Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
TacoTime logo

TacoTime Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Quick-Service RestaurantsAZFranchising since 1961
CAverageAverage40/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$366K – $824K
Disclosed sales
$860K
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
31.2%
on 89 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-02543FDD 2025Data QualityExcellent91%
Manager-run OKNo: No territory protection

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

TacoTime is a quick-service franchise serving Mexican-inspired tacos, burritos, and its signature Mexi-Fries. Franchisees run restaurants with drive-thru and dine-in service, managing food prep and staffing.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A TacoTime franchise requires a total initial investment of $366K – $824K, including a $30K franchise fee and an ongoing 6.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2025 FDD, average unit revenue was $860K[2]. SBA 7(a) loans show a 31.2% charge-off rate across 89 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: C (Average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - issued 12 to 24 months ago; a newer filing is likely on file

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored7 of 7 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$366K – $824K
59th pct Service Resta…
Avg gross sales
$860K
15th pct Service Resta…
Royalty
6.0%
48th pct Service Resta…
Units
99
76th pct Service Resta…
SBA charge-off
31.2%
% of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category

Quick verdict · Quick-Service Restaurants · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$366K – $824K
Median $486K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$30K – $30K
Median $35K
below median ↓, better than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$5K – $20K
Median $33K
below median ↓, better than category
Avg Revenue
$860K
Median $975K
below median ↓, worse than category
Royalty Rate
6.0%
Median 5.5%
near median
Ongoing Fees
10.0% of rev
Median 7.5%
above median ↑, worse than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
31.2%
89 loans · Median 14.3%
above median ↑, worse than category
System Size
99 units
Median 18 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
2.0%
Median 0.0%
Territory
None
The franchisor can open or license outlets nearby
Owner-Operator
Optional
Can hire a manager
Litigation
20 cases
Review carefully

Green = favorable by >10% vs Quick-Service Restaurants median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $366K – $824K including a $30K franchise fee, 6.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $860K/year (median $825K).
  • RISKVerdict C (Average), verdict score 40/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 31.2% across 89 loans (well above the 16% franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
  • GROWTHNegative: net -2 franchised outlets in the latest year (0 opened, 2 closed); 8 signed but not yet open (Item 20).
  • LEGAL20 litigation matters disclosed in Item 3, higher than typical. Review the summary for patterns (franchisor-initiated vs. franchisee-initiated).

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Kahala Franchising, L.L.C.
Parent company
Kahala Brands, Inc.
FDD Item 1, page 7 of the 2025 FDD
Ultimate parent
MTY Food Group, Inc.
FDD Item 1, page 7 of the 2025 FDD
Predecessor
Taco Time International, Inc.
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
Chief Executive Officer of MTY
Eric Lefebvre
CEO experience
2018 yrs
Years in role or industry
Incorporated in
Arizona
HQ
9311 E. Via De Ventura, Scottsdale, Arizona 85258
Auditor
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$597.5M
vs $606.6M prior year
Management churn noted
Frequent turnover
Item 2 disclosed frequent executive changes

Same owner · FDD Item 1, page 7

26 other brands on this site name MTY Food Group, Inc. as parent or ultimate parent in their own FDD.

Portfolio: MTY Food Group · Kahala Brands

Grouped by the owner's name as each filing prints it (this page: the 2025 FDD). Spelling variants of the same group may be listed apart; a brand is never grouped with an owner its filing does not name.

Overview

About

CEO
Eric Lefebvre
Headquarters
AZ
FDD year
2025
States available
10

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 23% above the typical quick-service restaurants franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$366K – $824KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 39 of the 2025 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$30,000Verified — printed on page 31 of the 2025 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty6.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 33 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund4.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 33 of the 2025 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$5K – $20K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

FDD Item 7 · 2025 filing

Initial investment breakdown

TacoTime: Item 7 initial investment breakdown
Cost componentLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$30K$30K
Working capital (3–6 mo)$5K$20K
Equipment, build-out, other$331K$774K
Total initial investment$366K$824K

Source: TacoTime 2025 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$366K – $824K
Middle of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$5K – $20K
Top 40% of category vs category
Franchise fee
$30K – $30K
Top 40% of category vs category
Royalty
6.0%
Set by a formula · typical 6–8%
Ad fund
4.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
10.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

TacoTime: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty6.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund4.0% of gross sales
Technology fee$75
Training fee$2K
Transfer fee$8K
Renewal fee$15K
Inventory (initial)$4K – $10K
Total fee load10.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 12% below the quick-service restaurants norm.

