Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

FDD Items 3 & 4 · 2025 filing

Atax litigation history

What Atax disclosed about lawsuits, arbitrations and bankruptcy in the 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document. Item 3 lists the material legal actions a franchisor must report; Item 4 covers bankruptcy. This is the franchisor's own disclosure, not a court record, and not legal advice.

Items 3 (litigation) & 4 (bankruptcy) at a glance

What the filing discloses

Cases disclosed
10
Item 3, as counted in the filing
Largest settlement, franchisor's own cases
$545K
As stated in Item 3
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
None
Franchisor, parent, predecessor or officer
Filing year
2025
Disclosures cover the prior ten years

Extracted from the 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document

Item 3: litigation

Item 3 discloses 12 matters: 2 pending (minority-investor suit against Hewitt/ATAX/Loyalty alleging fraud/breach of fiduciary duty; arbitration with Fortis Lux/Tutum re: joint venture breach) and concluded actions including ATAX v. Mercedes/Toro Taxes (trade secrets, $350,000 judgment), JTH Tax/Liberty Tax v. Hewitt et al (trade dress/trade secrets, settled $545,000), two Virginia Beach contract/employment suits (settled $50,000 each), Delaware shareholder derivative suits against Hewitt re: Liberty Tax (settled, no liability found), RSL Senior Partners derivative suit (settled), Shahabuddin v. JTH Tax/Hewitt (settled $775,000), a California DFPI consent order requiring Hewitt to disclose a prior federal Final Order, and the underlying DOJ action against Liberty Tax Service (settled via compliance-monitor order).

Item 3 (litigation) · 10 matters disclosed · 2 pending listed

Litigation cases

The franchisor

Pending (2)

  • Ira Lubert and John Martinson v. John T. Hewitt, ATAX, LLC, and Loyalty, LLC

    pending

    Brought by a third party · filed 2025-05-30 · Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania · 250503829

    “… (Case No 250503829) filed May 30, 2025, in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania.”Page 13 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3
  • ATAX, LLC v. Annette Mercedes, Toro Taxes Franchise L.L.C., Tony Villalobos, LDTTAX NJ Corporation, LDM Union City Corporation, Yaely Mercedes, and Alba Villalobos

    pending

    Brought against a franchisee · filed 2023-12-08 · Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Hudson County · L-004320-23

    “… Docket No. L- 004320-23, filed December 8, 2023, in the Superior Court of New Jersey Law Division: Hudson County.”Page 13 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3

Concluded (1)

  • JTH Tax LLC d/b/a Liberty Tax Service v. John T. Hewitt, Loyalty LLC, ATAX LLC, ATAX Franchise, Inc. and Yneva Marte

    settled

    Brought by a third party · filed 2021-02-04 · U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia · 2:21-cv-00076-RBS-LRL

    “… (Case No.2:21-cv-00076-RBS-LRL) filed February 4, 2021 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.”Page 15 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3

    Outcome: “Under the Settlement Agreement, Defendants agreed to pay the Plaintiff $545,000 over 6 years, and to refrain from: (1) unfairly competing with Liberty Tax by tortiously interfering with its franchise agreements;”

Officers and directors (individuals, not the company)

Concluded (7)

  • United States of America v. Franchise Group Intermediate L 1, LLC d/b/a Liberty Tax Service

    settled

    Government or regulatory action · John T. Hewitt (referenced in the order; not a party) · filed 2019-12-03 · U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia · 2:19-cv-00653-RAJ-DEM

    “Governmental Actions against Unrelated Entities: United States of America v. Franchise Group Intermediate L 1, LLC d/b/a Liberty Tax Service, (Case No. 2:19-cv-00653-RAJ-DEM) filed on or around December 3, 2019 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.”Page 18 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3
  • Bablu Shahabuddin v. JTH Tax, Inc., Siempre Tax, and John Hewitt

    settled

    John T. Hewitt (with JTH Tax/Siempre Tax, unrelated) · filed 2018-01-11 · U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia · 2:18-cv-00016-MDS-DEM

