Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Re-Bath logo

Re-Bath Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Home ServicesAZFranchising since 1991
BAbove averageAbove average56/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$276K – $607K
Disclosed sales
$3.9M
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
18.2%
on 25 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-02103FDD 2025Data QualityExcellent95%
Manager-run OKYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Re-Bath is a home-services franchise providing full bathroom remodels and tub-and-shower replacements with a streamlined, showroom-based process. Franchisees run a showroom-and-install operation handling design, sales, and installation crews in a territory.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Re-Bath franchise requires a total initial investment of $276K – $607K, including a $50K franchise fee and an ongoing 5.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2025 FDD, average unit revenue was $3.9M[2]. SBA 7(a) loans show a 18.2% charge-off rate across 25 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: B (Above average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - issued 12 to 24 months ago; a newer filing is likely on file

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored8 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$276K – $607K
83rd pct Home Services
Avg gross sales
$3.9M
22nd pct Home Services
Royalty
5.0%
8th pct Home Services
Units
145
68th pct Home Services
SBA charge-off
18.2%
% of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category

Quick verdict · Home Services · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$276K – $607K
Median $168K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$50K – $50K
Median $50K
near median
Liquid Capital Req'd
$75K – $250K
Median $29K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
$3.9M
Median $587K
above median ↑, better than category
Royalty Rate
5.0%
Median 6.0%
below median ↓, better than category
Ongoing Fees
7.0% of rev
Median 8.0%
below median ↓, better than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
18.2%
25 loans · Median 15.4%
above median ↑, worse than category
System Size
145 units
Median 47 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
5.5%
Median 4.3%
above median ↑, worse than category
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Optional
Can hire a manager
Litigation
4 cases
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Home Services median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $276K – $607K including a $50K franchise fee, 5.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $3.9M/year (median $2.5M). Note: this is gross profit, not take-home income.
  • RISKVerdict B (Above average), verdict score 56/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 18.2% across 25 loans (above the 16% franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
  • GROWTHPositive: net +9 franchised outlets in the latest year (17 opened, 8 closed) (Item 20).
  • GROWTHSystem growing at 31.8% CAGR over 3 years with 145 total units. Strong expansion trajectory.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
ReBath, LLC
Parent company
Home Brands Group, LLC (HBG)
FDD Item 1, page 8 of the 2025 FDD
Ultimate parent
TZP Group LLC
FDD Item 1, page 8 of the 2025 FDD
CEO title
Chief Executive Officer
Brad Hillier
Incorporated in
Delaware
HQ
426 N. 44th Street, Suite 410, Phoenix, Arizona 85008
Auditor
RSM US LLP
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$34.4M
vs $29.3M prior year

Independent franchisee associations

  • Independent Franchisee Association

Franchisee-led councils or alliances disclosed in Item 20. Indicates operator voice.

Affiliated brands

  • Agile Building Solutions

Other brands the franchisor or its parent operates (Item 1).

Overview

About

CEO
Brad Hillier
Headquarters
AZ
FDD year
2025
States available
43

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 162% above the typical home services franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$276K – $607KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 21 of the 2025 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$50,000Verified — printed on page 12 of the 2025 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty5.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 14 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund2.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 14 of the 2025 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$75K – $250K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

Full Item 7 breakdown13 line items

Initial investment breakdown

Item 7 initial investment line items
Line itemLowHigh
Initial Franchise Fee$50K$50K
Initial Training$0$5K
Travel and Living Expenses During Training$2K$8K
Insurance Premium (auto and general commercial liability), 3 months$3K$10K
Business License and Permits$2K$5K
Vehicle(s)$30K$80K
Vehicle(s) "Wrap" Advertising$400$4K
Equipment, Supplies & Inventory$18K$50K
Internet, 3 months$100$300
Showroom / Warehouse / Office$60K$100K
Professional Fees$1K$4K
Grand Opening Campaign and Minimum Local Advertising Requirement$34K$41K
Additional Funds, 3 Months$75K$250K
Total initial investment$276K$607K

Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$276K – $607K
Bottom third — review vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$75K – $250K
Bottom third — review vs category
Franchise fee
$50K – $50K
Middle of category vs category
Royalty
5.0%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
2.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
7.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Re-Bath: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty5.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund2.0% of gross sales
Technology fee$1K
Training fee$500
Transfer fee$25K
Renewal fee$13K
Inventory (initial)$18K – $50K
Total fee load7.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 565% above the home services norm.

