Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Big O Tires logo

Big O Tires Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

AutomotiveFLFranchising since 1982
BAbove averageAbove average64/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$512K – $1.9M
Disclosed sales
$2.8M
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
14.5%
on 352 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-00301FDD 2025Data QualityExcellent86%
Manager-run OKYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Big O Tires is an automotive franchise selling tires and providing installation, alignment, and general repair and maintenance. Franchisees run tire-and-service centers managing retail sales, service bays, technicians, and inventory.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Big O Tires franchise requires a total initial investment of $512K – $1.9M, including a $18K franchise fee and an ongoing 5.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2025 FDD, average unit revenue was $2.8M[2]. SBA 7(a) loans show a 14.5% charge-off rate across 352 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: B (Above average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - issued 12 to 24 months ago; a newer filing is likely on file

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored6 of 7 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing; the rest are marked “Not cited” beside the figure.

Overview

Investment
$512K – $1.9M
48th pct Automotive
Avg gross sales
$2.8M
20th pct Automotive
Royalty
5.0%
10th pct Automotive
Units
461
46th pct Automotive
SBA charge-off
14.5%
% of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category

Quick verdict · Automotive · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$512K – $1.9M
Median $368K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$18K – $18K
Median $35K
below median ↓, better than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$50K – $150K
Median $40K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
$2.8M
Median $1.0M
above median ↑, better than category
Royalty Rate
5.0%
Median 6.0%
below median ↓, better than category
Ongoing Fees
4.4% of rev
Median 8.0%
below median ↓, better than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
14.5%
352 loans · Median 12.9%
above median ↑, worse than category
System Size
461 units
Median 92 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
2.0%
Median 2.4%
below median ↓, better than category
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Optional
Can hire a manager
Litigation
4 cases
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Automotive median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $512K – $1.9M including a $18K franchise fee, 5.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $2.8M/year. Note: this is gross profit, not take-home income.
  • RISKVerdict B (Above average), verdict score 64/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 14.5% across 352 loans (above the 16% franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
  • GROWTHNegative: net -1 franchised outlets in the latest year (8 opened, 9 closed); 13 signed but not yet open (Item 20).

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Big O Tires, LLC
Parent company
TBC Shared Services, LLC
FDD Item 1, page 9 of the 2025 FDD
Ultimate parent
TBC Holdings, LLC
FDD Item 1, page 9 of the 2025 FDD
Predecessor
Big O Tire Dealers, Inc.
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
Chief Executive Officer
Don Byrd
Incorporated in
NV
HQ
4260 Design Center Drive, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410
Auditor
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$3.0B
vs $3.2B prior year

Independent franchisee associations

  • Franchise Advisory Council (FAC)

Franchisee-led councils or alliances disclosed in Item 20. Indicates operator voice.

Overview

About

CEO
Don Byrd
Headquarters
FL
Founded
1982
FDD year
2025
States available
24

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 225% above the typical automotive franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$512K – $1.9MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 36 of the 2025 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$17,500Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 14 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Royalty5.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 21 of the 2025 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund0.9%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 21 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$50K – $150K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

Full Item 7 breakdown12 line items

Initial investment breakdown

Item 7 initial investment line items
Line itemLowHigh
Initial Franchise Fee/Minimum Deposit$10K$18K
Initial Training - Fees, Travel & Lodging Expensesnot refundable$1K$9K
Real Estate Leases (Three Months' Rent Plus Security Deposit)$40K$160K
Equipment, Fixtures and Other Fixed Assetsnot refundable$250K$395K
Construction, Remodeling, Leasehold Improvements and Decorating Costsnot refundable$25K$750K
Signsnot refundable$15K$75K
Grand Opening Advertisingnot refundable$10K$50K
Initial Inventorynot refundable$75K$188K
Insurance and Other Security (3 months)not refundable$10K$20K
Computer Hardware and Softwarenot refundable$21K$34K
Non-recurring Pre-opening Costsnot refundable$5K$35K
Additional Funds (up to 12 months)not refundable$50K$150K
Total initial investment$512K$1.9M

Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$512K – $1.9M
Middle of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$50K – $150K
Top 40% of category vs category
Franchise fee
$18K – $18K
Top 40% of category vs category
Royalty
5.0%
Tiered by sales volume · typical 6–8%
Ad fund
0.9%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
4.4%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Big O Tires: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty5.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund0.9%
Technology fee$304
Training fee$1K
Transfer fee$5K
Inventory (initial)$75K – $188K
Total fee load4.4% of rev
Fee structure insight

A 4.4% total fee load is unusually lean. More of each revenue dollar stays with the franchisee.

