Planet Smoothie Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026
- Investment
- $206K – $479K
- Disclosed sales
- $280K
- gross sales, not profit
- SBA charge-off
- 27.2%
- on 120 loans
Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records
Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology
Planet Smoothie is a quick-service franchise serving fruit smoothies with add-ins and supplements. Franchisees run compact shops managing blending, fresh inventory, and counter service.
FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026
A Planet Smoothie franchise requires a total initial investment of $206K – $479K, including a $15K – $25K franchise fee and an ongoing 5.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2025 FDD, average unit revenue was $280K[2]. SBA 7(a) loans show a 27.2% charge-off rate across 120 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: C (Average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →
Sources, dates and evidence
FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - issued 12 to 24 months ago; a newer filing is likely on file
Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored7 of 7 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.
Overview
- Investment
- $206K – $479K
- 25th pct Service Resta…
- Avg gross sales
- $280K
- 0th pct Service Resta…
- Royalty
- 5.0%
- 12th pct Service Resta…
- Units
- 154
- 81st pct Service Resta…
- SBA charge-off
- 27.2%
- % of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category
Quick verdict · Quick-Service Restaurants · color = vs category peers
Green = favorable by >10% vs Quick-Service Restaurants median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)
Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology
Bottom line
- COSTTotal investment $206K – $479K including a $25K franchise fee, 5.0% ongoing royalty.
- RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $280K/year (median $260K).
- RISKVerdict C (Average), verdict score 40/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 27.2% across 120 loans (well above the 16% franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
- GROWTHNegative: net -4 franchised outlets in the latest year (10 opened, 14 closed) (Item 20).
- LEGAL20 litigation matters disclosed in Item 3, higher than typical. Review the summary for patterns (franchisor-initiated vs. franchisee-initiated).
Item 1 · who you're contracting with
The Franchisor
Corporate structure & franchisor financials
- Legal entity
- Kahala Franchising, L.L.C.
- Parent company
- Kahala Brands, Inc.
- FDD Item 1, page 7 of the 2025 FDD
- Ultimate parent
- MTY Food Group, Inc.
- FDD Item 1, page 7 of the 2025 FDD
- Predecessor
- Tasti D-Lite LLC (formerly Tasti Acquisition LLC); Planet Smoothie, LLC
- Prior franchisor entity
- CEO title
- Chief Executive Officer
- Eric Lefebvre
- CEO experience
- 2018 yrs
- Years in role or industry
- Incorporated in
- AZ
- HQ
- 9311 E. Via De Ventura, Scottsdale, Arizona 85258
- Auditor
- PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC)
- Audited financials
- Franchisor revenue
- $580.3M
- vs $472.1M prior year
Same owner · FDD Item 1, page 7
26 other brands on this site name MTY Food Group, Inc. as parent or ultimate parent in their own FDD.
- Barrio QueenC
- BlimpieD
- Chicken Strips and DipsD
- Cold Stone CreameryC
- Extreme PitaF
- Famous Dave’sB
- Ginger Sushi + Poke ShopC
- GrabbagreenC
- Great SteakC
- Kahala Coffee TradersB
- La DiperieB
- Manchu WOKB
- Maui WowiD
- Mucho BurritoB
- NrGize Lifestyle CafeB
- Papa Murphy'sA
- PinkberryB
- Samurai Sam’s Teriyaki GrillB
- Sauce Pizza / WineD
- Surf City SqueezeD
- TacoTimeC
- Thai ExpressD
- Village InnD
- Wetzel’s PretzelsA
- +2 more
Portfolio: MTY Food Group · Kahala Brands
Grouped by the owner's name as each filing prints it (this page: the 2025 FDD). Spelling variants of the same group may be listed apart; a brand is never grouped with an owner its filing does not name.
Overview
About
- CEO
- Eric Lefebvre
- Headquarters
- AZ
- Founded
- 2008
- FDD year
- 2025
- States available
- 28
Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?
Entry cost runs 30% below the typical quick-service restaurants franchise.
Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7
Full Item 7 breakdown17 line items
Initial investment breakdown
| Line item | Low | High | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial Franchise Fee (Traditional) | $12K | $25K | |
| Lease Review Fee (Traditional) | $0 | $3K | |
| Rent/Security Deposit (3 months) (Traditional) | $6K | $20K | |
| Travel and Living Expenses (3 persons) during training (Traditional) | $4K | $8K | |
| Real Estate (Traditional) | — | — | |
| Architectural Fees (Traditional) | $10K | $21K | |
| Leasehold Improvements (Traditional) | $78K | $220K | |
| Restaurant Equipment, Furniture, Small Wares, Interior Signage and Menu Panels (Traditional) | $56K | $94K | |
| Exterior Signage (Traditional) | $8K | $17K | |
| Computer Hardware, Software (POS System) (Traditional) | $3K | $5K | |
| PCI Compliance Costs (Traditional) | $150 | $1K | |
| Opening Inventory (food and paper) (Traditional) | $5K | $15K | |
| Business Insurance (Traditional) | $1K | $5K | |
| Miscellaneous Opening Costs (Traditional) | $5K | $17K | |
| Grand Opening Marketing (Traditional) | $10K | $10K | |
| Depository Account (Traditional) | $3K | $3K | |
| Additional Funds - 3 month initial period (Traditional) | $5K | $15K | |
| Total initial investment | $206K | $479K |
Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.
Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate
The Vitals
- Total investment
- $206K – $479K
- Top 40% of category vs category
- Liquid capital req'd
- $5K – $15K
- Top 40% of category vs category
- Franchise fee
- $15K – $25K
- Top 40% of category vs category
- Royalty
- 5.0%
- typical 6–8%
- Ad fund
- 2.0%
- typical 3–5%
- Total fee load
- 7.0%
- vs 9–13% typical
Ongoing fees · Item 6
| Fee | Amount |
|---|---|
| Royalty | 5.0% of gross sales |
| Marketing / ad fund | 2.0% |
| Technology fee | $150 |
| Training fee | $1K |
| Transfer fee | $8K |
| Renewal fee | $13K |
| Inventory (initial) | $5K – $15K |
| Total fee load | 7.0% of rev |
What do units actually make?
Average unit sales run 71% below the quick-service restaurants norm.
Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19
Single-unit · not modelled
Returns at a glance
An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Planet Smoothie until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.
—
Not modelled yet
An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.
Total invested capital · disclosed
$352K
Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.
ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
What one unit earns on your invested capital
Model A · Single-Unit Return
Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.
Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.
Returns model · single-unit ROIC
What would one Planet Smoothie unit return on the cash you put in?
Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.
Unlevered ROIC · per unit
Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.
—
An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.
What 25 units return when you use SBA financing
Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition
Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).
This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.
What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.
Not modelled yet
An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.
A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.
These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.
Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD
Financial Performance
- Avg gross sales
- $280K
- Per unit, per year
- Median gross sales
- $260K
Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.
- Item 19 type
- gross sales
- Sample size
- 143 outlets
- vs category median 19 · large
- Quartile band
- $141K→$554K
- Bottom 25% → top 25%
- Reporting year
- 2024
- Fiscal year the figures cover
- Source filing
- FDD 2025
- Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2024
- Transparency
- 4 / 10
- vs category median 4 / 10 · typical
Compared against 781 Quick-Service Restaurants brands
Revenue is only 0.8x the investment. This means each unit may take 5+ years to recoup the initial outlay at typical margins.
Operator outlook
What the numbers say
Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.
Unit economics
Average unit generates $280K/year in gross sales. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 0.8x.
Fee burden
Total ongoing fee load of 7.0% (near the Quick-Service Restaurants median).
Disclosure
Transparency score 4/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.
Operator retention
System roughly stable (+1.3% 3-year CAGR) with 154 units.
Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.
vs Quick-Service Restaurants medians
How Planet Smoothie Compares
Category median of published Quick-Service Restaurants brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.
Is the system healthy?
Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20
Unit growth
Item 20 · unit dynamics
The Growth Chart
- Total units
- 154
- Opened
- 10
- Last reporting year
- Closed
- 14
- Terminated
- 4
- Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
- Non-renewed
- 2
- Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
- Turnover rate
- 9.1%
- Company-owned
- 0
- Corporate units in the system
- % franchised
- 100%
- vs corporate-owned
- Net growth (3-yr)
- -2.5%
- Net unit change over 3 years
- 3-yr CAGR
- +1.3%
- Compounded over last 3 years
Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers
- Terminated
- 4
- Not renewed
- 2
- Transfer rate
- 7.1%
- Owners selling to other franchisees
- Continuity rate
- 91.7%
- Units that stayed open
- Termination rate
- 3.9%
- Franchisor-initiated terminations
- Ceased ops
- 5.2%
- Units that stopped operating
Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.
Item 20 · 16 states with active franchisees
The Territory Map
Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).
States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.
Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list
86 current owners across 16 states.
- FL 38
- GA 22
- PA 5
- SC 4
- NC 3
- TX 3
- NY 2
- AL 1
- AZ 1
- CA 1
- HI 1
- LA 1
- +4 more states
Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.
