FranchiseVerdict
Well Infused logo
B68/100FDD 2025

Well Infused — Litigation & Risk

Health & Wellness - Other · FDD Items 3, 4 & 5

Back to overview

Lower Risk

No litigation cases disclosed in FDD Items 3 and 4.

Source: FDD Items 3–5

FDD Items 3 & 4

Litigation Metrics

Cases disclosed
0
Total from FDD Items 3 and 4
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
—
Franchisor or officer bankruptcy
Overall risk score
68 / 100
FranchiseVerdict composite
Rating
MODERATE
STRONG / MODERATE / CAUTION / AVOID

FDD Items 5, 6 & 17 — what you give up

Contract Risk Indicators

Mandatory arbitration
Required
Disputes resolved outside court — limits your legal options
Jury trial waiver
Waived
You give up the right to a jury trial
Non-compete
2 yrs
Post-termination restriction on similar businesses
Franchisor can compete
Yes
Franchisor can open competing locations in or near your territory
Right of first refusal
Yes
Franchisor can match any purchase offer when you try to sell
Governing law
Florida
State whose law governs disputes — relevant if you're not based there

What drove the 68/100 rating

Risk Score Breakdown

  1. 01MEDOnly 2 existing units with unknown growth trajectory indicates extremely limited operating history and proof of concept
  2. 02HIGHGoing Concern status of False suggests financial instability or viability concerns at franchisor level
  3. 03MEDNo Item 19 (financial performance representations) disclosed limits ability to validate the $208k avg net income claim
  4. 04MINORWide investment range ($324k-$1M) with only 2 comparable units makes ROI projections unreliable
  5. 05MINORMinimal franchisee network (2 units) creates execution risk and insufficient peer support/troubleshooting resources

Severity inferred from FDD text — not a regulatory or legal classification

Litigation data from FDD Items 3, 4, and 5. SBA data from public 7(a) FOIA records (FY2020–present). Not legal advice — consult a franchise attorney before signing any franchise agreement.