Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Roof Scientist logo

Roof Scientist Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Formerly known as HFB Roof

Home ServicesNorth CarolinaFranchising since 2024
DBelow averageBelow average33/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$218K – $390K
Disclosed sales
$526K
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
Not SBA-matched

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-02178FDD 2025Data QualityStandard76%
Owner-operator requiredNo: No territory protection

Data from FDD filing

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Roof Scientist is a home services franchise providing roof inspection, repair, and replacement using proprietary roof-coating technology. Franchisees run local operations, managing crews, inspections, and accounts.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Roof Scientist franchise requires a total initial investment of $218K – $390K, including a $60K – $74K franchise fee and an ongoing 7.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2025 FDD, average unit revenue was $526K[2]. FranchiseVerdict grade: D (Below average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Limited operating history: franchising since 2024. A system this young has fewer than three years of Item 20 outlet history and rarely enough SBA loans for a charge-off rate, so its grade rests on less evidence than an established system's. Read its Item 20 tables and talk to its first franchisees before relying on the grade. Other new franchisors

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - issued 12 to 24 months ago; a newer filing is likely on file

Evidence: partial✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✗ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored6 of 7 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing; the rest are marked “Not cited” beside the figure.

Overview

Investment
$218K – $390K
79th pct Home Services
Avg gross sales
$526K
Outlet subset1 outlet
Royalty
7.0%
48th pct Home Services
Units
4
9th pct Home Services
SBA charge-off
N/A

Quick verdict · Home Services · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$218K – $390K
Median $168K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$60K – $74K
Median $50K
above median ↑, worse than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$60K – $100K
Median $29K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
$526K
Median $587K
below median ↓, worse than category
Outlet subset1 outlet
Royalty Rate
7.0%
Median 6.0%
above median ↑, worse than category
Ongoing Fees
9.0% of rev
Median 8.0%
above median ↑, worse than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Not SBA-matched
Not matched to SBA 7(a) loans
System Size
4 units
Median 47 units
below median ↓, worse than category
Turnover Rate
N/A
Median 4.3%
below median ↓, better than category
Territory
None
The franchisor can open or license outlets nearby
Owner-Operator
Required
You must run it yourself
Litigation
1 case
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Home Services median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $218K – $390K including a $60K franchise fee, 7.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $526K/year (reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system).
  • RISKVerdict D (Below average), verdict score 33/100 (higher is better).
  • GROWTHFlat: no net change in franchised outlets in the latest year (0 opened, 0 closed) (Item 20).
  • FLAGRevenue data based on only 1 outlet. Treat as directional, not definitive. Ask franchisees directly for current unit economics.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
HFB RoofCo Franchising, LLC
Parent company
HFB Franchisor Holdings, LLC
FDD Item 1, page 11 of the 2025 FDD
Ultimate parent
HFB Enterprise Holdings, LLC
FDD Item 1, page 11 of the 2025 FDD
Predecessor
Innovative Roof Solutions, LLC
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
Chief Executive Officer
Jeffrey Dudan
Incorporated in
North Carolina
HQ
107 Parr Drive, Huntersville, North Carolina 28078
Auditor
Kezos & Dunlavy
Audited financials

Same owner · FDD Item 1, page 11

3 other brands on this site name HFB Enterprise Holdings, LLC as parent or ultimate parent in their own FDD.

Grouped by the owner's name as each filing prints it (this page: the 2025 FDD). Spelling variants of the same group may be listed apart; a brand is never grouped with an owner its filing does not name.

Overview

About

CEO
Jeffrey Dudan
Headquarters
North Carolina
Founded
2024
FDD year
2025
States available
2

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 81% above the typical home services franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$218K – $390KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 33 of the 2025 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$59,900Verified — printed on page 16 of the 2025 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty7.0%Not cited — published from our reading of the franchisor's disclosure document; the page it is printed on has not been located.
Ad fund2.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 20 of the 2025 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$60K – $100K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

FDD Item 7 · 2025 filing

Initial investment breakdown

Roof Scientist: Item 7 initial investment breakdown
Cost componentLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$60K$60K
Working capital (3–6 mo)$60K$100K
Equipment, build-out, other$98K$230K
Total initial investment$218K$390K

Source: Roof Scientist 2025 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$218K – $390K
Bottom third — review vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$60K – $100K
Bottom third — review vs category
Franchise fee
$60K – $74K
Bottom third — review vs category
Royalty
7.0%
Tiered by sales volume · typical 6–8%
Ad fund
2.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
9.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Roof Scientist: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty7.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund2.0% of gross sales
Technology fee$850
Training fee$500
Transfer fee$10K
Renewal fee$5K
Inventory (initial)$35K – $53K
Total fee load9.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 10% below the home services norm.