SBA loan performance
Government records
SBA Loan Data
Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.
- Total loans
- 120
- Loan volume
- $22.1M
- Median loan
- $150K
- 50th percentile
- Charge-off rate
- 27.2%
- on 120 loans · rates vary by category · see methodology
Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated
- Repayment rate (PIF)
- 73.1%
- 5-yr charge-off
- 9.1%
- Loans approved 2021+
- Active lenders
- 49
- Defaults
- 22
- Typical loan rate
- 7.4%
- avg rate to borrowers
- Franchised industry avg
- 21.5%
- brand above franchise avg ↑
- Jobs supported
- 1,660
- 8.7 per loan
- Lender concentration
- 7%
- top lender's share
Borrower mix: 76% went to startups / new businesses, 24% to established operators
Franchise vs independent — in limited-service restaurants, franchised businesses charge off at 21.5% vs 25.0% for independents — franchising is associated with 14% lower SBA default risk in this category.
Vintage analysis
Planet Smoothie charge-off rate by loan vintage
Top lenders financing Planet Smoothie franchisees
Showing 3 of 49 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.
Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.
Lender network · 7(a) + 504
SBA Lending Report
Full lending analysis for Planet Smoothie from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.
- Principal loss rate
- 17.1%
- Avg SBA guarantee
- 75%
- Avg interest rate
- 7.44%
- Avg chargeoff amount
- $155K
- Lender concentration
- 7.0%
- Job velocity
- 8.7 per $100K
- Startup risk premium
- +9.1pp
- NAICS benchmark
- 15.7%
- NAICS 722211
- Jobs supported
- 1,660
Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 7% of loans
| # | Lender | Loans | Volume | Default % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Readycap Lending, LLC | 7 | $1.3M | 57.1% |
| 2 | Wells Fargo Bank National Association | 6 | $1.2M | 60.0% |
| 3 | SouthState Bank, National Association | 6 | $586K | 0.0% |
| 4 | Popular Bank | 6 | $1.2M | 16.7% |
| 5 | Stearns Bank National Association | 6 | $1.1M | 0.0% |
| 6 | Seacoast National Bank | 6 | $1.3M | 20.0% |
| 7 | Cadence Bank | 5 | $859K | 33.3% |
| 8 | Citizens Bank | 5 | $2.0M | N/A |
| 9 | The Huntington National Bank | 4 | $664K | 0.0% |
| 10 | Textron Business Credit, Inc. | 3 | $452K | 66.7% |
Geographic failure vector
| State | Loans | Defaults | Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLFlorida | 34 | 4 | 14.3% |
| GAGeorgia | 10 | 3 | 42.9% |
| CACalifornia | 9 | 4 | 44.4% |
| ALAlabama | 6 | 0 | 0.0% |
| OHOhio | 5 | 0 | 0.0% |
| NCNorth Carolina | 4 | 1 | 50.0% |
| TXTexas | 4 | 3 | 100.0% |
| HIHawaii | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| ILIllinois | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| MNMinnesota | 2 | 0 | -- |
SBA 7(a) lending trend
Borrower profile
Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict
A 27.2% charge-off rate means roughly 1 in 4 franchisees failed to repay their SBA loan. Investigate what changed.
What could kill this investment?
SBA loans charge off at 27.2% — 70% above the 16.0% national norm, i.e. higher lender-observed risk.
Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21
Risk analysis
FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21
Risk & Legal
Planet Smoothie presents a CAUTION-to-HIGH RISK profile: shrinking franchisee base, undisclosed profitability, litigation pattern involving fraud/misrepresentation claims, unprotected territories, and opaque earnings claims.
Litigation (Item 3)
Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).
Two concluded litigation cases involving predecessor and affiliate entities. First case: Purav Enterprises, L.L.C., Balwant Bahia, and Paramjit Samra v. The Extreme Pita Franchising USA, Inc. (FIPA violations and misrepresentation) settled for $20,000 on March 11, 2016. Second case: KOHO, Inc. v. Kahala Franchising, L.L.C. (breach of contract, unjust enrichment) with cross-complaint filed; outcome status incomplete in provided text.
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
None disclosed
Audited financials (Item 21)
Yes · PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC)
Franchisor revenue (Item 21)
Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)
Item 21 financial statements are the audited consolidated statements of the franchisor's parent/guarantor, MTY Franchising USA, Inc. (Kahala Franchising, L.L.C. is the franchisor). Figures are for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2023 (most recent set actually included in Exhibit V), with FY2022 comparatives. Statements stated in thousands of US dollars; all figures scaled x1000. Assets (1,459,449K) = liabilities (1,206,513K) + stockholder's equity (252,936K), reconciles. Auditor opinion dated February 2, 2024, signed in Montreal, Canada (PwC).