Avg gross sales$3.9MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 58 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$2.5MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 58 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typegross sales
Sample size113 outlets

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Re-Bath until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$604K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Re-Bath unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $3,904,233 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $276K–$607K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $75K–$250K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$604K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$3.9M
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$2.5M

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
gross sales
Sample size
113 outlets
vs category median 32 · large
Range (low → high)
$632K→$26.6MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 58 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Reporting year
2024
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2025
Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2024
Transparency
9 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · above
Gross sales rank22th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank83th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank8th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank68th
vs Home Services peers
Risk score rank49th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 319 Home Services brands

Showing the headline figures — all 151 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →
Revenue insight

Revenue is 8.8x the investment midpoint. At typical franchise margins, this suggests a payback under 3 years.

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $3.9M/year in gross sales. Median is $2.5M — top performers pull the average up, so a typical unit earns less. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 8.8x.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 7.0% (near the Home Services median).

Disclosure

Transparency score 9/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System expanding at 31.8% CAGR over 3 years across 145 units — operators are staying and new ones are joining.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Home Services medians

How Re-Bath Compares

Metric
Re-Bath
Category median
vs median
Investment
$441K
$168Kmiddle half $122K–$232K · n=283
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
$3.9M
$587Kmiddle half $376K–$1.3M · n=79
Above median, better than category
Unit Count
145
47middle half 14–137 · n=283
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Home Services brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units145Verified — printed on page 60 of the 2025 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it three ways.
3-yr growth+31.8% (favorable vs category)
Turnover rate5.5% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
145
Opened
17
Last reporting year
Closed
8
Terminated
3
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
5
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
5.5%
Company-owned
0
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
100%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
+31.8%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+31.8%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
3
Not renewed
5
Transferred
5
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
0
0.00 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
15
Franchisor's next-year forecast
Termination rate
0.1%
Franchisor-initiated terminations
2022
124
Franchised units
2023
136+12
Franchised units
2024
145+9
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 11 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 11 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

15 current owners across 11 states.

  • CA 2
  • CO 2
  • NY 2
  • TX 2
  • AZ 1
  • GA 1
  • IA 1
  • NM 1
  • OR 1
  • PA 1
  • UT 1

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

D
SBA Lending Health
Below-average SBA lending record · 18.2% charge-off
Total loans
25
Loan volume
$10.2M
Median loan
$304K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
18.2%
on 25 loans · rates vary by category · see methodology

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
80.0%
5-yr charge-off
0.0%
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
16
Defaults
2
Typical loan rate
6.9%
avg rate to borrowers
Franchised industry avg
17.1%
brand above franchise avg ↑
Jobs supported
249
2.7 per loan
Lender concentration
19%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 58% went to startups / new businesses, 42% to established operators

Franchise vs independent — in residential remodelers, franchised businesses charge off at 17.1% vs 22.4% for independents — franchising is associated with 24% lower SBA default risk in this category.

Top lenders financing Re-Bath franchisees

Live Oak Banking Company4 loans—
Simmons Bank2 loans100.0%
KeyBank National Association2 loans0.0%

Showing 3 of 16 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Total loans
3
Loan volume
$955K
Charge-off rate
N/A
Jobs created
10

Historical SBA 504 lending data via CDCs, not predictive of future performance.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for Re-Bath from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Principal loss rate
4.9%
Avg SBA guarantee
72%
Avg interest rate
6.86%
Avg chargeoff amount
$226K
Lender concentration
19.1%
Job velocity
2.7 per $100K
NAICS benchmark
9.5%
NAICS 236118
Jobs supported
249

Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 19% of loans

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
1Live Oak Banking Company4$3.1MN/A
2Simmons Bank2$509K100.0%
3KeyBank National Association2$1.3M0.0%
4Bank of Dudley1$260KN/A
5Milestone Bank1$120K0.0%
6CDC Small Business Finance Corp.1$150K0.0%
7Ameris Bank1$217K0.0%
8The Huntington National Bank1$677K0.0%
9First Interstate Bank1$325K0.0%
10The Bancorp Bank National Association1$350KN/A

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
NCNorth Carolina500.0%
AKAlaska200.0%
KSKansas22100.0%
TXTexas200.0%
ALAlabama10--
CACalifornia100.0%
FLFlorida10--
GAGeorgia10--
MDMaryland10--
NENebraska100.0%

SBA 7(a) lending trend

2015
1
2016
3
2017
5
2019
1
2020
1
2021
5
2022
1
2023
2
2025
2

Borrower profile

Startup5 (42%)
Ownership change4 (33%)
New (< 2 yr)2 (17%)
Existing (2+ yr)1 (8%)

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

What could kill this investment?

