B60/100FDD 2025
SalesStar — Litigation & Risk
Education - Tutoring & Test Prep · FDD Items 3, 4 & 5
Lower Risk
No litigation cases disclosed in FDD Items 3 and 4.
Source: FDD Items 3–5
FDD Items 3 & 4
Litigation Metrics
Cases disclosed
0
Total from FDD Items 3 and 4
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
—
Franchisor or officer bankruptcy
Overall risk score
60 / 100
FranchiseVerdict composite
Rating
MODERATE
STRONG / MODERATE / CAUTION / AVOID
FDD Items 5, 6 & 17 — what you give up
Contract Risk Indicators
Mandatory arbitration
Required
Disputes resolved outside court — limits your legal options
Jury trial waiver
Waived
You give up the right to a jury trial
Non-compete
1 yrs
Post-termination restriction on similar businesses
Franchisor can compete
Yes
Franchisor can open competing locations in or near your territory
Right of first refusal
Yes
Franchisor can match any purchase offer when you try to sell
Governing law
Delaware
State whose law governs disputes — relevant if you're not based there
What drove the 60/100 rating
Risk Score Breakdown
- 01MEDAverage net income of $170,408 not validated against disclosed gross revenue—Item 19 financial performance representation missing entirely
- 02MINORNo territory protection despite $205,500-$241,500 investment and 10% royalty structure creates cannibalization risk with only 7 units
- 03MINORExplosive 133.3% YoY unit growth (likely 3→7 units) may indicate unsustainable expansion or inflated projections rather than sustainable franchisee success
- 04MINORHigh franchise fee ($125,000) represents 61% of total investment with unproven unit economics and no average revenue disclosure
- 05MINOR5-year term is below industry standard (10 years common) with unprotected territory, limiting franchisee ability to build equity
Severity inferred from FDD text — not a regulatory or legal classification
Litigation data from FDD Items 3, 4, and 5. SBA data from public 7(a) FOIA records (FY2020–present). Not legal advice — consult a franchise attorney before signing any franchise agreement.