Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Tous Les Jours logo

Tous Les Jours Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Quick-Service RestaurantsCAFranchising since 2009
AStrongest tierStrongest tier91/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$718K – $1.6M
Disclosed sales
$1.9M
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
8.3%
on 76 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-02771FDD 2025Data QualityExcellent91%
Manager-run OKYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Tous Les Jours is a French-Asian bakery-cafe franchise serving fresh-baked breads, pastries, cakes, and coffee. Franchisees run cafes managing in-store baking, counter service, and staffing.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Tous Les Jours franchise requires a total initial investment of $718K – $1.6M, including a $10K – $40K franchise fee and an ongoing 5.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2025 FDD, average unit revenue was $1.9M[2]. SBA 7(a) loans show a 8.3% charge-off rate across 76 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: A (Strongest tier), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - issued 12 to 24 months ago; a newer filing is likely on file

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored7 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing; the rest are marked “Not cited” beside the figure.

Overview

Investment
$718K – $1.6M
87th pct Service Resta…
Avg gross sales
$1.9M
32nd pct Service Resta…
Royalty
5.0%
12th pct Service Resta…
Units
149
80th pct Service Resta…
SBA charge-off
8.3%
% of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category

Quick verdict · Quick-Service Restaurants · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$718K – $1.6M
Median $486K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$10K – $40K
Median $35K
below median ↓, better than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$60K – $80K
Median $33K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
$1.9M
Median $975K
above median ↑, better than category
Royalty Rate
5.0%
Median 5.5%
near median
Ongoing Fees
8.0% of rev
Median 7.5%
near median
SBA Charge-Off Rate
8.3%
76 loans · Median 14.3%
below median ↓, better than category
System Size
149 units
Median 18 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
0.7%
Median 0.0%
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Optional
Can hire a manager
Litigation
None disclosed
Clean record

Green = favorable by >10% vs Quick-Service Restaurants median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $718K – $1.6M including a $40K franchise fee, 5.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $1.9M/year (median $1.7M).
  • RISKVerdict A (Strongest tier), verdict score 91/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 8.3% across 76 loans (near or below the 16% franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
  • GROWTHPositive: net +41 franchised outlets in the latest year (42 opened, 1 closed) (Item 20).
  • GROWTHSystem growing at 73.8% CAGR over 3 years with 149 total units. Strong expansion trajectory.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Tous Les Jours International Corp.
Parent company
CJ Foodville USA, Inc.
FDD Item 1, page 11 of the 2025 FDD
Ultimate parent
CJ Foodville Co., Ltd. dba CJ Foodville Corp.
FDD Item 1, page 11 of the 2025 FDD
CEO title
President and Chief Executive Officer
Hun Soo Ahn
Incorporated in
California
HQ
6832 E. Slauson Ave., Commerce, CA 90040
Auditor
LEK Partners (Duluth, GA)
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$8.8M
vs $6.3M prior year

Overview

About

CEO
Hun Soo Ahn
Headquarters
CA
Founded
2009
FDD year
2025
States available
28

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 141% above the typical quick-service restaurants franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$718K – $1.6MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 22 of the 2025 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$40,000Verified — printed on page 14 of the 2025 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty5.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 15 of the 2025 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund0.0%Not cited — published from our reading of the franchisor's disclosure document; the page it is printed on has not been located.
Working capital$60K – $80K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

Full Item 7 breakdown10 line items

Initial investment breakdown

Item 7 initial investment line items
Line itemLowHigh
Initial Franchise Feenot refundable$40K$40K
Real Estate Security/Utility Deposits, Licenses and Prepaid Feesnot refundable$7K$40K
Equipment, Fixtures & Furniturenot refundable$230K$430K
Leasehold Improvementsnot refundable$320K$890K
Opening Inventorynot refundable$28K$40K
Insurancenot refundable$1K$2K
Signage, Menu Boardnot refundable$12K$45K
Grand Opening Marketing Programnot refundable$10K$20K
POS and Cash Registers/Other Office Equipmentnot refundable$10K$38K
Additional Funds - 3 monthsnot refundable$60K$80K
Total initial investment$718K$1.6M

Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$718K – $1.6M
Bottom third — review vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$60K – $80K
Bottom third — review vs category
Franchise fee
$10K – $40K
Middle of category vs category
Royalty
5.0%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
0.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
8.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Tous Les Jours: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty5.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund0.0%
Technology fee$100
Training fee$350
Transfer fee$20K
Renewal fee$20K
Inventory (initial)$28K – $40K
Total fee load8.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 99% above the quick-service restaurants norm.