Avg gross sales$860KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 77 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$825KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 77 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typegross sales
Sample size94 outlets

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for TacoTime until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$607K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one TacoTime unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $860,131 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $366K–$824K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $5K–$20K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$607K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$860K
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$825K

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
gross sales
Sample size
94 outlets
vs category median 19 · large
Quartile band
$442K→$1.6M
Bottom 25% → top 25%
Reporting year
2024
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2025
Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2024
Transparency
4 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · typical
Gross sales rank15th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank59th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank48th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank76th
vs Quick-Service Restaurants peers
Risk score rank74th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 781 Quick-Service Restaurants brands

Showing the headline figures — all 155 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $860K/year in gross sales. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 1.4x.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 10.0% — above the Quick-Service Restaurants median of 7.5%.

Disclosure

Transparency score 4/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System contracting at -7.6% CAGR over 3 years. Investigate whether closures are franchisor-driven consolidation or franchisee exits.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Quick-Service Restaurants medians

How TacoTime Compares

Metric
TacoTime
Category median
vs median
Investment
$595K
$486Kmiddle half $342K–$748K · n=780
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
$860K
$975Kmiddle half $664K–$1.4M · n=284
Below median, worse than category
Unit Count
99
18middle half 5–79 · n=755
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Quick-Service Restaurants brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units99Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 78 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
3-yr growth-7.6% (worth scrutinizing)
Turnover rate2.0% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
99
Opened
0
Last reporting year
Closed
2
Terminated
0
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
1
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
2.0%
Company-owned
2
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
1%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
-7.6%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
-7.6%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
0
Not renewed
1
Transferred
5
Reacquired
1
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
8
0.08 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
1
Franchisor's next-year forecast
Transfer rate
5.1%
Owners selling to other franchisees
Termination rate
2.0%
Franchisor-initiated terminations
Ceased ops
1.0%
Units that stopped operating
2022
105
Franchised units
2023
99-6
Franchised units
2024
97-2
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 12 · 10 states reported

The Territory Map

FDD Item 12 reports the state count, but the specific list isn't in our current data. The map will appear once we re-extract from the FDD or enough franchisee contacts are available.

10

states with franchisees (per FDD Item 12)

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

1 current owner across 1 state; 2 former (terminated, transferred or not renewed) listed separately.

  • UT 1

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

F
SBA Lending Health
Weak SBA lending record · 31.2% charge-off
Total loans
89
Loan volume
$27.6M
Median loan
$365K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
31.2%
on 89 loans · rates vary by category · see methodology

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
68.8%
5-yr charge-off
0.0%
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
29
Defaults
20
Typical loan rate
8.2%
avg rate to borrowers
Franchised industry avg
10.8%
brand above franchise avg ↑
Jobs supported
202
5.5 per loan
Lender concentration
44%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 33% went to startups / new businesses, 67% to established operators

Franchise vs independent — in limited-service restaurants, franchised businesses charge off at 10.8% vs 10.0% for independents — franchising is associated with 8% higher SBA default risk in this category.

Vintage analysis

TacoTime charge-off rate by loan vintage

BrandNational avg
TacoTime charge-off rate by loan vintage. Showing 6 vintages from 1992 to 2005. Rates range from 0.0% to 66.7%.0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%'92'93'95'99'00'05

Top lenders financing TacoTime franchisees

Columbia Bank4 loans0.0%
KeyBank National Association2 loans0.0%
America First FCU1 loans—

Showing 3 of 29 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Total loans
3
Loan volume
$1.3M
Charge-off rate
N/A
Jobs created
53

Historical SBA 504 lending data via CDCs, not predictive of future performance.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for TacoTime from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Principal loss rate
0.0%
Avg SBA guarantee
70%
Avg interest rate
8.17%
Lender concentration
44.4%
Job velocity
5.5 per $100K
NAICS benchmark
8.7%
NAICS 722513
Jobs supported
202

Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 44% of loans

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
1Columbia Bank4$1.5M0.0%
2KeyBank National Association2$1.1M0.0%
3America First FCU1$243KN/A
4Citizens Bank1$365KN/A
5BMO Bank National Association1$427KN/A

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
UTUtah40--
IDIdaho300.0%
OROregon20--

SBA 7(a) lending trend

2018
1
2020
2
2021
2
2022
1
2024
3

Borrower profile

Existing (2+ yr)4 (44%)
Ownership change2 (22%)
Startup2 (22%)
New (< 2 yr)1 (11%)

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

Lending insight

A 31.2% charge-off rate means roughly 1 in 3 franchisees failed to repay their SBA loan. Investigate what changed.

