a total initial investment of $165K – $211K, including a $60K franchise fee and an ongoing 6.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2025 FDD, average revenue per franchisee was $486K. This franchisor reports Item 19 per franchisee rather than per outlet, so the figure is not comparable with per-outlet averages[2]. SBA 7(a) loans show a 0.0% charge-off rate across 35 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: A (Strongest tier), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →
Sources, dates and evidence
FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - issued 12 to 24 months ago; a newer filing is likely on file
Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored6 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing; the rest are marked “Not cited” beside the figure.
Overview
- Investment
- $165K – $211K
- 67th pct Home Services
- Avg gross sales
- $486K
- Per franchisee, not per outlet
- Royalty
- 6.0%
- 21st pct Home Services
- Units
- 153
- 70th pct Home Services
- SBA charge-off
- 0.0%
- % of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category
Quick verdict · Home Services · color = vs category peers
Green = favorable by >10% vs Home Services median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)
Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology
Bottom line
- COSTTotal investment $165K – $211K including a $60K franchise fee, 6.0% ongoing royalty.
- RETURNSAverage revenue per franchisee of $486K/year (median $392K). Averaged per franchisee, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures.
- RISKVerdict A (Strongest tier), verdict score 73/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 0.0% across 35 loans (well below the franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
- GROWTHPositive: net +98 franchised outlets in the latest year (112 opened, 14 closed); 46 signed but not yet open (Item 20).
- GROWTHSystem growing at 2960.0% CAGR over 3 years with 153 total units. Strong expansion trajectory.
Item 1 · who you're contracting with
The Franchisor
Corporate structure & franchisor financials
- Legal entity
- HPB Blinds and Shutters LLC
- Parent company
- JEZ Investments LLC
- FDD Item 1, page 11 of the 2025 FDD
- Predecessor
- Omaha Blinds and Shutters, L.L.C. (d/b/a Omaha Blinds and Shutters)
- Prior franchisor entity
- CEO title
- Chief Executive Officer
- Anthony Hulbert
- Incorporated in
- PA
- HQ
- 2525 N. 117th Avenue, Omaha, Nebraska 68164
- Auditor
- Forvis Mazars, LLP
- Audited financials
- Franchisor revenue
- $3.4M
- vs $1.1M prior year
Affiliated brands
- HPB Automotive Sales
- HorsePower Nation
- HPB Accounting
- HPB Blinds and Shutters Holdings
Other brands the franchisor or its parent operates (Item 1).
Same owner · FDD Item 1, page 11
8 other brands on this site name JEZ Investments LLC as parent or ultimate parent in their own FDD.
- Blingle!B
- Gatsby GlassB
- Groovy Hues Peace Love Paint PowerwashB
- Heroes Lawn CareB
- Mighty Dog RoofingA
- Stand Strong FencingA
- Varsity ZoneC
- iFoamF
Grouped by the owner's name as each filing prints it (this page: the 2025 FDD). Spelling variants of the same group may be listed apart; a brand is never grouped with an owner its filing does not name.
Overview
About
- CEO
- Anthony Hulbert
- Headquarters
- NE
- Founded
- 2022
- FDD year
- 2025
- States available
- 18
Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?
Entry cost runs 12% above the typical home services franchise.
Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7
Full Item 7 breakdown19 line items
Initial investment breakdown
| Line item | Low | High | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial Feenot refundable | $60K | $60K | |
| Insurance (90 days)not refundable | $3K | $5K | |
| Tuition Feenot refundable | $5K | $5K | |
| Travel and Living Expenses while Trainingnot refundable | $2K | $4K | |
| Opening Packagenot refundable | $13K | $17K | |
| Utilities (90 days)not refundable | $200 | $500 | |
| Vehiclesnot refundable | $13K | $15K | |
| Licenses Certificates and Permitsnot refundable | $0 | $2K | |
| Professional Fees (Attorneys / Accountants)not refundable | $1K | $11K | |
| Technology Feenot refundable | $2K | $2K | |
| Special Software Feenot refundable | $900 | $900 | |
| Contact Center Feenot refundable | $1K | $4K | |
| Dues and Subscriptionsnot refundable | $0 | $2K | |
| Brand Marketing Feenot refundable | $16K | $16K | |
| Initial Marketing Expenditure and Local Advertising Expenditure (90 days)not refundable | $20K | $20K | |
| Digital Management Feenot refundable | $2K | $2K | |
| Accounting Services Feenot refundable | $2K | $2K | |
| ZeePartnerships Feenot refundable | $5K | $5K | |
| Additional Funds (90 days)not refundable | $20K | $40K | |
| Total initial investment | $165K | $211K |
Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.
Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate
The Vitals
- Total investment
- $165K – $211K
- Bottom third — review vs category
- Liquid capital req'd
- $20K – $40K
- Middle of category vs category
- Franchise fee
- $60K – $60K
- Middle of category vs category
- Royalty
- 6.0%
- Tiered by sales volume · typical 6–8%
- Ad fund
- 0.0%
- typical 3–5%
- Total fee load
- 9.0%
- vs 9–13% typical
Ongoing fees · Item 6
| Fee | Amount |
|---|---|
| Royalty | 6.0% of gross sales |
| Marketing / ad fund | 0.0% |
| Technology fee | $792 |
| Training fee | $5K |
| Transfer fee | $12K |
| Renewal fee | $12K |
| Total fee load | 9.0% of rev |
What do units actually make?
Average unit sales run 17% below the home services norm.
Averaged per franchisee, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures
Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19
Single-unit · not modelled
Returns at a glance
An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for BUMBLE BEE BLINDS until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.
—
Not modelled yet
An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.
Total invested capital · disclosed
$218K
Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.
ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
What one unit earns on your invested capital
Model A · Single-Unit Return
Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.
Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.
Returns model · single-unit ROIC
What would one BUMBLE BEE BLINDS unit return on the cash you put in?
Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.
Unlevered ROIC · per unit
Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.
—
An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.
What 25 units return when you use SBA financing
Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition
Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).
This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.
What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.
Not modelled yet
An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.
A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.
These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.
Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD
Financial Performance
Averaged per franchisee, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures
- Avg gross sales
- $486K
- Per franchisee, per year — not per outlet
- Median gross sales
- $392K
- Per franchisee, not per outlet
Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.
- Item 19 type
- gross sales
- Sample size
- 12 franchisees
- vs category median 32 · small
- Range (low → high)
- $177K→$1.2MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 83 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
- Cohort dispersion (min → max)
- Reporting year
- 2024
- Fiscal year the figures cover
- Source filing
- FDD 2025
- Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2024
- Transparency
- 4 / 10
- vs category median 4 / 10 · typical
Compared against 319 Home Services brands
Operator outlook
What the numbers say
Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.
Unit economics
The average franchisee generates $486K/year in gross sales. Median is $392K — top performers pull the average up, so a typical unit earns less.
Fee burden
Total ongoing fee load of 9.0% (near the Home Services median).
Disclosure
Transparency score 4/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.
Operator retention
System expanding at 2960.0% CAGR over 3 years across 153 units — operators are staying and new ones are joining.
Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.
vs Home Services medians
How Bumble Bee Blinds Compares
Per franchisee, not per outlet - the category median is per-outlet only, so no comparison is shown
Category median of published Home Services brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.
Is the system healthy?
Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20
This franchisor's Item 20 states that its outlet tables count territories rather than individual premises, so the figure above is a count of territories. We label a brand here only where its filing says so, and a brand that counts territories without stating it cannot be identified from its text — so this is not a complete list.
Unit growth
Item 20 · unit dynamics
The Growth Chart
- Total units
- 153
- Opened
- 112
- Last reporting year
- Closed
- 14
- Turnover rate
- 10.5%
- Company-owned
- 0
- Corporate units in the system
- % franchised
- 100%
- vs corporate-owned
Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers
- Signed, not yet open
- 46
- 0.30 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
- Projected new
- 38
- Franchisor's next-year forecast
Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.
Item 20 · 24 states with active franchisees
The Territory Map
Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).
States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.
Available to sell in · Item 12
- California
- Hawaii
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Maryland
- Michigan
- South Dakota
States where the franchisor is registered to sell new franchises (FDD registration filings).
Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list
55 current owners across 24 states.
- TX 12
- FL 7
- CO 4
- GA 3
- SC 3
- SD 3
- AL 2
- MI 2
- MO 2
- NC 2
- UT 2
- AR 1
- +12 more states
Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.
SBA loan performance
Government records
SBA Loan Data
Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.