    “… (Case No. 2:18-cv-00016- MDS-DEM) filed on January 11, 2018 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.”Page 17 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3
  • RSL Senior Partners, LLC, derivatively and on behalf of Liberty Tax, Inc. v. Brunot et al.

    settled

    Brought by a third party · John T. Hewitt (former Liberty Tax CEO) · filed 2018-03-07 · U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia · 2:18-cv-00127-HCM-DEM

    “RSL Senior Partners, LLC, derivatively and on behalf of Liberty Tax, Inc. v Brunot et al, (Case No. 2:18-cv-00127-HCM-DEM), filed on March 7, 2018, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.”Page 16 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3
  • In Re: Liberty Tax, Inc. Stockholder Litigation (consolidated Asbestos Workers’ Philadelphia Pension Fund v. John Hewitt and Erie County Employees Retirement System v. John T. Hewitt)

    settled

    Brought by a third party · John T. Hewitt · filed 2017-12-12 · Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware · 2017-0883; 2017-0914

    “Asbestos Workers’ Philadelphia Pension Fund, derivatively on behalf of Liberty Tax, Inc., v. John Hewitt. Defendant, and Liberty Tax, Inc., Nominal Defendant, (Case No. 2017-0883), filed on December 12, 2017 in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware.”Page 16 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3
  • K&A Publicidad, Inc. v. JTH Tax, Inc., d/b/a Liberty Tax Service, Liberty Tax, Inc. d/b/a Siempre Tax and John Hewitt

    settled

    John T. Hewitt (with JTH Tax/Liberty Tax, unrelated) · filed 2017-09-05 · Virginia Beach Circuit Court · CL17-4169

    “… (Case No. CL17-4169), filed on September 5, 2017 in the Virginia Beach Circuit Court.”Page 15 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3
  • Kirke Franz Szawronski v. JTH Tax, Inc., d/b/a Liberty Tax Service, Liberty Tax, Inc., d/b/a Siempre Tax and John Hewitt

    settled

    John T. Hewitt (with JTH Tax/Liberty Tax, unrelated) · filed 2017-09-05 · Virginia Beach Circuit Court · CL17-4170

    “… (Case No. CL17-4170), filed on September 5, 2017 in the Virginia Beach Circuit Court.”Page 15 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3
  • In the Matter of a Consent Order between The Commissioner of Financial Protection and Innovation and John T. Hewitt

    concluded

    Government or regulatory action · John T. Hewitt · California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation

    “… before the Commissioner of Financial Protection and Innovation for the State of California.”Page 17 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3

Item 3 lists the litigation the franchisor must disclose; a matter against a parent, an affiliate or a named officer is not a matter against the franchisor, and pending claims are allegations, not findings.

Disclosure signals that moved the score

How this shows up in the verdict

  • Multiple concurrent litigation categories including investor claims, IP disputes with Liberty Tax Service, shareholder derivative suits, and governmental consent orders indicate systemic governance and compliance failures
  • Historical litigation with former CEO John Hewitt and governmental consent orders indicate past compliance/transparency violations that may recur

The verdict grade is FranchiseVerdict's editorial assessment across SBA loan performance, unit growth, revenue and disclosure signals. It is not investment advice.

Before you weigh a lawsuit

How to read Item 3

A franchisor must disclose pending actions and any material civil action involving the franchise relationship, plus convictions or civil judgments for fraud, unfair or deceptive practices, or franchise-law violations, going back ten years. A case the franchisor brought against a franchisee counts too. Item 3 does not include every dispute: settled claims below the materiality line and matters resolved in private arbitration can be absent.

Questions worth asking current and former franchisees, using the contact list in Item 20:

  • Were you, or anyone you know in the system, party to a dispute with the franchisor?
  • Was it resolved by settlement, arbitration or a court, and on what terms?
  • Has the number of disputes gone up or down since you signed?