Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
BAD ASS COFFEE OF HAWAII logo

Bad Ass Coffee Of Hawaii Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Quick-Service RestaurantsCOFranchising since 2019
BAbove averageAbove average64/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$526K – $992K
Disclosed sales
$665K
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
0.0%
on 10 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-00223FDD 2025Data QualityExcellent95%
Owner-operator requiredYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Bad Ass Coffee of Hawaii is a coffee franchise serving Hawaiian-sourced coffee, espresso drinks, and island-themed treats. Franchisees run the cafes, managing baristas, retail coffee, and counter service.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A BAD ASS COFFEE OF HAWAII franchise requires a total initial investment of $526K – $992K, including a $40K franchise fee and an ongoing 5.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2025 FDD, average unit revenue was $665K[2]. SBA 7(a) loans show a 0.0% charge-off rate across 10 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: B (Above average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - issued 12 to 24 months ago; a newer filing is likely on file

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored8 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$526K – $992K
78th pct Service Resta…
Avg gross sales
$665K
Net sales9th pct Service Resta…
Royalty
5.0%
12th pct Service Resta…
Units
33
58th pct Service Resta…
SBA charge-off
0.0%
% of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category

Quick verdict · Quick-Service Restaurants · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$526K – $992K
Median $486K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$40K – $40K
Median $35K
above median ↑, worse than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$30K – $30K
Median $33K
near median
Avg Revenue
$665K
Median $975K
below median ↓, worse than category
Net sales
Royalty Rate
5.0%
Median 5.5%
near median
Ongoing Fees
7.0% of rev
Median 7.5%
near median
SBA Charge-Off Rate
0.0%
10 loans · Median 14.3%
below median ↓, better than category
System Size
33 units
Median 18 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
3.0%
Median 0.0%
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Required
You must run it yourself
Litigation
2 cases
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Quick-Service Restaurants median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $526K – $992K including a $40K franchise fee, 5.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $665K/year (median $519K).
  • RISKVerdict B (Above average), verdict score 64/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 0.0% across 10 loans (well below the franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
  • GROWTHPositive: net +2 franchised outlets in the latest year (3 opened, 1 closed); 26 signed but not yet open (Item 20).
  • GROWTHSystem growing at 28.0% CAGR over 3 years with 33 total units. Strong expansion trajectory.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Royal Aloha Franchise Company, LLC
Parent company
Royal Aloha Coffee Company, LLC
FDD Item 1, page 7 of the 2025 FDD
Predecessor
Bad Ass Coffee Company of Hawaii, Inc.
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
Chief Executive Officer
Scott Snyder
Incorporated in
CO
HQ
7347 South Revere Parkway, Building A, Suite A, Centennial, CO 80112
Auditor
The Adams Group, LLC
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$2.9M
vs $2.3M prior year

Independent franchisee associations

  • Franchise Advisory Council (FAC)

Franchisee-led councils or alliances disclosed in Item 20. Indicates operator voice.

Affiliated brands

  • company
  • Enterprises

Other brands the franchisor or its parent operates (Item 1).

Overview

About

CEO
Scott Snyder
Headquarters
CO
Founded
2019
FDD year
2025
States available
13

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 56% above the typical quick-service restaurants franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$526K – $992KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 16 of the 2025 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$40,000Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 11 of the 2025 FDD (Item 5). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Royalty5.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 12 of the 2025 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund2.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 12 of the 2025 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$30K – $30K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

Full Item 7 breakdown12 line items

Initial investment breakdown

Item 7 initial investment line items
Line itemLowHigh
Development Feenot refundable$100K$100K
Architectural Servicesnot refundable$18K$30K
Shop Opening Assistance Feenot refundable$7K$7K
Building and Tenant Improvementsnot refundable$170K$530K
Equipment and Furnishingsnot refundable$152K$220K
Signsnot refundable$9K$25K
Point-of-Sale System, Software and Office Equipmentnot refundable$1K$5K
Opening Inventorynot refundable$15K$15K
Security Deposits, Utility Deposits, Business Licensesnot refundable$5K$10K
Grand Opening Marketing Campaignnot refundable$15K$15K
Initial Training: Travel and Living Expensesnot refundable$4K$6K
Additional Funds - 3 Monthsnot refundable$30K$30K
Total initial investment$526K$992K

Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$526K – $992K
Bottom third — review vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$30K – $30K
Middle of category vs category
Franchise fee
$40K – $40K
Middle of category vs category
Royalty
5.0%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
2.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
7.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

BAD ASS COFFEE OF HAWAII: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty5.0% of net sales
Marketing / ad fund2.0% of net sales
Technology fee$499
Transfer fee$10K
Renewal fee$5K
Inventory (initial)$15K – $15K
Total fee load7.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 32% below the quick-service restaurants norm.