ⓘ These are the parent company's consolidated financials (the parent guarantees the franchisor), not this brand's standalone results — the figure reflects the whole corporate group, not this brand alone.
Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16
- Franchisor sells you products: Yes
- Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
- Must buy proprietary products: Yes
- Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
- Can negotiate own supplier terms: No
Score breakdown · what drove the 40 / 100 verdict
- 01MINORDeclining unit count (-2.5% YoY) suggests system contraction and potential market saturation or performance issues
- 02HIGHSignificant litigation history involving franchisor, predecessors, and affiliates with claims of breach of contract, misrepresentation, fraud, and franchise act violations—pattern of legal disputes is concerning
- 03MEDNo average net income disclosed in FDD—inability or unwillingness to provide profitability data is a major red flag for franchisee earnings potential
- 04MINORNo protected territory creates direct competition risk; franchisees could face cannibalization from new units in same geographic area
Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification
What are you signing up for?
Ongoing fees run about 7.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.
Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17
FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal
Contract & Territory Detail
| Initial term | 10 years |
|---|---|
| Renewal term | 5 years |
| Allowed renewalsℹ | 1 |
| Territory type | No territory protection |
| Protected territory | No |
| Exclusive territoryℹ | No |
| Online sales rightsℹ | Granted |
| Franchisor can compete | Yes |
| Hire a manager? | Allowed |
| Owner-operator | Optional |
| Non-compete (years)ℹ | 2 years |
| Non-compete (miles)ℹ | 10 mi |
| Right of first refusalℹ | Yes |
| Transfer requires consent | Yes |
| Termination notice | 14 days |
| Mandatory arbitration | Yes |
| Arbitration location | County and state where franchised business is located |
| Jury trial waiver | Yes |
| Governing law | Arizona |
| Litigation count | 20 |
View Item 3 litigation summary
Two concluded litigation cases involving predecessor and affiliate entities. First case: Purav Enterprises, L.L.C., Balwant Bahia, and Paramjit Samra v. The Extreme Pita Franchising USA, Inc. (FIPA violations and misrepresentation) settled for $20,000 on March 11, 2016. Second case: KOHO, Inc. v. Kahala Franchising, L.L.C. (breach of contract, unjust enrichment) with cross-complaint filed; outcome status incomplete in provided text.
Items 10, 11
Training & Operations
- Classroom training
- 40 hrs
- On-the-job training
- 24 hrs
- Training location
- Online or KTEC (Kahala Training & Education Center), Scottsdale, AZ; in-store training at franchisee's location
- Ongoing training
- Optional
- Field support
- 0 hrs/yr
- On-site visits per year
- Time to open
- 6 mo
- From signing to launch
- Site selection
- franchisee with franchisor approval
- Franchisor financing
- Not offered
- Item 10
- POS system
- FOCUS POS System or NCR POS System
- Operating tech stack
Items 5 & 11
Franchisor Support
Technology: FOCUS POS System or NCR POS System
Item 20 · call current owners
Franchisee Contacts
86 owners to call
Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20
Frequently asked questions
Frequently Asked Questions
How much does it cost to open a Planet Smoothie franchise?
The total investment to open a Planet Smoothie franchise ranges from $206K – $479K, with an initial franchise fee of $25K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).
What do Planet Smoothie franchise owners earn?
According to Item 19 of the Planet Smoothie FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $280K. The median is $260K. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.
Who owns Planet Smoothie?
Planet Smoothie is franchised by Kahala Franchising, L.L.C.. Its parent company is Kahala Brands, Inc.. The ultimate parent named in the FDD is MTY Food Group, Inc.. Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.
What is Item 19 in the Planet Smoothie FDD?
The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Planet Smoothie FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.
What is Planet Smoothie's franchise failure rate?
Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, Planet Smoothie has a charge-off rate of 27.2% across 120 loans, meaning 27.2% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.
How many Planet Smoothie franchise locations are there?
As of their most recent FDD filing, Planet Smoothie has 154 total units in the United States, including 154 franchised units and 0 company-owned units. 10 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.
Is Planet Smoothie a good franchise to buy?
FranchiseVerdict rates Planet Smoothie as a C-grade franchise with a verdict score of 40 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.
Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.
For franchisors
Are you the franchisor?
If you represent Planet Smoothie, you can request corrections or provide updated information.
Other Quick-Service Restaurants franchises
Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Quick-Service Restaurants category
Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.