Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
The Original Pancake House logo
BAbove average56/100FDD 2025

The Original Pancake House: Litigation & Risk

Full-Service Restaurants · FDD Items 3, 4 & 5

Back to overview

Elevated Risk

2 cases disclosed in FDD Items 3 and 4. Bankruptcy disclosed in Item 4.

Source: FDD Items 3–5

FDD Items 3 & 4

Litigation Metrics

Cases disclosed
2
Total from FDD Items 3 and 4
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
Disclosed
Franchisor or officer bankruptcy
Verdict score
56 / 100
FranchiseVerdict composite · higher is better
Rating
B
A / B / C / D / F verdict grade

7(a) FOIA data · FY2020–present

SBA Loan Performance

Aggregated from public SBA 7(a) loan disclosures. Charge-off rate is the share of loans that were charged off or settled for less than the full balance.

Total 7(a) loans
59
Government-backed loans issued
Charge-off rate
13.6%
vs 16% franchise average
5-yr charge-off rate
0.0%
Defaults
6 loans
Loans charged off or defaulted
Total loan volume
$32.0M
Avg loan size
$542K
Participating lenders
11

FDD Items 5, 6 & 17: What You Give Up

Contract Risk Indicators

Mandatory arbitration
Not required
You retain the right to sue in court
Jury trial waiver
Waived
You give up the right to a jury trial
Non-compete
1 yrs
Post-termination restriction on similar businesses
Franchisor can compete
Yes
Franchisor can open competing locations in or near your territory
Right of first refusal
Yes
Franchisor can match any purchase offer when you try to sell
Governing law
Oregon
State whose law governs disputes. Relevant if you're not based there

Extracted from FDD Item 3

Litigation Detail

The Original Pancake House Franchising, Inc. brought 2 cases against franchisees during fiscal year 2024: (1) Case No. 24CV05538 in Oregon Circuit Court (Multnomah County) against Top H Enterprises, LLC, Forever Holdings, LLC, and Taylor McEver for collection of royalty payments and enforcement of reporting requirements; (2) Case No. 24GC07047 in Georgia Superior Court (Cobb County) against the same defendants to enforce a default judgment obtained in the first matter.

What drove the 56/100 verdict

Risk Score Breakdown

  1. 01MINORStrong financials: net income $3.95M, equity $863,185
  2. 02MINOR147 units, established since 1991
  3. 03MINOR2 suits are franchisor-plaintiff collections (routine)

Severity inferred from FDD text. Not a regulatory or legal classification

Litigation data from FDD Items 3, 4, and 5. SBA data from public 7(a) FOIA records (FY2020–present). Not legal advice. Consult a franchise attorney before signing any franchise agreement.