Avg gross sales$665K

Reported as net sales, not gross sales

Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 41 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$519KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 41 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typenet sales
Sample size29 outlets

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for BAD ASS COFFEE OF HAWAII until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$789K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one BAD ASS COFFEE OF HAWAII unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $665,300 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $526K–$992K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $30K–$30K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$789K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Reported as net sales, not gross sales

Avg gross sales
$665K
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$519K

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
net sales
Sample size
29 outlets
vs category median 19
Range (low → high)
$286K→$1.7MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 41 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Reporting year
2024
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2025
Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2024
Transparency
4 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · typical
Gross sales rank9th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank78th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank12th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank58th
vs Quick-Service Restaurants peers
Risk score rank25th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 781 Quick-Service Restaurants brands

Showing the headline figures — all 159 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →
Revenue insight

Revenue is only 0.9x the investment. This means each unit may take 5+ years to recoup the initial outlay at typical margins.

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $665K/year in gross sales. Median is $519K — top performers pull the average up, so a typical unit earns less. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 0.9x.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 7.0% (near the Quick-Service Restaurants median).

Disclosure

Transparency score 4/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System expanding at 28.0% CAGR over 3 years across 33 units — operators are staying and new ones are joining.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Quick-Service Restaurants medians

How Bad Ass Coffee Of Hawaii Compares

Metric
Bad Ass Coffee Of Hawaii
Category median
vs median
Investment
$759K
$486Kmiddle half $342K–$748K · n=780
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
$665K
$975Kmiddle half $664K–$1.4M · n=284
Below median, worse than category
Unit Count
33
18middle half 5–79 · n=755
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Quick-Service Restaurants brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units33Verified — printed on page 42 of the 2025 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it two ways.
3-yr growth+28.0% (favorable vs category)
Turnover rate3.0% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
33
Opened
3
Last reporting year
Closed
1
Terminated
0
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
3.0%
Company-owned
1
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
97%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
+28.0%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+28.0%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
0
Not renewed
0
Transferred
0
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
26
0.79 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
10
Franchisor's next-year forecast
Termination rate
3.1%
Franchisor-initiated terminations
Ceased ops
3.1%
Units that stopped operating
2022
25
Franchised units
2023
30+5
Franchised units
2024
32+2
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 12 · 13 states reported

The Territory Map

FDD Item 12 reports the state count, but the specific list isn't in our current data. The map will appear once we re-extract from the FDD or enough franchisee contacts are available.

13

states with franchisees (per FDD Item 12)

Growth insight

Fast growth in a small system. Newer franchisors expanding quickly may not yet have the support infrastructure of larger systems.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

A
SBA Lending Health
Excellent SBA lending record · 0.0% charge-off
Total loans
10
Loan volume
$6.0M
Median loan
$491K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
0.0%
on 10 loans · rates vary by category · see methodology

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
100.0%
5-yr charge-off
0.0%
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
8
Defaults
0
Typical loan rate
8.9%
avg rate to borrowers
Franchised industry avg
10.6%
brand beats franchise avg ↓
Jobs supported
115
1.9 per loan
Lender concentration
20%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 100% went to startups / new businesses, 0% to established operators

Franchise vs independent — in snack and nonalcoholic beverage bars, franchised businesses charge off at 10.6% vs 8.9% for independents — franchising is associated with 19% higher SBA default risk in this category.

Top lenders financing Bad Ass Coffee Of Hawaii franchisees

Third Coast Bank2 loans—
The Huntington National Bank2 loans—
Newtek Small Business Finance, Inc.1 loans0.0%

Showing 3 of 8 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for Bad Ass Coffee Of Hawaii from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Principal loss rate
0.0%
Avg SBA guarantee
74%
Avg interest rate
8.88%
Lender concentration
20.0%
Job velocity
1.9 per $100K
NAICS benchmark
7.0%
NAICS 722515
Jobs supported
115

Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 20% of loans

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
1Third Coast Bank2$1.5MN/A
2The Huntington National Bank2$550KN/A
3Newtek Small Business Finance, Inc.1$170K0.0%
4Merchants Bank of Indiana1$460KN/A
5The Bancorp Bank National Association1$791KN/A
6First Savings Bank1$1.5MN/A
7Cadence Bank1$453K0.0%
8Valley National Bank1$482KN/A

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
SCSouth Carolina30--
FLFlorida20--
TXTexas20--
CACalifornia100.0%
MNMinnesota100.0%
VAVirginia10--

SBA 7(a) lending trend

2019
1
2022
2
2023
1
2024
2
2025
4

Borrower profile

Startup10 (100%)

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

Lending insight

With a 0.0% charge-off rate across 10 loans, banks have historically viewed this brand favorably for lending.