Avg gross sales$1.9MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 57 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$1.7MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 57 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typeaverage gross sales
Sample size90 outlets

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Tous Les Jours until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$1.2M

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Tous Les Jours unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $1,944,938 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $718K–$1.6M (midpoint used)
FDD reports $60K–$80K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$1.2M
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$1.9M
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$1.7M

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
average gross sales
Sample size
90 outlets
vs category median 19 · large
Range (low → high)
$361K→$6.6MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 57 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Reporting year
2023
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2025
Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2023
Transparency
4 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · typical
Gross sales rank32th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank87th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank12th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank80th
vs Quick-Service Restaurants peers
Risk score rank1th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 781 Quick-Service Restaurants brands

Showing the headline figures — all 142 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $1.9M/year in gross sales. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 1.7x.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 8.0% (near the Quick-Service Restaurants median).

Disclosure

Transparency score 4/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System expanding at 73.8% CAGR over 3 years across 149 units — operators are staying and new ones are joining.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Quick-Service Restaurants medians

How Tous Les Jours Compares

Metric
Tous Les Jours
Category median
vs median
Investment
$1.2M
$486Kmiddle half $342K–$748K · n=780
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
$1.9M
$975Kmiddle half $664K–$1.4M · n=284
Above median, better than category
Unit Count
149
18middle half 5–79 · n=755
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Quick-Service Restaurants brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units149Verified — printed on page 62 of the 2025 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it three ways.
3-yr growth+73.8% (favorable vs category)
Turnover rate0.7% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
149
Opened
42
Last reporting year
Closed
1
Terminated
1
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
0.7%
Company-owned
3
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
98%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
+73.8%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+73.8%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
1
Not renewed
0
Transferred
2
Transfer rate
1.3%
Owners selling to other franchisees
Termination rate
0.7%
Franchisor-initiated terminations
Ceased ops
0.7%
Units that stopped operating
2022
84
Franchised units
2023
105+21
Franchised units
2024
146+41
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 20 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 20 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

67 current owners across 20 states.

  • CA 20
  • NJ 9
  • IL 5
  • MA 5
  • GA 4
  • MD 4
  • CO 3
  • FL 2
  • NC 2
  • NE 2
  • NY 2
  • AL 1
  • +8 more states

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

B
SBA Lending Health
Strong SBA lending record · 8.3% charge-off
Total loans
76
Loan volume
$54.4M
Median loan
$629K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
8.3%
on 76 loans · rates vary by category · see methodology

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
91.7%
5-yr charge-off
0.0%
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
36
Defaults
1
Typical loan rate
8.2%
avg rate to borrowers
Franchised industry avg
10.0%
brand beats franchise avg ↓
Jobs supported
1,125
2.2 per loan
Lender concentration
11%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 80% went to startups / new businesses, 20% to established operators

Franchise vs independent — in retail bakeries, franchised businesses charge off at 10.0% vs 17.6% for independents — franchising is associated with 43% lower SBA default risk in this category.

Top lenders financing Tous Les Jours franchisees

Hanmi Bank8 loans—
The Huntington National Bank7 loans—
Bank of Hope6 loans0.0%

Showing 3 of 36 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for Tous Les Jours from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Principal loss rate
0.2%
Avg SBA guarantee
72%
Avg interest rate
8.18%
Avg chargeoff amount
$81K
Lender concentration
11.4%
Job velocity
2.2 per $100K
NAICS benchmark
1.2%
NAICS 311811
Jobs supported
1,125

Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 11% of loans

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
1Hanmi Bank8$7.0MN/A
2The Huntington National Bank7$3.2MN/A
3Bank of Hope6$2.2M0.0%
4Wilmington Savings Fund Society FSB4$3.7M0.0%
5PromiseOne Bank3$1.9MN/A
6Centerstone SBA Lending, Inc.3$5.9MN/A
7EagleBank2$1.2M0.0%
8JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association2$400K0.0%
9UniBank2$414K0.0%
10Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company2$900KN/A

