Lower Risk
No litigation cases disclosed in FDD Items 3 and 4.
Source: FDD Items 3–5
FDD Items 3 & 4
Litigation Metrics
Cases disclosed
0
Total from FDD Items 3 and 4
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
—
Franchisor or officer bankruptcy
Overall risk score
65 / 100
FranchiseVerdict composite
Rating
MODERATE
STRONG / MODERATE / CAUTION / AVOID
FDD Items 5, 6 & 17 — what you give up
Contract Risk Indicators
Mandatory arbitration
Not required
You retain the right to sue in court
Jury trial waiver
Waived
You give up the right to a jury trial
Non-compete
2 yrs
Post-termination restriction on similar businesses
Franchisor can compete
Yes
Franchisor can open competing locations in or near your territory
Governing law
New York
State whose law governs disputes — relevant if you're not based there
What drove the 65/100 rating
Risk Score Breakdown
- 01HIGHGoing concern warning indicates potential financial distress or viability questions at corporate level
- 02MEDCritical financial metrics completely undisclosed: no average unit revenue, net income, or royalty rate published
- 03MINORExtremely rapid unit growth (166.7% YoY from ~3 to 9 units) suggests either aggressive expansion or turnover; insufficient track record at scale
- 04MINORZero franchise fee is unusual and may indicate difficulty attracting franchisees through traditional means or aggressive market penetration strategy
- 05MINORUnknown term length and royalty structure prevent proper financial modeling and long-term commitment assessment
- 06MEDOnly 9 total units provides minimal comparable performance data and limited corporate stability/resources
- 07MINORNo Item 19 financial performance claims limits ability to validate earnings potential
Severity inferred from FDD text — not a regulatory or legal classification
Litigation data from FDD Items 3, 4, and 5. SBA data from public 7(a) FOIA records (FY2020–present). Not legal advice — consult a franchise attorney before signing any franchise agreement.