FDD Items 3 & 4 · 2025 filing
Supercuts litigation history
What Supercuts disclosed about lawsuits, arbitrations and bankruptcy in the 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document. Item 3 lists the material legal actions a franchisor must report; Item 4 covers bankruptcy. This is the franchisor's own disclosure, not a court record, and not legal advice.
Items 3 & 4 at a glance
What the filing discloses
- Cases disclosed
- 16
- Item 3, as counted in the filing
- Largest disclosed settlement
- $285K
- As stated in Item 3
- Bankruptcy (Item 4)
- None
- Franchisor, parent, predecessor or officer
- Filing year
- 2025
- Disclosures cover the prior ten years
Extracted from the 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document
Item 3: litigation
2 current matters (Aboukoura collections/counterclaims settlement in process $95,000; Delamarter putative class action re: receipt truncation, now individual case pending mediation) and multiple concluded arbitrations/lawsuits (Furber $110,000; Negussie $150,000; Sims $210,000; Shaffer $280,000; Curneen $29,500; Sea Fever Ventures arbitration award $1,015,104.83 against franchisor for FTC Rule/VRFA/VCPA violations; ProPoint Solutions trade-secret suit settled with $2-5M in services payments; six Pro-Cuts Sports franchisee arbitrations settled 2017 for combined ~$1.3M; North Star Solutions arbitration settled with $25,000 refund).
Item 3 · 16 matters disclosed · 1 pending listed
Litigation cases
The franchisor
Pending (1)
Supercuts, Inc. v. Mohamed Aboukoura and iEndeavor, LLC
pendingBrought against a franchisee · filed 2021-01-26 · American Arbitration Association · AAA Case No. 01-21-0000-3502
“Supercuts, Inc. v. Mohamed Aboukoura and iEndeavor, LLC (AAA Case No. 01-21-0000-3502, filed January 26, 2021). This case was a collections matter against a franchisee; the franchisee asserted counterclaims for violation of the Virginia Franchising and Consumer Protection Acts, the Minnesota Franchise Act, and common law fraud claims.”Page 18 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3
Outcome:“The parties have agreed to a resolution and documentation of settlement agreement are in process, with Aboukoura agreeing to pay Supercuts and Regis $95,000.00.”
Concluded (7)
Supercuts, Inc. v. Court Curneen and Quartz, LLC
settledBrought against a franchisee · filed 2021-01-26 · American Arbitration Association · AAA Case No. 01-21-0000-3506
“Supercuts, Inc. v. Court Curneen and Quartz, LLC (AAA Case No. 01-21-0000-3506, filed January 26, 2021). This case was a collections matter against a franchisee. The franchisee asserted counterclaims for violation of the Virginia Franchising and Consumer Protection Acts, the Minnesota Franchise Act, and common law fraud claims.”Page 19 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3
Outcome:“This matter was settled on March 3, 2022, with Supercuts, Inc. and Regis Corporation agreeing to pay the franchisee $29,500.00.”
Supercuts, Inc. v. Daniel C. Negussie, Grimt Habtermariam, and DnG, LLC
settledBrought against a franchisee · filed 2021-01-26 · American Arbitration Association · AAA Case No. 01-21-0000-3507
“Supercuts, Inc. v. Daniel C. Negussie, Grimt Habtermariam, and DnG, LLC, AAA Case No. 01- 21-0000-3507 (Filed January 26, 2021). Supercuts filed an arbitration with the AAA against Daniel C. Negussie, Grimt Habtermariam, and DnG, LLC (collectively, “Negussie”), for past due royalties, advertising fund contributions and rent in the amount of $105,721.13.”Page 18 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3
Outcome:“This matter was settled on April 12, 2022, for $150,000.00 to be paid by Supercuts to Negussie.”