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
VAVirginia1100.0%
CACalifornia1000.0%
MDMaryland60--
OHOhio50--
MIMichigan40--
COColorado300.0%
GAGeorgia30--
NCNorth Carolina30--
NJNew Jersey3150.0%
NYNew York300.0%

SBA 7(a) lending trend

2013
2
2014
2
2015
3
2016
1
2017
1
2018
1
2019
1
2020
2
2021
5
2022
7
2023
6
2024
13
2025
21
2026
5

Borrower profile

Startup45 (74%)
Existing (2+ yr)8 (13%)
New (< 2 yr)4 (7%)
Ownership change2 (3%)
Unanswered1 (2%)
Established (5+ yr)1 (2%)

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

What could kill this investment?

SBA loans charge off at 8.3% — 48% below the 16.0% national norm, i.e. lower lender-observed risk.

SBA charge-off8.3% · 76 loans
Verdict score91/100 (higher is better)
Litigation0 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

AStrongest tier91Verdict score 91/100

Tous Les Jours presents elevated risk due to missing profitability data, unprotected territories, aggressive expansion without disclosed unit economics, and corporate going concern issues.

Why this reads harsher than the A grade: the grade weighs financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency across the whole filing, while this summary lists individual flags without that weighting. The flags are worth checking with current owners; neither is investment advice.

High confidence±4 pts
8795

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: officers or affiliates. The franchisor is not a named party in these cases.

Item 3 states: "No litigation is required to be disclosed in this Item."

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · LEK Partners (Duluth, GA)

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $8.8MYr 2: $6.3MNon-royalty: $1.0M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Item 19 reports Average Sales for Eligible Outlets; no quartile breakdowns are provided (tables segment by company/franchised and by months-open tenure). Highest/lowest gross are from the 2024 Total Outlets row of Table 1C. Item 21 financials (total liabilities, total revenue, other income) are from audited statements as of December 31, 2023 (most recent audited year in Exhibit H; audit dated March 11, 2024). Franchisor has no long-term liabilities, so total liabilities equals total current liabilities. Other revenue reflects 'Other income, net' (interest income + miscellaneous).

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 91 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINORUnprotected territory creates direct competition risk within same market
  2. 02MINORRapid unit growth (73.8% YoY) suggests possible oversaturation or aggressive recruitment masking profitability issues
  3. 03MINOR5% royalty on gross sales (not net) means franchisees pay even during unprofitable periods

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 142 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 8.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term5 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training231 hrs

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term5 years
Allowed renewalsℹ2
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory radius1 mi
Territory population50,000
Online sales rightsRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorOptional
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ15 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
RoFR response window30 days
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Curable defaultsℹ2
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationCalifornia
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawCA
Litigation count0
View Item 3 litigation summary

Item 3 states: "No litigation is required to be disclosed in this Item."

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
38 hrs
On-the-job training
192 hrs
Training location
Commerce, CA and Brea, CA
Ongoing training
Required
Time to open
12 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
franchisee
POS system
POS
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Technology: POS

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

67 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 67 contacts · $49
Free preview
(213) 219-••••CA
Unlock all 67 contacts
(781) 272-••••MA
(908) 821-••••NJ
(562) 303-••••CA
(469) 585-••••CA

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Tous Les Jours franchise?

The total investment to open a Tous Les Jours franchise ranges from $718K – $1.6M, with an initial franchise fee of $40K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Tous Les Jours franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Tous Les Jours FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $1.9M. The median is $1.7M. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Tous Les Jours?

Tous Les Jours is franchised by Tous Les Jours International Corp.. Its parent company is CJ Foodville USA, Inc.. The ultimate parent named in the FDD is CJ Foodville Co., Ltd. dba CJ Foodville Corp.. Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Tous Les Jours FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Tous Les Jours FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Tous Les Jours's franchise failure rate?

Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, Tous Les Jours has a charge-off rate of 8.3% across 76 loans, meaning 8.3% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.

How many Tous Les Jours franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Tous Les Jours has 149 total units in the United States, including 146 franchised units and 3 company-owned units. 42 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Tous Les Jours a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Tous Les Jours as a A-grade franchise with a verdict score of 91 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Tous Les Jours, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Quick-Service Restaurants franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Quick-Service Restaurants category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.