Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Ululani’s Hawaiian Shave Ice logo

Ululani’s Hawaiian Shave Ice Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Quick-Service RestaurantsWAFranchising since 2016
BAbove averageAbove average56/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$286K – $566K
Disclosed sales
$455K
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
Not SBA-matched

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-02840FDD 2025Data QualityExcellent81%
Manager-run OKYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Ululani's Hawaiian Shave Ice is a dessert franchise serving fine-shaved Hawaiian shave ice with homemade syrups and toppings. Franchisees run the shops, managing product prep, staffing, and counter service.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Ululani’s Hawaiian Shave Ice franchise requires a total initial investment of $286K – $566K, including a $48K franchise fee and an ongoing 5.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2025 FDD, average unit revenue was $455K[2]. FranchiseVerdict grade: B (Above average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - issued 12 to 24 months ago; a newer filing is likely on file

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✗ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored5 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing; the rest are marked “Not cited” beside the figure.

Overview

Investment
$286K – $566K
46th pct Service Resta…
Avg gross sales
$455K
3rd pct Service Resta…
Royalty
5.0%
12th pct Service Resta…
Units
11
39th pct Service Resta…
SBA charge-off
N/A

Quick verdict · Quick-Service Restaurants · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$286K – $566K
Median $486K
below median ↓, better than category
Franchise Fee
$48K – $48K
Median $35K
above median ↑, worse than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$5K – $10K
Median $33K
below median ↓, better than category
Avg Revenue
$455K
Median $975K
below median ↓, worse than category
Royalty Rate
5.0%
Median 5.5%
near median
Ongoing Fees
5.5% of rev
Median 7.5%
below median ↓, better than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Not SBA-matched
Not matched to SBA 7(a) loans
System Size
11 units
Median 18 units
below median ↓, worse than category
Turnover Rate
N/A
Median 0.0%
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Optional
Can hire a manager
Litigation
None disclosed
Clean record

Green = favorable by >10% vs Quick-Service Restaurants median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $286K – $566K including a $48K franchise fee, 5.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $455K/year (median $345K).
  • RISKVerdict B (Above average), verdict score 56/100 (higher is better).
  • GROWTHPositive: net +2 franchised outlets in the latest year (2 opened, 0 closed); 4 signed but not yet open (Item 20).

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
UHSI Franchise, LLC
Ultimate parent
UHSI International, LLC
FDD Item 1, page 7 of the 2025 FDD
CEO title
Chief Executive Officer (of Affiliate)
David Yamashiro
CEO experience
2008 yrs
Years in role or industry
Founder active
Yes
Original founder still leading the business
Incorporated in
Delaware
HQ
13517 NE 42nd Ave., Vancouver, Washington 98686
Auditor
Kezos & Dunlavy
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$151K
vs $167K prior year

Overview

About

CEO
David Yamashiro
Headquarters
WA
Founded
2008
FDD year
2025
States available
3

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 12% below the typical quick-service restaurants franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$286K – $566KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 16 of the 2025 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$48,000Verified — printed on page 9 of the 2025 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty5.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 10 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund0.5%Not cited — published from our reading of the franchisor's disclosure document; the page it is printed on has not been located.
Working capital$5K – $10K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

FDD Item 7 · 2025 filing

Initial investment breakdown

Ululani’s Hawaiian Shave Ice: Item 7 initial investment breakdown
Cost componentLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$48K$48K
Working capital (3–6 mo)$5K$10K
Equipment, build-out, other$233K$508K
Total initial investment$286K$566K

Source: Ululani’s Hawaiian Shave Ice 2025 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$286K – $566K
Middle of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$5K – $10K
Top 40% of category vs category
Franchise fee
$48K – $48K
Bottom third — review vs category
Royalty
5.0%
Tiered by sales volume · typical 6–8%
Ad fund
0.5%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
5.5%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Ululani’s Hawaiian Shave Ice: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty5.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund0.5% of gross sales
Technology fee$75
Training fee$990
Transfer fee$5K
Renewal fee$1K
Inventory (initial)$50K – $50K
Total fee load5.5% of rev
Fee structure insight

A 5.5% total fee load is unusually lean. More of each revenue dollar stays with the franchisee.

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 53% below the quick-service restaurants norm.

Avg gross sales$455KNot cited — published from our reading of the franchisor's disclosure document; the page it is printed on has not been located.
Median gross sales$345KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 42 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typehistorical gross sales by …
Sample size6 outlets

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Ululani’s Hawaiian Shave Ice until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$434K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Ululani’s Hawaiian Shave Ice unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $455,028 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $286K–$566K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $5K–$10K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$434K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$455K
Per unit/yr · from the Item 19 franchised-cohort breakdown (no single system-wide average disclosed)
Median gross sales
$345K

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
historical gross sales by individual outlet (affiliate-owned and franchisee-owned), 2020-2024
Sample size
6 outlets
vs category median 19 · small
Range (low → high)
$194K→$1.6MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 42 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Reporting year
2024
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2025
Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2024
Gross sales rank3th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank46th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank12th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank39th
vs Quick-Service Restaurants peers
Risk score rank35th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 781 Quick-Service Restaurants brands

Showing the headline figures — all 155 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $455K/year in gross sales. Median is $345K — top performers pull the average up, so a typical unit earns less. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 1.1x.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 5.5% — below the Quick-Service Restaurants median of 7.5%.