Supercuts, Inc. v. Keith and Marie Shaffer, KeiMar LLC, KieMar II LLC, and KeiMar III LLC
settledBrought against a franchisee · filed 2021-01-26 · American Arbitration Association · AAA Case No. 01-21-0000-3504
“Supercuts, Inc. v. Keith and Marie Shaffer, KeiMar LLC, KieMar II LLC, and KeiMar III LLC (AAA Case No. 01-21-0000-3504, filed January 26, 2021). This case involved a collections matter against”Page 18 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3
Outcome:“This matter was settled on June 16, 2022, with Supercuts Inc. and Regis Corporation agreeing to pay the franchisee and its principals $280,000.00.” (page 19)
Supercuts, Inc. v. Scott and Vicki Furber and Dawg Concepts, Inc.
settledBrought against a franchisee · filed 2021-01-26 · American Arbitration Association · AAA Case No. 01-21-0000-3512
“Supercuts, Inc. v. Scott and Vicki Furber and Dawg Concepts, Inc., AAA Case No. 01-21-0000- 3512 (Filed January 26, 2021). Supercuts filed an arbitration with the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”) against Scott and Vicki Furber and Dawg Concepts, Inc. (collectively, “Furber”), for past due royalties, advertising fund contributions and rent in the amount of $656,725.96.”Page 18 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3
Outcome:“This matter was settled on April 12, 2022, for $110,000.00 to be paid by Supercuts to Furber.”
Sea Fever Ventures, Inc., John Lovegrove, and Judith Lafleur-Lovegrove v. Regis Corporation and Supercuts, Inc.
judgmentBrought by a franchisee · filed 2020-11-18 · American Arbitration Association · AAA Case No. 01-20-0015-7648
“Sea Fever Ventures, Inc., John Lovegrove, and Judith Lafleur-Lovegrove v. Regis Corporation and Supercuts, Inc. (AAA Case No. 01-20-0015-7648, filed November 18, 2020). A Supercuts franchisee and its owners filed an arbitration with the American Arbitration Association”Page 19 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3
Outcome:“On November 23, 2021, the Arbitrator issued his final award and found that Supercuts’ sale of the franchise to the franchisee violated the FTC Rule, the VRFA, and the VCPA and awarded a total amount to the franchisee of $1,015,104.83,”
Delamarter v. Supercuts, Inc. (Christopher Delamarter v. Supercuts, Inc.)
settledThird-party plaintiff · filed 2019-11-19 · Hennepin County District Court, Minnesota (removed to federal court and remanded; interlocutory review sought from the Minnesota Court of Appeals, No. A22-0448, and Minnesota Supreme Court) · Case No. 27-cv-19-19280
“Delamarter v. Supercuts, Inc. (Case No. 27-cv-19-19280, Hennepin County District Court, Minnesota). This case was filed as a class action against Supercuts on November 19, 2019, on behalf of Plaintiff and a putative class of consumers”Page 21 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3
Outcome:“During a mediation on January 6, 2023, the Parties reached a settlement that requires third-party ProPoint’s insurance carrier, CNA, to pay $285,000 total, which includes $5,000 each for Plaintiffs Delamarter and Cone, with the balance being payable to Plaintiff’s counsel. The case has now been dismissed pursuant to the settlement agreement.”
North Star Solutions, Inc. v. Supercuts, Inc. a Division of Regis, Inc.
settledBrought by a franchisee · filed 2018-05-04 · American Arbitration Association · AAA Case No. 01-18-0001-6461
“North Star Solutions, Inc. v. Supercuts, Inc. a Division of Regis, Inc. (AAA Case No. 01-18-0001- 6461, filed May 4, 2018). A Supercuts franchisee filed an arbitration against Supercuts, Inc., the franchisor, and its affiliate, Regis, Inc. (n/k/a Regis LLC), alleging violation of the Minnesota Franchise Act,”Page 21 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3
Outcome:“Supercuts and Regis denied the allegations and settled the matter in October 2018 without admitting liability by refunding $25,000 to the franchisee and rescinding franchisee’s development agreement and franchise agreement in return for a release”
Parent, affiliates and predecessor
Concluded (3)
Joseph and Elizabeth Sims, Big Hair Salons, LLC v. The Barbers, Hairstyling for Men & Women, Inc.
settledBrought by a franchisee · The Barbers, Hairstyling for Men & Women, Inc., with parent Regis Corporation and Regis Corp. (the 'Regis Entities') · filed 2021-02-16 · American Arbitration Association · AAA Case No. 01-21-0001-9146
“A Smartstyle franchisee (“Franchisee”) and its owners (collectively with the Franchisee, the “Sims”) filed an arbitration with the AAA against The Barbers, Hairstyling for Men & Women, Inc. , Regis Corporation, and Regis Corp. (collectively, the “Regis Entities”) alleging the Regis Entities made material misrepresentations and omissions to induce Franchisee”Page 18 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3
Outcome:“This matter was settled on August 9, 2022, for $210,000.00 to be paid by The Regis Entities to the Sims.”