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 175% above the automotive norm.

Avg gross sales$2.8MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 86 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross salesNot extracted
Item 19 typegross revenues and cost an…
Sample size457 outlets

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Big O Tires until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$1.3M

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Big O Tires unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $2,824,713 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $512K–$1.9M (midpoint used)
FDD reports $50K–$150K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$1.3M
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$2.8M
Per unit, per year

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
gross revenues and cost analysis
Sample size
457 outlets
vs category median 70 · large
Range (low → high)
$748K→$10.2MNot cited — published from our reading of the franchisor's disclosure document; the page it is printed on has not been located.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Quartile band
$1.4M→$4.7M
Bottom 25% → top 25%
Reporting year
2024
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2025
Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2024
Transparency
9 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · above
Gross sales rank20th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank48th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank10th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank46th
vs Automotive peers
Risk score rank25th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 167 Automotive brands

Showing the headline figures — all 160 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $2.8M/year in gross sales. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 2.4x.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 4.4% — below the Automotive median of 8.0%.

Disclosure

Transparency score 9/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System roughly stable (+0.2% 3-year CAGR) with 461 units.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Automotive medians

How Big O Tires Compares

Metric
Big O Tires
Category median
vs median
Investment
$1.2M
$368Kmiddle half $178K–$858K · n=95
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
$2.8M
$1.0Mmiddle half $695K–$1.8M · n=38
Above median, better than category
Unit Count
461
92middle half 23–293 · n=94
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Automotive brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units461Verified — printed on page 89 of the 2025 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it three ways.
3-yr growth-0.2% (worth scrutinizing)
Turnover rate2.0% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
461
Opened
8
Last reporting year
Closed
9
Terminated
4
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
2
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
2.0%
Company-owned
0
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
100%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
-0.2%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+0.2%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
4
Not renewed
2
Signed, not yet open
13
0.03 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
13
Franchisor's next-year forecast
Transfer rate
0.2%
Owners selling to other franchisees
Ceased ops
0.2%
Units that stopped operating
2022
460
Franchised units
2023
462+2
Franchised units
2024
461-1
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 13 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 13 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

17 current owners across 13 states.

  • AZ 3
  • CO 2
  • UT 2
  • CA 1
  • GA 1
  • ID 1
  • IN 1
  • MO 1
  • NE 1
  • NM 1
  • OK 1
  • TX 1
  • +1 more states

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20; 469 entries carry no state. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

C
SBA Lending Health
Average SBA lending record · 14.5% charge-off
Total loans
352
Loan volume
$222.9M
Median loan
$378K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
14.5%
on 352 loans · rates vary by category · see methodology

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
85.5%
5-yr charge-off
0.0%
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
72
Defaults
42
Typical loan rate
6.3%
avg rate to borrowers
Franchised industry avg
14.0%
brand above franchise avg ↑
Jobs supported
3,038
1.4 per loan
Lender concentration
30%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 27% went to startups / new businesses, 73% to established operators

Franchise vs independent — in tire dealers, franchised businesses charge off at 14.0% vs 16.4% for independents — franchising is associated with 15% lower SBA default risk in this category.

Vintage analysis

Big O Tires charge-off rate by loan vintage

BrandNational avg
Big O Tires charge-off rate by loan vintage. Showing 30 vintages from 1992 to 2022. Rates range from 0.0% to 54.5%.0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%'92'97'02'07'13'18'22

Top lenders financing Big O Tires franchisees

Wells Fargo Bank National Association107 loans17.5%
Live Oak Banking Company36 loans0.0%
Readycap Lending, LLC27 loans29.6%

Showing 3 of 72 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Total loans
50
Loan volume
$28.0M
Charge-off rate
2.9%
Jobs created
509

Historical SBA 504 lending data via CDCs, not predictive of future performance.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for Big O Tires from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Principal loss rate
4.5%
Avg SBA guarantee
74%
Avg interest rate
6.33%
Avg chargeoff amount
$237K
Lender concentration
30.4%
Job velocity
1.4 per $100K
Startup risk premium
0.0pp
NAICS benchmark
13.1%
NAICS 441320
Jobs supported
3,038

Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 30% of loans

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
1Wells Fargo Bank National Association107$51.0M17.5%
2Live Oak Banking Company36$51.7M0.0%
3Readycap Lending, LLC27$24.0M29.6%
4Wachovia SBA Lending, Inc.17$11.9M0.0%
5Zions Bank, A Division of12$8.8M22.2%
6Bank of America, National Association11$1.2M9.1%
7Loans from Old Closed Lenders8$2.6M0.0%
8GE Capital Small Business Finance Corporation7$2.0M42.9%
9JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association6$2.1M0.0%
10First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company6$3.0M16.7%