- Total loans
- 35
- Loan volume
- $8.2M
- Median loan
- $280K
- 50th percentile
- Charge-off rate
- 0.0%
- on 35 loans · rates vary by category · see methodology
Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated
- Repayment rate (PIF)
- 100.0%
- 5-yr charge-off
- 0.0%
- Loans approved 2021+
- Active lenders
- 10
- Defaults
- 0
- Typical loan rate
- 10.7%
- avg rate to borrowers
- vs industry
- 0.0%
- brand is above its industry ↑
- Jobs supported
- 149
- 1.8 per loan
- Lender concentration
- 40%
- top lender's share
Borrower mix: 100% went to startups / new businesses, 0% to established operators
Top lenders financing Bumble Bee Blinds franchisees
Showing 3 of 10 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.
Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.
Lender network · 7(a) + 504
SBA Lending Report
Full lending analysis for Bumble Bee Blinds from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.
- Principal loss rate
- 0.0%
- Avg SBA guarantee
- 70%
- Avg interest rate
- 10.66%
- Lender concentration
- 40.0%
- Job velocity
- 1.8 per $100K
- NAICS benchmark
- 0.0%
- NAICS 449122
- Jobs supported
- 149
Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 40% of loans
| # | Lender | Loans | Volume | Default % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Huntington National Bank | 14 | $2.4M | 0.0% |
| 2 | First Bank of the Lake | 13 | $3.7M | N/A |
| 3 | iTHINK Financial CU | 1 | $220K | N/A |
| 4 | Readycap Lending, LLC | 1 | $330K | N/A |
| 5 | Pathward National Association | 1 | $204K | N/A |
| 6 | Newtek Bank, National Association | 1 | $225K | N/A |
| 7 | Hancock Whitney Bank | 1 | $295K | N/A |
| 8 | Peoples National Bank National Association | 1 | $280K | N/A |
| 9 | Celtic Bank Corporation | 1 | $290K | N/A |
| 10 | First Commonwealth Bank | 1 | $290K | N/A |
Geographic failure vector
| State | Loans | Defaults | Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLFlorida | 9 | 0 | 0.0% |
| TXTexas | 6 | 0 | 0.0% |
| GAGeorgia | 4 | 0 | -- |
| OHOhio | 2 | 0 | -- |
| SCSouth Carolina | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| TNTennessee | 2 | 0 | -- |
| ALAlabama | 1 | 0 | -- |
| ILIllinois | 1 | 0 | -- |
| MNMinnesota | 1 | 0 | -- |
| MOMissouri | 1 | 0 | -- |
SBA 7(a) lending trend
Borrower profile
Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict
With a 0.0% charge-off rate across 35 loans, banks have historically viewed this brand favorably for lending.
What could kill this investment?
SBA loans charge off at 0.0% — 100% below the 16.0% national norm, i.e. lower lender-observed risk.
Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21
Risk analysis
FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21
Risk & Legal
Bumble Bee Blinds presents elevated risk due to active litigation, non-transparent unit economics, aggressive unsustainable growth trajectory, and parent company financial uncertainties despite a protected territory and reasonable initial investment.
Why this reads harsher than the A grade: the grade weighs financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency across the whole filing, while this summary lists individual flags without that weighting. The flags are worth checking with current owners; neither is investment advice.
Litigation (Item 3)
Subject: officers or affiliates. The franchisor is not a named party in these cases.
Beutler Holdings, LLC and Zachery Beutler v. Joshua Skolnick, Skolnick Holdings, LLC, and JEZ Investments LLC (AAA, Omaha, NE, filed December 8, 2025) - disputes over governance, ownership interests, and operation of JEZ Investments LLC. Claims include fraudulent misrepresentation, minority oppression, breach of fiduciary duty, statutory dissolution. Pending.
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
None disclosed
Audited financials (Item 21)
Yes · Forvis Mazars, LLP
Franchisor revenue (Item 21)
Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)
Audited FY ended December 31, 2024. Revenues: Franchise revenues $1,574,330; Royalties $612,200; Other service fees $1,209,407; total $3,395,937. Other income (interest + other) of $25,102 reported separately below operating loss. Members' deficit (negative equity) of $(2,163,985).
Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16
- Franchisor sells you products: No
- Kickbacks from required suppliers: No
- Must buy proprietary products: No
- Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
- Can negotiate own supplier terms: No
Score breakdown · what drove the 73 / 100 verdict
- 01HIGHActive litigation involving parent company governance and ownership disputes creates operational uncertainty and potential distraction from franchisee support
- 02MINORNo average net income disclosure despite 153 units operating — impossible to validate ROI claims or unit economics transparency
- 03MINORExplosive 178.2% YoY unit growth is unsustainable and suggests potential oversaturation of territories or recruitment-driven expansion rather than organic demand
- 04MINORMinimum $500/month royalty fee ($6,000 annually) represents 1.2% of average revenue even at top tier — high fixed cost burden for struggling locations
- 05MINORHigh franchise fee ($59,500) coupled with non-disclosure of net income creates misalignment of incentives — franchisor profits upfront while franchisee bears long-term risk
Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification
What are you signing up for?
Ongoing fees run about 9.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.
Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17
FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal
Contract & Territory Detail
| Initial term | 10 years |
|---|---|
| Renewal term | 10 years |
| Allowed renewalsℹ | 1 |
| Territory type | Protected territory |
| Protected territory | Yes |
| Exclusive territoryℹ | No |
| Territory population | 200,000 |
| Online sales rightsℹ | Restricted |
| Franchisor can compete | Yes |
| Hire a manager? | Allowed |
| Owner-operator | Optional |
| Non-compete (years)ℹ | 2 years |
| Non-compete (miles)ℹ | 25 mi |
| Right of first refusalℹ | No |
| Transfer requires consent | Yes |
| Termination notice | 15 days |
| Termination groundsℹ | 1 |
| Curable defaultsℹ | 2 |
| Mandatory arbitration | Yes |
| Arbitration location | Bucks County, Pennsylvania |
| Jury trial waiver | No |
| Governing law | PA |
| Litigation count | 1 |
View Item 3 litigation summary
Beutler Holdings, LLC and Zachery Beutler v. Joshua Skolnick, Skolnick Holdings, LLC, and JEZ Investments LLC (AAA, Omaha, NE, filed December 8, 2025) - disputes over governance, ownership interests, and operation of JEZ Investments LLC. Claims include fraudulent misrepresentation, minority oppression, breach of fiduciary duty, statutory dissolution. Pending.
Items 10, 11
Training & Operations
- Classroom training
- 54 hrs
- On-the-job training
- 59 hrs
- Training location
- Phase I and II: digital/webinar; Phase III: Omaha, Nebraska
- Ongoing training
- Required
- Time to open
- 6 mo
- From signing to launch
- Site selection
- franchisee with franchisor approval
- Franchisor financing
- Offered
- Item 10
- POS system
- Service Titan
- Operating tech stack
Items 5 & 11
Franchisor Support
Technology: Service Titan
Item 20 · call current owners
Franchisee Contacts
55 owners to call
Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20
Frequently asked questions
Frequently Asked Questions
How much does it cost to open a BUMBLE BEE BLINDS franchise?
The total investment to open a BUMBLE BEE BLINDS franchise ranges from $165K – $211K, with an initial franchise fee of $60K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).
What do BUMBLE BEE BLINDS franchise owners earn?
According to Item 19 of the BUMBLE BEE BLINDS FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $486K. The median is $392K. Important context: Averaged per franchisee, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.
Who owns BUMBLE BEE BLINDS?
BUMBLE BEE BLINDS is franchised by HPB Blinds and Shutters LLC. Its parent company is JEZ Investments LLC. Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.
What is Item 19 in the BUMBLE BEE BLINDS FDD?
The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the BUMBLE BEE BLINDS FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.
What is BUMBLE BEE BLINDS's franchise failure rate?
Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, BUMBLE BEE BLINDS has a charge-off rate of 0.0% across 35 loans, meaning 0.0% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.
How many BUMBLE BEE BLINDS franchise locations are there?
As of their most recent FDD filing, BUMBLE BEE BLINDS has 153 total units in the United States, including 153 franchised units and 0 company-owned units. 112 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.
Is BUMBLE BEE BLINDS a good franchise to buy?
FranchiseVerdict rates BUMBLE BEE BLINDS as a A-grade franchise with a verdict score of 73 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.
Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.
For franchisors
Are you the franchisor?
If you represent BUMBLE BEE BLINDS, you can request corrections or provide updated information.
Other Home Services franchises
Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Home Services category
Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.