Disclosure

Transparency score 0/10 — minimal disclosure beyond the required average. Hard to judge the distribution of outcomes across units.

Operator retention

System expanding at 300.0% CAGR over 3 years across 11 units — operators are staying and new ones are joining.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Quick-Service Restaurants medians

How Ululani’s Hawaiian Shave Ice Compares

Metric
Ululani’s Hawaiian Shave Ice
Category median
vs median
Investment
$426K
$486Kmiddle half $342K–$748K · n=780
Below median, better than category
Revenue
$455K
$975Kmiddle half $664K–$1.4M · n=284
Below median, worse than category
Unit Count
11
18middle half 5–79 · n=755
Below median, worse than category

Category median of published Quick-Service Restaurants brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units11Not cited — published from our reading of the franchisor's disclosure document; the page it is printed on has not been located.
3-yr growthOutlier (see FDD) (caution)

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
11
Opened
2
Last reporting year
Closed
0
Terminated
0
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
N/A
Company-owned
3
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
73%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
Outlier (see FDD)
Likely small-sample artifact
3-yr CAGR
Outlier (see FDD)
Likely small-sample artifact

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
0
Not renewed
0
Transferred
0
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
4
0.36 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
6
Franchisor's next-year forecast
Ceased ops
10.0%
Units that stopped operating
2022
2
Franchised units
2023
6+4
Franchised units
2024
8+2
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 12 · 3 states reported

The Territory Map

FDD Item 12 reports the state count, but the specific list isn't in our current data. The map will appear once we re-extract from the FDD or enough franchisee contacts are available.

3

states with franchisees (per FDD Item 12)

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

1 current owner across 1 state.

  • CA 1

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20; 13 entries carry no state. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

Growth insight

Fast growth in a small system. Newer franchisors expanding quickly may not yet have the support infrastructure of larger systems.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

No SBA loan data available for this brand.

What could kill this investment?

SBA charge-offNot SBA-matched
Verdict score56/100 (higher is better)
Litigation0 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

BAbove average56Verdict score 56/100
Moderate confidence±13 pts
4369

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: officers or affiliates. The franchisor is not a named party in these cases.

No litigation required to be disclosed

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Kezos & Dunlavy

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $0.2MYr 2: $0.2M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Franchisor total revenue for FY2024 was $151,454; supplier-affiliate UHSI Food, LLC had total revenue of $649,827 (77% from franchisee sales).

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: No
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: Yes

Score breakdown · what drove the 56 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINORNegative franchisor net worth: -$223,923
  2. 02MINORThin total revenue: $151,454
  3. 03MINORSmall system: 10 total units

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 155 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 5.5% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training90 hrs

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term10 years
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory radius3 mi
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorOptional
Non-compete (years)ℹ3 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ50 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
RoFR response window30 days
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Mandatory arbitrationNo
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawWashington
Litigation count0
View Item 3 litigation summary

No litigation required to be disclosed

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
32 hrs
On-the-job training
58 hrs
Training location
Typically Our Affiliate's Headquarters (currently in Kahului, Hawaii)
Ongoing training
Required
Field support
58 hrs/yr
On-site visits per year
Time to open
7 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
franchisee, with optional franchisor advice/approval
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✓Lease negotiation help

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

14 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 14 contacts · $49
Free preview
800-367-••••
Unlock all 14 contacts
415-533-••••
201-899-••••CA
619-456-••••
808-368-••••

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Ululani’s Hawaiian Shave Ice franchise?

The total investment to open a Ululani’s Hawaiian Shave Ice franchise ranges from $286K – $566K, with an initial franchise fee of $48K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Ululani’s Hawaiian Shave Ice franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Ululani’s Hawaiian Shave Ice FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $455K. The median is $345K. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Ululani’s Hawaiian Shave Ice?

Ululani’s Hawaiian Shave Ice is franchised by UHSI Franchise, LLC. The ultimate parent named in the FDD is UHSI International, LLC. Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Ululani’s Hawaiian Shave Ice FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Ululani’s Hawaiian Shave Ice FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Ululani’s Hawaiian Shave Ice's franchise failure rate?

SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for Ululani’s Hawaiian Shave Ice (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.

How many Ululani’s Hawaiian Shave Ice franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Ululani’s Hawaiian Shave Ice has 11 total units in the United States, including 8 franchised units and 3 company-owned units. 2 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Ululani’s Hawaiian Shave Ice a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Ululani’s Hawaiian Shave Ice as a B-grade franchise with a verdict score of 56 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Ululani’s Hawaiian Shave Ice, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Quick-Service Restaurants franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Quick-Service Restaurants category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.