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
CACalifornia1151919.4%
AZArizona63712.3%
COColorado58510.2%
UTUtah2915.0%
INIndiana13240.0%
NMNew Mexico13111.1%
NVNevada11225.0%
IDIdaho10111.1%
WAWashington900.0%
NENebraska600.0%

SBA 7(a) lending trend

1992
10
1993
8
1994
11
1995
10
1996
30
1997
14
1998
11
1999
7
2000
19
2001
12
2002
15
2003
17
2004
16
2005
11
2006
6
2007
12
2008
12
2009
2
2010
3
2011
4
2012
3
2013
5
2014
5
2015
10
2016
5
2017
7
2018
14
2019
13
2020
15
2021
19
2022
12
2023
6
2024
1
2025
7

Borrower profile

Ownership change35 (41%)
Existing (2+ yr)25 (29%)
Startup14 (16%)
New (< 2 yr)9 (10%)
Unanswered1 (1%)
Established (5+ yr)1 (1%)
Less than 5 years old but at least 41 (1%)

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

What could kill this investment?

SBA loans here charge off near the 16.0% national average.

SBA charge-off14.5% · 352 loans
Verdict score64/100 (higher is better)
Litigation4 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

BAbove average64Verdict score 64/100

Big O Tires presents high risk due to active litigation alleging franchisor misrepresentation, declining unit count, thin profit margins, and high capital requirements that compress ROI.

Why this reads harsher than the B grade: the grade weighs financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency across the whole filing, while this summary lists individual flags without that weighting. The flags are worth checking with current owners; neither is investment advice.

High confidence±4 pts
6068

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).

3 prior actions disclosed: (1) Fratilla v. Big O Tires class action re tire protection program; settled $2.05M. (2) TBC Retail Group Wage and Hour Cases JCCP 4701; settled $1.84M. (3) Black Donuts et al. franchisee fraud/breach claims; settled with nominal payment. Also 1 administrative action (People of CA v. Big O Tires re advertising, $25K penalty, permanent injunction).

Largest disclosed settlement: $2,050,000

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $2951.6MYr 2: $3181.8M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Consolidated net revenues of TBC Holdings, LLC and subsidiaries (a joint venture of Michelin North America, Inc. and Sumitomo Corporation of Americas), the parent. FY ended March 31, 2025 ($2,951,647K) and 2024 ($3,181,848K), USD in thousands, audited by PwC. These are the consolidated parent figures, not standalone Big O Tires, LLC franchisor revenue. Item 8 states the franchisor's own total revenue as $385,060,332 (FY ending 2025-03-31); the statements above are the parent's.

ⓘ These are the parent company's consolidated financials (the parent guarantees the franchisor), not this brand's standalone results — the figure reflects the whole corporate group, not this brand alone.

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 64 / 100 verdict

  1. 01HIGHActive multi-front litigation including franchisee misrepresentation claims that directly undermine trust in franchisor disclosures
  2. 02MINORUnit count declining (-0.2% YoY) despite 461-unit system size, indicating market saturation or franchisee attrition
  3. 03MINORNet profit margin of only 9.2% ($258,878 on $2.8M avg revenue) leaves minimal buffer for royalty payments (3.5-5%), labor costs, and unexpected expenses
  4. 04MINORThree separate class action lawsuits (tire protection program, wage/hour violations at company stores, and franchisee false representations) suggest systemic operational or disclosure issues
  5. 05MINORHigh initial investment range ($511.5K-$1.88M) combined with thin margins creates extended payback period and capital recovery risk

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 160 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

Litigation case detail4 matters · Item 3

Litigation cases

The franchisor

Concluded (4)

  • TBC Retail Group Wage and Hour Cases

    settled

    Third-party plaintiff · filed 2012 · California Superior Court (coordinated proceeding; components were filed in Los Angeles County and Orange County) · JCCP Case No. 4701

    “This action coordinated two class actions that were pending in two different California Superior Courts on February 10, 2012. This action coordinated Paul Quintana, as an Individual and on Behalf Of All Similarly Situated Employees v. Big O Tires, LLC, Case No. BC451272, Superior Court of California for the County of Los Angeles”Page 13 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3

    Outcome:“Parties in both the Goegan and Quintana actions settled in 2018, with Big O agreeing to pay a total of $1.84 million, and the final order approving settlement was issued in March 2019. Black”