SBA loans charge off at 18.2% — 14% above the 16.0% national norm, i.e. higher lender-observed risk.

SBA charge-off18.2% · 25 loans
Verdict score56/100 (higher is better)
Litigation4 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

BAbove average56Verdict score 56/100
High confidence±4 pts
5260

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).

One pending AAA arbitration (Remodeling Solutions, Inc., filed March 2025) alleging improper technology fee charges, breach of contract and implied covenant, seeking $149,999 plus fees. Three completed matters: (1) 2016 territorial-protection suit by franchisee group settled with new franchise agreement form and fee payments; (2) 2018 arbitration by three franchisees over contract breach, resulting in $1,002,107 award to claimants, partial settlement with one claimant ($688,000 payment), and Delaware court confirming the award in 2020; (3) 2018 arbitration/litigation with a marketing vendor (1-800 BATHTUB, LLC) over a marketing services agreement and phone number, resulting in a reduced $354,792.79 award after Michigan court proceedings and an unsuccessful cross-appeal (affirmed April 2024).

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · RSM US LLP

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $34.4MYr 2: $29.3MTotal: $68.5M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: No
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
  • Must buy proprietary products: No
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 56 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINORNegative franchisor net worth -$9,980,069 (non-parent)
  2. 02HIGH4 litigation matters incl. active 2025 arbitration over tech-fee/breach
  3. 03MINORStrong offsetting financials: $68.5M revenue, $12.6M net income, 31.8% net unit growth

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 151 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 7.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term5 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training158 hrs

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term5 years
Allowed renewalsℹ2
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory population1,000,000
Online sales rightsℹGranted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorOptional
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ10 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
RoFR response window30 days
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Termination groundsℹ1
Curable defaultsℹ4
Mandatory arbitrationNo
Arbitration locationNot specified as arbitration-specific; dispute resolution requires mediation first (Section 24); choice of forum is Maricopa County, Arizona or U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, Southern Division, or franchisee's state/county of residence at franchisor's election
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawArizona
Litigation count4
View Item 3 litigation summary

One pending AAA arbitration (Remodeling Solutions, Inc., filed March 2025) alleging improper technology fee charges, breach of contract and implied covenant, seeking $149,999 plus fees. Three completed matters: (1) 2016 territorial-protection suit by franchisee group settled with new franchise agreement form and fee payments; (2) 2018 arbitration by three franchisees over contract breach, resulting in $1,002,107 award to claimants, partial settlement with one claimant ($688,000 payment), and Delaware court confirming the award in 2020; (3) 2018 arbitration/litigation with a marketing vendor (1-800 BATHTUB, LLC) over a marketing services agreement and phone number, resulting in a reduced $354,792.79 award after Michigan court proceedings and an unsuccessful cross-appeal (affirmed April 2024).

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
56 hrs
On-the-job training
102 hrs
Training location
On-site and corporate
Ongoing training
Required
Site selection
franchisor
Franchisor financing
Offered
Item 10
POS system
RBDirect
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Technology: RBDirect

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

15 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 15 contacts · $49
Free preview
(512) 836-••••TX
Unlock all 15 contacts
(970) 535-••••CO
(925) 646-••••CA
(505) 880-••••NM
(909) 247-••••CA

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Re-Bath franchise?

The total investment to open a Re-Bath franchise ranges from $276K – $607K, with an initial franchise fee of $50K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Re-Bath franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Re-Bath FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $3.9M. The median is $2.5M. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Re-Bath?

Re-Bath is franchised by ReBath, LLC. Its parent company is Home Brands Group, LLC (HBG). The ultimate parent named in the FDD is TZP Group LLC. Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Re-Bath FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Re-Bath FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Re-Bath's franchise failure rate?

Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, Re-Bath has a charge-off rate of 18.2% across 25 loans, meaning 18.2% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.

How many Re-Bath franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Re-Bath has 145 total units in the United States, including 145 franchised units and 0 company-owned units. 17 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Re-Bath a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Re-Bath as a B-grade franchise with a verdict score of 56 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Re-Bath, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Home Services franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Home Services category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.