Avg gross sales$526K

Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system

Based on a single outlet - not a system average

Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 70 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross salesNot extracted
Item 19 typegross sales
Sample size1 outlet

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Roof Scientist until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$384K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Roof Scientist unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $525,961 per unit — Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system. Adjust to a franchisee figure before relying on this.
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $218K–$390K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $60K–$100K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$384K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system

Based on a single outlet - not a system average

Avg gross sales
$526K
Per unit, per year

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
gross sales
Sample size
1 outlet
vs category median 32 · small
Reported figure
$526KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 70 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
A single outlet — not a range
Reporting year
2024
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2025
Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2024
Transparency
8 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · above
Gross sales rank
No comparison data
Investment cost rank79th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank48th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank9th
vs Home Services peers
Risk score rank94th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 319 Home Services brands

Showing the headline figures — all 144 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $526K/year in gross sales. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 1.7x. Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 9.0% (near the Home Services median).

Disclosure

Transparency score 8/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence. Sample size of 1 outlet — treat as directional only.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Home Services medians

How Roof Scientist Compares

Metric
Roof Scientist
Category median
vs median
Investment
$304K
$168Kmiddle half $122K–$232K · n=283
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
$526K
$587Kmiddle half $376K–$1.3M · n=79
Below median, worse than category
Unit Count
4
47middle half 14–137 · n=283
Below median, worse than category

Category median of published Home Services brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units4Verified — printed on page 73 of the 2025 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it two ways.

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
4
Opened
0
Last reporting year
Closed
0
Terminated
0
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
N/A
Company-owned
1
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
75%
vs corporate-owned

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
0
Not renewed
0
Transferred
0
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
0
0.00 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
0
Franchisor's next-year forecast
2022
0
Franchised units
2023
3+3
Franchised units
2024
3±0
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 12 · 2 states reported

The Territory Map

FDD Item 12 reports the state count, but the specific list isn't in our current data. The map will appear once we re-extract from the FDD or enough franchisee contacts are available.

2

states with franchisees (per FDD Item 12)

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

No SBA loan data available for this brand.

What could kill this investment?

SBA charge-offNot SBA-matched
Verdict score33/100 (higher is better)
Litigation1 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

DBelow average33Verdict score 33/100

Early-stage franchisor (began 2024) with financial distress: negative net worth -$294,585 and a large net loss of -$544,585. One affiliate litigation matter over a franchise termination dispute. Distress flagged as early-stage, but the loss substantially exceeds net worth and there is an active affiliate suit, stacking two concerns.

Low confidence±15 pts
1848

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: the franchisor is a named party (plaintiff).

Affiliate A1 Kitchen & Bath Franchising, LLC filed suit against its franchisee (Proverbs 163 Ventures, Inc., Joel Senger, Amy Senger, Senger Custom Homes, LLC) in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina (Case No. 3:25-cv-261) alleging breach of contract, diversion of business, trademark infringement, and unfair competition; franchisee counterclaimed with fraud, breach, and unfair trade practice allegations. Case ongoing as of the disclosure date.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Kezos & Dunlavy

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes

Score breakdown · what drove the 33 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINORNegative net worth -$294,585, net loss -$544,585
  2. 02MINORFinancial distress (early-stage)
  3. 03HIGH1 active affiliate litigation over franchise termination
  4. 04MINOROnly 4 units

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 144 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 9.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryNone (caution)
Initial training46 hrs

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term10 years
Allowed renewalsℹ1
Territory typeNo territory protection
Protected territoryNo
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory population80,000
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorRequired
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Right of first refusalℹYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Curable defaultsℹ7
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationMecklenburg County / Charlotte, North Carolina
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawNorth Carolina
Litigation count1
View Item 3 litigation summary

Affiliate A1 Kitchen & Bath Franchising, LLC filed suit against its franchisee (Proverbs 163 Ventures, Inc., Joel Senger, Amy Senger, Senger Custom Homes, LLC) in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina (Case No. 3:25-cv-261) alleging breach of contract, diversion of business, trademark infringement, and unfair competition; franchisee counterclaimed with fraud, breach, and unfair trade practice allegations. Case ongoing as of the disclosure date.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
31 hrs
On-the-job training
14 hrs
Training location
Home Office in Huntersville, North Carolina and other locations near Charlotte, North Carolina
Ongoing training
Required
Time to open
3 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
franchisor approval of franchisee-proposed site; home office/storage facility permitted
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
ServiceTitan
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Technology: ServiceTitan

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Roof Scientist franchise?

The total investment to open a Roof Scientist franchise ranges from $218K – $390K, with an initial franchise fee of $60K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Roof Scientist franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Roof Scientist FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $526K. Important context: Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system; Based on a single outlet - not a system average. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Roof Scientist?

Roof Scientist is franchised by HFB RoofCo Franchising, LLC. Its parent company is HFB Franchisor Holdings, LLC. The ultimate parent named in the FDD is HFB Enterprise Holdings, LLC. Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Roof Scientist FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Roof Scientist FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Roof Scientist's franchise failure rate?

SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for Roof Scientist (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.

How many Roof Scientist franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Roof Scientist has 4 total units in the United States, including 3 franchised units and 1 company-owned units.

Is Roof Scientist a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Roof Scientist as a D-grade franchise with a verdict score of 33 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Roof Scientist, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Home Services franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Home Services category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.