  • Black Donuts, Inc., Jan W. Talbot, Jeff Magna; T&T Pasadena, Inc., T&T Thousand Oaks, Inc., T&T Glendora, Inc., Tareq Nasrallah, Tony Nasrallah, G&G 2000, Inc., Jerry Riccio, Greg Minshell, Manzano, Inc., Kevin Raach, Chula Vista Tire, Inc., Jeff Yasukochi, Big Red Tire, Inc., James Park, Felix Bros

    settled

    Brought by a franchisee · filed 2009 · Superior Court of California for the County of Los Angeles · BC427136

    “Plaintiffs, both current and former franchisees of ours, filed the initial Complaint in December 2009. Plaintiffs alleged that Big O made false statements and representations and withheld information that the Plaintiffs alleged was important in connection with their purchase of their Big O franchise. Plaintiffs initially claimed”Page 13 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3

    Outcome:“The parties settled with a nominal payment from Big O. Big O maintained counterclaims against several of the remaining plaintiffs, which resulted in the gross amount of $42,500 from such plaintiffs to” (page 14)

  • People of the State of California v. Big O Tires, Inc., et al.

    judgment

    Government or regulatory action · filed 1993 · San Diego County Superior Court in California · Civil Action No. 671161

    “were the subject of an investigation regarding the advertising of store products and services by the Office of the City Attorney of San Diego. We cooperated with the California authorities in reviewing and assessing allegations as to whether violations of California law that regulate advertising had occurred, and in November 199”Page 14 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3

    Outcome:“As part of the Stipulation, the San Diego Target Franchisees and we agreed to pay certain costs and civil penalties totaling $35,000. Our portion totaled $25,000. Actions Filed Aga”

  • Fratilla, Brian Jeffrey v. Big O Tires, LLC

    settled

    Third-party plaintiff · Superior Court of California, San Diego County · 37-2013-00028542-CU-BT-CTL

    “A purported class action lawsuit was filed on behalf of customers of Big O alleging that Big O’s former tire protection program (“Former TPP”) is actually an insurance contract under California law which required Big O to register as an insurer, comply with various formatting requirements and disclosures, and notify consumers th”Page 13 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3

    Outcome:“The parties reached a settlement under which Big O agreed to pay $2.05 million in total, which the Court has approved by order dated August 24, 2018. TBC Retail”

Item 3 lists the litigation the franchisor must disclose; a matter against a parent, an affiliate or a named officer is not a matter against the franchisor, and pending claims are allegations, not findings.

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 4.4% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training274 hrs

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term10 years
Allowed renewalsℹ1
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory radius2 mi
Territory population50,000
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorOptional
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ10 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Curable defaultsℹ6
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationDenver, Colorado
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawCO
Litigation count4
View Item 3 litigation summary

3 prior actions disclosed: (1) Fratilla v. Big O Tires class action re tire protection program; settled $2.05M. (2) TBC Retail Group Wage and Hour Cases JCCP 4701; settled $1.84M. (3) Black Donuts et al. franchisee fraud/breach claims; settled with nominal payment. Also 1 administrative action (People of CA v. Big O Tires re advertising, $25K penalty, permanent injunction).

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
73 hrs
On-the-job training
200 hrs
Training location
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida or online virtual classroom; field training at a Big O Store
Ongoing training
Required
Time to open
3 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
Franchisee with franchisor approval
Franchisor financing
Offered
Item 10
POS system
BOT POS System (Navex / transitioning to Tekmetric)
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✓Lease negotiation help

Technology: BOT POS System (Navex / transitioning to Tekmetric)

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

486 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 486 contacts · $49
Free preview
(307) 635-••••
Unlock all 486 contacts
(502) 267-••••
(714) 826-••••
(210) 921-••••
(480) 946-••••

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Big O Tires franchise?

The total investment to open a Big O Tires franchise ranges from $512K – $1.9M, with an initial franchise fee of $18K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Big O Tires franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Big O Tires FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $2.8M. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Big O Tires?

Big O Tires is franchised by Big O Tires, LLC. Its parent company is TBC Shared Services, LLC. The ultimate parent named in the FDD is TBC Holdings, LLC. Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Big O Tires FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Big O Tires FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Big O Tires's franchise failure rate?

Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, Big O Tires has a charge-off rate of 14.5% across 352 loans, meaning 14.5% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.

How many Big O Tires franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Big O Tires has 461 total units in the United States, including 461 franchised units and 0 company-owned units. 8 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Big O Tires a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Big O Tires as a B-grade franchise with a verdict score of 64 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Big O Tires, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Automotive franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Automotive category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.