What could kill this investment?

SBA loans charge off at 31.2% — 95% above the 16.0% national norm, i.e. higher lender-observed risk.

SBA charge-off31.2% · 89 loans
Verdict score40/100 (higher is better)
Litigation20 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

CAverage40Verdict score 40/100

Parent-level financials (MTY/Kahala) with strong net worth $252.9M and net income $17.0M; litigation summary is largely concluded historical franchisee disputes across many affiliated brands, not active suits against TacoTime. Audited, Item 19 disclosed (avg gross $860,131). Units down 7.6% in a 99-unit system.

High confidence±4 pts
3644

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).

Two concluded litigation matters disclosed: (1) Purav Enterprises, L.L.C., Balwant Bahia, and Paramjit Samra v. The Extreme Pita Franchising USA, Inc., EP Development, Inc., and Feisal Ramjee (Washington Superior Court, Case No. 15-2-15120-7) - franchisees alleged FIPA violations and misrepresentation; settled March 11, 2016 for $20,000; dismissed March 16, 2016. (2) KOHO, Inc. v. Kahala Franchising, L.L.C. (California Superior Court, Los Angeles County, Case No. BC572565) - area representative sued for breach of contract and unjust enrichment; Kahala cross-complained; court granted judgment for Kahala; awarded Kahala $205,000 in attorney's fees; settled June 19, 2017 with Kahala repurchasing territory for $75,000 and forgiving $130,000 in remaining damages.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $597.5MYr 2: $606.6MNon-royalty: $51.7M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Guarantor MTY Franchising USA, Inc. consolidated revenue; figures in thousands of USD converted to dollars; FY ends November 30

ⓘ These are the parent company's consolidated financials (the parent guarantees the franchisor), not this brand's standalone results — the figure reflects the whole corporate group, not this brand alone.

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: No
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: No
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 40 / 100 verdict

  1. 01HIGHLitigation is mostly concluded, affiliate-level (parent MTY)
  2. 02MINORParent-level financials strong: net worth $252.9M
  3. 03MEDUnit decline -7.6%
  4. 04MEDItem 19 disclosed, audited

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 155 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 10.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term5 yrs
TerritoryNone (caution)
Initial training160 hrs

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term5 years
Allowed renewalsℹ1
Protected territoryNo
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorOptional
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ10 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice90 days
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationcounty and state where the Franchised Business is located
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawArizona
Litigation count20
View Item 3 litigation summary

Two concluded litigation matters disclosed: (1) Purav Enterprises, L.L.C., Balwant Bahia, and Paramjit Samra v. The Extreme Pita Franchising USA, Inc., EP Development, Inc., and Feisal Ramjee (Washington Superior Court, Case No. 15-2-15120-7) - franchisees alleged FIPA violations and misrepresentation; settled March 11, 2016 for $20,000; dismissed March 16, 2016. (2) KOHO, Inc. v. Kahala Franchising, L.L.C. (California Superior Court, Los Angeles County, Case No. BC572565) - area representative sued for breach of contract and unjust enrichment; Kahala cross-complained; court granted judgment for Kahala; awarded Kahala $205,000 in attorney's fees; settled June 19, 2017 with Kahala repurchasing territory for $75,000 and forgiving $130,000 in remaining damages.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
40 hrs
On-the-job training
120 hrs
Training location
Online. KTEC (Kahala Training & Education Center) in Scottsdale
Ongoing training
Optional
Time to open
9 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
franchisee (with franchisor approval)
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✓Lease negotiation help

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

3 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 3 contacts · $49
Free preview
(435) 797-••••UT

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a TacoTime franchise?

The total investment to open a TacoTime franchise ranges from $366K – $824K, with an initial franchise fee of $30K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do TacoTime franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the TacoTime FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $860K. The median is $825K. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns TacoTime?

TacoTime is franchised by Kahala Franchising, L.L.C.. Its parent company is Kahala Brands, Inc.. The ultimate parent named in the FDD is MTY Food Group, Inc.. Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.

What is Item 19 in the TacoTime FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the TacoTime FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is TacoTime's franchise failure rate?

Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, TacoTime has a charge-off rate of 31.2% across 89 loans, meaning 31.2% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.

How many TacoTime franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, TacoTime has 99 total units in the United States, including 97 franchised units and 2 company-owned units.

Is TacoTime a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates TacoTime as a C-grade franchise with a verdict score of 40 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent TacoTime, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Quick-Service Restaurants franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Quick-Service Restaurants category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.