Propoint Solutions, LLC v. Regis Corporation, Chad Kapadia, et al.
settledThird-party plaintiff · Regis Corporation and its Chief Technology Officer Chad Kapadia · filed 2020-03-31 · N.D. Cal. · Case No. 3:20-cv-2181-MMC
“Propoint Solutions, LLC v. Regis Corporation, Chad Kapadia, et al. Case No. 3:20-cv-2181-MMC (N.D. Cal. Filed March 31, 2020). The Franchisor’s parent, Regis Corporation (“Regis”) and Regis’s Chief Technology Officer were sued by Regis’s point of sale and back office system supplier, ProPoint Solutions, LLC (“ProPoint”),”Page 19 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3
Outcome:“Regis and Propoint entered into a settlement agreement, effective June 25, 2021, that provided for the dismissal of the lawsuit and set forth a commercial services agreement pursuant to which Propoint would assist in the transfer of Regis’s franchised salons, including Supercuts salons, from its point-of-sale system to Regis’s salon management system,” (page 20)
David Williams, Shelly Williams, and Look Sharp, LLC v. RPC Acquisition Corp. and Regis Corporation; Scott Carlson, Jacquelyn Carlson, and SKC Concepts, Inc. v. RPC Acquisition Corp. and Regis Corporation; Jason Link and Link JAS, Inc. v. RPC Acquisition Corp and Regis Corporation; Chad Schwinghamme
settledBrought by a franchisee · RPC Acquisition Corp. (franchisor of Pro-Cuts Sports, an affiliate), parent Regis Corporation, and affiliate Pro-Cuts Corporate Shops, Inc. · filed 2015 · American Arbitration Association · AAA 01-15-0004-2079 (Williams); 01-15-0004-2072 (Carlson); 01-15-0005-2403 (Link); 01-15-0006-0307 (Schwinghammer); 01-1
“Six Pro-Cuts Sports franchisees and their owners filed separate arbitrations with the American Arbitration Association against RPC Acquisition Corp. (“RPC”), the franchisor of their Pro-Cuts Sports franchises and an affiliate of Supercuts, Inc., each alleging violation of the Minnesota Franchise Act (or Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law),”Page 20 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3
Outcome:“All six of the disputes described previously were settled in March 2017 and April 2017. All the arbitrations were dismissed on April 27, 2017.” (page 21)
This list shows 11 of the 16 matters Item 3 discloses; the rest are in the filing.
Item 3 lists the litigation the franchisor must disclose; a matter against a parent, an affiliate or a named officer is not a matter against the franchisor, and pending claims are allegations, not findings.
Disclosure signals that moved the score
How this shows up in the verdict
- 11 litigation matters incl. putative class action + six-figure settlements
The verdict grade is FranchiseVerdict's editorial assessment across SBA loan performance, unit growth, revenue and disclosure signals. It is not investment advice.
Before you weigh a lawsuit
How to read Item 3
A franchisor must disclose pending actions and any material civil action involving the franchise relationship, plus convictions or civil judgments for fraud, unfair or deceptive practices, or franchise-law violations, going back ten years. A case the franchisor brought against a franchisee counts too. Item 3 does not include every dispute: settled claims below the materiality line and matters resolved in private arbitration can be absent.
Questions worth asking current and former franchisees, using the contact list in Item 20:
- Were you, or anyone you know in the system, party to a dispute with the franchisor?
- Was it resolved by settlement, arbitration or a court, and on what terms?
- Has the number of disputes gone up or down since you signed?