What could kill this investment?

SBA loans charge off at 0.0% — 100% below the 16.0% national norm, i.e. lower lender-observed risk.

SBA charge-off0.0% · 10 loans
Verdict score64/100 (higher is better)
Litigation2 cases · none name the franchisor
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

BAbove average64Verdict score 64/100

Modest growth, hidden profitability metrics, and past litigation signal execution risks in a maturing system where franchisees may struggle to justify $526k+ investment.

High confidence±4 pts
6068

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: officers or affiliates. The franchisor is not a named party in these cases.

Two predecessor litigation cases disclosed: (1) Naughty Donkey Enterprises v. Bad Ass Coffee Company of Hawaii (2009, Alabama) - settled 2019 with payment of $162,066 judgment; (2) Bad Ass Coffee v. Royal Aloha International (2013, Utah) - settled with $75,000 payment, Satisfaction of Judgment entered March 2021

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · The Adams Group, LLC

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $2.9MYr 2: $2.3MNon-royalty: $0.0M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Consolidated total income FY2024 comprises royalty fees $1,007,732, royalty fees-related party $56,466, franchise fees and other $1,422,919, advertising fund contributions $409,611, and other income $6,443. Franchisor reported a net loss; member's equity $468,713 reflects member contributions of $738,031 in 2024.

ⓘ These are the parent company's consolidated financials (the parent guarantees the franchisor), not this brand's standalone results — the figure reflects the whole corporate group, not this brand alone.

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 64 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MEDNet income not disclosed in Item 19 — unable to verify actual profitability despite $665k average revenue
  2. 02MINORSlow unit growth of 6.7% YoY suggests market saturation or franchisee struggles in a mature 33-unit system
  3. 03HIGHTwo settled litigation cases (promissory note dispute with area developer and international license dispute) indicate operational/contractual friction
  4. 04MEDHigh initial investment ($526k–$992k) combined with undisclosed profitability creates unclear ROI timeline

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 159 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 7.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training80 hrs

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term10 years
Allowed renewalsℹ1
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory radius1 mi
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorRequired
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ25 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
RoFR response window30 days
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Curable defaultsℹ4
Mandatory arbitrationNo
Arbitration locationColorado
Jury trial waiverNo
Governing lawCO
Litigation count2
View Item 3 litigation summary

Two predecessor litigation cases disclosed: (1) Naughty Donkey Enterprises v. Bad Ass Coffee Company of Hawaii (2009, Alabama) - settled 2019 with payment of $162,066 judgment; (2) Bad Ass Coffee v. Royal Aloha International (2013, Utah) - settled with $75,000 payment, Satisfaction of Judgment entered March 2021

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
30 hrs
On-the-job training
50 hrs
Training location
Centennial, CO (classroom); Denver, CO area shop (OJT)
Ongoing training
Required
Time to open
15 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
Franchisee with franchisor approval
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✓Lease negotiation help

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

51 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 51 contacts · $49
Free preview
469-344-••••
Unlock all 51 contacts
808-877-••••
201-697-••••
714-269-••••
713-256-••••

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a BAD ASS COFFEE OF HAWAII franchise?

The total investment to open a BAD ASS COFFEE OF HAWAII franchise ranges from $526K – $992K, with an initial franchise fee of $40K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do BAD ASS COFFEE OF HAWAII franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the BAD ASS COFFEE OF HAWAII FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $665K. The median is $519K. Important context: Reported as net sales, not gross sales. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns BAD ASS COFFEE OF HAWAII?

BAD ASS COFFEE OF HAWAII is franchised by Royal Aloha Franchise Company, LLC. Its parent company is Royal Aloha Coffee Company, LLC. Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.

What is Item 19 in the BAD ASS COFFEE OF HAWAII FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the BAD ASS COFFEE OF HAWAII FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is BAD ASS COFFEE OF HAWAII's franchise failure rate?

Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, BAD ASS COFFEE OF HAWAII has a charge-off rate of 0.0% across 10 loans, meaning 0.0% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.

How many BAD ASS COFFEE OF HAWAII franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, BAD ASS COFFEE OF HAWAII has 33 total units in the United States, including 32 franchised units and 1 company-owned units. 3 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is BAD ASS COFFEE OF HAWAII a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates BAD ASS COFFEE OF HAWAII as a B-grade franchise with a verdict score of 64 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent BAD ASS COFFEE OF HAWAII, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Quick-Service Restaurants franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Quick-Service Restaurants category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.